# Atomic Minerals Plans Lisbon Valley East Radon Survey

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/atomic-minerals-plans-lisbon-valley-east-radon-survey--70e2d2af-e02c-4523-b0e3-45b6cc185c6c

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/ATOM/news/7261238671399886/atomic-minerals-plans-lisbon-valley-east-radon-survey

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-03-17T11:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Atomic Minerals Corporation

- Ticker: ATOM

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Utah

- Primary commodity: Uranium

- Secondary commodities: Vanadium

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-17 11:05:32 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.30 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Atomic Minerals Corporation plans to conduct a radon cup survey at its South Lisbon Valley East property in Utah to refine targets for an upcoming drill program. The company is targeting uranium mineralization in the Chinle Formation, citing historical production and gamma ray anomalies in the area.

Reasoning: The company is announcing a non-drilling geophysical survey \(radon cup\) to refine targets for a future drill program, leveraging historical context of the district.

- Positive factor: Planned survey to de-risk upcoming drill program

- Positive factor: Proximity to historic high-grade production \(Rio Algom mine\)

- Positive factor: Historical gamma ray anomalies in the target belt

- Negative factor: Historical data used is not independently verified by the company

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The project's value premise is based on its location within the Colorado Plateau uranium district and proximity to the historic Lisbon Valley production.

Evidence · text

> located with the Colorado Plateau uranium district, approximately 35 kilometres NE of Monticello, Utah.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (2)

### Rio Algom mine

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/atomic-minerals-plans-lisbon-valley-east-radon-survey--70e2d2af-e02c-4523-b0e3-45b6cc185c6c#fact-drill-facts-1)

Lisbon Valley East · uranium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: Rio Algom mine
- Project: Lisbon Valley East
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: ATOM

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.25
- Grade Unit: %

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-03-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill results from the Rio Algom mine are cited as supporting the presence of the arcuate belt.

- Positive factor: High grade reported in historic hole

- Negative factor: Historical data not independently verified

Evidence · text

> The Rio Algom mine produced 13 million pounds at an average grade of 0.25% U 3 O 8

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### historic oil and gas wells

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/atomic-minerals-plans-lisbon-valley-east-radon-survey--70e2d2af-e02c-4523-b0e3-45b6cc185c6c#fact-drill-facts-2)

South Lisbon Valley East · uranium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: historic oil and gas wells
- Project: South Lisbon Valley East
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: ATOM

#### Geometry

- Intercept: 4.5 m
- From: 760 m
- To: 880 m
- Intercept Depth: 760 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: historic oil and gas wells:760-880

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-03-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical oil and gas drilling recorded radioactivity in the target formation.

- Positive factor: Anomalous radioactivity recorded

Evidence · text

> recorded within the favorable Chinle Formation host rock over widths of 1.8 to 4.5 m \(6 to 15 feet\) from depths of 760 to 880 m

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
