# Apollo Files NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Calico Silver Project Updated Mineral Resource Estimate

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/apollo-files-ni-43-101-technical-report-for-the-calico-silver-project-updated-mi--eef830d5-e72d-42a1-8877-0e924585364a

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apollo-files-ni-43-101-232000306.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2025-10-16T23:20:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Apollo Silver Corp.

- Ticker: APGO

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: California, USA

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-09-21 12:49:26 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.00 · Neutral

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Apollo Silver Corp. has filed an independent NI 43-101 technical report containing an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for its Calico Silver Project in California, USA.

Reasoning: The document is a headline announcement stating that a technical report and updated MRE have been filed. No specific resource numbers \(tonnes, grades, or categories\) are provided in the text to allow for technical assessment.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 0

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The announcement explicitly states it is for an 'updated Mineral Resource Estimate'.

Evidence · text

> updated Mineral Resource Estimate \(“MRE"\) for the Calico Silver Project

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 0. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

No stored fact records are available for this extraction.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.