ACQUISITION OF SIERRA BLANCA PROJECT
Original announcement by research on
- Company
- Unavailable
- Ticker
- USL
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Agreement transaction, Resource update, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-11-06 10:54:55 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Unico Silver announced a binding agreement to acquire 100% of the Sierra Blanca silver-gold project in Santa Cruz, Argentina. The release emphasizes regional consolidation around Cerro Leon and cites a 92Moz silver equivalent resource, but the drill intercepts quoted are historical results from prior work. The transaction remains subject to shareholder approval and other conditions precedent.
Reasoning: The document is primarily a corporate acquisition announcement, with material resource and historical exploration context supporting the transaction thesis. It contains no new assay results, but it does include a resource summary and specific historical drill intercepts that are relevant to valuation.
Positive factors
- announced binding share purchase agreement to acquire 100% of Sierra Blanca
- expands Cerro Leon portfolio and consolidates the Pinguino vein field
- resource summary states 92Moz silver equivalent at 172gpt AgEq
- historical drill intersections include multiple wide silver-gold intervals
Negative factors
- transaction is subject to shareholder approval and royalty deed assignment
- several drill results are historical and restated from prior releases
- no new drilling or assays are reported in this document
Facts used in scoring: 67
Classification and evidence
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The resource summary states: "The preceding statements of Mineral Resources conforms to the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) 2012 Edition."
Evidence · text
“conforms to the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) 2012 Edition”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Todd Williams is named as a Competent Person responsible for the exploration results and resource context.
Evidence · text
“Todd Williams, a Competent Person”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The project is positioned as adjacent to and west of USL's Pinguino project and as a western continuation of the Pinguino vein field.
Evidence · text
“adjacent and west of USL's Pinguino mineral properties”
Stale Data Re Releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The drill intervals are explicitly described as historical drill results and are cited from prior press releases rather than new assays in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drill results”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release states a QA/QC program, ALS laboratory usage, and duplicates, standards and blanks.
Evidence · text
“All technical information for the Company's Argentina projects is obtained and reported under a quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The historical drill table reports downhole intervals and does not state true widths for the intercepts quoted in the text.
Evidence · text
“Reported downhole assay results are cited”
Step Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The release describes the acquisition as including the western continuation of the Pinguino vein field and says it provides immediate options for incremental growth.
Evidence · text
“western continuation of the Pinguino vein field”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 67. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (50)
SBR20Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR20
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 55 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR20:55-57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 161
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-11-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a short historical gold intercept with limited standalone materiality.
Positive factors
- historical assay is explicitly disclosed
Negative factors
- short narrow interval
- historical restatement
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re Releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR20Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 130Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR20
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 130
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 55 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR20:55-57
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 161
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-11-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This silver intercept is explicitly reported but remains historical.
Positive factors
- historical silver assay is explicitly disclosed
Negative factors
- historical restatement
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re Releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR19Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR19
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR19:25-37
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR19 Chala 25 37 12 0.2 63 78 946”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR19 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR19Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR19
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR19:25-37
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 63 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 756.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR19 Chala 25 37 12 0.2 63 78 946”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR19 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- From
- 1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 517
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 1 0.2 502 517 518”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 502Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 502
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- From
- 1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 517
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 502 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t.
