Aztec Drilling Expands Oxide Gold-Silver Zone at Tombstone Project, Arizona; intersecting 0.62 gpt Au and 24.8 gpt Ag over 107.9m in Westside Area and 0.48 gpt Au and 12.6 gpt Ag over 112.5m at Contention Area

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Aztec Minerals Corp.
Ticker
AZT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Arizona
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 11:29:17 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aztec Minerals announced drill results from 14 RC holes at its Tombstone Project in Arizona, expanding the oxide gold-silver mineralization in the Westside and Contention areas. Notable intercepts include 107.9m at 0.62 gpt Au and 24.8 gpt Ag in the Westside Area, and 112.5m at 0.48 gpt Au and 12.6 gpt Ag in the Contention Area. The company highlights the potential for significant growth of shallow, bulk tonnage oxide gold-silver mineralization, with drilling continuing to test new targets.

Reasoning: The announcement reports strong gold-silver drill results from step-out drilling at the Tombstone Project, expanding the oxide mineralization in both the Westside and Contention areas. The intercepts are wide and shallow, indicating potential for bulk tonnage, which is a significant positive. QA/QC disclosure adds confidence, though the lack of true width reporting is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold-silver intercepts in multiple holes, expanding known mineralization.
  • Broad zones of oxide gold-silver mineralization identified, suitable for bulk tonnage.
  • Step-out drilling successfully extended mineralization in both Westside and Contention areas.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Negative factors

  • Reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, which may overstate thickness.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 86

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The drilling program is explicitly described as 'Step-Out Drilling' and aims to 'Expand the known mineralization horizontally to the west, north and south, and down dip beyond the holes drilled by Aztec in 2020-24'.

Evidence · text

“Step-Out Drilling Continues to Expand the Contention and Westside zones of Oxide Au/Ag Mineralization”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths, which can range at the property from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details the QA/QC program, including certified blanks, standards, and duplicates, and mentions Bureau Veritas as the independent laboratory.

Evidence · text

“The company uses quality assurance-quality control as a standard part of its sampling-assaying-assessments in conjunction with its exploration sampling programs. Samples and their collection are controlled by an industry standard conforming QAQC program including all drill holes containing certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Allen David Heyl, VP Exploration of Aztec, is named as a Qualified Person under NI43-101 and has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Allen David Heyl, B.Sc., CPG - AIPG No.11277, VP Exploration of Aztec, a Qualified Person under NI43-101.”

Certified Labpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Bureau Veritas is named as the laboratory for sample analysis and is stated to be independent of the Company and the Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“The samples are analyzed by Bureau Veritas for gold with a 30-gram sample size using the method FA430 followed by MA300. Bureau Veritas is independent of the Company and of the Qualified Person.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 86. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (86)

TR26-01Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
51.7 m
To
74.5 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:51.7-74.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, which is not particularly material, but it contributes to the overall understanding of the Westside anticline mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-01Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
51.7 m
To
74.5 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:51.7-74.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, which is not particularly material, but it contributes to the overall understanding of the Westside anticline mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“11.76”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-01Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
86.6 m
To
110.9 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
86.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:86.6-110.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, which is not particularly material, but it contributes to the overall understanding of the Westside anticline mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-01Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
86.6 m
To
110.9 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
86.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:86.6-110.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, which is not particularly material, but it contributes to the overall understanding of the Westside anticline mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“13.37”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.136
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
0 m
To
19.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:0-19.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept from surface is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the gold grade is relatively low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.136”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
0 m
To
19.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:0-19.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept from surface is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the silver grade is relatively low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“12.62”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.088
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
54.7 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
54.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:54.7-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.088”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
54.7 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
54.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:54.7-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“13.67”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.094Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.094
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
91.2 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
91.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:91.2-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.094”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
91.2 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
91.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:91.2-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“5.65”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.076Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.076
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
130.7 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:130.7-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.076”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
130.7 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:130.7-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Target area
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“2.76”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.069Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.069
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention and Westside mineralization zones
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.069”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention and Westside mineralization zones
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“3.73”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.103
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
167.2 m
To
177.8 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:167.2-177.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention and Westside mineralization zones
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.103”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
167.2 m
To
177.8 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:167.2-177.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention and Westside mineralization zones
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“7.21”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.149Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.149
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
193 m
To
205.2 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
193 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:193-205.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention and Westside mineralization zones
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.149”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
193 m
To
205.2 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
193 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:193-205.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention and Westside mineralization zones
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
53.2 m
To
63.8 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:53.2-63.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside area
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
53.2 m
To
63.8 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:53.2-63.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside area
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“8.17”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside area
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.040”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside area
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“4.16”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
168.7 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
168.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:168.7-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside area
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.220”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
168.7 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
168.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:168.7-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside area
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“13.75”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.223Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.223
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
16.7 m
To
36.5 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:16.7-36.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the gold grade is relatively low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.223”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
16.7 m
To
36.5 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:16.7-36.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the silver grade is relatively low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“8.78”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.117
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
60.8 m
To
73 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:60.8-73
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.117”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
60.8 m
To
73 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:60.8-73
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
80.6 m
To
130.7 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
80.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:80.6-130.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a wide zone of mineralization, which is positive for bulk tonnage potential, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
80.6 m
To
130.7 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
80.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:80.6-130.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a wide zone of mineralization, which is positive for bulk tonnage potential, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“4.90”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.117
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
136.8 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
136.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:136.8-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.117”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
136.8 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
136.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:136.8-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the silver grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“11.44”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.086Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.086
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
165.7 m
To
174.8 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
165.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:165.7-174.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.086”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
165.7 m
To
174.8 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
165.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:165.7-174.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“4.65”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.119Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.119
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
182.4 m
To
217.4 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:182.4-217.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.119”

