Alamos Gold Announces Island Gold District Expansion to 20,000 TPD, Creating One of Canada's Largest and Lowest Cost Gold Mines with Attractive Economics, including 69% After-Tax IRR and $12.2 Billion NPV at $4,500/oz Gold

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Alamos Gold Inc.
Ticker
AGI
Exchange
TSX
Region
Ontario, Canada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Resource update, Production, Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-13 11:13:15 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Alamos Gold announced a positive expansion study for its Island Gold District operation in Ontario, Canada, projecting a 30% increase in Mineral Reserves to 8.3 million ounces of gold and an expansion of the Magino mill to 20,000 tpd. The study outlines robust economics with a 69% after-tax IRR and $12.2 billion NPV at $4,500/oz gold, positioning it as one of Canada's largest and lowest-cost gold mines. The increase in reserves was driven by successful resource conversion, although Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Resources saw declines, and the overall reserve grade decreased by 10% for the district. Additionally, the company reported exceptional high-grade drill results from the Cline-Pick target, including 178.07 g/t Au over 3.54 m.

Reasoning: Alamos Gold announced a highly positive expansion study for its Island Gold District, significantly increasing gold reserves and production forecasts, and demonstrating robust economics. While resources declined, this was due to successful conversion to higher-confidence reserves. Exceptional drill results from regional targets further enhance the project's upside.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in Mineral Reserves (30% overall, 25% Island Gold underground, 40% Magino open pit)
  • Conversion of Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves, de-risking the project
  • Exceptional drill results from Cline-Pick target (178.07 g/t Au over 3.54 m)
  • Strong economic metrics (69% after-tax IRR, $12.2 billion NPV at $4,500/oz gold)
  • Increased production forecast (534,000 oz/year over 10 years post-expansion)
  • Low-cost structure with mine-site AISC of $1,025/oz over 10 years
  • Long mine life of 19 years maintained despite increased throughput
  • Expansion largely de-risked with key components underway or completed
  • Significant GHG emission intensity reduction (56%)

Negative factors

  • Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources declined across all projects, though this is attributed to conversion to reserves
  • Inferred Mineral Resources declined for Magino and the District, also attributed to conversion to reserves
  • Overall grade of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves decreased by 10% for the Island Gold District

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 32

Classification and evidence

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves for the Island Gold District increased by 45% from 88.642 million tonnes to 128.212 million tonnes.

Evidence · table

“128,212”

Context: Proven and Probable

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves for the Island Gold District increased by 30% from 6,347 koz to 8,282 koz.

Evidence · table

“8,282”

Context: Proven and Probable

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: The average grade of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves for the Island Gold District decreased by 10% from 2.23 g/t Au to 2.01 g/t Au.

Evidence · table

“2.01”

Context: Proven and Probable

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document reports results of an Expansion Study which includes updated Mineral Reserves and Resources compared to a prior Base Case LOM.

Evidence · text

“Alamos Gold Announces Island Gold District Expansion to 20,000 TPD, Creating One of Canada's Largest and Lowest Cost Gold Mines with Attractive Economics, including 69% After-Tax IRR and $12.2 Billion NPV at $4,500/oz Gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: Mineral Reserves and Resources are reported consistent with CIM Definition Standards and Qualified Persons are stated to be within the meaning of Canadian Securities Administrator's National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Mr. McCann is a Qualified Person within the meaning of Canadian Securities Administrator's National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101")”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Francis McCann, P.Eng., and Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng., are named as Qualified Persons for the Mineral Reserve estimate, and Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, and Tyler Poulin, P. Geo., are named for the Mineral Resource estimate.

Evidence · text

“Francis McCann, P.Eng, Director - Technical Services is the Qualified Person for Magino’s Mineral Reserve estimate. Mr. McCann is a Qualified Person within the meaning of Canadian Securities Administrator's National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101")”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Mineral Reserves are reported to a cut-off grade of 3.78 Au g/t at Island Gold and 0.30 Au g/t for Magino, and Mineral Resources at 3.36 g/t for Island Gold underground and 0.28 g/t Au for Magino open pit.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Reserves are reported to a cut-off grade of 3.78 Au g/t at Island Gold and 0.30 Au g/t for Magino”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 178.07 g/t Au over 3.54 m is exceptionally high-grade for an orogenic gold deposit.

Evidence · text

“178.07 g/t Au over 3.54 m (25IGX128)”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True width for the drill intercepts is estimated as a range (40-85% or 10-20% of core length), not a single precise value.