Positive factors
- 502 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 1 0.2 502 517 518”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR38Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR38
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR38:33-36
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 576
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.3 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR38 33 36 3 4.3 236 576 1,729”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR38 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR38Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 236Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR38
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 236
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR38:33-36
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 576
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 236 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 708.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 236 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR38 33 36 3 4.3 236 576 1,729”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR38 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR40Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR40
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR40:33-37
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 318
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR40 33 37 4 2.5 120 318 1,272”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR40 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR40Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 120Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR40
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 120
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR40:33-37
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 318
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 120 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 480.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR40 33 37 4 2.5 120 318 1,272”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR40 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR50Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR50
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR50:70-75
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 244
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR50 70 75 5 0.9 173 244 1,221”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR50 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR50Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 173Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR50
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 173
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR50:70-75
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 244
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 865.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR50 70 75 5 0.9 173 244 1,221”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR50 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 727Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 727
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- -2.95 m
- To
- 0.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-2.95-0.75
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 765
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 727 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2689.9 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 727 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 0.75 3.7 727 1,020 765”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 1020Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1020
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- -2.95 m
- To
- 0.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-2.95-0.75
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 765
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1020 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3774.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1020 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 0.75 3.7 727 1,020 765”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR27Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR27
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 54 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR27:33-54
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 244
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14.7 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR27 33 54 21 0.7 189 244 5,133”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR27 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBR27Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 189Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBR27
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 189
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 54 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBR27:33-54
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 244
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 189 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3969.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 189 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBR27 33 54 21 0.7 189 244 5,133”
Context: Historical drill results · SBR27 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 1435Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1435
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- -0.7 m
- To
- 2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-0.7-2
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3298
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1435 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3874.5 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 1435 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 2 2.7 1,435 1,648 3,298”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 1648Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1648
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- -0.7 m
- To
- 2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-0.7-2
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3298
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1648 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4449.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1648 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 2 2.7 1,435 1,648 3,298”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBD51Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBD51
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBD51:46-57
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 655
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 37.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.4 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBD51 46 57 11 3.4 386 655 7,207”
Context: Historical drill results · SBD51 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBD51Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 386Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBD51
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 386
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBD51:46-57
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 655
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 386 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4246.0 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 386 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBD51 46 57 11 3.4 386 655 7,207”
Context: Historical drill results · SBD51 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 1172Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1172
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.7 m
- From
- -9.9 m
- To
- 2.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-9.9-2.8
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6097
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1172 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14884.4 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 1172 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 2.8 12.7 1,172 2,177 6,097”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 2177Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2177
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.7 m
- From
- -9.9 m
- To
- 2.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-9.9-2.8
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6097
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2177 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27647.9 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 2177 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 2.8 12.7 1,172 2,177 6,097”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBD55Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBD55
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.3 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 45.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBD55:31-45.3
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 463
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 40.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBD55 31 45.3 14.3 2.8 242 463 6,631”
Context: Historical drill results · SBD55 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
SBD55Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 242Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SBD55
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 242
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.3 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 45.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SBD55:31-45.3
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 463
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 242 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3460.6 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 242 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“SBD55 31 45.3 14.3 2.8 242 463 6,631”
Context: Historical drill results · SBD55 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 775Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 775
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- -13.7 m
- To
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-13.7-1.5
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2968
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 775 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11780.0 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 775 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 1.5 15.2 775 1,978 2,968”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 1978Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1978
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- -13.7 m
- To
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:-13.7-1.5
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2968
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1978 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30065.6 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 1978 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 1.5 15.2 775 1,978 2,968”
Context: Historical drill results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD61Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD61
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 87 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD61:87-90
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 780
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 28.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD61 87 90 3 9.5 28 780 2,341”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD61 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD61Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD61
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 87 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD61:87-90
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 780
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 84.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 28 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD61 87 90 3 9.5 28 780 2,341”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD61 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD71Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD71
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.3 m
- From
- 121.7 m
- To
- 142 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD71:121.7-142
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 152
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 30.5 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD71 Archen 121.7 142 20.3 1.5 34 152 3,101”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD71 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD71Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD71
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.3 m
- From
- 121.7 m
- To
- 142 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD71:121.7-142
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 152
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 690.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD71 Archen 121.7 142 20.3 1.5 34 152 3,101”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD71 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD84Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD84
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.1 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 53.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD84:23-53.1
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 275
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 66.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD84 23 53.1 30.1 2.2 101 275 8,283”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD84 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD84Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 101Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD84
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 101
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.1 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 53.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD84:23-53.1
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 275
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 101 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3040.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 101 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD84 23 53.1 30.1 2.2 101 275 8,283”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD84 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD95Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD95
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 80.6 m
- To
- 81.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD95:80.6-81.2
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 865
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD95 80.6 81.2 0.6 4 549 865 519”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD95 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
CHD95Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 549Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CHD95
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 549
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 80.6 m
- To
- 81.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CHD95:80.6-81.2
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 865
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 549 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 329.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 549 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“CHD95 80.6 81.2 0.6 4 549 865 519”
Context: Historical drill results · CHD95 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
VND102Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- VND102
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- VND102:85.5-90
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 444
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.6 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“VND102 Vetarron 85.5 90 4.5 3.6 159 444 1,998”
Context: Historical trench results · VND102 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
VND102Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 159Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- VND102
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 159
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- VND102:85.5-90
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 444
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 159 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 715.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“VND102 Vetarron 85.5 90 4.5 3.6 159 444 1,998”
Context: Historical trench results · VND102 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- From
- 0.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1690
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t.