Context: 35.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
182.4 m
To
217.4 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:182.4-217.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the silver grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“5.95”

Context: 35.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.091
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
231 m
To
255.3 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
231 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:231-255.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width and ended in mineralization, which is positive for continuity, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.091”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
231 m
To
255.3 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
231 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:231-255.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width and ended in mineralization, which is positive for continuity, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.124Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.124
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
31.9 m
To
47.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
31.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:31.9-47.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the gold grade is relatively low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.124”

Context: 15.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
31.9 m
To
47.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
31.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:31.9-47.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“4.06”

Context: 15.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.223Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.223
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
62.3 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:62.3-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.223”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
62.3 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:62.3-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“11.66”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.159Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.159
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
88.2 m
To
120.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
88.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:88.2-120.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.159”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
88.2 m
To
120.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
88.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:88.2-120.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“3.86”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
130.7 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:130.7-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the gold grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 29.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
29.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
130.7 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:130.7-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width and a moderate silver grade, which is a positive result.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.
  • Moderate silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“29.22”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.104Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.104
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.3 m
From
202.2 m
To
261.5 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
202.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:202.2-261.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a wide zone and ended in mineralization, which is positive for continuity, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.104”

Context: 59.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.3 m
From
202.2 m
To
261.5 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
202.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:202.2-261.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention area
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a wide zone and ended in mineralization, which is positive for continuity, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“4.96”

Context: 59.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.479Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 111.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.479
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
111.5 m
From
50.2 m
To
162.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
50.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:50.2-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention mineralization
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very wide zone of mineralization with a moderate gold grade, which is a strong positive for bulk tonnage potential.

Positive factors

  • Very wide intercept length.
  • Moderate gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.479”

Context: 111.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 111.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
111.5 m
From
50.2 m
To
162.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
50.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:50.2-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention mineralization
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very wide zone of mineralization with a moderate silver grade, which is a strong positive for bulk tonnage potential.

Positive factors

  • Very wide intercept length.
  • Moderate silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“12.64”

Context: 111.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.127Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.127
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
173.2 m
To
185.4 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:173.2-185.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention mineralization
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.127”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
173.2 m
To
185.4 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:173.2-185.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention mineralization
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“8.11”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.049Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.049
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
221.9 m
To
238.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
221.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:221.9-238.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention mineralization
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.049”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
221.9 m
To
238.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
221.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:221.9-238.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central Contention mineralization
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“7.49”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.576Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.576
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
121.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
121.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-08:121.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588445
Northing
3508184
Azimuth
18 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade, which is positive, but the width is narrow.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.576”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
121.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
121.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-08:121.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588445
Northing
3508184
Azimuth
18 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade, which is positive, but the width is narrow.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“8.4”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.069Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.069
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
35 m
To
45.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:35-45.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside anticline
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.069”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 9.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
35 m
To
45.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:35-45.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside anticline
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“9.06”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.181Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.181
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.2 m
To
59.3 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:53.2-59.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside anticline
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.181”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.2 m
To
59.3 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:53.2-59.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside anticline
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“13.1”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
158.1 m
To
164.1 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:158.1-164.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside anticline
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
158.1 m
To
164.1 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:158.1-164.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside anticline
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“7.37”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
southwest portion of the Tombstone
Easting
588271
Northing
3507282
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.
  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
southwest portion of the Tombstone
Easting
588271
Northing
3507282
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.
  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“9.15”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.173Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.173
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
100.3 m
From
100.3 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
250 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-11:100.3-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Contention mineralization
Easting
588653
Northing
3507717
Azimuth
109 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept expands the Contention mineralization, which is a strong positive for continuity, despite the low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Very wide intercept length.
  • Expands mineralization to the west and depth.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.173”

