Aztec Drills 40 RC holes at Tombstone Project, Arizona in 2025, Continues to Expand Shallow Silver-Gold Mineralization
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Aztec Minerals Corp.
- Ticker
- AZT
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Arizona
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 12:39:35 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Aztec Minerals announced drill results from 40 RC holes at its Tombstone Project in Arizona, continuing to expand shallow silver-gold mineralization. Highlights include bonanza grades in TR25-17 (4.6m at 58.5 gpt Au and 173.13 gpt Ag) and broad intercepts in TR25-09 (164.2m at 16.74 gpt AgEq) and TR25-14 (86.6m at 38.17 gpt AgEq). The program successfully extended mineralization laterally and at depth, targeting bulk tonnage, heap-leachable oxide material, with QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Reasoning: The document reports significant high-grade gold and silver drill intercepts, particularly in TR25-17, which includes bonanza grades. The drilling successfully expanded the mineralization laterally and at depth, confirming broad continuity for a shallow, bulk-tonnage, heap-leachable target. QA/QC is disclosed, enhancing confidence. However, the lack of true width reporting for all intercepts is a negative factor, and while metal equivalent assumptions are given, the underlying prices are not fully detailed.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold and silver intercepts, including bonanza grades in TR25-17
- Broad continuity of mineralization expanded to west, east, and depth
- Drill program targets shallow, bulk tonnage, heap leachable oxide mineralization, indicating potential for open-pit mining
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including use of certified lab (Bureau Veritas) and QP sign-off
- Step-out drilling successfully extended mineralization beyond previously known limits
Negative factors
- All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, which may overstate true thickness
- Metal equivalent assumptions are disclosed but the specific prices used for the 70:1 ratio are not explicitly stated, only the ratio itself
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 100
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Drill hole TR25-17 intersected 4.6m at 58.5 gpt Au and 173.13 gpt Ag, resulting in 4268.13 gpt AgEq, which is exceptionally high grade.
Evidence · table
“4268.13”
Context: 4.6
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of the mineralization, not true widths'.
Evidence · text
“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of the mineralization, not true widths, which can range at the property from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions that 'The samples are analyzed by Bureau Veritas for gold... The company uses quality assurance-quality control as a standard part of its sampling-assaying-assessments... containing certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.' and 'The scientific and technical information... has been reviewed and approved by Allen David Heyl, B.Sc., CPG - AIPG No.11277, VP Exploration of Aztec, a Qualified Person under NI43-101.'
Evidence · text
“The samples are analyzed by Bureau Veritas for gold with a 30-gram sample size using the method FA430 followed by MA300. Bureau Veritas is independent of the Company and of the Qualified Person. ... The company uses quality assurance-quality control as a standard part of its sampling-assaying-assessments in conjunction with its exploration sampling programs. Samples and their collection are controlled by an industry standard conforming QAQC program including all drill holes containing certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drilling program's primary objectives include 'Expand the known mineralization horizontally to the west, north and south, and down dip beyond the holes drilled by Aztec in 2020-24 at the Contention Pit with step outs to enlarge the shallow, broad, bulk tonnage gold-silver mineralization discovered there'.