Positive factors
- 12.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 0.5 12.1 732 1,690 845”
Context: Historical trench results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Inc.Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 732Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 732
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- From
- 0.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1690
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 732 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t.
Positive factors
- 732 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 0.5 12.1 732 1,690 845”
Context: Historical trench results · Inc. · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh025Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh025
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 10.4 m
- To
- 14.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh025:10.4-14.7
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 287
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.29 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh025 Achen 10.4 14.7 4.3 0.29 264 287 1,234”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh025 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh025Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 264Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh025
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 264
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 10.4 m
- To
- 14.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh025:10.4-14.7
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 287
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 264 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1135.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 264 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh025 Achen 10.4 14.7 4.3 0.29 264 287 1,234”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh025 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh024Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh024
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 13.2 m
- To
- 21.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh024:13.2-21.1
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 503
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.56 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh024 13.2 21.1 7.9 1.56 380 503 3,978”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh024 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh024Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 380Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh024
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 380
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 13.2 m
- To
- 21.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh024:13.2-21.1
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 503
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 380 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3002.0 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 380 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh024 13.2 21.1 7.9 1.56 380 503 3,978”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh024 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh003Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 10.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh003
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh003:0-3.4
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2033
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.05 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 34.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.05 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh003 Chala 0 3.4 3.4 10.05 1,238 2,033 6,915”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh003 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh003Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 1238Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh003
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1238
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh003:0-3.4
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2033
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1238 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4209.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1238 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh003 Chala 0 3.4 3.4 10.05 1,238 2,033 6,915”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh003 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh005Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 6.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh005
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh005:0-4.55
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 632
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.68 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 30.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.68 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh005 0 4.55 4.55 6.68 104 632 2,880”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh005 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh005Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 104Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh005
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 104
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh005:0-4.55
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 632
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 104 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 473.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh005 0 4.55 4.55 6.68 104 632 2,880”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh005 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh012Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh012
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.45 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh012:0-9.45
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1296
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.99 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh012 Chala Splay 0 9.45 9.45 0.99 1,218 1,296 12,251”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh012 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh012Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 1218Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh012
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1218
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.45 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh012:0-9.45
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1296
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1218 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11510.1 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 1218 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh012 Chala Splay 0 9.45 9.45 0.99 1,218 1,296 12,251”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh012 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh001Sierra Blanca · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh001
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh001:0-9.4
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2464
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.29 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh001 0 9.4 9.4 1.29 2,362 2,464 23,163”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh001 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
TCh001Sierra Blanca · silverGrade: 2362Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TCh001
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
- Ticker
- CMIL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2362
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TCh001:0-9.4
- Mining Method
- combined
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2464
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2362 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22202.8 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 2362 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“TCh001 0 9.4 9.4 1.29 2,362 2,464 23,163”
Context: Historical trench results · TCh001 · Columns: Hole | Prospect | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq (gpt) | GT*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Sierra Blanca is an advanced project that expands the Company's exploration footprint and includes the Veta Chala and Ar"
Resource Estimates (17)
indicatedSierra Blanca · silverTonnes: 6820000Grade: 86Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 18.8Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:0af7db4d7293ad5f0864
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6820000
- Grade
- 86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 18.8
- Contained Unit
- moz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This row provides the contained silver component of the indicated resource and is material to the project scale.
Positive factors
- silver grade and contained ounces are explicitly disclosed
- JORC compliant resource table
Negative factors
- this is part of a broader resource summary rather than a new estimate
- cut-off grade not stated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · silverTonnes: 9650000Grade: 71Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 22.1Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:afe6322247cf076aed21
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9650000
- Grade
- 71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 22.1
- Contained Unit
- moz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred silver component is explicit and contributes to the overall project scale.
Positive factors
- silver grade and contained ounces are disclosed for inferred material
Negative factors
- inferred category limits confidence
- cut-off grade not stated
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
indicatedSierra Blanca · goldTonnes: 6820000Grade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 107Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:0af7db4d7293ad5f0864
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6820000
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 107
- Contained Unit
- koz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The gold component is secondary to the silver-equivalent headline but still material and explicitly stated.
