Aztec Drilling Expands Oxide Gold-Silver Zone Step Outs at Tombstone; intersecting 2.31 gpt Au and 43.23 gpt Ag over 27.4 m within 66.9 m of 1.05 gpt Au and 23.21 gpt Ag

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Aztec Minerals Corp.
Ticker
AZT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Southeastern Arizona
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 11:12:42 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aztec Minerals reports significant step-out drill results from its Tombstone Property in Southeastern Arizona, expanding the oxide gold-silver zone. The drilling encountered multiple thick, near-surface, high-grade intercepts, including 27.4 meters at 2.31 gpt gold and 43.23 gpt silver within a broader 66.9-meter interval. The company states that the mineralization remains open in multiple directions, suggesting a much larger system than historically considered.

Reasoning: The drill results from the Tombstone project show significant step-out success, expanding the oxide gold-silver zone with multiple wide, high-grade intercepts. The company believes this indicates a much larger system than previously thought, with mineralization remaining open. While true widths are not disclosed, the overall results are very positive for the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant step-out drilling success expanding the oxide gold-silver mineralization to the west and depth.
  • Multiple thick, near-surface high-grade intercepts, including 27.4m at 2.31 gpt Au and 43.23 gpt Ag.
  • Continuity of mineralization demonstrated down dip and along strike.
  • The project is interpreted to be a much larger oxide gold-silver system than historically considered, remaining open in multiple directions.
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure, including certified lab and QP sign-off.

Negative factors

  • All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, which can range from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.
  • Metal equivalent assumptions use a relatively high silver price and recovery, which may not be fully transparent without full economic assumptions.

Facts used in scoring: 122

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 122. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (122)

TR26-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.214Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.214
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
92.7 m
To
139.8 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
92.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-15:92.7-139.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588756
Northing
3508067
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.456
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept demonstrates the presence of oxide mineralization over a good width, contributing to the overall expansion of the target area.

Positive factors

  • Demonstrated oxide mineralization towards the Contention pit.
  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.214”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
92.7 m
To
139.8 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
92.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-15:92.7-139.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588756
Northing
3508067
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.456
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept demonstrates the presence of oxide mineralization over a good width, contributing to the overall expansion of the target area.

Positive factors

  • Demonstrated oxide mineralization towards the Contention pit.
  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“13.26”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.096Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.096
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44 m
From
156.6 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-15:156.6-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588756
Northing
3508067
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.157
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.096”

Context: 44.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44 m
From
156.6 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-15:156.6-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588756
Northing
3508067
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.157
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.42”

Context: 44.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.223Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 89.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.223
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
89.8 m
From
57.9 m
To
147.8 m
Hole Depth
198.2 m
Intercept Depth
57.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-16:57.9-147.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588812
Northing
3508045
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.423
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept confirms mineralization in a new area, expanding the target, though the grade is moderate and the hole did not reach its full target depth.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a very significant width of mineralization.
  • Contributes to expanding the Contention target area.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Hole failed to reach target depth.

Evidence · table

“0.223”

Context: 89.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 89.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
89.8 m
From
57.9 m
To
147.8 m
Hole Depth
198.2 m
Intercept Depth
57.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-16:57.9-147.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588812
Northing
3508045
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.423
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept confirms mineralization in a new area, expanding the target, though the grade is moderate and the hole did not reach its full target depth.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a very significant width of mineralization.
  • Contributes to expanding the Contention target area.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Hole failed to reach target depth.

Evidence · table

“10.96”

Context: 89.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.065Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.065
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
164.6 m
To
181.3 m
Hole Depth
198.2 m
Intercept Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-16:164.6-181.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588812
Northing
3508045
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.166
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization but at very low grades, and the hole did not reach its intended depth.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Hole failed to reach target depth.

Evidence · table

“0.065”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
164.6 m
To
181.3 m
Hole Depth
198.2 m
Intercept Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-16:164.6-181.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588812
Northing
3508045
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.166
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization but at very low grades, and the hole did not reach its intended depth.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Hole failed to reach target depth.

Evidence · table

“5.54”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.077Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.077
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
195.1 m
To
198.1 m
Hole Depth
198.2 m
Intercept Depth
195.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-16:195.1-198.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588812
Northing
3508045
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.181
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept shows continued mineralization at the end of the hole, but its economic significance is limited.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Hole failed to reach target depth.

