Azimut Advances Major Fortin Antimony-Gold Zone, Wabamisk Property, James Bay Region, Québec
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Azimut Exploration Inc.
- Ticker
- AZM
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Québec
- Primary commodity
- Antimony
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Lithium, Copper, Nickel, Platinum group elements
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 12:31:58 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Azimut Exploration announced high-grade antimony and gold drill results from its Fortin Zone on the Wabamisk Property in Québec, including 10.9 g/t Au over 1.7 m and 2.69% Sb over 5.0 m. The company has commenced a new 5,000-meter drilling program to expand the zone and initiated metallurgical and market studies. The Fortin Zone is described as a 1.8-kilometre-long antimony-gold system, open in all directions, with a separate gold target also being delineated.
Reasoning: The document reports significant antimony and gold drill results from the Fortin Zone, including high-grade intercepts and bonanza gold grades, confirming a large mineralized system. A new drilling program is underway to expand the zone, and metallurgical tests have been initiated, indicating strong project advancement. The company also references a prior resource estimate for its Patwon deposit. The QA/QC procedures are well-disclosed, but true widths are not provided for the intercepts.
Positive factors
- High-grade antimony and gold intercepts, including bonanza gold grades.
- Significant strike length and depth extent of mineralization confirmed.
- New drilling program underway to expand and delineate the zone.
- Metallurgical tests and market studies initiated, indicating project advancement.
- Strong QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Some drill results are historical or previously reported, reducing novelty for those specific facts.
- No true width disclosed for drill intercepts.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 51
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 51. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (49)
WS25-67Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 41.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 41.9 m
- From
- 171.6 m
- To
- 213.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:171.6-213.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade over a good width, contributing positively to the project's understanding. However, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade over a significant width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.89% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“41.9 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-67Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 41.9 m
- From
- 171.6 m
- To
- 213.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:171.6-213.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.65 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“41.9 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-67Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- From
- 174 m
- To
- 187.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:174-187.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.05% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“13.5 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-67Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- From
- 174 m
- To
- 187.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:174-187.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.88 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“13.5 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-67Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.84
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 177 m
- To
- 178.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:177-178.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.84% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.7 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
WS25-67Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 10.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 177 m
- To
- 178.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:177-178.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“10.9 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade gold zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“10.9 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.7 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-67Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 197 m
- To
- 213.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:197-213.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.27% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“16.5 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-67Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 2.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 207 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:202-207
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“2.69% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“5.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 41 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 41 m
- From
- 129 m
- To
- 170 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:129-170
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade over a significant width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.74% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“41.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:148-165
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.98% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“17.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:148-165
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.15 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“17.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 135 m
- To
- 137 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:135-137
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.93% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.82
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 150 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:148-150
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.82% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 150 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:148-150
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.13 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 154 m
- To
- 157 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:154-157
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.16%Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 154 m
- To
- 157 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:154-157
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.12 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:162-165
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.62% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-85Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:162-165
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.18 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-86Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-86
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-86:252-279
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.56% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-86
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“27.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-86
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-86Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-86
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 260 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-86:253-260
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.40% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-86
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“7.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-86
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-86Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-86
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 260 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-86:253-260
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.16 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-86
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“7.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-86
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-86Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-86
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 258 m
- To
- 260 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-86:258-260
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“3.32% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-86
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-86
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-86Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-86
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 258 m
- To
- 260 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-86:258-260
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.10 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-86
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-86
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-72Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-72
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.6 m
- From
- 120.5 m
- To
- 134.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-72:120.5-134.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.07% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-72
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“13.6 m”
Context: Hole WS25-72
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-72Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-72
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 128 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-72:126-128
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“3.12% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-72
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-72
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-72Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-72
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 128 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-72:126-128
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.14 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-72
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-72
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-55Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 78 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-55
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 78 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-55:16-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade over a very significant width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade over a very significant width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.28% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-55
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“78.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-55Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-55
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 78 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-55:16-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade over a very significant width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.12 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-55
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“78.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-55Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-55
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-55:120-132
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.26% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-55
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“12.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-55Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-55
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-55:120-132
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.12 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-55
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“12.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-65Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-65
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.85 m
- From
- 63.8 m
- To
- 81.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-65:63.8-81.65
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.57% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-65
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“17.85 m”
Context: Hole WS25-65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-65Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-65
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- From
- 79.5 m
- To
- 81.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-65:79.5-81.65
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.13% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-65
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.15 m”
Context: Hole WS25-65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-65Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-65
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- From
- 79.5 m
- To
