Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Aztec Minerals Corp.
Ticker
AZT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Arizona
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 12:36:11 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aztec Minerals Corp. announced high-grade silver equivalent drill results from its Tombstone Project in Arizona, including 48.6 meters at 133.1 gpt AgEq from surface in hole TR25-26 and 152.4 meters at 36.32 gpt AgEq in TR25-24. The company has expanded its drill program by 3,500 meters, citing broad continuity of oxidized silver-gold mineralization that remains open at depth and along strike. All reported widths are apparent, not true widths, and metal equivalent ratios have varied over time.

Reasoning: The document reports strong drill results with high silver equivalent grades and significant intercept lengths, particularly from surface, at the Tombstone Project. The expansion of the drill program and the indication that mineralization remains open suggest positive future potential. However, the lack of true width disclosure and changing metal equivalent ratios are minor concerns.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercepts from surface, indicating potential for open-pit mining.
  • Significant intercept lengths, including 48.6m at 133.1 gpt AgEq and 152.4m at 36.32 gpt AgEq.
  • Drill program expansion by 3,500m demonstrates continued exploration success and confidence.
  • Mineralization remains open at depth and along strike, indicating further growth potential.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified blanks, standards, and duplicates, and analysis by an independent laboratory.

Negative factors

  • Reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, which may overstate true thickness.
  • Metal equivalent assumptions (Ag:Au ratio) have changed over time, which can complicate historical comparisons.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 130

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole TR25-24 includes a sub-interval of 10.6 meters at 212.35 gpt AgEq, which is an exceptionally high-grade zone for silver.

Evidence · table

“212.35”

Context: 10.6

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole TR25-24 includes a sub-interval of 4.6 meters at 176.57 gpt AgEq, which is an exceptionally high-grade zone for silver.

Evidence · table

“176.57”

Context: 4.6

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole TR25-26 intersected 48.6 meters at 133.13 gpt AgEq from surface, which is an exceptionally high-grade zone for silver.

Evidence · table

“133.13”

Context: 48.6

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths'.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of mineralization, not true widths, which can range at the property from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions that 'The company uses quality assurance-quality control as a standard part of its sampling-assaying-assessments in conjunction with its exploration sampling programs. Samples and their collection are controlled by an industry standard conforming QAQC program including all drill holes containing certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.'

Evidence · text

“The company uses quality assurance-quality control as a standard part of its sampling-assaying-assessments in conjunction with its exploration sampling programs. Samples and their collection are controlled by an industry standard conforming QAQC program including all drill holes containing certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.”

Certified Labpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Samples are analyzed by Bureau Veritas, which is stated to be independent and accredited.

Evidence · text

“The samples are analyzed by Bureau Veritas for gold with a 30-gram sample size using the method FA430 followed by MA300. Bureau Veritas is independent of the Company and of the Qualified Person.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The scientific and technical information has been reviewed and approved by Allen David Heyl, VP Exploration of Aztec, a Qualified Person under NI43-101.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Allen David Heyl, B.Sc., CPG - AIPG No.11277, VP Exploration of Aztec, a Qualified Person under NI43-101.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The drilling program aims to 'Expand the known mineralization horizontally to the west, north and south, and down dip beyond the holes drilled by Aztec in 2020-24 at the Contention Pit with step outs'.

Evidence · text

“Expand the known mineralization horizontally to the west, north and south, and down dip beyond the holes drilled by Aztec in 2020-24 at the Contention Pit with step outs to enlarge the shallow, broad, bulk tonnage gold-silver mineralization discovered there”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: The silver:gold ratio used for AgEq calculation has changed multiple times (70:1, 90:1, 80:1) across different reporting periods, which complicates direct comparison and transparency.

Evidence · text

“Gold and Silver equivalents are calculated using a 70:1 silver:gold ratio for holes reported since November 2025, 90:1 in 2025 prior to November, 80:1 2023 and 2024, and a 70:1 silver:gold ratio in 2021.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 130. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (130)

