AbraSilver Reports High-Grade Drill Results from Multiple Targets at the Diablillos
Original announcement by research on
- Company
- AbraSilver Resource Corp.
- Ticker
- ABRA
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Argentina
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-11-04 07:43:07 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
AbraSilver reported new Phase IV drill assays from multiple targets at Diablillos, including high-grade silver and gold intercepts at Sombra, Oculto Northeast and JAC Extension. The results extend mineralization beyond existing pit boundaries and will be incorporated into an updated mineral resource estimate scheduled for mid-2025.
Reasoning: The release reports new assay results from a completed drill program and highlights multiple high-grade intercepts that extend mineralization beyond modeled open-pit boundaries.
Positive factors
- Multiple new drill intercepts returned high-grade silver and gold mineralization across Sombra, Oculto Northeast and JAC Extension.
- Several intervals extend mineralization beyond existing pit boundaries, including 30.0 m at 237 g/t Ag and 17.0 m at 1.80 g/t Au plus 39 g/t Ag.
- The company reported completion of Phase IV drilling and said results will feed an updated Mineral Resource estimate in mid-2025.
Negative factors
- Widths are drilled widths, not true widths.
- QA/QC is disclosed, but these are still exploration drill results rather than completed resource growth.
- Additional drilling is planned, so continuity and extent remain to be further defined.
Facts used in scoring: 15
Classification and evidence
Step Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Several holes were drilled beyond the Oculto and JAC open pit boundaries and the release says the results extend mineralization beyond existing boundaries.
Evidence · text
“drilled approximately 50 m beyond the Oculto open pit boundary”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release names the laboratory workflow and QA/QC methods including blanks, certified reference materials and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“quality control materials are inserted at regular intervals; these include blanks and certified reference materials as well as duplicate core samples”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The company states that the reported widths are drilled widths, not true widths.
Evidence · text
“Widths are drilled widths, not true widths.”
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: The release explicitly says the reported widths are drilled widths and not true widths, so true width is not provided.
Evidence · text
“Widths are drilled widths, not true widths.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The Diablillos property is described as having satellite zones around the Oculto/JAC epicentre and similar deposits nearby are listed as comparators.
Evidence · text
“satellites zones of silver/gold-rich epithermal mineralization have been located within a 500 m to 1.5 km distance surrounding the Oculto/JAC epicentre”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The company says the Phase IV results will be incorporated in an updated Mineral Resource estimate and references expansion/continuity around the existing modeled areas.
Evidence · text
“All drill results from this program will be incorporated in an updated Mineral Resource estimate scheduled for release in mid-2025.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 15. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (13)
24-075Diablillos · silverGrade: 237Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-075
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 237
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 125.5 m
- To
- 155.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 157.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH 24-075:125.5-155.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- JAC Extension
- Easting
- 719164
- Northing
- 7198583
- Elevation
- 4128 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Headline JAC Extension silver assay from the table.
Positive factors
- Table confirms the 30.0 m headline silver interval.
- This is among the strongest intervals in the release.
Negative factors
- Widths are drilled widths, not true widths.
- No cut-off grade or internal dilution rules are stated.
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
24-070Diablillos · goldGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-070
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 145 m
- Hole Depth
- 224 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH 24-070:144.0-145.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Oculto NE
- Easting
- 720673
- Northing
- 7200086
- Elevation
- 4262 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Small deeper gold assay in DDH 24-070.
Positive factors
- Table records 1.0 m at 2.25 g/t Au.
Negative factors
- Only 1.0 m interval.
- Widths are drilled widths, not true widths.
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
DDH-24-068Diablillos · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-068
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35.1 m
- From
- 39.9 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-068:39.9-75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 702.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-068 Sombra 39.9 75.0 Oxides 35.1 20.0 0.05”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-068 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-068Diablillos · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-068
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35.1 m
- From
- 39.9 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-068:39.9-75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-068 Sombra 39.9 75.0 Oxides 35.1 20.0 0.05”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-068 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-069Diablillos · silverGrade: 100.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-069
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 100.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-069:38-55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 100.8 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1713.6 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-069 Sombra 38.0 55.0 Oxides 17.0 100.8 -”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-069 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-070Diablillos · silverGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-070
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 117 m
- Intercept Depth
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-070:116-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-070 Oculto NE 116.0 117.0 Oxides 1.0 5.7 0.59”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-070 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-070Diablillos · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-070
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 117 m
- Intercept Depth
- 116 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-070:116-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-070 Oculto NE 116.0 117.0 Oxides 1.0 5.7 0.59”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-070 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-070Diablillos · silverGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-070
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.8 m
- From
- 145 m
- To
- 175.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-070:145-175.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 69.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“144.0 145.0 Oxides 1.0 30.8 2.25”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-070 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-070Diablillos · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-070
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.9 m
- From
- 168 m
- To
- 206.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-070:168-206.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 70.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“151.0 168.0 Oxides 17.0 38.9 1.80”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-070 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-070Diablillos · silverGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-070
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.8 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 189.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-070:162-189.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 91.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“including 157.6 162.0 Oxides 4.4 27.8 3.30”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-070 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-072Diablillos · silverGrade: 47.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-072
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-072:85.5-90
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 213.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-072 JAC Extension 85.5 90.0 Oxides 4.5 47.4 -”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-072 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-073Diablillos · silverGrade: 72.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-073
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 72.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.4 m
- From
- 58.7 m
- To
- 72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-073:58.7-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 72.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 974.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-073 JAC Extension 58.7 72.0 Oxides 13.4 72.7 -”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-073 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DDH-24-075Diablillos · silverGrade: 134Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-24-075
- Project
- Diablillos
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- ABRA
Geometry
- Grade
- 134
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 106.5 m
- To
- 113 m
- Intercept Depth
- 106.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-24-075:106.5-113
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 134 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 871.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“DDH-24-075 JAC Extension 106.5 113.0 Oxides 6.5 134.0 -”
Context: Table 1 – Summary of Key Drill Intercepts · DDH-24-075 · Columns: Drill Hole | Area | From (m) | To (m) | Type | Interval (m) | Ag g/t | Au g/t
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (2)
probablesilverTonnes: 42294Grade: 91Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- ABRA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Effective date
- 2024-03-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- Resource group id
- resource:6d6caef572fbd9e15a4b
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- probable
- Tonnes
- 42294
- Grade
- 91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“91”
Context: 42,294
Tags used in scoring
Probable Reservepositive
Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "probable"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NI 43 101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PFS Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
probablegoldTonnes: 42294Grade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- ABRA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Effective date
- 2024-03-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- Resource group id
- resource:6d6caef572fbd9e15a4b
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- probable
- Tonnes
- 42294
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 42,294
Tags used in scoring
Probable Reservepositive
Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "probable"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
NI 43 101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PFS Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.