Azarga Metals Announces Mineral Resource Estimate for the Marg Project, Central Yukon
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- AZARGA METALS CORP.
- Ticker
- AZR
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Zinc, Silver, Gold
- Document categories
- Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 13:21:32 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Azarga Metals has announced a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for its Marg Project in Central Yukon, Canada, reporting 4.3 Mt Indicated at 2.9% CuEq and 10.0 Mt Inferred at 2.3% CuEq. The polymetallic VMS deposit, rich in copper, lead, zinc, silver, and gold, remains open for expansion along strike and down dip. The estimate, compliant with NI 43-101, highlights significant potential for growth and forms the basis for further exploration and engineering studies.
Reasoning: The document announces a significant maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for the Marg Project, highlighting high-grade polymetallic mineralization and substantial exploration upside. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by QPs, providing a strong foundation for future development. While a large portion is Inferred, the overall scale and grade are highly encouraging for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate for the Marg Project, establishing a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- High-grade copper equivalent (CuEq) values for both Indicated (2.9% CuEq) and Inferred (2.3% CuEq) categories.
- Resource remains open to expansion along strike and down dip, indicating significant exploration potential.
- Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards, with QP sign-off and site visit.
- Metallurgical testwork suggests amenability to differential flotation.
Negative factors
- Significant portion of the resource is in the Inferred category (10.0 Mt Inferred vs 4.3 Mt Indicated).
- Reliance on historical selective sampling practices for some data, limiting confidence in near-surface low-grade potential for open pit scenarios.
- Metal equivalent assumptions use recovery and payability from a 2016 metallurgical assessment, which may be dated.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 64
Classification and evidence
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 64. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (64)
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 4300000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 4300000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Indicated lead grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, contributing to the overall economic potential of the Marg Project.
Positive factors
- Significant lead grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 4300000Grade: 3.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Indicated zinc grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, enhancing the overall economic potential of the Marg Project.
Positive factors
- Significant zinc grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 4300000Grade: 42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Indicated silver grade adds to the polymetallic value of the resource, contributing to the overall economic viability of the Marg Project.
Positive factors
- Significant silver grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · goldTonnes: 4300000Grade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Indicated gold grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, contributing to the overall economic potential of the Marg Project.
Positive factors
- Gold grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 10000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling.
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10000000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred lead grade adds to the polymetallic nature of the resource, providing additional value potential, though with lower confidence due to its category.
Positive factors
- Significant lead grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 10000000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred zinc grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, enhancing the overall economic potential, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.
Positive factors
- Significant zinc grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 10000000Grade: 33Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred silver grade adds to the polymetallic value of the resource, providing additional economic potential, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.
Positive factors
- Significant silver grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“33”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · goldTonnes: 10000000Grade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred gold grade adds to the polymetallic value of the resource, providing additional economic potential, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.
Positive factors
- Gold grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 4200000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 4200000Grade: 3.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 4200000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 4200000Grade: 42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 3800000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 3800000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 3800000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 3800000Grade: 44Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“44”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 3000000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 3000000Grade: 3.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 3000000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 3000000Grade: 48Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“48”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 2500000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 2500000Grade: 4.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 2500000Grade: 2.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 2500000Grade: 51Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“51”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 2100000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 2100000Grade: 4.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 2100000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 2100000Grade: 54Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“54”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 10200000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 10200000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10200000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 10200000Grade: 32Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 10100000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1f08b671879edf711819
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 10100000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1f08b671879edf711819
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10100000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1f08b671879edf711819
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 10100000Grade: 32Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:1f08b671879edf711819
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 9800000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 9800000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 9800000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 9800000Grade: 33Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“33”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 9400000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 9400000Grade: 2.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 9400000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 9400000Grade: 34Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“34”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 7800000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 7800000Grade: 3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 7800000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 7800000Grade: 37Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“37”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 5700000Grade: 1.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 5700000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 5700000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 5700000Grade: 42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 3900000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:60981523f92c424a61ab
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 3900000Grade: 3.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:60981523f92c424a61ab
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 3900000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:60981523f92c424a61ab
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 3900000Grade: 47Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:60981523f92c424a61ab
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“47”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 2300000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 2300000Grade: 4.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 2300000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 2300000Grade: 53Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“53”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 4300000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource.
- Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: Indicated 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon, Canada
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101, jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de
- Deposit or zone
- Marg deposit
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades.
- Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit.
- Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: Inferred 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.