TR25-18Tombstone · silverGrade: 48.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
48.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
22.8 m
To
31.9 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-18:22.8-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588427
Northing
3507861
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
65.81
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a decent width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit, with potential for extension.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a reasonable width.
  • Mineralization remains open in all directions and to depth.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“48.67”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-18Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.245Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.245
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
22.8 m
To
31.9 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-18:22.8-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588427
Northing
3507861
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
65.81
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value for this intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.245”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-19Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-19
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
158.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-19:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588414
Northing
3507712
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.95
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade from surface, but contributes to understanding the near-surface mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“7.94”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-19Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-19
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
158.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-19:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588414
Northing
3507712
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.95
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-21Tombstone · silverGrade: 16.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
16.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
83.6 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:83.6-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.21
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing to the understanding of mineralization continuity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“16.2”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-21Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.143Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.143
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
83.6 m
To
91.2 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:83.6-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.21
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.143”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-21Tombstone · silverGrade: 15.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
100.3 m
To
126.1 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:100.3-126.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.53
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating continuity of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“15.73”

Context: 25.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-21Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
100.3 m
To
126.1 m
Hole Depth
194.5 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:100.3-126.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588571
Northing
3508197
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.53
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: 25.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-22Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.3 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:16.7-21.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.43”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-22Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.083Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.083
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.3 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:16.7-21.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.083”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-22Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
60.8 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:60.8-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.96
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.23”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-22Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.067Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.067
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
60.8 m
To
69.9 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:60.8-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588772
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.96
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.067”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-23Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.56
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade from surface, but contributes to understanding the near-surface mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“7.25”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-23Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.161
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.56
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.161”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-23Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
22.8 m
To
30.4 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:22.8-30.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
20.33
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“12.48”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-23Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
22.8 m
To
30.4 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:22.8-30.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
20.33
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-23Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
118.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m
Intercept Depth
118.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:118.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.15
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“5.07”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-23Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
118.6 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
205.2 m
Intercept Depth
118.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:118.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588769
Northing
3507516
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.15
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-24Tombstone · silverGrade: 19.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 152.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
152.4 m
From
0 m
To
152.4 m
Hole Depth
155 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:0-152.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.32
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very long intercept from surface with a good silver equivalent grade, indicating significant bulk tonnage potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length from surface.
  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a very broad width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“19.81”

Context: 152.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-24Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.236Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 152.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.236
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
152.4 m
From
0 m
To
152.4 m
Hole Depth
155 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:0-152.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.32
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate over a very broad width, contributing significantly to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.236”

Context: 152.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-24Tombstone · silverGrade: 81.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
81.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m
Hole Depth
155 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:3-13.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
212.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval represents a bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept from near surface, significantly enhancing the overall hole's value.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a good width.
  • Intercept from near surface.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“81.41”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-24Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.871Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.871
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m
Hole Depth
155 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:3-13.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
212.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The strong gold grade contributes significantly to the bonanza silver equivalent value in this sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.871”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-24Tombstone · silverGrade: 92.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
92.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
50.1 m
To
54.7 m
Hole Depth
155 m
Intercept Depth
50.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:50.1-54.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176.57
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval also shows a bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept, further highlighting the high-grade nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“92.8”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-24Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.197Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.197
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
50.1 m
To
54.7 m
Hole Depth
155 m
Intercept Depth
50.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:50.1-54.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588776
Northing
3507517
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176.57
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The strong gold grade contributes significantly to the bonanza silver equivalent value in this sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.197”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
25.56
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade from surface over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“11.5”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.186Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.186
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
25.56
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.186”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
48.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:36.5-48.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.32
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“5.39”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.042Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.042
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
48.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:36.5-48.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.32
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.042”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
111 m
To
159.6 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:111-159.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.19
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating broad but lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.79”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.106Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.106
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
111 m
To
159.6 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:111-159.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.19
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.106”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
171.8 m
To
203.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:171.8-203.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.36
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating broad but lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“8.65”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.139Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.139
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
171.8 m
To
203.7 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:171.8-203.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.36
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.139”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 15.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
225 m
To
247.8 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
225 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:225-247.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating continuity of mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“15.15”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.192
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
225 m
To
247.8 m
Hole Depth
252.3 m
Intercept Depth
225 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:225-247.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588671
Northing
3508000
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.192”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-26Tombstone · silverGrade: 58.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
58.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
0 m
To
48.6 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:0-48.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
133.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept from surface over a significant width, representing a highly material result.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a significant width.
  • Intercept from surface, indicating potential for open-pit mining.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“58.93”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-26Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
0 m
To
48.6 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:0-48.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
133.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The strong gold grade contributes significantly to the bonanza silver equivalent value in this long intercept from surface.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a significant width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 48.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-26Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
130.7 m
To
141.3 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:130.7-141.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.34
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width at depth.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.06”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-26Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.061
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
130.7 m
To
141.3 m
Hole Depth
182.4 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:130.7-141.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588879
Northing
3508028
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.34
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.061”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TC25-01Tombstone · silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
105.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.4
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width, providing context for the current drilling program.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“23.0”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TC25-01Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
105.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.4
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02aTombstone · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
73.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
40.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a significant width, providing context for the current drilling program.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“19.4”

