1911 Gold expands True North resource potential with high-grade drill results
Original announcement by proactiveinvestors on
- Company
- 1911 Gold Corp
- Ticker
- AUMB
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Manitoba
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-12 00:26:55 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
1911 Gold Corp has reported high-grade underground drill results from its True North Gold Project in Manitoba, including an intercept of 49.50 g/t gold over 0.80 metres. The drilling successfully demonstrated the connection between the L10 and 710-711 vein systems, extending mineralization beyond the current resource estimate.
Reasoning: Significant high-grade underground intercepts that extend mineralization beyond the existing resource boundary, supporting a larger continuous structure.
Positive factors
- High-grade intercepts (49.5 g/t Au)
- Step-out extension beyond current resource limits
- Confirmed connection between L10 and 710-711 vein systems
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 49.50 g/t gold exceeds the underground exceptional threshold of 15 g/t.
Evidence · text
“49.50 g/t gold over 0.80 metres”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drilling confirmed mineralization beyond the limits of the 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate.
Evidence · text
“confirmed the continuation of gold mineralization beyond the limits of the 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
UG16-26-072True North · goldGrade: 10.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UG16-26-072
- Project
- True North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- AUMB
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 245.3 m
- To
- 254.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 245.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UG16-26-072:245.3-254.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- L10 Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong grade and width for an underground vein system.
Positive factors
- High grade intercept
Evidence · text
“UG16-26-072, which returned 10.73 grams per tonne (g/t) gold over 8.90 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
UG16-26-072True North · goldGrade: 16.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UG16-26-072
- Project
- True North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- AUMB
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 245.3 m
- To
- 250.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 245.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UG16-26-072:245.3-250.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- L10 Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant high-grade sub-interval within the main intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“intersected 16.12 g/t gold over 5.40 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
UG16-26-072True North · goldGrade: 49.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UG16-26-072
- Project
- True North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- AUMB
Geometry
- Grade
- 49.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 245.3 m
- To
- 246.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 245.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UG16-26-072:245.3-246.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- L10 Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade section.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade
Evidence · text
“49.50 g/t gold over 0.80 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.