Almadex Provides Paradise Drilling Update and Discusses Davis High Grade Gold and Silver Targets

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Almadex Minerals Ltd.
Ticker
DEX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-15 19:33:07 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Almadex Minerals provided an update on its Paradise and Davis projects in Nevada. New, early-stage exploration drilling at the Paradise porphyry lithocap project confirmed metal endowment with generally low to moderate gold and base metal grades, including one strong copper intercept. The company also reviewed historical high-grade gold and silver results from the adjacent Davis epithermal project, highlighting significant potential for future follow-up. Almadex is financed for first-pass drilling and plans to continue its vectoring drill campaign at Paradise.

Reasoning: The announcement provides a mixed bag of new, early-stage exploration results from Paradise, which confirm metal endowment but are generally low-grade, and a re-discussion of historical high-grade gold and silver results from Davis. The new Paradise results are important for vectoring future exploration in a large porphyry system, while the historical Davis results highlight significant epithermal potential for future follow-up. The company's in-house drilling capability is a positive for cost-effective exploration.

Positive factors

  • Confirmation of metal endowment in a large porphyry system at Paradise
  • High-grade historical gold and silver intercepts at Davis highlight significant potential
  • Company is financed for first-pass drilling and owns its own drill rigs, enabling cost-effective exploration
  • True width estimates provided for historical Davis drilling

Negative factors

  • New Paradise drill results are generally low-grade for early-stage porphyry exploration
  • True width for Paradise intercepts cannot be determined due to complex geology
  • Davis results are historical and do not represent new information, reducing novelty
  • Surface samples are not representative of overall mineralization

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 2

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

PD-25-002Paradise · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD-25-002
Project
Paradise
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
DEX

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
From
33 m
To
36.5 m
Hole Depth
3.5 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD-25-002:33-36.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Chemex Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade for a porphyry system, which is a positive indication for early-stage exploration, despite the narrow width and unknown true width.

Positive factors

  • Grade is moderate for porphyry gold
  • Part of an early-stage exploration program confirming metal endowment

Negative factors

  • Intercept width is narrow
  • True width not determinable

Evidence · text

“From 33.00 to 36.50 (3.50 metres) 0.37 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "We are contemplating next steps for Davis and will make plans on how to advance the Project either ourselves or by seeki"

PD-25-002Paradise · silverGrade: 23.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PD-25-002
Project
Paradise
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
DEX

Geometry

Grade
23.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.95 m
From
135.65 m
To
136.6 m
Hole Depth
3.5 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PD-25-002:135.65-136.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Chemex Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and the intercept is narrow, indicating limited significance for this metal in this early-stage exploration hole.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below weak for porphyry/epithermal systems
  • Intercept width is very narrow
  • True width not determinable

Evidence · text

“From 135.65 to 136.60 (0.95 metres) 23.10 g/t silver”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "We are contemplating next steps for Davis and will make plans on how to advance the Project either ourselves or by seeki"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.