Evidence · text

“True width is estimated to be 40 to 85% of core length unless otherwise indicated.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that 'All reported composite intervals reported as uncut, and composites lengths are reported as core length.' and mentions QP sign-off.

Evidence · text

“All reported composite intervals reported as uncut, and composites lengths are reported as core length.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated with a 0.5 g/t cut-off, maximum internal waste of 4 m, and no minimum length.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated with a 0.5 g/t cut-off, maximum internal waste of 4 m, and no minimum length.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (11)

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 178.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.54 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
178.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.54 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 178.07 g/t Au over 3.54 m is an exceptional high-grade result for an orogenic gold deposit, with a strong grade-thickness product, indicating significant mineralization. True width is estimated as a range (40-85%), so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional Grade
  • Strong GT Product
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“178.07 g/t Au over 3.54 m (25IGX128)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 219Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
219
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 219.00 g/t Au over 0.70 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the bonanza-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as a range (40-85%), so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“219.00 g/t Au over 0.70 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 301Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
301
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 301.00 g/t Au over 0.68 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the bonanza-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as a range (40-85%), so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“301.00 g/t Au over 0.68 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 295Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.62 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
295
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 295.00 g/t Au over 0.62 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the bonanza-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as a range (40-85%), so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“295.00 g/t Au over 0.62 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 112.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
112.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 112.50 g/t Au over 0.50 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the bonanza-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as a range (40-85%), so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“112.50 g/t Au over 0.50 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 15.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
15.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 15.28 g/t Au over 5.52 m is a strong high-grade result for an orogenic gold deposit, with a strong grade-thickness product, indicating significant mineralization. True width is estimated as approximately 50%, so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong Grade
  • Strong GT Product
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“15.28 g/t Au over 5.52 m (25IGX128)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 25.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.66 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
25.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.66 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 25.20 g/t Au over 0.66 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the high-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as approximately 50%, so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“25.20 g/t Au over 0.66 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 19.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
19.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 19.15 g/t Au over 0.35 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the high-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as approximately 50%, so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“19.15 g/t Au over 0.35 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX128Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 40.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX128
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
40.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.59 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 40.30 g/t Au over 0.59 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the bonanza-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as approximately 50%, so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“40.30 g/t Au over 0.59 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX112Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 12.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX112
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
12.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept of 12.75 g/t Au over 8.79 m is a strong high-grade result for an orogenic gold deposit, with a strong grade-thickness product, indicating significant mineralization. True width is estimated as a range (10-20%), so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong Grade
  • Strong GT Product
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“12.75 g/t Au over 8.79 m (25IGX112 )”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25IGX112Cline-Pick · goldGrade: 93.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.01 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25IGX112
Project
Cline-Pick
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
AGI

Geometry

Grade
93.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval of 93.75 g/t Au over 1.01 m is an exceptional high-grade result within a broader intercept, further highlighting the bonanza-grade potential of the target. True width is estimated as a range (10-20%), so the reported length is apparent.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional Grade
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“93.75 g/t Au over 1.01 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Resource Estimates (21)

provenIsland Gold · goldTonnes: 1123000Grade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 415Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:390efd587a2e3b353a6c

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
1123000
Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
415
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
3.78
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
821000
Prior Grade
11.82
Prior Contained Metal
312
Prior Cutoff Grade
3.78

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Proven reserves for Island Gold increased significantly in both tonnage (37%) and contained metal (33%), indicating successful delineation and de-risking, despite a slight grade decrease.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth
  • Category Upgrade

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“11.50”

Context: 1,123

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 1123000 against 821000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 415 against 312 previously

probableIsland Gold · goldTonnes: 13949000Grade: 10.54Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4726Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:2309d70d5a3e5b92c244

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
13949000
Grade
10.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4726
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
3.78
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
10947000
Prior Grade
10.78
Prior Contained Metal
3795
Prior Cutoff Grade
3.78

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable reserves for Island Gold increased substantially in tonnage (27%) and contained metal (25%), reflecting successful conversion and expansion, with a minor grade reduction.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“10.54”

Context: 13,949

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 13949000 against 10947000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 4726 against 3795 previously

probableIsland Gold · goldTonnes: 15072000Grade: 10.61Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5141Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:889d2918d632b70ae7ba

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
15072000
Grade
10.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5141
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
3.78
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
11769000
Prior Grade
10.85
Prior Contained Metal
4107
Prior Cutoff Grade
3.78