Evidence · table

“0.077”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
195.1 m
To
198.1 m
Hole Depth
198.2 m
Intercept Depth
195.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-16:195.1-198.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588812
Northing
3508045
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.181
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept shows continued mineralization at the end of the hole, but its economic significance is limited.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Hole failed to reach target depth.

Evidence · table

“5.7”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.613Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.613
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
62.5 m
To
67.1 m
Hole Depth
204.3 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-17:62.5-67.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588837
Northing
3508056
Azimuth
145 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.651
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow but good-grade intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade for a shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.613”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
62.5 m
To
67.1 m
Hole Depth
204.3 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-17:62.5-67.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588837
Northing
3508056
Azimuth
145 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.651
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is less significant on its own but contributes to the overall mineralization picture.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“2.13”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.294Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 121.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.294
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
121.9 m
From
82.3 m
To
204.2 m
Hole Depth
204.3 m
Intercept Depth
82.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-17:82.3-204.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588837
Northing
3508056
Azimuth
145 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.499
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept is highly material, demonstrating significant continuity and depth potential for the mineralization, despite moderate grades.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
  • Demonstrates continuity of mineralization in the northern end of the Contention target.
  • Expanded potential to depth, with hole ending in mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.294”

Context: 121.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 121.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
121.9 m
From
82.3 m
To
204.2 m
Hole Depth
204.3 m
Intercept Depth
82.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-17:82.3-204.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588837
Northing
3508056
Azimuth
145 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.499
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept is highly material, demonstrating significant continuity and depth potential for the mineralization, despite moderate grades.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
  • Demonstrates continuity of mineralization in the northern end of the Contention target.
  • Expanded potential to depth, with hole ending in mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“11.3”

Context: 121.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.017
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
85.3 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
204.3 m
Intercept Depth
85.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-17:85.3-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588837
Northing
3508056
Azimuth
145 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.281
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade included interval significantly enhances the overall quality of the broader intercept in TR26-17.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept within a broader mineralized zone.
  • Contributes to the overall positive results of the hole.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.017”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 14.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
14.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
85.3 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
204.3 m
Intercept Depth
85.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-17:85.3-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588837
Northing
3508056
Azimuth
145 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.281
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This good-grade included interval enhances the overall quality of the broader intercept in TR26-17.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade within a broader mineralized zone.
  • Contributes to the overall positive results of the hole.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“14.54”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.775Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 53.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.775
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
53.2 m
From
0 m
To
53.2 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:0-53.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.356
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very strong, wide, and shallow intercept from surface is highly material, indicating significant potential for open-pit development and expanding the known mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Excellent shallow, wide intercept from surface.
  • High gold grade for an open-pit target.
  • Demonstrates significant width and leaves mineralization open.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.775”

Context: 53.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · silverGrade: 31.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 53.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
31.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
53.2 m
From
0 m
To
53.2 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:0-53.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.356
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very strong, wide, and shallow intercept from surface is highly material, indicating significant potential for open-pit development and expanding the known mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Excellent shallow, wide intercept from surface.
  • High silver grade for an open-pit target.
  • Demonstrates significant width and leaves mineralization open.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“31.94”

Context: 53.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.909Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.909
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
25.8 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
25.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:25.8-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.346
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade included interval is highly material, significantly boosting the overall economic potential of the shallow mineralization in TR26-18.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade for an open-pit target.
  • Significant width for a high-grade intercept.
  • Enhances the overall value of the broader shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.909”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · silverGrade: 79.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
79.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
25.8 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
25.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:25.8-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.346
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade included interval is highly material, significantly boosting the overall economic potential of the shallow mineralization in TR26-18.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade for an open-pit target.
  • Significant width for a high-grade intercept.
  • Enhances the overall value of the broader shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“79.07”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.132Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.132
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
79 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:79-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.212
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.132”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
79 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:79-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.212
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.41”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.084Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 53.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.084
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
53.2 m
From
111 m
To
164.2 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:111-164.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.198
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows continued mineralization at greater depth, but with very low grades, limiting its immediate economic impact.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.084”

Context: 53.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-18Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.246Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 53.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.246
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
53.2 m
From
111 m
To
164.2 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-18:111-164.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588879
Northing
3508034
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.198
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows continued mineralization at greater depth, but with very low grades, limiting its immediate economic impact.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.246”

Context: 53.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 66.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
66.9 m
From
13.7 m
To
80.6 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:13.7-80.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.472
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This highly material, wide, and high-grade intercept from near surface is a very strong result, confirming continuity and expanding the mineralization down dip and to depth.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional shallow, wide intercept from near surface.
  • High gold grade for an open-pit target.
  • Demonstrates continuity of mineralization down dip and expands potential to depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.050”

