Apollo Reports High-Grade Silver, Gold and Barite Results at Calico

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Apollo Silver Corp.
Ticker
APGO
Exchange
TSX
Region
San Bernardino County, California
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Barite, Zinc, Lead
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-15 10:44:22 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Apollo Silver Corp. announced high-grade silver, gold, and barite results from a new surface sampling program at its Calico Silver Project in California. Highlights include up to 1,280 g/t silver at the Mule Property, 4.85 g/t gold at Burcham, and 76.12% barite at Langtry, along with high-grade zinc. These results reinforce the project's exploration potential, with follow-up drilling planned for Q3 2026, pending final permits.

Reasoning: The new surface sampling program returned exceptionally high-grade silver and barite, along with strong gold and zinc values, confirming the exploration potential of the Calico Project. However, the selective nature of surface samples and the delay in follow-up drilling temper the immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver, gold, barite, and zinc results from new surface sampling.
  • Reinforces confidence in upside prospectivity for additional discoveries.
  • QP signed off and QA/QC procedures disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Surface samples are selective and may not indicate true underlying mineralization.
  • Planned drilling program delayed due to permitting issues.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 87

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that the Company’s Qualified Person is of the opinion that the sample preparation, analytical, and security procedures followed are sufficient and reliable, and details the analytical methods used by ALS Global.

Evidence · text

“The Company’s Qualified Person (“QP”) is of the opinion that the sample preparation, analytical, and security procedures followed are sufficient and reliable.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 87. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (87)

J423516Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423516
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
12.5
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508257
Northing
3870297
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 12.50 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“12.50”

Context: J423516

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423516Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 76.12Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423516
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
76.12
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508257
Northing
3870297
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 76.12% barite grade is exceptionally high, confirming anomalous barite mineralization at Langtry, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Exceptionally high-grade barite result
  • New exploration result confirming mineralization at Langtry

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“76.12”

Context: J423516

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 76.12% Barite is described as 'highly elevated' in the document, indicating exceptional grade.

Evidence · table

“76.12”

Context: J423516

J423568Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 37Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423568
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
37
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508360
Northing
3870376
Elevation
773 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 37.00 g/t silver grade is above the weak threshold, indicating some silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the weak threshold for silver

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“37.00”

Context: J423568

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423568Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 27.78Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423568
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
27.78
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508360
Northing
3870376
Elevation
773 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 27.78% barite grade is high and confirms the presence of barite mineralization at Langtry, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade barite result
  • New exploration result confirming mineralization at Langtry

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“27.78”

Context: J423568

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423568Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423568
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508360
Northing
3870376
Elevation
773 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.01% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: J423568

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423572Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 76.7Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423572
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
76.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508265
Northing
3870305
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 76.70 g/t silver grade is above the moderate threshold, indicating good silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the moderate threshold for silver

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“76.70”

Context: J423572

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423572Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 22.77Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423572
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
22.77
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508265
Northing
3870305
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 22.77% barite grade is high and confirms the presence of barite mineralization at Langtry, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade barite result
  • New exploration result confirming mineralization at Langtry

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“22.77”

Context: J423572

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423572Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423572
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Langtry
Easting
508265
Northing
3870305
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.01% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: J423572

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423741Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 78.5Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423741
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
78.5
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
514256
Northing
3867572
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 78.50 g/t silver grade is above the moderate threshold, indicating good silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the moderate threshold for silver

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“78.50”

Context: J423741

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423741Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423741
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
514256
Northing
3867572
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 1.27% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: J423741

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423741Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423741
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
514256
Northing
3867572
Elevation
785 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.01% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: J423741

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423689Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 221Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423689
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
221
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
513923
Northing
3867752
Elevation
795 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 221.00 g/t silver grade is strong, indicating significant silver mineralization at the Mule Property, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade from regional assessment
  • New exploration result from Mule Property

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“221.00”

Context: J423689

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of a 'regional scale assessment of the Mule Property' which aims to extend mineralization.

