Arya Resources Intersects 3.86 g/t Gold (Au) over 44.0 m at Twin Zone, Including 9.90 g/t Au over 16.0 m and 26.14 g/t Au over 3.80 m, Wedge Lake Gold Project, Saskatchewan

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Arya Resources Ltd.
Ticker
RBZ
Exchange
TSX
Region
Saskatchewan
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-16 19:02:36 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Arya Resources reports high-grade gold assay results from three drill holes at its Twin Zone, Wedge Lake Gold Project in Saskatchewan. Hole AR25-09 intersected 3.86 g/t Au over 44.0 m, including 26.14 g/t Au over 3.80 m, confirming the zone as a significant gold system. The drilling aims to validate historical mineralization for future resource estimation, with comprehensive QA/QC procedures in place.

Reasoning: The document reports strong gold drill results from the Twin Zone, including a significant high-grade intercept of 26.14 g/t Au over 3.80 m within a wider 44.0 m interval at 3.86 g/t Au. The program aims to validate historical data for resource estimation, indicating progress towards a formal resource. Comprehensive QA/QC procedures are disclosed, enhancing confidence in the results. However, true widths are not provided for the new intercepts.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercepts, particularly in AR25-09, with significant grade-thickness values.
  • Wide mineralized zones, suggesting good continuity.
  • Confirmation of the Twin Zone as a major gold system.
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure, including certified lab and QP sign-off.
  • Drilling designed to validate historical results for resource estimation.

Negative factors

  • Current drill results are reported as core length, with no true width stated, potentially overstating actual thickness.
  • One hole (AR25-08) returned low-grade mineralization, though noted as a bulk tonnage target.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 9

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 9. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (9)

AR25-09Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AR25-09
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
3.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44 m
From
76.5 m
To
120.5 m
Hole Depth
186 m
Intercept Depth
76.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AR25-09:76.5-120.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone
Easting
572369
Northing
6234656
CRS
NAD 83, Zone 13N
Elevation
457.5 m
Azimuth
169.2 °
Dip
-47.3 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories (Saskatchewan Research Council)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a significant intercept with a strong grade-thickness product, indicating a wide and well-mineralized zone. The grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, but the width makes it highly material. Novelty is high as it's a new result from the current program.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-thickness product (169.84 g/t*m) for an orogenic gold deposit.
  • Wide intercept length (44.0 m) indicates good continuity.
  • Confirms significant gold mineralization at the Twin Zone.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, potentially overstating actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“3.86”

Context: 44.00

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“44.0 m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, and stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Arya Resources Ltd. maintains tight core-sample security, quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for all aspects of its exploration program.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

AR25-09Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 9.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AR25-09
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
9.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
89 m
To
105 m
Hole Depth
186 m
Intercept Depth
76.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AR25-09:89-105
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone
Easting
572369
Northing
6234656
CRS
NAD 83, Zone 13N
Elevation
457.5 m
Azimuth
169.2 °
Dip
-47.3 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories (Saskatchewan Research Council)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval represents a high-grade core within the broader intercept, demonstrating excellent gold grades and a strong grade-thickness product. It significantly contributes to the overall materiality of the hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade (9.90 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit.
  • Strong grade-thickness product (158.4 g/t*m).
  • Part of a wider significant intercept, indicating a high-grade core.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“9.90”

Context: 16.00

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“16.0 m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, and stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Arya Resources Ltd. maintains tight core-sample security, quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for all aspects of its exploration program.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

AR25-09Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 26.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AR25-09
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
26.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
94.6 m
To
98.4 m
Hole Depth
186 m
Intercept Depth
76.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AR25-09:94.6-98.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone
Easting
572369
Northing
6234656
CRS
NAD 83, Zone 13N
Elevation
457.5 m
Azimuth
169.2 °
Dip
-47.3 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories (Saskatchewan Research Council)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval is a bonanza-grade intercept, significantly enhancing the overall value of the AR25-09 hole. The grade is exceptional, making it a highly material result despite the narrower width.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade (26.14 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit.
  • Strong grade-thickness product (99.33 g/t*m).
  • Represents a bonanza-grade zone within the overall intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“26.14”

Context: 3.80

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Exceptionnally high-grade zone (26.14 g/t Au), well above the orogenic gold deposit norm.