Evidence · text
“Expand the known mineralization horizontally to the west, north and south, and down dip beyond the holes drilled by Aztec in 2020-24 at the Contention Pit with step outs to enlarge the shallow, broad, bulk tonnage gold-silver mineralization discovered there”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 100. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (100)
TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-09
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 12.1 m
- To
- 24.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 274.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-09:12.1-24.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588636
- Northing
- 3507894
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a low gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-09
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 12.1 m
- To
- 24.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 274.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-09:12.1-24.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588636
- Northing
- 3507894
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“9.49”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.312Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-09
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.312
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.4 m
- From
- 51.7 m
- To
- 85.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 274.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-09:51.7-85.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588636
- Northing
- 3507894
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 33.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.312”
Context: 33.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-09
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.4 m
- From
- 51.7 m
- To
- 85.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 274.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-09:51.7-85.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588636
- Northing
- 3507894
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 33.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“12.1”
Context: 33.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 164.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-09
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 164.2 m
- From
- 109.4 m
- To
- 273.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 274.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-09:109.4-273.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588636
- Northing
- 3507894
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very long intercept, despite low gold grades, significantly expands the mineralized volume and indicates broad continuity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Very long intercept length, indicating broad mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: 164.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 164.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-09
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 164.2 m
- From
- 109.4 m
- To
- 273.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 274.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-09:109.4-273.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588636
- Northing
- 3507894
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very long intercept, despite moderate silver grades, significantly expands the mineralized volume and indicates broad continuity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Very long intercept length, indicating broad mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“7.31”
Context: 164.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-10
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.192
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 72.9 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 72.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 79.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-10:0-72.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588833
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept from surface indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.192”
Context: 72.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 14.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-10
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 72.9 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 72.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 79.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-10:0-72.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588833
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept from surface indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“14.92”
Context: 72.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.485Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-10
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.485
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 31.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 79.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-10:21.3-31.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588833
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 70.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within TR25-10 enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Higher gold grade within a broader intercept
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“0.485”
Context: 10.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 36.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-10
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 31.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 79.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-10:21.3-31.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588833
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 70.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within TR25-10 enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Higher silver grade within a broader intercept
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“36.71”
Context: 10.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-11
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 88.2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 88.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-11:0-88.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588831
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept from surface indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: 88.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-11
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 88.2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 88.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-11:0-88.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588831
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept from surface indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“11.2”
Context: 88.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.453Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-11
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.453
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 107.9 m
- To
- 115.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-11:107.9-115.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588831
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 34.49
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within TR25-11 enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Higher gold grade within a broader intercept
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“0.453”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-11
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 107.9 m
- To
- 115.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-11:107.9-115.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588831
- Northing
- 3507673
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 34.49
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within TR25-11 enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Higher AgEq grade within a broader intercept
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low silver grade
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-12
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.041
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-12:0-6.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507599
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 17.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept from surface indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.041”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 15.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-12
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-12:0-6.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507599
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 17.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept from surface indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“15.1”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-12
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.5 m
- From
- 72.9 m
- To
- 112.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-12:72.9-112.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507599
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a low gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: 39.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-12
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.5 m
- From
- 72.9 m
- To
- 112.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-12:72.9-112.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507599
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“6.06”
Context: 39.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-12
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.043
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 153.5 m
- To
- 162.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-12:153.5-162.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507599
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.04
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a low gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.043”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-12
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 153.5 m
- To
- 162.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-12:153.5-162.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507599
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.04
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“4.03”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-13
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.045
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 155 m
- To
- 167.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-13:155-167.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588681
- Northing
- 3507534
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a low gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-13
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 155 m
- To
- 167.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-13:155-167.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588681
- Northing
- 3507534
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“11.78”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.214Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-14
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.214
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 86.6 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 109.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 134.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-14:21.3-109.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588792
- Northing
- 3507753