Evidence · text

“regional scale assessment of the Mule Property”
J423689Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423689
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
513923
Northing
3867752
Elevation
795 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.33% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: J423689

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423689Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423689
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
513923
Northing
3867752
Elevation
795 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.02% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: J423689

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423690Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 1280Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423690
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
1280
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
513923
Northing
3867751
Elevation
795 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 1,280 g/t silver grade is exceptionally high, indicating significant exploration potential at the Mule Property, although it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Exceptionally high-grade silver result
  • New exploration result from regional assessment

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“1,280.00”

Context: J423690

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 1,280 g/t Ag is well above the 500 g/t exceptional threshold for silver.

Evidence · table

“1,280.00”

Context: J423690

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of a 'regional scale assessment of the Mule Property' which aims to extend mineralization.

Evidence · text

“regional scale assessment of the Mule Property”
J423690Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423690
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
513923
Northing
3867751
Elevation
795 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.12% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: J423690

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423690Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423690
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Mule
Easting
513923
Northing
3867751
Elevation
795 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.03% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: J423690

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423532Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423532
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510096
Northing
3868597
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.01 g/t gold grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is below the weak threshold for gold
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: J423532

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423532Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 46Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423532
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
46
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510096
Northing
3868597
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 46.00 g/t silver grade is above the weak threshold, indicating some silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the weak threshold for silver

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“46.00”

Context: J423532

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423532Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 35.68Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423532
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
35.68
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510096
Northing
3868597
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 35.68% barite grade is high and confirms the presence of barite mineralization at Waterloo, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade barite result
  • New exploration result confirming mineralization at Waterloo

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“35.68”

Context: J423532

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423532Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423532
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510096
Northing
3868597
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.06% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: J423532

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423532Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423532
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510096
Northing
3868597
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.01% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: J423532

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423588Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 139Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423588
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
139
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510474
Northing
3868190
Elevation
769 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 139.00 g/t silver grade is above the moderate threshold, indicating good silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the moderate threshold for silver

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“139.00”

Context: J423588

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423588Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 21.24Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423588
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
21.24
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510474
Northing
3868190
Elevation
769 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 21.24% barite grade is high and confirms the presence of barite mineralization at Waterloo, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • High-grade barite result
  • New exploration result confirming mineralization at Waterloo

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“21.24”

Context: J423588

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423588Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423588
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510474
Northing
3868190
Elevation
769 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.05% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: J423588

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423588Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423588
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510474
Northing
3868190
Elevation
769 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.34% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: J423588

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423534Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 80.7Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423534
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
80.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510113
Northing
3868578
Elevation
782 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 80.70 g/t silver grade is above the moderate threshold, indicating good silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the moderate threshold for silver

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“80.70”

Context: J423534

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423534Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423534
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510113
Northing
3868578
Elevation
782 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 4.66% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: J423534

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423534Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423534
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510113
Northing
3868578
Elevation
782 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.03% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: J423534

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423534Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423534
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510113
Northing
3868578
Elevation
782 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.21% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: J423534

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423538Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 149Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423538
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
149
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510469
Northing
3868173
Elevation
758 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 149.00 g/t silver grade is above the moderate threshold, indicating good silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is above the moderate threshold for silver

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“149.00”

Context: J423538

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423538Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423538
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
2.12
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510469
Northing
3868173
Elevation
758 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 2.12% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“2.12”

Context: J423538

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423538Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423538
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510469
Northing
3868173
Elevation
758 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.24% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: J423538

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423538Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423538
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
510469
Northing
3868173
Elevation
758 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.27% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: J423538

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423625Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423625
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511521
Northing
3867444
Elevation
748 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.17 g/t gold grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is below the weak threshold for gold
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: J423625

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423625Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 6.89Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423625
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
6.89
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511521
Northing
3867444
Elevation
748 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 6.89 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“6.89”

Context: J423625

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423625Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423625
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511521
Northing
3867444
Elevation
748 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.09% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: J423625

