Auriginal Confirms Gold-Rich VMS System at Roger; Drills 32.6 g/t Gold Over 1.2 m
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Auriginal Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- AUME
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Quebec
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 10:42:52 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Auriginal Mining Corp. announced drill results from its Roger Project, confirming a gold-rich VMS system and intersecting high-grade gold, including 32.6 g/t Au over 1.2 m in hole AUR-26-04A. The program expanded the known porphyry system and identified new geophysical targets. The company plans a follow-up drill program with an additional $2.0 million budget.
Reasoning: The drill program at the Roger Project successfully confirmed a gold-rich VMS system and delivered a bonanza-grade gold intercept, significantly expanding the known mineralization and identifying new targets. This represents a material de-risking and expansion of the project's potential, despite some pending assays and limited QA/QC detail.
Positive factors
- Confirmation of a gold-rich VMS system, opening new exploration potential.
- High-grade gold intercept of 32.6 g/t over 1.2 m, indicating bonanza grades.
- Expansion of the known porphyry system 600 m NE and 500 m SW.
- Identification of a new geophysical target for follow-up drilling.
- Budget allocated for a follow-up drill program.
Negative factors
- Assays are still pending for some holes, including AUR-26-05, which could alter overall program results.
- Lack of detailed QA/QC methods (e.g., blanks, standards, duplicates) disclosed, reducing confidence in assay reliability.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 57
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 57. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (57)
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 180 m
- To
- 181.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:180-181.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept in the VMS system, contributing to the overall confirmation of the geological model.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: 180.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 180.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 180 m
- To
- 181.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:180-181.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept, but part of the overall VMS system confirmation.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade for a VMS system.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 180.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 180.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 255 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:253-255
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept within the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.88”
Context: 253.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 253.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 255 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:254-255
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept within a sub-interval, indicating higher-grade zones.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“3.46”
Context: 254.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 254.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 255 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:254-255
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver grade in a sub-interval.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 254.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 254.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 256.5 m
- To
- 274.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:256.5-274.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept over a moderate width, contributing to the VMS system definition.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade over a moderate width.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 256.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“18.0”
Context: 256.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 259.5 m
- To
- 268.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 259.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:259.5-268.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept within a sub-interval, contributing to the VMS system definition.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade over a moderate width.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 259.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“9.0”
Context: 259.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 362.5 m
- To
- 363 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 362.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:362.5-363
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a very narrow width.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Narrow intercept length.
Evidence · table
“1.54”
Context: 362.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 362.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 362.5 m
- To
- 363 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 362.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:362.5-363
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept over a very narrow width.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade over a very narrow width.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 362.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 362.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 367.5 m
- To
- 369 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 367.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:367.5-369
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a narrow width.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: 367.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 367.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 627 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 627 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:627-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a narrow width, contributing to the VMS system confirmation.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.55”
Context: 627.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: 627.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · silverGrade: 41.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 627 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 627 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:627-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver intercept over a narrow width, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“41.2”
Context: 627.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: 627.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 627 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 627 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:627-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept over a narrow width, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade over a narrow width.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 627.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: 627.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept within a sub-interval, indicating higher-grade zones within the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: 629.9
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 629.9
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · silverGrade: 83.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 83.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver intercept within a sub-interval, indicating higher-grade zones within the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“83.9”
Context: 629.9
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 629.9
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept within a sub-interval, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 629.9
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 629.9
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grade within a sub-interval, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak zinc grade.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 629.9
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 629.9
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 673.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-673.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a narrow width, contributing to the VMS system confirmation.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · silverGrade: 11.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 673.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-673.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver intercept over a narrow width, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak silver grade.
Evidence · table
“11.7”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 673.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-673.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept over a narrow width, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade over a narrow width.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 673.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-673.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc intercept over a narrow width, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak zinc grade.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · goldGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept within a sub-interval, indicating higher-grade zones within the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“3.07”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · silverGrade: 19.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver intercept within a sub-interval, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak silver grade.
Evidence · table
“19.2”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept within a sub-interval, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc intercept within a sub-interval, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak zinc grade.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 669.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 669.3
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-03Roger · zincGrade: 0.104Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-03
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.104
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 665.8 m
- To
- 673.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 741 m
- Intercept Depth
- 665.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-03:665.8-673.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc intercept over a narrow width, supporting the polymetallic nature of the VMS system.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak zinc grade.
