Azimut Further Defines Extensive High-Grade Lithium Pegmatite Field at Wabamisk East, James Bay Region, Quebec
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Azimut Exploration Inc.
- Ticker
- AZM
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- James Bay Region, Quebec
- Primary commodity
- Lithium
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 12:42:27 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Azimut Exploration has identified an extensive high-grade lithium pegmatite field at the Wabamisk East Property in Quebec. Initial diamond drilling has visually confirmed spodumene-rich pegmatites, although formal assays for these holes are pending.
Reasoning: The announcement reports significant exploration progress with high-grade surface samples and visual spodumene in initial drilling, though formal assay results for the drill holes are pending.
Positive factors
- High-grade lithium pegmatite field defined
- Spodumene-rich pegmatites visually confirmed in initial drilling
- Extensive surface sampling returning high grades
- Near proximity to Whabouchi lithium deposit
Negative factors
- Assays for diamond drilling are still pending
- True widths for drill intervals are currently undetermined
- Rio Tinto terminating option to JV agreement
Facts used in scoring: 23
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drilling confirmed the down-dip extension of mineralized outcrops.
Evidence · text
“confirmed the down-dip extension of the mineralized outcrops”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The property is located 42 km from the Whabouchi lithium deposit.
Evidence · text
“42 kilometres northeast of the Whabouchi lithium deposit”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: While industry-standard procedures are mentioned, specific lab results or method details for the current drilling are not provided in this release.
Evidence · text
“Azimut applies industry-standard QA/QC procedures to its sampling programs”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 23. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (23)
WL25-01Wabamisk EastView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WL25-01
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual confirmation of spodumene in a thick interval is a positive exploration signal, but lacks assay verification.
Positive factors
- Significant spodumene content (20-30%)
Negative factors
- Assays pending
- True width undetermined
Evidence · text
“One 37.55-metre-thick coarse-grained pegmatite interval with 20 to 30% spodumene from 41.0 m to 78.55 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WL25-02Wabamisk EastView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WL25-02
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual spodumene identification in multiple intervals.
Positive factors
- High spodumene content (35-40%)
Negative factors
- Assays pending
Evidence · text
“Three coarse-grained spodumene pegmatite intervals ( 7.74 m , 11.75 m , and 24.30 m thick ) from 11.7 m to 76.65 m. ... Spodumene content ranges from 35 to 40%.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WL25-03Wabamisk EastView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WL25-03
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual spodumene identification.
Positive factors
- Spodumene content 15-30%
Negative factors
- Assays pending
Evidence · text
“Four coarse-grained spodumene pegmatite intervals ( 6.45 m , 3.37m , 0.95 m , and 6.1 m thick ) from 43.5 m to 114.1 m. ... Spodumene content generally ranges from 15 to 30%.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WL25-04Wabamisk EastView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WL25-04
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual spodumene identification.
Positive factors
- Spodumene content 10-15%
Negative factors
- Assays pending
Evidence · text
“Five spodumene pegmatite intervals ( 15.65 m , 4.4 m , 1.95 m , 4.35 m and 1.2 m ) from 20.15 m to 154.3 m. ... Spodumene content is variable, generally ranging from 10 to 15%.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WL25-05Wabamisk EastView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WL25-05
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual spodumene identification.
Positive factors
- 15% spodumene content
Negative factors
- Assays pending
Evidence · text
“One 5.45-metre interval of coarse-grained pegmatite with 15% spodumene from 49.65 m to 55.1 m.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Prospect 1Wabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Prospect 1
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade channel composite.
Positive factors
- High grade channel sample
Evidence · table
“1.68”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Prospect 1Wabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Prospect 1
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade channel composite.
Positive factors
- High grade channel sample
Evidence · table
“1.68”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Prospect 1Wabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Prospect 1
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade inclusion within a channel sample.
Positive factors
- High grade inclusion
Evidence · table
“2.46”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos North 1Wabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos North 1
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.57”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos North 2Wabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos North 2
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.90”
Context: 11.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos North 2Wabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos North 2
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.72”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos North 2Wabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos North 2
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.58”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos SouthWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos South
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade channel composite.
Positive factors
- High grade channel sample
Evidence · table
“2.25”
Context: 5.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos SouthWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos South
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.97”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos SouthWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos South
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos South – JumboWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos South – Jumbo
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade inclusion within a channel sample.
Positive factors
- High grade inclusion
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos South – JumboWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 4.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos South – Jumbo
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high grade inclusion within a channel sample.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade inclusion
Evidence · table
“4.02”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos South – JumboWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos South – Jumbo
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade inclusion within a channel sample.
Positive factors
- High grade inclusion
Evidence · table
“2.12”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Lithos South – JumboWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lithos South – Jumbo
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade inclusion within a channel sample.
Positive factors
- High grade inclusion
Evidence · table
“2.86”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BennyWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Benny
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“2.33”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WhaleWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Whale
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.42”
Context: 6.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WhaleWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Whale
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
WhaleWabamisk East · lithiumGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Whale
- Project
- Wabamisk East
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- AZM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Channel composite result.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.