Context: 66.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · silverGrade: 23.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 66.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
66.9 m
From
13.7 m
To
80.6 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:13.7-80.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.472
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This highly material, wide, and high-grade intercept from near surface is a very strong result, confirming continuity and expanding the mineralization down dip and to depth.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional shallow, wide intercept from near surface.
  • High silver grade for an open-pit target.
  • Demonstrates continuity of mineralization down dip and expands potential to depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“23.21”

Context: 66.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · goldGrade: 2.309Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.309
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
30.4 m
To
57.8 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
30.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:30.4-57.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.095
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade included interval is exceptionally material, representing a very high-quality shallow intercept that significantly boosts the project's economic potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade for an open-pit target.
  • Significant width for a high-grade intercept.
  • Enhances the overall value of the broader shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“2.309”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · silverGrade: 43.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
43.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
30.4 m
To
57.8 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
30.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:30.4-57.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.095
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade included interval is exceptionally material, representing a very high-quality shallow intercept that significantly boosts the project's economic potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza silver grade for an open-pit target.
  • Significant width for a high-grade intercept.
  • Enhances the overall value of the broader shallow intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“43.23”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
88.2 m
To
107.9 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
88.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:88.2-107.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.283
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · silverGrade: 6.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
88.2 m
To
107.9 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
88.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:88.2-107.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.283
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.68”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · goldGrade: 0.395Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.395
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
114 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
114 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:114-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.62
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows good gold grades over a reasonable width at depth, contributing positively to the overall mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade for the depth.
  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.395”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · silverGrade: 12.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
114 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
114 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:114-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.62
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows good silver grades over a reasonable width at depth, contributing positively to the overall mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade for the depth.
  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“12.37”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · goldGrade: 0.092Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.092
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
142.9 m
To
167.2 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
142.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:142.9-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.221
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.092”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · silverGrade: 7.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
142.9 m
To
167.2 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
142.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:142.9-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.221
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“7.14”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · goldGrade: 0.105Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.105
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
174.8 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:174.8-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.286
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.105”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-19TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-19
Project
TR26-19 was drilled az 105 in the central portion of the northern Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
174.8 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
208.8 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-19:174.8-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588857
Northing
3507943
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.286
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“10.0”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-01Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
51.7 m
To
72.9 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:51.7-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.208
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width, with sampling issues due to historic workings, limiting its significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Presence of historic workings affecting sampling.

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-01Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
51.7 m
To
72.9 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:51.7-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.208
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades over a moderate width, but with sampling issues due to historic workings, limiting its significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Presence of historic workings affecting sampling.

Evidence · table

“11.76”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-01Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
86.6 m
To
110.9 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
86.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:86.6-110.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.23
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width, with significant sampling issues, limiting its significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Sampling issues due to historic workings and no recovery.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-01Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
86.6 m
To
110.9 m
Hole Depth
117.4 m
Intercept Depth
86.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-01:86.6-110.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588429
Northing
3508259
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.23
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades over a moderate width, but with significant sampling issues, limiting its significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.
  • Sampling issues due to historic workings and no recovery.

Evidence · table

“13.37”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.136
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
0 m
To
19.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:0-19.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.316
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization from surface.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.136”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
0 m
To
19.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:0-19.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.316
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows moderate silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization from surface.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“12.62”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.088
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
54.7 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
54.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:54.7-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.284
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.088”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
54.7 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
54.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:54.7-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.284
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, moderate-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“13.67”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.094Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.094
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
91.2 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
91.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:91.2-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.175
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.094”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
91.2 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
91.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:91.2-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.175
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“5.65”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.076Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.076
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
130.7 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:130.7-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.115
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.076”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
130.7 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
231.7 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-02:130.7-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588463
Northing
3507996
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.115
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“2.76”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.069Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.069
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.122
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.069”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.122
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.73”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.103
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
167.2 m
To
177.8 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:167.2-177.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.206
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.103”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
167.2 m
To
177.8 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:167.2-177.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.206
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“7.21”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.149Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.149
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
193 m
To
205.2 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
193 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:193-205.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.273
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.149”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
193 m
To
205.2 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
193 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-03:193-205.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588670
Northing
3508001
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.273
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
53.2 m
To
63.8 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:53.2-63.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.173
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, very low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
53.2 m
To
63.8 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:53.2-63.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.173
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“8.17”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.040”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
147.4 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
147.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:147.4-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.16”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
168.7 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
168.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:168.7-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.416
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.220”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
168.7 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
207.3 m
Intercept Depth
168.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-04:168.7-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588712
Northing
3508065
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.416
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with moderate grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“13.75”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.223Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.223
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
16.7 m
To
36.5 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:16.7-36.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.358
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.223”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
16.7 m
To
36.5 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:16.7-36.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.358
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“8.78”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.117
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
60.8 m
To
73 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:60.8-73
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.172
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.117”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
60.8 m
To
73 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:60.8-73
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.172
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
80.6 m
To
130.7 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
80.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:80.6-130.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.182
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows low gold grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
80.6 m
To
130.7 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
80.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:80.6-130.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.182
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows low silver grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.90”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.117
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
136.8 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
136.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:136.8-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.28
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.117”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
136.8 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
136.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:136.8-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.28
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver grades over a moderate width at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“11.44”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.086Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.086
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
165.7 m
To
174.8 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
165.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:165.7-174.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.152
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.086”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
165.7 m
To
174.8 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
165.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:165.7-174.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.152
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.65”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.119Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.119
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
182.4 m
To
217.4 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:182.4-217.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.204
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows low gold grades at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.119”