Evidence · table
“0.104”
Context: 665.8
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: 665.8
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-04ARoger · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-04A
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 294 m
- To
- 306 m
- Hole Depth
- 657 m
- Intercept Depth
- 294 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-04A:294-306
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a moderate width, contributing to the VMS system definition.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 294.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“12.0”
Context: 294.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-04ARoger · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-04A
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 294 m
- To
- 306 m
- Hole Depth
- 657 m
- Intercept Depth
- 294 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-04A:294-306
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept over a moderate width, contributing to the VMS system definition.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Weak copper grade.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 294.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“12.0”
Context: 294.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-04ARoger · goldGrade: 2.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-04A
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 298.5 m
- To
- 301.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 657 m
- Intercept Depth
- 298.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-04A:298.5-301.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept within a sub-interval, contributing to the VMS system definition.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.11”
Context: 298.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 298.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-04ARoger · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-04A
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 546.2 m
- To
- 547.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 657 m
- Intercept Depth
- 546.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-04A:546.2-547.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a very narrow width.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Narrow intercept length.
Evidence · table
“1.26”
Context: 546.2
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 546.2
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-04ARoger · goldGrade: 4.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-04A
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 553.7 m
- To
- 556.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 657 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-04A:553.7-556.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept over a narrow width, indicating higher-grade zones.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“4.01”
Context: 553.7
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: 553.7
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-04ARoger · goldGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-04A
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 555 m
- To
- 556.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 657 m
- Intercept Depth
- 555 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-04A:555-556.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold intercept within a sub-interval, highlighting high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“5.39”
Context: 555.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 555.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-04ARoger · goldGrade: 32.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-04A
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 584.6 m
- To
- 585.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 657 m
- Intercept Depth
- 584.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-04A:584.6-585.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Bonanza gold intercept, a significant high-grade result confirming the gold-rich nature of the VMS system.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“32.6”
Context: 584.6
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade gold zone (32.6 g/t Au) well above the VMS deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“32.6”
Context: 584.6
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 584.6
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-05Roger · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-05
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
- From
- 210.5 m
- To
- 216.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 651 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-05:210.5-216.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a narrow width.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 210.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“5.6”
Context: 210.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-05Roger · goldGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-05
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 210.5 m
- To
- 212 m
- Hole Depth
- 651 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-05:210.5-212
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept within a sub-interval.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.08”
Context: 210.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 210.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-05Roger · goldGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-05
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 222 m
- To
- 234 m
- Hole Depth
- 651 m
- Intercept Depth
- 222 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-05:222-234
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept over a moderate width, with assays still pending for the remainder of the hole.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: 222.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“12.0”
Context: 222.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-05Roger · goldGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-05
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 222 m
- To
- 223 m
- Hole Depth
- 651 m
- Intercept Depth
- 222 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-05:222-223
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept within a sub-interval, with assays still pending for the remainder of the hole.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.08”
Context: 222.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 222.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-05Roger · goldGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-05
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 225.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 651 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-05:224-225.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept within a sub-interval, indicating high-grade potential, with assays still pending for the remainder of the hole.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“12.2”
Context: 224.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 224.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
AUR-26-05Roger · goldGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AUR-26-05
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 228 m
- To
- 229.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 651 m
- Intercept Depth
- 228 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AUR-26-05:228-229.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept within a sub-interval, with assays still pending for the remainder of the hole.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
- Assays are still pending for the remainder of the hole.
Evidence · table
“1.47”
Context: 228.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 228.0
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 255 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:253-255
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.88 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.88”
Context: incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · goldGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 255 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:254-255
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.46 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.46 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.46”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 255 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:254-255
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 259.5 m
- To
- 268.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 259.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:259.5-268.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · goldGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.27 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.27 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · silverGrade: 83.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 83.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 83.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 125.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“83.9”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 % copper is weak against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 629.9 m
- To
- 631.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:629.9-631.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · goldGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.07 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.07 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.07”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · silverGrade: 19.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.2”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.29 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 669.3 m
- To
- 670.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 669.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:669.3-670.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclRoger · goldGrade: 2.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 298.5 m
- To
- 301.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 690 m
- Intercept Depth
- 298.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:298.5-301.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.11 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.11 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.11”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclRoger · goldGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 555 m
- To
- 556.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 690 m
- Intercept Depth
- 555 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:555-556.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.39 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.39 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.39”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · goldGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 210.5 m
- To
- 212 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:210.5-212
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.08 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.08 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.08”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · goldGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 222 m
- To
- 223 m
- Intercept Depth
- 222 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:222-223
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.08 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.08 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.08”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · goldGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 225.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:224-225.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 13.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.2”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Roger · goldGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Roger
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AUME
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 228 m
- To
- 229.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 228 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:228-229.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.47 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.47”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.