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423625Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423625
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511521
Northing
3867444
Elevation
748 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.31% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: J423625

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423625Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 27.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423625
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
27.6
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511521
Northing
3867444
Elevation
748 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 27.60% zinc grade is exceptionally high, confirming significant zinc mineralization in specularite manto zones at Waterloo, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Exceptionally high-grade zinc result
  • New exploration result from infill sampling

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“27.60”

Context: J423625

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423617Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423617
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511491
Northing
3867386
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.21 g/t gold grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is below the weak threshold for gold
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: J423617

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423617Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 3.34Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423617
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
3.34
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511491
Northing
3867386
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 3.34 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“3.34”

Context: J423617

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423617Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423617
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511491
Northing
3867386
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.09% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: J423617

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423617Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 15.5Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423617
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
15.5
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511491
Northing
3867386
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 15.50% zinc grade is strong, indicating good zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade is above the strong threshold for zinc

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“15.50”

Context: J423617

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423624Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423624
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511508
Northing
3867462
Elevation
754 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.19 g/t gold grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is below the weak threshold for gold
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: J423624

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423624Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423624
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511508
Northing
3867462
Elevation
754 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 2.23 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“2.23”

Context: J423624

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423624Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423624
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511508
Northing
3867462
Elevation
754 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.07% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: J423624

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423624Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423624
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511508
Northing
3867462
Elevation
754 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.06% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: J423624

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423624Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 18.4Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423624
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
18.4
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo
Easting
511508
Northing
3867462
Elevation
754 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 18.40% zinc grade is exceptionally high, confirming significant zinc mineralization in specularite manto zones at Waterloo, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Exceptionally high-grade zinc result
  • New exploration result from infill sampling

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“18.40”

Context: J423624

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

J423590Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423590
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511272
Northing
3867667
Elevation
778 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 1.30 g/t gold grade is above the moderate threshold, indicating good gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the moderate threshold for gold

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“1.30”

Context: J423590

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423590Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 9.53Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423590
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
9.53
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511272
Northing
3867667
Elevation
778 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 9.53 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“9.53”

Context: J423590

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423590Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423590
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511272
Northing
3867667
Elevation
778 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.12% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: J423590

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423590Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423590
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511272
Northing
3867667
Elevation
778 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.43% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: J423590

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423590Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423590
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511272
Northing
3867667
Elevation
778 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.07% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: J423590

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423623Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423623
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511498
Northing
3867519
Elevation
771 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 3.70 g/t gold grade is strong and supports the potential for expanding the gold resource at Burcham, despite being from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade from infill sampling
  • Supports potential for expanding gold resource

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“3.70”

Context: J423623

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423623Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 14.8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423623
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
14.8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511498
Northing
3867519
Elevation
771 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 14.80 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“14.80”

Context: J423623

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423623Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423623
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511498
Northing
3867519
Elevation
771 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.05% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: J423623

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423623Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423623
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511498
Northing
3867519
Elevation
771 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 1.88% lead grade is above the weak threshold, indicating some lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade is above the weak threshold for lead

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“1.88”

Context: J423623

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423623Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423623
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511498
Northing
3867519
Elevation
771 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.26% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: J423623

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423544Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 4.85Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423544
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
4.85
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 4.85 g/t gold grade is strong and supports the potential for expanding the gold resource at Burcham, despite being from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade from infill sampling
  • Supports potential for expanding gold resource

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“4.85”

Context: J423544

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423544Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423544
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
12.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 12.20 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“12.20”

Context: J423544

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423544Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423544
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.05% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: J423544

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423544Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423544
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.71% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: J423544

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423544Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423544
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.22% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: J423544

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423597Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423597
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511311
Northing
3867500
Elevation
736 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 1.87 g/t gold grade is above the moderate threshold, indicating good gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the moderate threshold for gold

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“1.87”

Context: J423597

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423597Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 10.05Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423597
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
10.05
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511311
Northing
3867500
Elevation
736 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 10.05 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“10.05”