Context: 100.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
100.3 m
From
100.3 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
250 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-11:100.3-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Contention mineralization
Easting
588653
Northing
3507717
Azimuth
109 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept expands the Contention mineralization, which is a strong positive for continuity, despite the low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Very wide intercept length.
  • Expands mineralization to the west and depth.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“11.46”

Context: 100.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.172Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.172
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
100.3 m
To
149 m
Hole Depth
237.8 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-12:100.3-149
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Contention mineralization
Easting
588699
Northing
3507669
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept expands the Contention mineralization, which is a strong positive for continuity, despite the low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.
  • Expands mineralization to the west and depth.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.172”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 18.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
18.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
100.3 m
To
149 m
Hole Depth
237.8 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-12:100.3-149
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Contention mineralization
Easting
588699
Northing
3507669
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept expands the Contention mineralization, which is a strong positive for continuity, despite the low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.
  • Expands mineralization to the west and depth.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“18.04”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.056Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.056
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
18.2 m
To
27.4 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
18.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:18.2-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.056”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
18.2 m
To
27.4 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
18.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:18.2-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“8.27”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.132Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.132
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
63.8 m
To
68.4 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
63.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:63.8-68.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.
  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.132”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
63.8 m
To
68.4 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
63.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:63.8-68.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.
  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“3.33”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
85.1 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:85.1-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
85.1 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:85.1-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“5.00”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.062Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.062
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
194.5 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:194.5-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.062”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.275Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.275
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
194.5 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:194.5-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
central portion of the Westside area
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“4.275”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.195Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.195
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
0 m
To
10.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:0-10.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept from surface is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the gold grade is relatively low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.195”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
0 m
To
10.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:0-10.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept from surface is positive for potential open-pit mining, but the silver grade is relatively low.

Positive factors

  • Shallow intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“13.00”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.618Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 107.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.618
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
107.9 m
From
39.5 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
39.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:39.5-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a highly significant intercept with exceptional width and strong gold grade, demonstrating substantial mineralization potential in the Westside anticline.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.
  • Strong gold grade for an oxide gold project.
  • Demonstrates potential for oxidized precious metal mineralization across the entire width of the Westside anticline.

Evidence · table

“0.618”

Context: 107.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 24.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 107.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
24.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
107.9 m
From
39.5 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
39.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:39.5-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a highly significant intercept with exceptional width and moderate silver grade, demonstrating substantial mineralization potential in the Westside anticline.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.
  • Moderate silver grade for an oxide silver project.
  • Demonstrates potential for oxidized precious metal mineralization across the entire width of the Westside anticline.

Evidence · table

“24.80”

Context: 107.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.091
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
176.3 m
To
225 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
176.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:176.3-225
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a wide zone of mineralization, which is positive for bulk tonnage potential, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.091”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
176.3 m
To
225 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
176.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:176.3-225
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a wide zone of mineralization, which is positive for bulk tonnage potential, but the silver grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Wide intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“8.11”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.121
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
234.1 m
To
243.2 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
234.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:234.1-243.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade and ended in mineralization, which is positive for continuity, but the grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade for an oxide gold project.

Evidence · table

“0.121”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
234.1 m
To
243.2 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
234.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:234.1-243.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver grade and ended in mineralization, which is positive for continuity, but the grade is low.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade for an oxide silver project.

Evidence · table

“10.17”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10 PCTombstone · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10 PC
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10 PC:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.162 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.162 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: TR26-10 PC

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10 PCTombstone · silverGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10 PC
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10 PC:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside anticline
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 55.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.15”

Context: TR26-10 PC

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.