Azarga Metals NI 43-101 Technical Report Filed for the Marg Project, Central Yukon
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Azarga Metals Corp.
- Ticker
- AZR
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Central Yukon
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Zinc, Silver, Gold
- Document categories
- Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 13:19:51 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Azarga Metals has filed a National Instrument 43-101 compliant technical report for its Marg Project in Central Yukon, Canada. The report details a 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate at a 0.5% copper equivalent cut-off, including 4.3 Mt Indicated at 2.9% CuEq and 10.0 Mt Inferred at 2.3% CuEq. The estimate includes copper, lead, zinc, silver, and gold, with clear disclosure of metal equivalent assumptions and Qualified Person sign-off.
Reasoning: Azarga Metals has filed a new NI 43-101 compliant technical report for its Marg Project, detailing a significant polymetallic resource with both indicated and inferred categories. The report provides transparent metal equivalent calculations and is signed off by Qualified Persons, indicating a high level of confidence in the data. While the estimate was previously announced, its formal filing and detailed disclosure are positive steps for the project.
Positive factors
- New NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate for the Marg Project
- Significant indicated and inferred resources for multiple metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, Au)
- Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation and assumptions
- Qualified Persons have reviewed and approved the technical information
Negative factors
- Resource estimate was previously disclosed, reducing novelty slightly
- Historic economic assessment indicated potential for both open pit and underground, but selective sampling historically limits confidence for near-surface low-grade open pit potential
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 64
Classification and evidence
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 64. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (64)
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 4300000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated copper resource of 4.3 Mt at 1.3% Cu is a material component of the overall resource, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade.
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for copper
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 4300000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated lead resource of 4.3 Mt at 1.7% Pb contributes significantly to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade.
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for lead
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 4300000Grade: 3.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated zinc resource of 4.3 Mt at 3.2% Zn is a material component of the overall resource, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade.
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for zinc
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 4300000Grade: 42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated silver resource of 4.3 Mt at 42 g/t Ag contributes significantly to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade.
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for silver
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · goldTonnes: 4300000Grade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated gold resource of 4.3 Mt at 0.66 g/t Au contributes to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade.
Positive factors
- Indicated resource tonnage and grade for gold
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 10000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred copper resource of 10.0 Mt at 1.0% Cu represents substantial potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage for copper, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10000000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred lead resource of 10.0 Mt at 1.3% Pb contributes to the polymetallic potential, but its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage for lead, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 10000000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred zinc resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.6% Zn represents substantial potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage for zinc, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 10000000Grade: 33Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred silver resource of 10.0 Mt at 33 g/t Ag contributes to the polymetallic potential, but its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage for silver, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“33”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · goldTonnes: 10000000Grade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred gold resource of 10.0 Mt at 0.54 g/t Au contributes to the polymetallic potential, but its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- Inferred resource tonnage for gold, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade disclosure
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 4200000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 4200000Grade: 3.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 4200000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 4200000Grade: 42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 3800000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:92f7719226346e808091
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 3800000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:92f7719226346e808091
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 3800000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:92f7719226346e808091
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 3800000Grade: 44Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:92f7719226346e808091
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3800000
- Grade
- 44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“44”
Context: 3.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 3000000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 3000000Grade: 3.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 3000000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 3000000Grade: 48Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3000000
- Grade
- 48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“48”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 2500000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 2500000Grade: 4.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 2500000Grade: 2.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 2500000Grade: 51Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2500000
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“51”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · copperTonnes: 2100000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:98fc709edda75e52809b
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · zincTonnes: 2100000Grade: 4.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:98fc709edda75e52809b
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 2100000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:98fc709edda75e52809b
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · silverTonnes: 2100000Grade: 54Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:98fc709edda75e52809b
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2100000
- Grade
- 54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“54”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 10200000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 10200000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10200000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 10200000Grade: 32Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10200000
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 10.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 10100000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 10100000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10100000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 10100000Grade: 32Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10100000
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 9800000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 9800000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 9800000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 9800000Grade: 33Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9800000
- Grade
- 33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.75
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“33”
Context: 9.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 9400000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 9400000Grade: 2.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 9400000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 9400000Grade: 34Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 9400000
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“34”
Context: 9.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 7800000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 7800000Grade: 3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 7800000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 7800000Grade: 37Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 7800000
- Grade
- 37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“37”
Context: 7.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 5700000Grade: 1.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 5700000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 5700000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 5700000Grade: 42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5700000
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 5.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 3900000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 3900000Grade: 3.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 3900000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 3900000Grade: 47Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3900000
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 2.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“47”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · copperTonnes: 2300000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · zincTonnes: 2300000Grade: 4.4Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 2300000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · silverTonnes: 2300000Grade: 53Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“53”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMarg Project · leadTonnes: 4300000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4300000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: Indicated 4.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMarg Project · leadTonnes: 10000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Marg Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_yt
- Reported Region
- Central Yukon
- Ticker
- AZR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- John Horton, Debbie James
- Resource group id
- resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528
- Deposit or zone
- Marg Project
- Mining method
- combined
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 10000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-08-29
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential
- NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off
- Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: Inferred 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.