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 38.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept indicates significant mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.214”
Context: 86.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 23.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-14
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 86.6 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 109.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 134.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-14:21.3-109.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588792
- Northing
- 3507753
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 38.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept indicates significant mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“23.19”
Context: 86.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.811Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-14
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.811
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 36.5 m
- To
- 51.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 134.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-14:36.5-51.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588792
- Northing
- 3507753
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 118.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity of TR25-14. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“0.811”
Context: 15.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 61.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-14
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 61.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 36.5 m
- To
- 51.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 134.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-14:36.5-51.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588792
- Northing
- 3507753
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 118.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity of TR25-14. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver sub-interval
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“61.68”
Context: 15.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-14
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 124.6 m
- To
- 133.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 134.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-14:124.6-133.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588792
- Northing
- 3507753
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a low gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-14
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 124.6 m
- To
- 133.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 134.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-14:124.6-133.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588792
- Northing
- 3507753
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“8.38”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-15
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 27.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-15:0-27.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507572
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 17.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept from surface with good gold grade indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 27.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-15
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 27.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-15:0-27.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507572
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 17.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept from surface indicates shallow mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept from surface, indicating shallow mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“12.37”
Context: 27.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-15
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.041
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.7 m
- From
- 85.1 m
- To
- 104.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-15:85.1-104.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507572
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a low gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.041”
Context: 19.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-15
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.7 m
- From
- 85.1 m
- To
- 104.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-15:85.1-104.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588793
- Northing
- 3507572
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“7.07”
Context: 19.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50.2 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 195.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16:16.7-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588859
- Northing
- 3507946
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 92.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept with good gold grade indicates significant mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept with good gold grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 50.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 50.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50.2 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 195.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16:16.7-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588859
- Northing
- 3507946
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 92.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept with good silver grade indicates significant mineralization and contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept with good silver grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“50.76”
Context: 50.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.921Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.921
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 152 m
- To
- 161.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 195.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16:152-161.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588859
- Northing
- 3507946
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept with good gold grade contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“0.921”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 32.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 152 m
- To
- 161.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 195.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16:152-161.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588859
- Northing
- 3507946
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept with good silver grade contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“32.27”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17ATombstone · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17A
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.2 m
- From
- 12.2 m
- To
- 22.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 30.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17A:12.2-22.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588872
- Northing
- 3507989
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 80.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept with good gold grade over a significant width contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 18.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17ATombstone · silverGrade: 10.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17A
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.2 m
- From
- 12.2 m
- To
- 22.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 30.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17A:12.2-22.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588872
- Northing
- 3507989
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 80.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept with good AgEq grade over a significant width contributes to resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Good AgEq grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“10.96”
Context: 18.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57.8 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17:9.1-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588874
- Northing
- 3507992
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 400.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptional gold grades over a significant width, making it a highly material result for resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes significantly to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: 57.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 39.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57.8 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17:9.1-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588874
- Northing
- 3507992
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 400.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptional AgEq grades over a significant width, making it a highly material result for resource expansion. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Exceptional AgEq grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes significantly to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“39.12”
Context: 57.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 58.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 21.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17:16.7-21.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588874
- Northing
- 3507992
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4268.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval is an exceptional result, indicating very high-grade mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes significantly to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“58.5”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 173.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 173.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 21.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17:16.7-21.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588874
- Northing
- 3507992
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4268.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval is an exceptional result, indicating very high-grade mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Bonanza silver grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes significantly to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
Evidence · table
“173.13”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.323Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.323
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.8 m
- From
- 174.8 m
- To
- 197.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17:174.8-197.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588874
- Northing
- 3507992
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.84
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate gold grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.323”
Context: 22.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.8 m
- From
- 174.8 m
- To
- 197.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17:174.8-197.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588874
- Northing
- 3507992
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.84
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while having a moderate silver grade, contributes to the overall mineralization footprint and is part of a program expanding the resource. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource expansion
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
Evidence · table
“8.25”
