Almaden Continues to Hit at Ixtaca North and Intersects 10.00m of 3.05 g/t Au and 198.8 g/t Ag(7.0 g/t AuEq) on Main Ixtaca Zone, Adds Fourth Drill to Program
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Almaden Minerals Ltd.
- Ticker
- AMM
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-15 11:39:16 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Almaden Minerals reported significant drill results from the Ixtaca project, specifically identifying a new mineralized area named Ixtaca North. Highlights include high-grade silver intercepts and continuous mineralization across multiple holes, supporting the expansion of the known vein system.
Reasoning: Drilling successfully extended the known mineralization into the new 'Ixtaca North' zone with several high-grade silver and gold intercepts, including a bonanza-grade silver interval.
Positive factors
- Step-Out Extension
- Bonanza Intercept
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Facts used in scoring: 34
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drilling intersected the new Ixtaca North zone, expanding the known extent.
Evidence · text
“further expand the known extent of the Ixtaca zone”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release details blanks, field duplicates, and certified standards.
Evidence · text
“Blanks, field duplicates and certified standards were inserted”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Silver grade of 853.5 g/t is exceptionally high.
Evidence · text
“853.5 g/t silver”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states true widths are approximately 60% of intersected widths, implying reported widths are apparent.
Evidence · text
“true widths are approximately 60% of intersected widths”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 34. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (34)
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34.06 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34.06 m
- From
- 72.54 m
- To
- 106.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.54 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:72.54-106.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept in a new zone.
Evidence · text
“34.06 meters @ 1.63 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 56.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34.06 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34.06 m
- From
- 72.54 m
- To
- 106.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.54 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:72.54-106.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grade accompanies the gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“56.2 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 5.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.25 m
- From
- 73.25 m
- To
- 78.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.25 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:73.25-78.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold grade for an underground/vein system.
Evidence · text
“5.25 meters @ 5.26 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 77.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 77.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.25 m
- From
- 73.25 m
- To
- 78.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.25 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:73.25-78.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High silver grade in sub-interval.
Evidence · text
“77.7 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.26 m
- From
- 234.14 m
- To
- 235.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.14 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:234.14-235.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 19.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade but very narrow interval.
Evidence · text
“1.26 meters @ 2.45 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 853.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 853.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.26 m
- From
- 234.14 m
- To
- 235.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.14 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:234.14-235.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 19.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptionally high silver grade.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Evidence · text
“853.5 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-60Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-60
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 83 m
- To
- 101 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-60:83-101
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low grade gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“18.00 meters @ 0.42 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-60Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 32.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-60
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 83 m
- To
- 101 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-60:83-101
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grade accompanies the gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“32.3 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-61Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-61
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34.76 m
- From
- 18.24 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.24 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-61:18.24-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low grade gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“34.76 meters @ 0.27 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-61Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 18.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-61
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34.76 m
- From
- 18.24 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.24 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-61:18.24-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- IXTACA NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low grade silver intercept.
Evidence · text
“18.8 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 100.8 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 126.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:26-126.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- MAIN IXTACA ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Wide, low-grade gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“100.80 meters @ 0.58 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 46.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 100.8 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 126.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:26-126.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- MAIN IXTACA ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grade accompanies the gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“46.2 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 3.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 49.8 m
- To
- 59.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:49.8-59.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- MAIN IXTACA ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold grade intercept.
Evidence · text
“10.00 meters @ 3.05 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 198.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 198.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 49.8 m
- To
- 59.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:49.8-59.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- MAIN IXTACA ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High silver grade intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Evidence · text
“198.8 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 58.95 m
- To
- 66.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58.95 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:58.95-66.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.84 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.84”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 46.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 58.95 m
- To
- 66.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58.95 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:58.95-66.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 46.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 374.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“46.8”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 5.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 85.65 m
- To
- 86.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.65 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:85.65-86.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.95 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.95”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 412.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 412.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 85.65 m
- To
- 86.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.65 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:85.65-86.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 412.5 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 412.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 412.5 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“412.5”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.35 m
- From
- 92.65 m
- To
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.65 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:92.65-100
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.88 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.88”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 100.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 100.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.35 m
- From
- 92.65 m
- To
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.65 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:92.65-100
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 100.8 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 740.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“100.8”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.85 m
- From
- 226.15 m
- To
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 226.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:226.15-251
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.75 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 163.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 163.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.85 m
- From
- 226.15 m
- To
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 226.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:226.15-251
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 163.4 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4060.5 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 163.4 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“163.4”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 13.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- From
- 248.45 m
- To
- 249.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248.45 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:248.45-249.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 65.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.86 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 13.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.86 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.86”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-56Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 2576.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-56
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2576.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- From
- 248.45 m
- To
- 249.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248.45 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-56:248.45-249.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 65.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2576.8 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2448.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2576.8 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2576.8”
Context: TU-11-56
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-60Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-60
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.48 m
- From
- 98.82 m
- To
- 100.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.82 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-60:98.82-100.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.56 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.56”
Context: TU-11-60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-60Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 223.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-60
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 223.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.48 m
- From
- 98.82 m
- To
- 100.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.82 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-60:98.82-100.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 223.3 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 330.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 223.3 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“223.3”
Context: TU-11-60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-61Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-61
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 38.6 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-61:38.6-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.44 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: TU-11-61
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-61Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 26.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-61
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 38.6 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-61:38.6-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 380.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.4”
Context: TU-11-61
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-61Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-61
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 120.7 m
- To
- 123.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-61:120.7-123.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.89 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.89 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: TU-11-61
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-61Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 67.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-61
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 120.7 m
- To
- 123.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-61:120.7-123.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- NORTH ZONE
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 67.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 213.9 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“67.9”
Context: TU-11-61
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.78 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48.78 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 74.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:26-74.78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 46.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: TU-11-65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.78 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48.78 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 74.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:26-74.78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 77 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3756.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 77 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“77.0”
Context: TU-11-65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · goldGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.4 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:43.6-68
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 40.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: TU-11-65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TU-11-65Ixtaca North · silverGrade: 134.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TU-11-65
- Project
- Ixtaca North
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AMM
Geometry
- Grade
- 134.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.4 m
- From
- 43.6 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TU-11-65:43.6-68
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- North Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2011-11-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 134.4 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3279.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 134.4 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“134.4”
Context: TU-11-65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.