# Azarga Metals Announces Mineral Resource Estimate for the Marg Project, Central Yukon Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/AZR/news/7621913246301831/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2025-09-08T15:35:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: AZARGA METALS CORP. - Ticker: AZR - Exchange: TSX - Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: Lead, Zinc, Silver, Gold - Document categories: Resource update - Extracted: 2026-09-19 13:21:32 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Azarga Metals has announced a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for its Marg Project in Central Yukon, Canada, reporting 4.3 Mt Indicated at 2.9% CuEq and 10.0 Mt Inferred at 2.3% CuEq. The polymetallic VMS deposit, rich in copper, lead, zinc, silver, and gold, remains open for expansion along strike and down dip. The estimate, compliant with NI 43-101, highlights significant potential for growth and forms the basis for further exploration and engineering studies. Reasoning: The document announces a significant maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for the Marg Project, highlighting high-grade polymetallic mineralization and substantial exploration upside. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by QPs, providing a strong foundation for future development. While a large portion is Inferred, the overall scale and grade are highly encouraging for a VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Maiden resource estimate for the Marg Project, establishing a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: High-grade copper equivalent \(CuEq\) values for both Indicated \(2.9% CuEq\) and Inferred \(2.3% CuEq\) categories. - Positive factor: Resource remains open to expansion along strike and down dip, indicating significant exploration potential. - Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards, with QP sign-off and site visit. - Positive factor: Metallurgical testwork suggests amenability to differential flotation. - Negative factor: Significant portion of the resource is in the Inferred category \(10.0 Mt Inferred vs 4.3 Mt Indicated\). - Negative factor: Reliance on historical selective sampling practices for some data, limiting confidence in near-surface low-grade potential for open pit scenarios. - Negative factor: Metal equivalent assumptions use recovery and payability from a 2016 metallurgical assessment, which may be dated. Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 64 ## Classification and evidence **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 64. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (64) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-0) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-1) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated lead grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, contributing to the overall economic potential of the Marg Project. - Positive factor: Significant lead grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-2) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 3.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated zinc grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, enhancing the overall economic potential of the Marg Project. - Positive factor: Significant zinc grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 3.2 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-3) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated silver grade adds to the polymetallic value of the resource, contributing to the overall economic viability of the Marg Project. - Positive factor: Significant silver grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 42 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-4) Marg Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 0.66 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated gold grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, contributing to the overall economic potential of the Marg Project. - Positive factor: Gold grade contributing to the polymetallic nature of the deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 0.66 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-5) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-6) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred lead grade adds to the polymetallic nature of the resource, providing additional value potential, though with lower confidence due to its category. - Positive factor: Significant lead grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-7) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 2.6 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred zinc grade is a valuable component of the polymetallic resource, enhancing the overall economic potential, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade. - Positive factor: Significant zinc grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 2.6 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-8) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 33 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred silver grade adds to the polymetallic value of the resource, providing additional economic potential, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade. - Positive factor: Significant silver grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 33 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-9) Marg Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 0.54 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred gold grade adds to the polymetallic value of the resource, providing additional economic potential, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade. - Positive factor: Gold grade in the Inferred category, contributing to polymetallic value. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 0.54 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-10) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-11) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 3.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 3.2 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-12) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-13) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:d242e95bfacdff89c20e - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 42 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-14) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 1.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.4 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-15) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 3.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 3.4 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-16) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 1.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.8 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-17) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1298bc0b1b5287488c90 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 44 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 44 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-18) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-19) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 3.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 3.8 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-20) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 2.0 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-21) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:346ea04d6f38875365f5 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 48 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 48 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-22) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-23) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 4.1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 4.1 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-24) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 2.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 2.2 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-25) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:323b3cb8beb4e39d382f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 51 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 51 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-26) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 1.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.8 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-27) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 4.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 4.3 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-28) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 2.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 2.3 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-29) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:24588b61acec4cbc143f - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 54 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 54 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-30) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-31) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 2.6 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 2.6 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-32) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-33) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:89b3f1ee59f077e5882a - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 32 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 32 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-34) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1f08b671879edf711819 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-35) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1f08b671879edf711819 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 2.6 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 2.6 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-36) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1f08b671879edf711819 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-37) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:1f08b671879edf711819 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 32 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 32 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-38) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-39) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 2.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 2.7 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-40) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-41) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:734fe31c27b5229d8ed9 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 33 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 33 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-42) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-43) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 2.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 2.8 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-44) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-45) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:74d5b52470f10e32dedf - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 34 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 34 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-46) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 1.1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.1 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-47) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 3.0 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-48) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-49) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6f5e2df9f8ebc566f482 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 37 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 37 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-50) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 1.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.2 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-51) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 3.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 3.4 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-52) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-53) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2792fc32a4c90ff4f693 - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 42 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-54) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:60981523f92c424a61ab - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 1.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.4 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-55) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:60981523f92c424a61ab - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 3.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 3.8 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-56) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:60981523f92c424a61ab - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-57) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:60981523f92c424a61ab - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 47 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 47 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-58) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-59) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 4.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 4.4 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-60) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 2.1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 2.1 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-61) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:3c0d68b4908acea1ef6c - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 53 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 53 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-62) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:63af344545e2af4c9eda - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a high-grade Indicated copper resource, forming a key part of the overall polymetallic VMS deposit, and is reported under robust standards. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: High-grade copper content for an Indicated resource. - Positive factor: Part of a significant polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: Indicated 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-announces-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-marg-project-central-y--43a476af-4c3b-4f3b-b021-d0fd4dca16b1#fact-resource-facts-63) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon, Canada - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101, jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:666b54e63b3fbc7474de - Deposit or zone: Marg deposit - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-08T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource is substantial and contributes significantly to the overall project scale, offering good potential for conversion to higher confidence categories with further drilling. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant copper content in the Inferred category, indicating potential for future upgrades. - Positive factor: Part of a polymetallic VMS deposit. - Positive factor: Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence. Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: Inferred 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.