- 81.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-65:79.5-81.65
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a low gold grade, it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.12 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-65
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.15 m”
Context: Hole WS25-65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-75Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-75
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.05 m
- From
- 177.1 m
- To
- 195.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 177.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-75:177.1-195.15
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade over a good width, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.34% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-75
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“18.05 m”
Context: Hole WS25-75
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-75Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-75
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 186.15 m
- To
- 189.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 177.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-75:186.15-189.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it was previously reported, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Result was previously reported, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.98% Sb”
Context: Hole WS25-75
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.35 m”
Context: Hole WS25-75
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-54Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 6.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-54
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 72.3 m
- To
- 74.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-54:72.3-74.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“6.24 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-54
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade gold zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“6.24 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-54
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“2.50 m”
Context: Hole WS25-54
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WS25-54Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 13.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-54
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 72.3 m
- To
- 73.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-54:72.3-73.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“13.4 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-54
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade gold zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“13.4 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-54
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-54
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WS25-67Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 66.8 m
- To
- 70.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:66.8-70.25
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“2.10 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.45 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WS25-67Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 12.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-67
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 69.85 m
- To
- 70.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-67:69.85-70.25
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“12.3 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade gold zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“12.3 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-67
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“0.40 m”
Context: Hole WS25-67
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WS25-85Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:34-43
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.79 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“9.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WS25-85Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 3.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-85
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 42 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-85:42-43
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“3.63 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade gold zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“3.63 g/t Au”
Context: Hole WS25-85
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.0 m”
Context: Hole WS25-85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
W25-53Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- W25-53
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- W25-53:5-9
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.76 g/t Au”
Context: Hole W25-53
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.00 m”
Context: Hole W25-53
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
W25-53Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- W25-53
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 7.5 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- W25-53:7.5-9
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, contributing positively to the gold target delineation. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“1.79 g/t Au”
Context: Hole W25-53
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“1.50 m”
Context: Hole W25-53
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
W10-05Wabamisk East · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- W10-05
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.8 m
- From
- 197.7 m
- To
- 215.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 197.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- W10-05:197.7-215.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, but it is a historical result, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical result, reducing novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.60 g/t Au”
Context: Hole W10-05
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“17.8 m”
Context: Hole W10-05
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · table
“historic hole”
Context: Hole W10-05
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WS25-74Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 23.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-74
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 23.5 m
- From
- 87 m
- To
- 110.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-74:87-110.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade over a good width. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade over a good width.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Hole WS25-74 0.24% Sb over 23.5 m (from 87.0 m to 110.5 m)”
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“23.5 m”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-74Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-74
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 88 m
- To
- 90.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-74:88-90.05
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“1.33% Sb over 2.05 m (from 88.0 m to 90.05 m)”
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“2.05 m”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-84Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-84
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.15 m
- From
- 86.5 m
- To
- 99.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-84:86.5-99.65
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a weak antimony grade over a good width. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Weak antimony grade.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Hole WS25-84 0.19% Sb over 13.15 m (from 86.5 m to 99.65 m)”
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“13.15 m”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-84Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-84
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 96.5 m
- To
- 99.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-84:96.5-99.65
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate antimony grade. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Moderate antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“0.52% Sb over 3.15 m (from 96.5 m to 99.65 m)”
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“3.15 m”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
WS25-71Wabamisk East · antimonyGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WS25-71
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 95.45 m
- To
- 95.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.45 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WS25-71:95.45-95.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong antimony grade, but it is very narrow. QA/QC procedures are disclosed, but true width is not.
Positive factors
- Strong antimony grade.
- QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept width.
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“Hole WS25-71 1.58% Sb over 0.45 m (from 95.45 m to 95.90 m)”
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“0.45 m”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its drilling and prospecting programs. All batches sent for analysis included certified reference materials, blanks and field duplicates.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
Resource Estimates (2)
indicatedElmer · goldTonnes: 4990000Grade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 311200Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Elmer
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- AZM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Martin Perron, Chafana Hamed Sako, Vincent Nadeau-Benoit, Simon Boudreau
- Resource group id
- resource:02381c0e9e8976eb7917
- Deposit or zone
- Patwon
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4990000
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 311200
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-01-04
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a previously reported Indicated resource estimate for the Patwon deposit, providing a baseline for the project. While compliant and QP signed, it is not new information and is part of an ongoing internal study.
Positive factors
- Resource estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
- Indicated category provides reasonable geological confidence.
Negative factors
- This is a historical estimate, not new information in this document.
- The estimate is from an 'internal scoping study in progress' which suggests early stage.
Evidence · text
“The initial MRE comprises Indicated resources of 311,200 ounces in 4.99 million tonnes grading 1.93 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed.
Evidence · text
“Indicated resources of 311,200 ounces”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Evidence · text
“National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Evidence · text
“prepared by Martin Perron, P.Eng., Chafana Hamed Sako, P.Geo., Vincent Nadeau-Benoit, P.Geo. and Simon Boudreau, P.Eng. of InnovExplo Inc.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.0 years before this release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“previously reported results presented in the figures and tables supporting this press release.”
inferredElmer · goldTonnes: 8220000Grade: 1.94Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 513900Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Elmer
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- AZM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2024-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Martin Perron, Chafana Hamed Sako, Vincent Nadeau-Benoit, Simon Boudreau
- Resource group id
- resource:2e3e8bff459734501999
- Deposit or zone
- Patwon
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8220000
- Grade
- 1.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 513900
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-01-04
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a previously reported Inferred resource estimate for the Patwon deposit. While compliant and QP signed, it is not new information and the Inferred category implies lower confidence for economic studies.
Positive factors
- Resource estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
Negative factors
- This is a historical estimate, not new information in this document.
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
- The estimate is from an 'internal scoping study in progress' which suggests early stage.
Evidence · text
“Inferred resources of 513,900 ounces in 8.22 million tonnes grading 1.94 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Evidence · text
“Inferred resources of 513,900 ounces”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Evidence · text
“National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Evidence · text
“prepared by Martin Perron, P.Eng., Chafana Hamed Sako, P.Geo., Vincent Nadeau-Benoit, P.Geo. and Simon Boudreau, P.Eng. of InnovExplo Inc.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.0 years before this release
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“previously reported results presented in the figures and tables supporting this press release.”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.