Apex Drills 14.9 m of 5.09 % REO and 12.3 m of 5.63 % REO with > 2.50 % REO Intercept Over 191.9 m in the Trinity Zone at the Rift Rare Earth Project

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
Unavailable
Ticker
APXC
Exchange
CSE
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Rare earth
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-20 10:04:18 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Apex Drills significant rare earth mineralization at the Rift Rare Earth Project, specifically within the Trinity Zone. Hole RIFT26-008 returned a wide 191.9 m intercept at 2.63% REO, confirming the extension of the zone to depth.

Reasoning: The drill hole RIFT26-008 returned a very wide 191.9 m intercept at a significant grade of 2.63% REO, confirming the extension of the Trinity Zone.

Positive factors

  • significant intercept width
  • extension of mineralization to depth
  • confirms historical discovery zone

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole RIFT26-008 was drilled 50m NE of historical discovery holes, extending the known zone.

Evidence · text

“drilled 50 m NE of historical discovery drillholes”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: Results confirm the extension of the Trinity Zone near historical discovery holes.

Evidence · text

“confirms the Trinity Zone extends to depth”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

RIFT26-008Rift Rare Earth · rare earthGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RIFT26-008
Project
Rift Rare Earth
Commodity
rare earth
Ticker
APXC

Geometry

Grade
2.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32.3 m
From
161.7 m
To
194 m
Intercept Depth
161.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RIFT26-008:161.7-194

Location

Location
Trinity Zone
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid intercept of 32.3m at 2.46% REO.

Evidence · text

“32.3 m at 2.46 % REO (1)from 161.7 m depth”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RIFT26-008Rift Rare Earth · rare earthGrade: 2.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 191.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RIFT26-008
Project
Rift Rare Earth
Commodity
rare earth
Ticker
APXC

Geometry

Grade
2.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
191.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Trinity Zone
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very wide 191.9m intercept at a high grade of 2.63% REO.

Positive factors

  • exceptional width

Evidence · text

“191.9 m at 2.63%”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.