Positive factors
- gold grade and contained ounces are disclosed in the resource table
Negative factors
- resource is summarized within an acquisition announcement
- cut-off grade not stated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
indicatedSierra Blanca · leadTonnes: 6820000Grade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 41.9Contained Unit: mlbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:0af7db4d7293ad5f0864
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6820000
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 41.9
- Contained Unit
- mlb
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Lead is a byproduct constituent in the polymetallic resource and is relevant to equivalent-grade valuation.
Positive factors
- lead grade and contained metal are explicitly disclosed
Negative factors
- lead is a byproduct component within the resource summary
- cut-off grade not stated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
indicatedSierra Blanca · zincTonnes: 6820000Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 140Contained Unit: mlbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:0af7db4d7293ad5f0864
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6820000
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 140
- Contained Unit
- mlb
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The zinc component is material because it feeds the AgEq calculation and is explicitly reported.
Positive factors
- zinc grade and contained metal are disclosed in the resource table
Negative factors
- zinc is a byproduct component within the resource summary
- cut-off grade not stated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
indicatedSierra Blanca · silverTonnes: 6.82Grade: 86Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:501d2a375effd86b2c9a
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6.82
- Grade
- 86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a material existing resource summary supporting the acquisition thesis, but it is not a fresh resource update. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated category reported under JORC
- resource summary states 37.8 Moz Ag and 172 g/t AgEq
- Competent Person statement included
Negative factors
- resource figures are summarized in the acquisition announcement rather than a new estimate
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“86”
Context: 6.82
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
indicatedSierra Blanca · goldTonnes: 6.82Grade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:501d2a375effd86b2c9a
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6.82
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a material existing resource summary supporting the acquisition thesis, but it is not a fresh resource update. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated category reported under JORC
- resource summary states 37.8 Moz Ag and 172 g/t AgEq
- Competent Person statement included
Negative factors
- resource figures are summarized in the acquisition announcement rather than a new estimate
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 6.82
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
indicatedSierra Blanca · leadTonnes: 6.82Grade: 0.28Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:501d2a375effd86b2c9a
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6.82
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a material existing resource summary supporting the acquisition thesis, but it is not a fresh resource update. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated category reported under JORC
- resource summary states 37.8 Moz Ag and 172 g/t AgEq
- Competent Person statement included
Negative factors
- resource figures are summarized in the acquisition announcement rather than a new estimate
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 6.82
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
indicatedSierra Blanca · zincTonnes: 6.82Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:501d2a375effd86b2c9a
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6.82
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a material existing resource summary supporting the acquisition thesis, but it is not a fresh resource update. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated category reported under JORC
- resource summary states 37.8 Moz Ag and 172 g/t AgEq
- Competent Person statement included
Negative factors
- resource figures are summarized in the acquisition announcement rather than a new estimate
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 6.82
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · silverTonnes: 9.65Grade: 71Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:10514bd7e1637c57ed76
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9.65
- Grade
- 71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“71”
Context: 9.65
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · goldTonnes: 9.65Grade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:10514bd7e1637c57ed76
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9.65
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 9.65
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · leadTonnes: 9.65Grade: 0.77Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:10514bd7e1637c57ed76
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9.65
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 9.65
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · zincTonnes: 9.65Grade: 0.77Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:10514bd7e1637c57ed76
- Deposit or zone
- Cerro Leon summary of mineral resources
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9.65
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 9.65
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · silverTonnes: 16.47Grade: 77Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:307c14776e17da70bba8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 16.47
- Grade
- 77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“77”
Context: 16.47
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · goldTonnes: 16.47Grade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:307c14776e17da70bba8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 16.47
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 16.47
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · leadTonnes: 16.47Grade: 0.57Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:307c14776e17da70bba8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 16.47
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 16.47
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
inferredSierra Blanca · zincTonnes: 16.47Grade: 0.84Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sierra Blanca
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Ticker
- USL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-05-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Williams
- Resource group id
- resource:307c14776e17da70bba8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 16.47
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-05-20
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 172
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The inferred component is significant in tonnage and metal but remains lower confidence than the indicated resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Inferred resource is quantified alongside the indicated resource
- resource summary helps frame project scale
- JORC compliance and competent person statement disclosed
Negative factors
- inferred material is lower confidence than indicated
- no cut-off grade is stated in the excerpt
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: 16.47
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.5 years before this release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.