# Azarga Metals NI 43-101 Technical Report Filed for the Marg Project, Central Yukon Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/AZR/news/6886597429806504/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2025-09-24T11:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Azarga Metals Corp. - Ticker: AZR - Exchange: TSX - Region: Central Yukon - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: Lead, Zinc, Silver, Gold - Document categories: Resource update - Extracted: 2026-09-19 13:19:51 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Azarga Metals has filed a National Instrument 43-101 compliant technical report for its Marg Project in Central Yukon, Canada. The report details a 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate at a 0.5% copper equivalent cut-off, including 4.3 Mt Indicated at 2.9% CuEq and 10.0 Mt Inferred at 2.3% CuEq. The estimate includes copper, lead, zinc, silver, and gold, with clear disclosure of metal equivalent assumptions and Qualified Person sign-off. Reasoning: Azarga Metals has filed a new NI 43-101 compliant technical report for its Marg Project, detailing a significant polymetallic resource with both indicated and inferred categories. The report provides transparent metal equivalent calculations and is signed off by Qualified Persons, indicating a high level of confidence in the data. While the estimate was previously announced, its formal filing and detailed disclosure are positive steps for the project. - Positive factor: New NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate for the Marg Project - Positive factor: Significant indicated and inferred resources for multiple metals \(Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, Au\) - Positive factor: Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation and assumptions - Positive factor: Qualified Persons have reviewed and approved the technical information - Negative factor: Resource estimate was previously disclosed, reducing novelty slightly - Negative factor: Historic economic assessment indicated potential for both open pit and underground, but selective sampling historically limits confidence for near-surface low-grade open pit potential Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 64 ## Classification and evidence **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 64. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (64) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-0) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated copper resource of 4.3 Mt at 1.3% Cu is a material component of the overall resource, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade. - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for copper - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-1) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated lead resource of 4.3 Mt at 1.7% Pb contributes significantly to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade. - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for lead - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-2) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 3.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated zinc resource of 4.3 Mt at 3.2% Zn is a material component of the overall resource, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade. - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for zinc - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure Evidence · table > 3.2 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-3) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated silver resource of 4.3 Mt at 42 g/t Ag contributes significantly to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade. - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and grade for silver - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure Evidence · table > 42 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-4) Marg Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 0.66 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated gold resource of 4.3 Mt at 0.66 g/t Au contributes to the polymetallic nature of the deposit, reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off and clear cut-off grade. - Positive factor: Indicated resource tonnage and grade for gold - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure Evidence · table > 0.66 Context: 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-5) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred copper resource of 10.0 Mt at 1.0% Cu represents substantial potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage for copper, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-6) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred lead resource of 10.0 Mt at 1.3% Pb contributes to the polymetallic potential, but its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage for lead, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-7) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 2.6 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred zinc resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.6% Zn represents substantial potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage for zinc, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 2.6 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-8) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 33 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred silver resource of 10.0 Mt at 33 g/t Ag contributes to the polymetallic potential, but its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage for silver, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 33 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-9) Marg Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 0.54 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred gold resource of 10.0 Mt at 0.54 g/t Au contributes to the polymetallic potential, but its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off. - Positive factor: Inferred resource tonnage for gold, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade disclosure - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 0.54 Context: 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-10) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-11) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 3.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 3.2 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-12) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-13) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:7f46d33a89d1dd9d9771 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4200000 - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 42 Context: 4.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-14) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:92f7719226346e808091 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 1.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.4 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-15) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:92f7719226346e808091 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 3.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 3.4 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-16) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:92f7719226346e808091 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 1.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.8 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-17) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:92f7719226346e808091 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3800000 - Grade: 44 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 44 Context: 3.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-18) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-19) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 3.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 3.8 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-20) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 2.0 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-21) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:2cd61dc6b3e02bee2d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3000000 - Grade: 48 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 48 Context: 3.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-22) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-23) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 4.1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 4.1 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-24) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 2.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 2.2 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-25) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:65a55da3e0d236d08b4c - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2500000 - Grade: 51 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 51 Context: 2.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-26) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:98fc709edda75e52809b - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 1.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.8 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-27) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:98fc709edda75e52809b - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 4.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 4.3 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-28) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:98fc709edda75e52809b - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 2.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 2.3 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-29) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:98fc709edda75e52809b - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2100000 - Grade: 54 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 54 Context: 2.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-30) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-31) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 2.6 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 2.6 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-32) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-33) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:a9cc9bbf93af5068288e - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10200000 - Grade: 32 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 32 Context: 10.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-34) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-35) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 2.6 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 2.6 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-36) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-37) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:6bf803bc6337851cda33 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 32 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.25 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 32 Context: 10.1 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-38) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-39) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 2.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 2.7 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-40) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-41) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:cae47fad2d6661155d95 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9800000 - Grade: 33 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.75 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 33 Context: 9.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-42) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-43) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 2.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 2.8 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-44) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-45) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:84f2b47cf17a52a873e5 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 9400000 - Grade: 34 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 34 Context: 9.4 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-46) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 1.1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.1 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-47) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 3.0 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-48) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-49) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:20a2ee7a93652ce09206 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 7800000 - Grade: 37 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 1.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 37 Context: 7.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-50) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 1.2 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.2 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-51) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 3.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 3.4 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-52) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-53) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:102e738cb4de6b77d7d3 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 5700000 - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 42 Context: 5.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-54) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 1.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.4 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-55) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 3.8 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 3.8 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-56) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-57) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:ee7a79aac48231c5f91f - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3900000 - Grade: 47 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 47 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-58) Marg Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-59) Marg Project · zinc #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 4.4 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 4.4 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-60) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 2.1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 2.1 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-61) Marg Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:874866893b5e91c1d1be - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 2300000 - Grade: 53 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 3 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 53 Context: 2.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-62) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:378b93cfc48c8af7f0f8 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 4300000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The indicated resource of 4.3 Mt at 2.9% CuEq represents a strong polymetallic resource, with transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: Indicated 4.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/azarga-metals-ni-43-101-technical-report-filed-for-the-marg-project-central-yuko--21454fb3-a069-4cd0-950d-8c511647945a#fact-resource-facts-63) Marg Project · lead #### Identity - Project: Marg Project - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_yt - Reported Region: Central Yukon - Ticker: AZR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2025-08-29T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: John Horton, Debbie James - Resource group id: resource:85fd5f161f5a5c647528 - Deposit or zone: Marg Project - Mining method: combined #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 10000000 - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.5 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-08-29 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2025-09-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The inferred resource of 10.0 Mt at 2.3% CuEq represents substantial polymetallic potential, though its inferred classification means lower confidence. The estimate is NI 43-101 compliant with QP sign-off and transparent equivalent calculations. \(Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.\) - Positive factor: Significant inferred resource tonnage and copper equivalent grade, indicating future potential - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant estimate with QP sign-off - Positive factor: Clear cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed - Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: Inferred 10.0 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.