Context: 62.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02aTombstone · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
73.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
40.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 62.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
27.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“10.4”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
27.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
123.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:123.4-158.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.8
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 35.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
123.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:123.4-158.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.8
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 35.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:182.9-192
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.9
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“5.4”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:182.9-192
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.9
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
89.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating good mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“53.0”

Context: 50.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
89.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing significantly to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 50.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 253Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
253
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
456.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“253.0”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
456.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The strong gold grade contributes significantly to the bonanza silver equivalent value in this historical sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 27.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
27.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
185.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
37.17
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“27.05”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
185.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
37.17
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Narrow width.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
196.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:196.1-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Narrow width.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“6.15”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
196.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:196.1-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Narrow width.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 36.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
36.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
3.04 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85.46
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a significant width from near surface, indicating good mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade over a significant width.
  • Intercept from near surface.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“36.36”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
3.04 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85.46
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing significantly to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 238.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
238.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
19.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
590.42
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“238.73”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
19.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
590.42
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The strong gold grade contributes significantly to the bonanza silver equivalent value in this historical sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“3.91”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“13.95”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 70.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
70.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:76-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
250.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional silver equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating a high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“70.83”

Context: 28.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:76-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
250.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The strong gold grade contributes significantly to the exceptional silver equivalent value in this historical intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“1.99”

Context: 28.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 556.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
556.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2149.5
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept, indicating a very high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“556.5”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
17.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2149.5
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The exceptional gold grade contributes significantly to the bonanza silver equivalent value in this historical sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:112.5-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.38
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“5.06”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:112.5-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.38
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
42.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.64
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“10.37”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
42.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.64
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
68.4 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:68.4-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“3.80”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
68.4 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:68.4-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
103.4 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
103.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:103.4-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.31
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“2.92”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
103.4 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
103.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:103.4-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.31
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41 m
From
171.8 m
To
212.8 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:171.8-212.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.89
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“5.39”

Context: 41.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41 m
From
171.8 m
To
212.8 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:171.8-212.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.89
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 41.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 94.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
94.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
48.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
155.78
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a bonanza-grade silver equivalent, indicating a high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“94.47”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
48.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
155.78
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The moderate gold grade contributes significantly to the exceptional silver equivalent value in this historical intercept.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 19.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74.5 m
From
47.1 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
47.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:47.1-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a very broad width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a very broad width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“19.85”

Context: 74.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74.5 m
From
47.1 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
47.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:47.1-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 74.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
156.6 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:156.6-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.72
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“6.04”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
156.6 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:156.6-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.72
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
12.1 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
12.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:12.1-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“9.49”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
12.1 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
12.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:12.1-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.4 m
From
51.7 m
To
85.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:51.7-85.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.92
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“12.1”

Context: 33.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.312Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.312
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.4 m
From
51.7 m
To
85.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:51.7-85.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.92
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.312”

Context: 33.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 164.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
164.2 m
From
109.4 m
To
273.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
109.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:109.4-273.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a very significant width, indicating broad but lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“7.31”

Context: 164.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 164.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.014
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
164.2 m
From
109.4 m
To
273.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
109.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:109.4-273.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.014”

Context: 164.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 14.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
14.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
72.9 m
From
0 m
To
72.9 m
Hole Depth
79.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:0-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588833
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a very broad width from surface, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a very broad width.
  • Intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“14.92”

Context: 72.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.192
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
72.9 m
From
0 m
To
72.9 m
Hole Depth
79.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:0-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588833
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.37
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.192”

Context: 72.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 36.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
36.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
31.9 m
Hole Depth
79.3 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:21.3-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588833
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70.65
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“36.71”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.485Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.485
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
31.9 m
Hole Depth
79.3 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:21.3-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588833
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70.65
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical sub-interval, contributing significantly to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.485”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.2 m
From
0 m
To
88.2 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:0-88.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588831
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a very significant width from surface, indicating broad but lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very significant intercept length.
  • Intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“11.2”