Context: 22.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TC25-01Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TC25-01
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 105.1 m
- To
- 128 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 105.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TC25-01:105.1-128
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588540
- Northing
- 3507254
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 22.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TC25-01Tombstone · silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TC25-01
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 105.1 m
- To
- 128 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 105.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TC25-01:105.1-128
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588540
- Northing
- 3507254
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“23.0”
Context: 22.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02aTombstone · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02a
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 62.5 m
- From
- 73.1 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 158.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588721
- Northing
- 3507513
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 40.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 62.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02aTombstone · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02a
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 62.5 m
- From
- 73.1 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 158.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588721
- Northing
- 3507513
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 40.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“19.4”
Context: 62.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 68.6 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02:68.6-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588722
- Northing
- 3507589
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 29.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 68.6 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02:68.6-97.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588722
- Northing
- 3507589
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“10.4”
Context: 29.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35.1 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 158.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02:123.4-158.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588722
- Northing
- 3507589
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 35.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35.1 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 158.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02:123.4-158.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588722
- Northing
- 3507589
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“8.7”
Context: 35.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 182.9 m
- To
- 192 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02:182.9-192
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588722
- Northing
- 3507589
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 12.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-02
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 182.9 m
- To
- 192 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-02:182.9-192
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588722
- Northing
- 3507589
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 12.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“5.4”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-03
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50.3 m
- From
- 67 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-03:67-117.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588721
- Northing
- 3507586
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 89.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept with good gold grade indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept with good gold grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 50.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-03
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50.3 m
- From
- 67 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-03:67-117.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588721
- Northing
- 3507586
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 89.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept with good silver grade indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept with good silver grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“53.0”
Context: 50.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-03
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 88.4 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 88.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-03:88.4-94.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588721
- Northing
- 3507586
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 456.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade historical sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“2.26”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 253Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-03
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 253
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 88.4 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 152.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 88.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-03:88.4-94.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588721
- Northing
- 3507586
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 456.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade historical sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver sub-interval
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“253.0”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-04
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.04 m
- From
- 185.4 m
- To
- 188.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-04:185.4-188.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588524
- Northing
- 3507933
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 37.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 3.04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 27.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-04
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.04 m
- From
- 185.4 m
- To
- 188.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-04:185.4-188.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588524
- Northing
- 3507933
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 37.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“27.05”
Context: 3.04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-04
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.04 m
- From
- 196.1 m
- To
- 199.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-04:196.1-199.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588524
- Northing
- 3507933
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 22.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 3.04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-04
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.04 m
- From
- 196.1 m
- To
- 199.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-04:196.1-199.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588524
- Northing
- 3507933
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 22.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“6.15”
Context: 3.04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-05
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.1 m
- From
- 3.04 m
- To
- 50.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.04 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-05:3.04-50.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588826
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 85.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept with good gold grade indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept with good gold grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 47.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 36.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-05
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.1 m
- From
- 3.04 m
- To
- 50.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.04 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-05:3.04-50.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588826
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 85.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept with good silver grade indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept with good silver grade
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“36.36”
Context: 47.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-05
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 19.8 m
- To
- 24.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-05:19.8-24.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588826
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 590.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade historical sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“3.91”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 238.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-05
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 238.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 19.8 m
- To
- 24.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-05:19.8-24.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588826
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 590.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade historical sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver sub-interval
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“238.73”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 44.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:35-44.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 44.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:35-44.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“13.95”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.9 m
- From
- 76 m
- To
- 104.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:76-104.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade historical intercept over a significant width indicates strong mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold over a significant width
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.99”
Context: 28.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 70.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 70.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.9 m
- From
- 76 m
- To
- 104.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:76-104.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade historical intercept over a significant width indicates strong mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver over a significant width
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“70.83”
Context: 28.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.6 m
- To
- 86.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:83.6-86.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2149.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade historical sub-interval is an exceptional result. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade sub-interval
- Intercept contributes significantly to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“17.7”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 556.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 556.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.6 m
- To
