Auriginal Confirms Two-Mineralization Style Potential at Roger: Drilling Hits Predicted VMS Sulphides and Expands the Porphyry Cu-Au System

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Auriginal Mining Corp.
Ticker
AUME
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-17 10:53:59 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Auriginal Mining Corp. has confirmed a dual-mineralization model at the Roger Project, intersecting both porphyry Cu-Au and predicted VMS-style sulphides. Drilling expanded the porphyry system strike length by 400m to the northeast and identified massive sulphides in the southwest extension.

Reasoning: The drilling successfully confirmed a dual-mineralization model, expanding the known porphyry footprint and intersecting predicted VMS-style sulphides, representing significant exploration upside.

Positive factors

  • Confirmation of two distinct mineralization styles (porphyry and VMS)
  • Expansion of porphyry system strike length by 400m
  • Discovery of massive sulphides overlying the porphyry as predicted by model
  • High-grade gold intercepts in the NE expansion

Negative factors

  • Assays for several key holes (AUR-26-03, 04A, 05) are still pending

Facts used in scoring: 14

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling 600m NE of historical limits expanded the porphyry system strike length by 400m.

Evidence · text

“Two holes drilled 600 m northeast of the historical Roger deposit intersected the fault-offset continuation of the porphyry system, tracing it over a new strike length of at least 400 m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release names a Qualified Person (André Liboiron) and provides technical oversight.

Evidence · text

“The technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by André Liboiron, géo.(617), a Qualified Person”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 14. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (14)

AUR-26-01Roger · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-01
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
52.5 m
To
53.8 m
Intercept Depth
52.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-01:52.5-53.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Routine intercept in an exploration hole.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-01Roger · goldGrade: 7.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-01
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
7.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
209.7 m
To
211.2 m
Intercept Depth
52.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-01:209.7-211.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong gold grade in the NE expansion zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept

Evidence · table

“7.24”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-01Roger · goldGrade: 2.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-01
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
291.8 m
To
292.5 m
Intercept Depth
52.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-01:291.8-292.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.37”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-01Roger · goldGrade: 2.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-01
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
342 m
To
342.5 m
Intercept Depth
52.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-01:342-342.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.57”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-01Roger · goldGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-01
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
351.1 m
To
352.6 m
Intercept Depth
52.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-01:351.1-352.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Routine intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.42”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-01Roger · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-01
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
460.5 m
To
462 m
Intercept Depth
52.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-01:460.5-462
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Routine intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: 1,5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-01Roger · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-01
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
520.5 m
To
522 m
Intercept Depth
52.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-01:520.5-522
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Routine intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-02Roger · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-02
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
109.6 m
To
114 m
Intercept Depth
109.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-02:109.6-114
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid gold intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 4.4

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-02Roger · goldGrade: 5.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-02
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
5.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
111 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
109.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-02:111-112.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong gold grade within the AUR-26-02 intercept.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept

Evidence · table

“5.08”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-02Roger · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-02
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
162 m
To
169.5 m
Intercept Depth
109.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-02:162-169.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wide intercept with moderate grade.

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 7.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-02Roger · goldGrade: 4.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-02
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
4.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
162 m
To
163.5 m
Intercept Depth
109.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-02:162-163.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong gold grade within the AUR-26-02 intercept.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept

Evidence · table

“4.78”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-02Roger · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-02
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
325.5 m
To
327 m
Intercept Depth
109.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-02:325.5-327
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Routine intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.73”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-02Roger · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-02
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
349.5 m
To
351 m
Intercept Depth
109.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-02:349.5-351
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Routine intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AUR-26-02Roger · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AUR-26-02
Project
Roger
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
AUME

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
481.4 m
To
484.5 m
Intercept Depth
109.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AUR-26-02:481.4-484.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid gold intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.63”

Context: 3.1

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.