# Amex Drills 76.51 g/t Au over 6.40 m in First Hole of Bulk Sample Grade Control Program

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/amex-drills-76-51-g-t-au-over-6-40-m-in-first-hole-of-bulk-sample-grade-control--7aabbf48-b3d3-4b5c-a622-36ed393b1ac8

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amex-drills-76-51-g-120000084.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2026-02-18T12:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Amex Exploration Inc.

- Ticker: AMX

- Exchange: LSE

- Region: Quebec

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-09-20 20:12:31 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Amex Exploration Inc. reported a high-grade gold intercept of 76.51 g/t Au over 6.40 m from the first hole of its Champagne Zone grade control program. Visual gold was also identified in the second and third holes of the program.

Reasoning: The company reported a high-grade gold intercept \(76.51 g/t over 6.40 m\) in the first hole of a grade control program, with visual gold noted in other holes.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept

- Positive factor: Visible gold in subsequent holes

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Bonanza Intercept**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 76.51 g/t gold significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold for underground/high-grade settings.

Evidence · text

> 76.51 g/t Au over 6.40 m

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling is part of a grade control program for a bulk sample, which is a form of confirmatory/definition drilling.

Evidence · text

> ongoing grade control program designed for the bulk sample

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (1)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/amex-drills-76-51-g-t-au-over-6-40-m-in-first-hole-of-bulk-sample-grade-control--7aabbf48-b3d3-4b5c-a622-36ed393b1ac8#fact-drill-facts-0)

Champagne Zone · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Champagne Zone
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: AMX

#### Geometry

- Grade: 76.51
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6.4 m

#### Classification

- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Location: Champagne Zone
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: No

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-02-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade gold intercept reported.

- Positive factor: High grade

Evidence · text

> 76.51 g/t Au over 6.40 m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.