Context: 35.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
182.4 m
To
217.4 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
182.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:182.4-217.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.204
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows low silver grades at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“5.95”

Context: 35.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.091
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
231 m
To
255.3 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
231 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:231-255.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.142
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.091”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
231 m
To
255.3 m
Hole Depth
256.1 m
Intercept Depth
231 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-05:231-255.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507804
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.142
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with lower grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.124Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.124
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
31.9 m
To
47.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
31.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:31.9-47.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.182
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.124”

Context: 15.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
31.9 m
To
47.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
31.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:31.9-47.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.182
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.06”

Context: 15.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.223Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.223
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
62.3 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:62.3-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.39
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.223”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
62.3 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:62.3-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.39
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, moderate-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“11.66”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.159Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.159
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
88.2 m
To
120.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
88.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:88.2-120.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.214
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows low gold grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.159”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
88.2 m
To
120.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
88.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:88.2-120.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.214
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows low silver grades, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.86”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
130.7 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:130.7-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.474
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows very low gold grades at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 29.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
29.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
130.7 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:130.7-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.474
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows high silver grades at depth, contributing positively to the overall mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High silver grade for an open-pit target.
  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“29.22”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.104Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.104
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.3 m
From
202.2 m
To
261.5 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
202.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:202.2-261.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.175
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with low grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a very significant width of mineralization at depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.104”

Context: 59.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.3 m
From
202.2 m
To
261.5 m
Hole Depth
262.2 m
Intercept Depth
202.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-06:202.2-261.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588625
Northing
3507751
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.175
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, but with low grades, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a very significant width of mineralization at depth.
  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.96”

Context: 59.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.479Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.479
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
112.4 m
From
50.2 m
To
162.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
50.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:50.2-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.659
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept with good gold grades is highly material, indicating significant potential for bulk tonnage mineralization, despite some historic workings.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
  • Good gold grade for an open-pit target.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.
  • Presence of historic workings affecting sampling.

Evidence · table

“0.479”

Context: 112.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
112.4 m
From
50.2 m
To
162.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
50.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:50.2-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.659
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept with moderate silver grades is highly material, indicating significant potential for bulk tonnage mineralization, despite some historic workings.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
  • Moderate silver grade for an open-pit target.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.
  • Presence of historic workings affecting sampling.

Evidence · table

“12.64”