Context: 88.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.033
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.2 m
From
0 m
To
88.2 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:0-88.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588831
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.033”

Context: 88.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
107.9 m
To
115.5 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
107.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:107.9-115.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588831
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
34.49
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“2.78”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.453Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.453
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
107.9 m
To
115.5 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
107.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:107.9-115.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588831
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
34.49
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.453”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 15.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507599
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade from surface over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“15.1”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507599
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.94
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
112.5 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:72.9-112.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507599
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.87
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“6.06”

Context: 39.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
112.5 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:72.9-112.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507599
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.87
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: 39.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
153.5 m
To
162.6 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
153.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:153.5-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507599
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“4.03”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
153.5 m
To
162.6 m
Hole Depth
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
153.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:153.5-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507599
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.04
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
155 m
To
167.2 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
155 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-13:155-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588681
Northing
3507534
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.92
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“11.78”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.045
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
155 m
To
167.2 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
155 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-13:155-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588681
Northing
3507534
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.92
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.045”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 23.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
109.4 m
Hole Depth
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:21.3-109.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588792
Northing
3507753
Azimuth
115 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a very broad width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a very broad width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“23.19”

Context: 86.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.214Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.214
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
109.4 m
Hole Depth
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:21.3-109.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588792
Northing
3507753
Azimuth
115 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.17
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.214”

Context: 86.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 61.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
61.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
51.7 m
Hole Depth
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:36.5-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588792
Northing
3507753
Azimuth
115 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
118.42
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“61,68”

Context: 15.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.811Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.811
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
51.7 m
Hole Depth
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:36.5-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588792
Northing
3507753
Azimuth
115 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
118.42
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The moderate gold grade contributes significantly to the strong silver equivalent value in this historical sub-interval.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.811”

Context: 15.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
124.6 m
To
133.7 m
Hole Depth
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
124.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:124.6-133.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588792
Northing
3507753
Azimuth
115 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“8.38”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.032
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
124.6 m
To
133.7 m
Hole Depth
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
124.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:124.6-133.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588792
Northing
3507753
Azimuth
115 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.032”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
0 m
To
27.4 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:0-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507572
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width from surface.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.
  • Intercept from surface.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“12.37”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
0 m
To
27.4 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:0-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507572
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.83
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 27.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.7 m
From
85.1 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:85.1-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507572
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low silver equivalent grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“7.07”

Context: 19.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.7 m
From
85.1 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:85.1-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588793
Northing
3507572
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical intercept, contributing minimally to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: 19.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 50.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
50.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
92.39
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating good mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade over a significant width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“50.76”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
92.39
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing significantly to the overall silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 32.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
32.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.73
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating a high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“32.27”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.921Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.921
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.73
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is moderate for this historical intercept, contributing significantly to the strong silver equivalent value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not disclosed.
  • Historical data, lower novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.921”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16*Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16*:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
92.39
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: TR25-16*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16*Tombstone · silverGrade: 50.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
50.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16*:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
92.39
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.76 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2548.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“50.76”

Context: TR25-16*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16*Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.921Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.921
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16*:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.921 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.921”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-16*Tombstone · silverGrade: 32.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
32.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16*:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.27 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 293.7 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.27”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17A*Tombstone · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17A*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
22.8 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17A*:12.2-22.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
80.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: TR25-17A*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17A*Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17A*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
22.8 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17A*:12.2-22.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
80.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 199.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.96”

Context: TR25-17A*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17*Tombstone · goldGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
57.8 m
From
9.1 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
9.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:9.1-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
400.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 298.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.16”

Context: TR25-17*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17*Tombstone · silverGrade: 39.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
39.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
57.8 m
From
9.1 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
9.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:9.1-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
400.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.12 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2261.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“39.12”

Context: TR25-17*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17*Tombstone · goldGrade: 58.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
58.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4268.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 269.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“58.5”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17*Tombstone · silverGrade: 173.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
173.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4268.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173.13 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 796.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“173.13”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17*Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.323Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.323
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
174.8 m
To
197.6 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:174.8-197.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
30.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.323 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.323”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

TR25-17*Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17*
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
174.8 m
To
197.6 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17*:174.8-197.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
30.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 188.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.25”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Aztec Drills 48.6m of 133.1 gpt AgEq from Surface at Tombstone Project, Arizona and Expands Drill Program by 3,500m Azte"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.