- 86.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:83.6-86.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2149.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade historical sub-interval is an exceptional result. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Bonanza silver grade sub-interval
- Intercept contributes significantly to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“556.5”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.8 m
- From
- 112.5 m
- To
- 135.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 112.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:112.5-135.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 22.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-06
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.8 m
- From
- 112.5 m
- To
- 135.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 170.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 112.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-06:112.5-135.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588825
- Northing
- 3507637
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“5.06”
Context: 22.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 42.6 m
- To
- 56.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:42.6-56.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 22.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 13.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 42.6 m
- To
- 56.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:42.6-56.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 22.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“10.37”
Context: 13.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 68.4 m
- To
- 79 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:68.4-79
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 17.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 10.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 68.4 m
- To
- 79 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:68.4-79
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 17.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“3.80”
Context: 10.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.2 m
- From
- 103.4 m
- To
- 121.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:103.4-121.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 18.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.2 m
- From
- 103.4 m
- To
- 121.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:103.4-121.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“2.92”
Context: 18.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 41 m
- From
- 171.8 m
- To
- 212.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:171.8-212.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 41.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-07
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 41 m
- From
- 171.8 m
- To
- 212.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-07:171.8-212.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588647
- Northing
- 3507948
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“5.39”
Context: 41.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-08
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 48.6 m
- To
- 60.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-08:48.6-60.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588639
- Northing
- 3507848
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 155.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept with good gold grade over a significant width indicates strong mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 94.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-08
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 94.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 48.6 m
- To
- 60.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-08:48.6-60.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588639
- Northing
- 3507848
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 155.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept with good silver grade over a significant width indicates strong mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade over a significant width
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“94.47”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-08
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 74.5 m
- From
- 47.1 m
- To
- 121.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-08:47.1-121.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588639
- Northing
- 3507848
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 74.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 19.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-08
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 74.5 m
- From
- 47.1 m
- To
- 121.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-08:47.1-121.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588639
- Northing
- 3507848
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad historical intercept indicates significant mineralization. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“19.85”
Context: 74.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-08
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 31.9 m
- From
- 156.6 m
- To
- 188.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-08:156.6-188.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588639
- Northing
- 3507848
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Low gold grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 31.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-08
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 31.9 m
- From
- 156.6 m
- To
- 188.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-08:156.6-188.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 588639
- Northing
- 3507848
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- gpt Ag Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept contributes to resource definition. QA/QC is disclosed, but only apparent width is reported, and it is a re-release of prior data.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to overall resource definition
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only reported
- Moderate silver grade
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“6.04”
Context: 31.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TR25-16*Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50.2 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16*:16.7-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 92.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: TR25-16*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-16*Tombstone · silverGrade: 50.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50.2 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16*:16.7-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 92.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.76 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2548.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“50.76”
Context: TR25-16*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-16*Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.921Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.921
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 152 m
- To
- 161.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16*:152-161.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.921 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.921”
Context: Table 1A: Contention & Head Center Area
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-16*Tombstone · silverGrade: 32.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-16*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 152 m
- To
- 161.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-16*:152-161.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.27 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 293.7 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.27”
Context: Table 1A: Contention & Head Center Area
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17A*Tombstone · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17A*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.2 m
- From
- 12.2 m
- To
- 22.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17A*:12.2-22.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 80.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: TR25-17A*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17A*Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17A*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.2 m
- From
- 12.2 m
- To
- 22.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17A*:12.2-22.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 80.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 199.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.96”
Context: TR25-17A*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17*Tombstone · goldGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57.8 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17*:9.1-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 400.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 298.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: TR25-17*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17*Tombstone · silverGrade: 39.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57.8 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 66.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17*:9.1-66.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 400.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.12 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2261.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“39.12”
Context: TR25-17*
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17*Tombstone · goldGrade: 58.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 21.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17*:16.7-21.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4268.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 269.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“58.5”
Context: Including:
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17*Tombstone · silverGrade: 173.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 173.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 16.7 m
- To
- 21.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17*:16.7-21.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4268.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173.13 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 796.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“173.13”
Context: Including:
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17*Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.323Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.323
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.8 m
- From
- 174.8 m
- To
- 197.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17*:174.8-197.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.84
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.323 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.323”
Context: Table 1A: Contention & Head Center Area
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TR25-17*Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TR25-17*
- Project
- Tombstone
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- AZT
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.8 m
- From
- 174.8 m
- To
- 197.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TR25-17*:174.8-197.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.84
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 188.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.25”
Context: Table 1A: Contention & Head Center Area
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.