Context: J423597

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423597Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423597
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511311
Northing
3867500
Elevation
736 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.04% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: J423597

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423597Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423597
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511311
Northing
3867500
Elevation
736 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.17% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: J423597

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423597Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423597
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511311
Northing
3867500
Elevation
736 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.03% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: J423597

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423738Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423738
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
2.61
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511307
Northing
3867482
Elevation
731 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 2.61 g/t gold grade is strong and supports the potential for expanding the gold resource at Burcham, despite being from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade from infill sampling
  • Supports potential for expanding gold resource

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“2.61”

Context: J423738

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423738Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 17.55Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423738
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
17.55
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511307
Northing
3867482
Elevation
731 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 17.55 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“17.55”

Context: J423738

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423738Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423738
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511307
Northing
3867482
Elevation
731 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.03% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: J423738

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423738Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423738
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511307
Northing
3867482
Elevation
731 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.49% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: J423738

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423738Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423738
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511307
Northing
3867482
Elevation
731 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.09% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: J423738

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423543Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 3.59Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423543
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
3.59
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 3.59 g/t gold grade is strong and supports the potential for expanding the gold resource at Burcham, despite being from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade from infill sampling
  • Supports potential for expanding gold resource

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“3.59”

Context: J423543

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423543Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 18.5Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423543
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
18.5
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 18.50 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“18.50”

Context: J423543

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423543Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423543
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.02% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: J423543

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423543Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423543
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.97% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: J423543

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423543Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423543
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511524
Northing
3867418
Elevation
735 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.07% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: J423543

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423618Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423618
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511492
Northing
3867385
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.06 g/t gold grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is below the weak threshold for gold
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: J423618

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423618Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423618
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511492
Northing
3867385
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.42 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: J423618

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423618Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423618
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511492
Northing
3867385
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.02% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: J423618

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423618Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 30Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423618
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
30
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511492
Northing
3867385
Elevation
728 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 30.00% zinc grade is exceptionally high, confirming significant zinc mineralization in specularite manto zones at Waterloo, though it is from a selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Exceptionally high-grade zinc result
  • New exploration result from infill sampling

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“30.00”

Context: J423618

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 30.00% Zn is well above the 18% exceptional threshold for zinc.

Evidence · table

“30.00”

Context: J423618

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423622Calico Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423622
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
gold
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511440
Northing
3867540
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.52 g/t gold grade is above the weak threshold, indicating some gold mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is above the weak threshold for gold

Negative factors

  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: J423622

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423622Calico Silver Project · silverGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423622
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
silver
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
7.6
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511440
Northing
3867540
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 7.60 g/t silver grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited silver mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is below the weak threshold for silver
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“7.60”

Context: J423622

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423622Calico Silver Project · bariteGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423622
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
barite
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511440
Northing
3867540
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.02% barite grade is low, indicating limited barite mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Barite grade is low
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: J423622

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423622Calico Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423622
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
lead
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511440
Northing
3867540
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.50% lead grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited lead mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Lead grade is below the weak threshold for lead
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: J423622

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”
J423622Calico Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J423622
Project
Calico Silver Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
san bernardino county, california
Reported Region
San Bernardino County, California
Ticker
APGO

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Waterloo, Burcham
Easting
511440
Northing
3867540
Elevation
777 m
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global-Geochemistry in Reno and ALS Global-Laboratory in Vancouver
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 0.23% zinc grade is below the weak threshold, indicating limited zinc mineralization in this selective surface sample.

Negative factors

  • Zinc grade is below the weak threshold for zinc
  • Result from selective surface sample, not necessarily indicative of true underlying mineralization
  • Follow-up drilling delayed due to permitting

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: J423622

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Individual manto horizons were not able to be traced continuously beyond approximately 50 m along strike, indicating str"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Infill DrillingRejected · neutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Reason: This sample was taken as part of 'systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect'.

Evidence · text

“systematic infill rock sampling at Burcham gold prospect”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.