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Proven and Probable reserves for Island Gold show strong growth in tonnage (28%) and contained metal (25%), indicating successful reserve expansion, despite a minor grade decrease.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“10.61”

Context: 15,072

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 15072000 against 11769000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 5141 against 4107 previously

provenMagino · goldTonnes: 42437000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1097Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magino
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:e6959c415184c67e17c9

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
42437000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1097
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
22163000
Prior Grade
0.88
Prior Contained Metal
626
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.3

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Proven reserves for Magino saw a substantial increase in tonnage (91%) and contained metal (75%), indicating successful conversion and expansion, despite a grade decrease.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth
  • Category Upgrade

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 42,437

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 42437000 against 22163000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.8 against 0.88 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 1097 against 626 previously

probableMagino · goldTonnes: 70704000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2044Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magino
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:6d194a4ae79a053798ae

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
70704000
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2044
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
54710000
Prior Grade
0.92
Prior Contained Metal
1613
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.3

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable reserves for Magino increased significantly in tonnage (29%) and contained metal (27%), reflecting successful conversion and expansion, with a minor grade reduction.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 70,704

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 70704000 against 54710000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 2044 against 1613 previously

probableMagino · goldTonnes: 113141000Grade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3141Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magino
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:dcd097ca402b87cc3f69

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
113141000
Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3141
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
76873000
Prior Grade
0.91
Prior Contained Metal
2240
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.3

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Proven and Probable reserves for Magino show strong growth in tonnage (47%) and contained metal (40%), indicating successful reserve expansion, despite a grade decrease.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 113,141

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 113141000 against 76873000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.86 against 0.91 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 3141 against 2240 previously

provenIsland Gold District · goldTonnes: 43559000Grade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1512Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold District
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:37f830e1a5ab7b594888

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
43559000
Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1512
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
22984000
Prior Grade
1.27
Prior Contained Metal
938
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.3

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Proven reserves for the Island Gold District increased substantially in tonnage (90%) and contained metal (61%), indicating successful delineation and de-risking, despite a grade decrease.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth
  • Category Upgrade

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: 43,559

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 43559000 against 22984000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.08 against 1.27 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 1512 against 938 previously

probableIsland Gold District · goldTonnes: 84653000Grade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6769Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold District
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:8a3f0c7c37ddd5112eb7

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
84653000
Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
6769
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
65657000
Prior Grade
2.56
Prior Contained Metal
5408
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.3

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable reserves for the Island Gold District increased significantly in tonnage (29%) and contained metal (25%), reflecting successful conversion and expansion, with a minor grade reduction.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“2.49”

Context: 84,653

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 84653000 against 65657000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 6769 against 5408 previously

probableIsland Gold District · goldTonnes: 128212000Grade: 2.01Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8282Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold District
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Francis McCann, P.Eng., Nathan Bourgeault, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:0dde6ba8b42cd520b474

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
128212000
Grade
2.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
8282
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
88642000
Prior Grade
2.23
Prior Contained Metal
6347
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.3

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Proven and Probable reserves for the Island Gold District show strong growth in tonnage (45%) and contained metal (30%), indicating successful reserve expansion, despite a grade decrease.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“2.01”

Context: 128,212

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 128212000 against 88642000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 2.01 against 2.23 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 8282 against 6347 previously

measuredIsland Gold · goldTonnes: 329000Grade: 11.19Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 118Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:4af892ec90138dc268da

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
329000
Grade
11.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
118
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
3.36
Cutoff Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
470000
Prior Grade
14.66
Prior Contained Metal
222
Prior Cutoff Grade
3.36

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resources for Island Gold declined significantly in tonnage (-30%), grade (-24%), and contained metal (-47%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“11.19”

Context: 329

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 329000 against 470000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 11.19 against 14.66 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 118 against 222 previously

indicatedIsland Gold · goldTonnes: 1764000Grade: 8.32Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 472Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:2452467f1c4346ab9bcc

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1764000
Grade
8.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
472
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
3.36
Cutoff Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
2640000
Prior Grade
9.75
Prior Contained Metal
827
Prior Cutoff Grade
3.36

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources for Island Gold declined significantly in tonnage (-33%), grade (-15%), and contained metal (-43%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“8.32”

Context: 1,764

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 1764000 against 2640000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 8.32 against 9.75 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 472 against 827 previously

indicatedIsland Gold · goldTonnes: 2093000Grade: 8.77Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 590Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:87db4d04f6c3248712a5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2093000
Grade
8.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
590
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
3.36
Cutoff Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
3110000
Prior Grade
10.49
Prior Contained Metal
1049
Prior Cutoff Grade
3.36