Evidence · text

“26.14 g/t Au”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3.80 m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, and stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Arya Resources Ltd. maintains tight core-sample security, quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for all aspects of its exploration program.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

AR25-08Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AR25-08
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69.45 m
From
8.55 m
To
78 m
Hole Depth
82 m
Intercept Depth
8.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AR25-08:8.55-78
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone
Easting
572183.9
Northing
6234442.9
CRS
NAD 83, Zone 13N
Elevation
458 m
Azimuth
350.5 °
Dip
-45.3 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories (Saskatchewan Research Council)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept, while wide, is low-grade for an orogenic gold deposit. It is described as a 'bulk tonnage target,' which could be positive if the width and continuity are sufficient for a different mining method, but the grade itself is weak. Novelty is moderate as it's a new result.

Positive factors

  • Very wide intercept length (69.45 m) suggests potential for bulk tonnage.
  • Hole ended in gold mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Low grade (0.44 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit, falling into the weak tier.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 69.45

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“69.45 m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, and stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Arya Resources Ltd. maintains tight core-sample security, quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for all aspects of its exploration program.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

AR25-07Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 6.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AR25-07
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
6.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.95 m
From
142.05 m
To
146 m
Hole Depth
166.1 m
Intercept Depth
142.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AR25-07:142.05-146
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone
Easting
572088.7
Northing
6234410.4
CRS
NAD 83, Zone 13N
Elevation
458 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-52.4 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories (Saskatchewan Research Council)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade but is relatively narrow. While positive, its limited width reduces its overall materiality compared to the wider intercepts. Novelty is moderate as it's a new result.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade (6.19 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (3.95 m).
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.19”

Context: 3.95

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3.95 m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, and stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Arya Resources Ltd. maintains tight core-sample security, quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for all aspects of its exploration program.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

82-02Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 5.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
82-02
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
5.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
True Width
5.5 m
Hole Depth
174 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone (HW)
Easting
572268
Northing
6234656
CRS
Nad 83
Azimuth
169 °
Dip
-46.5 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a moderate grade and disclosed true width. While positive, its historical nature means it adds little new information to the project's current understanding.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade (5.45 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit.
  • True width is disclosed, increasing confidence in the intercept's geometry.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, reducing novelty.

Evidence · table

“5.45 g/t / 5.5m”

Context: 0.159 oz/t over 5.5m

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated as 5.5m.

Evidence · text

“All thicknesses represent true width.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results from 1982 re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“Year 1982”
82-02Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 3.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
82-02
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
3.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.8 m
True Width
7.8 m
Hole Depth
174 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone (FW)
Easting
572268
Northing
6234656
CRS
Nad 83
Azimuth
169 °
Dip
-46.5 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade, even with disclosed true width. Its contribution to overall project materiality is low due to its grade and historical nature.

Positive factors

  • True width is disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade (3.77 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit.
  • Historical data, reducing novelty.

Evidence · table

“3.77 g/t / 7.8m”

Context: 0.11 oz/t over 7.8m

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated as 7.8m.

Evidence · text

“All thicknesses represent true width.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results from 1982 re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“Year 1982”
82-03Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
82-03
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
True Width
4.6 m
Hole Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone (FW)
Easting
572184
Northing
6234444
CRS
Nad 83
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-44 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1983-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade and narrow width, making it less material. Its primary value is for historical context and validation.

Positive factors

  • True width is disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade (2.40 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit.
  • Historical data, reducing novelty.

Evidence · table

“2.40 g/t / 4.6m”

Context: 0.07 oz/t over 4.6m

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated as 4.6m.

Evidence · text

“All thicknesses represent true width.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results from 1983 re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“Year 1983”
83-11Wedge Lake · goldGrade: 4.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
83-11
Project
Wedge Lake
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
RBZ

Geometry

Grade
4.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
True Width
4.2 m
Hole Depth
152 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Twin Zone (HW)
Easting
572089
Northing
6234413
CRS
Nad 83
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-52 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1983-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate gold grade and disclosed true width, providing useful context for the current twinning program. Its materiality is limited by its historical nature.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade (4.87 g/t Au) for an orogenic gold deposit.
  • True width is disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, reducing novelty.

Evidence · table

“4.87 g/t / 4.2m”

Context: 0.142 oz/t over 4.2m

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated as 4.2m.

Evidence · text

“All thicknesses represent true width.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Historical results from 1983 re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“Year 1983”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.