Context: 112.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.127Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.127
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
173.2 m
To
185.4 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:173.2-185.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.243
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.127”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
173.2 m
To
185.4 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:173.2-185.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.243
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low silver grades over a moderate width at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“8.11”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.049Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.049
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
221.9 m
To
238.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
221.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:221.9-238.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.156
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width at depth, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.049”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
221.9 m
To
238.6 m
Hole Depth
239.3 m
Intercept Depth
221.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-07:221.9-238.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588792
Northing
3507896
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.156
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low silver grades over a moderate width at depth, though the hole ending in mineralization is a positive sign for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Hole ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“7.49”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.576Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.576
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
121.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
121.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-08:121.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588445
Northing
3508184
Azimuth
18 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.696
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow but good-grade intercept contributes positively to the overall mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade for the depth.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.576”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
121.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
121.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-08:121.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588445
Northing
3508184
Azimuth
18 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.696
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept contributes positively to the overall mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“8.4”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.069Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.069
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
35 m
To
45.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:35-45.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.199
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.069”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 9.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
35 m
To
45.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:35-45.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.199
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint but with limited economic significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“9.06”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.181Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.181
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.2 m
To
59.3 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:53.2-59.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.367
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.181”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.2 m
To
59.3 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
53.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:53.2-59.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.367
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, moderate-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at shallow depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“13.1”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
158.1 m
To
164.1 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:158.1-164.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.147
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, very low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
158.1 m
To
164.1 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-09:158.1-164.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588487
Northing
3508275
Azimuth
114 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.147
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“7.37”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588271
Northing
3507282
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.293
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance, but confirms mineralization in a pre-collar.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588271
Northing
3507282
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.293
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance, but confirms mineralization in a pre-collar.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“9.15”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.173Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.173
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
100.3 m
From
100.3 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
250 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-11:100.3-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588653
Northing
3507717
Azimuth
109 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.337
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, contributing significantly to the overall mineralized footprint, despite low grades.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating very broad mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.173”

Context: 100.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
100.3 m
From
100.3 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
250 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-11:100.3-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588653
Northing
3507717
Azimuth
109 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.337
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept shows continued mineralization at depth, contributing significantly to the overall mineralized footprint, despite moderate grades.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating very broad mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“11.46”

Context: 100.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.172Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.172
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
100.3 m
To
149 m
Hole Depth
237.8 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-12:100.3-149
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588699
Northing
3507669
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.43
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows low gold grades at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.172”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 18.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
18.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
100.3 m
To
149 m
Hole Depth
237.8 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-12:100.3-149
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588699
Northing
3507669
Azimuth
125 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.43
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This wide intercept shows moderate silver grades at depth, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted a significant width of mineralization at depth.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“18.04”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.056Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.056
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
18.2 m
To
27.4 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
18.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:18.2-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.174
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, very low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.056”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
18.2 m
To
27.4 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
18.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:18.2-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.174
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“8.27”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.132Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.132
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
63.8 m
To
68.8 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
63.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:63.8-68.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.132”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
63.8 m
To
68.8 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
63.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:63.8-68.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, very low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.33”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
85.1 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:85.1-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, very low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
85.1 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:85.1-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“5.00”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.062Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.062
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
194.5 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:194.5-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.123
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, very low-grade intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.062”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.275Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.275
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
194.5 m
To
200.6 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
194.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-13:194.5-200.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588455
Northing
3508123
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.123
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, very low-grade silver intercept is of limited significance.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for silver.
  • Intercept length is narrow.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.275”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.195Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.195
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
0 m
To
10.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:0-10.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.381
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization from surface.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.195”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
0 m
To
10.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:0-10.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.381
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept shows moderate silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Intercepted mineralization from surface.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver but low for the overall context.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“13.00”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.618Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 107.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.618
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
107.9 m
From
39.5 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
39.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:39.5-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.972
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept with high gold grades is a highly material result, indicating significant potential for bulk tonnage mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating very broad mineralization.
  • High gold grade for an open-pit target.
  • Highly material result for the project.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.618”

Context: 107.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 24.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 107.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
24.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
107.9 m
From
39.5 m
To
147.4 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
39.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:39.5-147.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Easting
588669
Northing
3508049
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.972
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very wide intercept with high silver grades is a highly material result, indicating significant potential for bulk tonnage mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, indicating very broad mineralization.
  • High silver grade for an open-pit target.
  • Highly material result for the project.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“24.80”

Context: 107.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10 PCTombstone · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10 PC
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10 PC:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.293
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.162 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.162 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: TR26-10 PC

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-10 PCTombstone · silverGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-10 PC
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
118.6 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-10 PC:112.5-118.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.293
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 55.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.15”

Context: TR26-10 PC

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.091
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
176.3 m
To
225 m
Intercept Depth
176.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:176.3-225
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.206
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.091 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.091 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.091”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2026 Reported Result

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
176.3 m
To
225 m
Intercept Depth
176.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:176.3-225
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.206
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.11 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 394.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.11”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2026 Reported Result

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.121
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
234.1 m
To
243.2 m
Intercept Depth
234.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:234.1-243.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.267
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.121 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.121 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.121”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2026 Reported Result

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR26-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR26-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
234.1 m
To
243.2 m
Intercept Depth
234.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR26-14:234.1-243.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Contention Target
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.267
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.67 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 97.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.67 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.67”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2026 Reported Result

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.