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resources for Island Gold declined significantly in tonnage (-33%), grade (-16%), and contained metal (-44%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“8.77”

Context: 2,093

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 2093000 against 3110000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 8.77 against 10.49 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 590 against 1049 previously

measuredMagino · goldTonnes: 6714000Grade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 151Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magino
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:f7fab8fd27199fcfbe18

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
6714000
Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
151
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
5061000
Prior Grade
0.87
Prior Contained Metal
141
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resources for Magino increased in tonnage (33%) and contained metal (7%), despite a grade decline (-20%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth
  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 6,714

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 6714000 against 5061000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.7 against 0.87 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 151 against 141 previously

indicatedMagino · goldTonnes: 50084000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1288Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magino
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:41b41047503410fb053e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
50084000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1288
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
55209000
Prior Grade
0.91
Prior Contained Metal
1615
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources for Magino declined in tonnage (-9%), grade (-12%), and contained metal (-20%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 50,084

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 50084000 against 55209000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.8 against 0.91 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 1288 against 1615 previously

indicatedMagino · goldTonnes: 56798000Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1439Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magino
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:b3b2128edf81303ec8fd

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56798000
Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1439
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
60270000
Prior Grade
0.91
Prior Contained Metal
1756
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resources for Magino declined in tonnage (-6%), grade (-13%), and contained metal (-18%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 56,798

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 56798000 against 60270000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.79 against 0.91 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 1439 against 1756 previously

measuredIsland Gold District · goldTonnes: 7042000Grade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 270Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold District
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:e8459a7d1228d3a9bead

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
7042000
Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
270
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
5531000
Prior Grade
2.04
Prior Contained Metal
363
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resources for the Island Gold District increased in tonnage (27%) but declined significantly in grade (-42%) and contained metal (-26%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 7,042

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 7042000 against 5531000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.19 against 2.04 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 270 against 363 previously

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 270 from 363

indicatedIsland Gold District · goldTonnes: 51848000Grade: 1.056Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1760Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold District
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:a306c82b0b110a124223

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
51848000
Grade
1.056
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1760
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
57849000
Prior Grade
1.31
Prior Contained Metal
2442
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources for the Island Gold District declined in tonnage (-10%), grade (-19%), and contained metal (-28%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“1.056”

Context: 51,848

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 51848000 against 57849000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.056 against 1.31 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 1760 against 2442 previously

indicatedIsland Gold District · goldTonnes: 58891000Grade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2029Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold District
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:568c372e7ccc78c10fbd

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
58891000
Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2029
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
63380000
Prior Grade
1.38
Prior Contained Metal
2805
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resources for the Island Gold District declined in tonnage (-7%), grade (-22%), and contained metal (-28%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 58,891

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 58891000 against 63380000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.07 against 1.38 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 2029 against 2805 previously

inferredIsland Gold · goldTonnes: 2867000Grade: 11.51Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1061Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:725d02e2228f4778a80d

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2867000
Grade
11.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1061
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
3.36
Cutoff Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
2449000
Prior Grade
16.88
Prior Contained Metal
1329
Prior Cutoff Grade
3.36

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources for Island Gold increased in tonnage (17%) but declined significantly in grade (-32%) and contained metal (-20%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“11.51”

Context: 2,867

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 2867000 against 2449000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 11.51 against 16.88 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 1061 against 1329 previously

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 1061 from 1329

inferredMagino · goldTonnes: 14045000Grade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 338Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magino
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:4b2b3bd2e2adc5556cf6

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14045000
Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
338
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
40291000
Prior Grade
0.92
Prior Contained Metal
1191
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources for Magino declined significantly in tonnage (-65%), grade (-18%), and contained metal (-72%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 14,045

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 14045000 against 40291000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.75 against 0.92 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 338 against 1191 previously

inferredIsland Gold District · goldTonnes: 16912000Grade: 2.57Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1398Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Island Gold District
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
AGI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Tyler Poulin, P. Geo.
Resource group id
resource:6d08c4fc318edd0b853d

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16912000
Grade
2.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1398
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.28
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
42740000
Prior Grade
1.83
Prior Contained Metal
2520
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.28

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources for the Island Gold District declined significantly in tonnage (-60%) and contained metal (-45%), despite a grade increase (40%), likely due to successful conversion to reserves.

Positive factors

  • Grade Improvement
  • Resource conversion to reserves

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“2.57”

Context: 16,912

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 16912000 against 42740000 previously

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 2.57 against 1.83 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 1398 against 2520 previously

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.