Allied Critical Metals Confirms Ultra High-Grade Tungsten Zone at Borralha with 18.0 m @ 0.85 % WO3 including 4.0 m @ 3.72 % WO3
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Allied Critical Metals Inc.
- Ticker
- ACM
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- northern Portugal
- Primary commodity
- Tungsten
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-12 04:55:45 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Allied Critical Metals has confirmed an ultra high-grade tungsten zone at the Borralha project in Portugal. Drilling (Bo_RC_25) returned an 18.0 m intercept at 0.85% WO3, including a high-grade 4.0 m section at 3.72% WO3.
Reasoning: The intercept of 18.0 m @ 0.85% WO3 is high-grade for tungsten and includes a significant 4.0 m @ 3.72% WO3 sub-interval, reinforcing a known discovery.
Positive factors
- Ultra high-grade intercept reported
- Validates and expands previously identified zone
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drill hole Bo_RC_25 validates and expands the zone first identified in Bo_RC_14.
Evidence · text
“validates and expands the ultra high-grade zone first identified in Bo_RC_14”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Bo_RC_25Borralha · tungstenGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Bo_RC_25
- Project
- Borralha
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- northern portugal
- Reported Region
- northern portugal
- Ticker
- ACM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Bo_RC_25:0-18.0
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-11-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 18.0 m @ 0.85% WO3 is a strong intercept for tungsten.
Positive factors
- High-grade tungsten intercept
Evidence · text
“18.0 m @ 0.85 % WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
Bo_RC_25Borralha · tungstenGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Bo_RC_25
- Project
- Borralha
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- northern portugal
- Reported Region
- northern portugal
- Ticker
- ACM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Bo_RC_25:0-18.0
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-11-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 4.0 m @ 3.72% WO3 is an exceptionally high-grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“4.0 m @ 3.72 % WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.