Algo Grande Provides Phase II Drill Update at Adelita; Copper Intersected in Skarn and Andesitic Porphyry at Cerro Grande
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Algo Grande Copper Corp.
- Ticker
- ALGR
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Sonora, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Gold, Molybdenum, Tungsten
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 10:36:24 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Algo Grande has provided a Phase II drill update at the Adelita Project, reporting visual copper mineralization in Hole AG_CG_PH2_002. The hole intersected 28.37 metres of copper mineralization across two intervals in both skarn and andesitic porphyry, appearing over 100 metres above the expected depth. Assays for these intercepts are currently pending.
Reasoning: The company reported visual copper mineralization in two intervals in Hole 2, occurring much shallower than predicted, which suggests a proximal position to the mineralizing system, though actual assay grades are pending.
Positive factors
- Visual copper mineralization encountered significantly shallower than expected
- Intersection of both skarn and andesitic porphyry suggests proximity to a feeder system
- Mobilization of a second drill rig to accelerate the program
Negative factors
- Assay results are still pending
- No numeric grades provided for the new intercepts
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The release does not disclose specific QA/QC protocols, lab certification, or QP sign-off for the new intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Assays pending”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
AG_CG_PH2_002Adelita · copperIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AG_CG_PH2_002
- Project
- Adelita
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- ALGR
Geometry
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 146.7 m
- To
- 166.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AG_CG_PH2_002:146.7-166.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Cerro Grande
- Easting
- 738897
- Northing
- 2961802
- CRS
- WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
- Elevation
- 582 m
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- 80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual copper mineralization in massive garnet-dominant skarn, encountered 100m above target depth.
Positive factors
- Mineralization encountered shallower than expected
Negative factors
- Assays pending
Evidence · text
“19.80 metres of copper mineralization from 146.70 to 166.50 metres, comprising massive brown garnet-dominant skarn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AG_CG_PH2_002Adelita · copperIntercept: 8.57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AG_CG_PH2_002
- Project
- Adelita
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- ALGR
Geometry
- Intercept
- 8.57 m
- From
- 168.36 m
- To
- 176.93 m
- Intercept Depth
- 168.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AG_CG_PH2_002:168.36-176.93
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Cerro Grande
- Easting
- 738897
- Northing
- 2961802
- CRS
- WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
- Elevation
- 582 m
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- 80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Second mineralized interval in Hole 2, part of the 28.37m aggregate copper intersection.
Positive factors
- Part of a larger mineralized zone
Negative factors
- Assays pending
Evidence · text
“second 8.57-metre interval from 168.36 to 176.93 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AG_CG_PH2_001AdelitaView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AG_CG_PH2_001
- Project
- Adelita
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- ALGR
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 550 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Easting
- 739090
- Northing
- 2962006
- CRS
- WGS84, UTM Zone 12N
- Elevation
- 453 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Hole completion update with collar and survey data.
Evidence · text
“completed at a final depth of 550 metres from a collar at 739,090 mE / 2,962,006 mN (WGS84, UTM Zone 12N), elevation 453 metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.