ArcWest Provides Rip Project Update: Porphyry Copper-Molybdenum System Intersected in First Phase Drill Program, Funded by Copper Quest Exploration
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- ArcWest Exploration Inc.
- Ticker
- AWX
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Molybdenum, Gold, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 13:24:41 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
ArcWest Exploration Inc. has reported results from its first phase drill program at the Rip copper-molybdenum project in British Columbia. The drilling confirmed a porphyry Cu-Mo system at the North target, intersecting anomalous mineralization within porphyritic intrusions.
Reasoning: The program successfully confirmed a porphyry Cu-Mo system at the North target, providing geological validation for the geophysical anomalies, though grades remain in the anomalous/low-grade range.
Positive factors
- Intersection of porphyry Cu-Mo system
- Confirmation of geophysical anomaly
- Strong financial position
- Strategic partner funding
Negative factors
- Low grades (not considered ore grade)
- Largely covered/overburdened
- Limited testing to date
Facts used in scoring: 5
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: First phase drill program testing a previously untested geophysical anomaly.
Evidence · text
“First phase drill testing at Rip... has confirmed that a largely covered geophysical anomaly at the North target defines a Cu-Mo mineralized porphyry system”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes details on standards, blanks, duplicates, and lab methods.
Evidence · text
“One standard, one blank and one duplicate sample were added to each batch of 30 samples.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: Project is located 30 km from the Huckleberry mine and near Ootsa and Berg projects.
Evidence · text
“located in central British Columbia approximately 30 km northeast of Imperial Metals' past-producing Huckleberry mine”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (5)
RP24-001Rip · copperGrade: 0.0514Grade Unit: %Intercept: 126.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RP24-001
- Project
- Rip
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AWX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0514
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 126.6 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 148 m
- Hole Depth
- 533.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RP24-001:21.4-148
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- North target
- Easting
- 647857
- Northing
- 5967278
- CRS
- NAD83 Zone 10
- Elevation
- 1065 m
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.095
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-04-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Anomalous copper grade in a large porphyry-style intercept.
Evidence · table
“514”
Context: 126.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RP24-001Rip · molybdenumGrade: 43.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 126.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RP24-001
- Project
- Rip
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AWX
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 126.6 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 148 m
- Hole Depth
- 533.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RP24-001:21.4-148
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- North target
- Easting
- 647857
- Northing
- 5967278
- CRS
- NAD83 Zone 10
- Elevation
- 1065 m
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-04-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Anomalous molybdenum grade.
Evidence · table
“43.2”
Context: 126.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RP24-001Rip · copperGrade: 0.0659Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RP24-001
- Project
- Rip
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AWX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0659
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 72.6 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 533.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RP24-001:21.4-94
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- North target
- Easting
- 647857
- Northing
- 5967278
- CRS
- NAD83 Zone 10
- Elevation
- 1065 m
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.127
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-04-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Higher grade sub-interval within the larger intercept.
Evidence · table
“659”
Context: 72.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RP24-001Rip · copperGrade: 0.1285Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RP24-001
- Project
- Rip
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AWX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1285
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.6 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 46 m
- Hole Depth
- 533.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RP24-001:21.4-46
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- North target
- Easting
- 647857
- Northing
- 5967278
- CRS
- NAD83 Zone 10
- Elevation
- 1065 m
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.247
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-04-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strongest copper grade intercept in the program.
Evidence · table
“1285”
Context: 24.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RP24-002Rip · copperGrade: 0.0615Grade Unit: %Intercept: 114.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RP24-002
- Project
- Rip
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- AWX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.0615
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 114.3 m
- From
- 33.6 m
- To
- 147.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 499.87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RP24-002:33.6-147.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- North target
- Easting
- 647857
- Northing
- 5967278
- CRS
- NAD83 Zone 10
- Elevation
- 1065 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.106
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-04-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Anomalous copper grade in a wide intercept.
Evidence · table
“615”
Context: 114.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.