Aztec Drills 8.14 gpt Gold and 49.67 gpt Silver over 36.5 meters, including 58.5 gpt Gold and 158.0 gpt Silver over 4.6 meters, at the Tombstone Project, Arizona

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Aztec Minerals Corp.
Ticker
AZT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Arizona
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 13:09:31 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aztec Minerals announced high-grade gold and silver drill results from its Tombstone Project in Arizona, including 36.5 meters averaging 8.14 gpt gold and 49.67 gpt silver in hole TR25-17, with a bonanza intercept of 4.6 meters at 58.5 gpt gold and 158.0 gpt silver. These results extend mineralization into a previously untested area and confirm the project's potential for shallow, oxide gold-silver mineralization. The company noted that all reported widths are apparent, not true widths.

Reasoning: The document reports high-grade gold and silver drill results from the Tombstone Project, including a bonanza intercept in TR25-17, which significantly extends mineralization into a new area. The results are material due to their grade and width, and novel as they are from a previously untested zone. The company discloses QA/QC, but the lack of true width reporting and full metal equivalent assumptions are minor drawbacks.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold and silver intercepts, particularly in TR25-17, exceeding exceptional thresholds for gold and silver in an open-pit context.
  • Broad zones of mineralization, indicating potential for bulk tonnage.
  • Extension of mineralization into a previously untested area (Head Center Area), demonstrating exploration success.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off, enhancing data credibility.
  • Drill program aims to expand known mineralization horizontally and at depth, indicating clear exploration objectives.

Negative factors

  • Only apparent widths are reported, which may overstate true thickness.
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are disclosed but the specific prices and recoveries used for the 2025 ratio (90:1 Ag:Au) are not explicitly stated in the main text, only the ratio itself.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 56

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Drillhole TR25-17 intersected 4.6m averaging 58.5 gpt Au and 158.0 gpt Ag, which is exceptionally high-grade for both gold and silver, exceeding the exceptional threshold for gold (5 g/t) and silver (500 g/t) in an open-pit context.

Evidence · text

“including 4.6m averaging 58.5 gpt Au and 158.0 gpt Ag from 16.7m”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all reported intersection lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, which can range from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.

Evidence · text

“All reported intersection lengths are apparent widths of the mineralization, not true widths, which can range at the property from 30% to 100% of apparent widths.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions that samples are analyzed by Bureau Veritas, an independent lab, and that the company uses an industry-standard QAQC program including certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“The samples are analyzed by Bureau Veritas for gold with a 30-gram sample size using the method FA430 followed by MA300. Bureau Veritas is independent of the Company and of the Qualified Person. ... The company uses quality assurance-quality control as a standard part of its sampling-assaying-assessments in conjunction with its exploration sampling programs. Samples and their collection are controlled by an industry standard conforming QAQC program including all drill holes containing certified blanks, standards, and duplicates.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drillhole TR25-17 tested a previously undrilled area in the northern portion of the Contention Target, extending the known mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Drillhole TR25-17 intersected a broad zone of 36.5m averaging 8.14 gpt Au and 49.67 gpt Ag from 9.1 m including 4.6m averaging 58.5 gpt Au and 158.0 gpt Ag from 16.7m at a previously untested area of northern portion of the Contention Target”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The scientific and technical information has been reviewed and approved by Allen David Heyl, VP Exploration of Aztec, a Qualified Person under NI43-101.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Allen David Heyl, B.Sc., CPG - AIPG No.11277, VP Exploration of Aztec, a Qualified Person under NI43-101.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 56. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (56)

TR25-16potential expansion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.675Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
potential expansion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.675
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74.29
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of gold mineralization in a new area, contributing positively to the project's understanding, though the gold grade is moderate.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.
  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“0.675”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-16potential expansion of the Contention · silverGrade: 42.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
potential expansion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
42.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74.29
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of silver mineralization in a new area, contributing positively to the project's understanding, though the silver grade is weak.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.
  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“42.67”

Context: 50.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-16potential expansion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.921Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
potential expansion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.921
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
91.54
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the new area.

Positive factors

  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“0.921”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-16potential expansion of the Contention · silverGrade: 8.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
potential expansion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Hole Depth
195.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588859
Northing
3507946
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
91.54
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the new area.

Positive factors

  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“8.67”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17aTombstone · goldGrade: 0.583Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.583
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
30.4 m
Hole Depth
30.4 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17a:12.2-30.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588872
Northing
3507989
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
53.08
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade over a moderate width, but the presence of a stope indicates historical mining and complicates interpretation.

Positive factors

  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Presence of a large stope.

Evidence · table

“0.583”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17aTombstone · silverGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
30.4 m
Hole Depth
30.4 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17a:12.2-30.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588872
Northing
3507989
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
53.08
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade over a moderate width, but the presence of a stope indicates historical mining and complicates interpretation.

Positive factors

  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Presence of a large stope.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 8.138Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.138
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.5 m
From
9.1 m
To
45.6 m
Hole Depth
192 m
Intercept Depth
9.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:9.1-45.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588874
Northing
3507992
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
782.11
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept represents a significant high-grade gold discovery over a substantial width in a new area, making it highly material and novel.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade for an open-pit context.
  • Strong width of mineralization.
  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating significant exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“8.138”

Context: 36.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 49.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
49.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.5 m
From
9.1 m
To
45.6 m
Hole Depth
192 m
Intercept Depth
9.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:9.1-45.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588874
Northing
3507992
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
782.11
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of silver mineralization in a new area, contributing positively to the project's understanding, though the silver grade is weak.

Positive factors

  • Strong width of mineralization.
  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating significant exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“49.67”

Context: 36.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 58.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
58.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m
Hole Depth
192 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588874
Northing
3507992
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5423
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade gold intercept over a moderate width, representing a highly significant discovery in a new area.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade, indicating a bonanza intercept.
  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating significant exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“58.5”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 158Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
158
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m
Hole Depth
192 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588874
Northing
3507992
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5423
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong silver intercept over a moderate width, contributing significantly to the overall high-grade discovery in a new area.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade, indicating a bonanza intercept.
  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating significant exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“158”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.423Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.423
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
174.8 m
To
191.5 m
Hole Depth
192 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:174.8-191.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588874
Northing
3507992
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.11
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the new area but not highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“0.423”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
174.8 m
To
191.5 m
Hole Depth
192 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:174.8-191.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Head Center Mine area
Easting
588874
Northing
3507992
Azimuth
104 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.11
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the new area but not highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Located in a previously untested area, indicating exploration success.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TC25-01Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
105.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.4
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TC25-01Tombstone · silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
105.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.4
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“23.0”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02aTombstone · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
73.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
40.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak gold grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 62.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02aTombstone · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
73.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
40.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“19.4”

Context: 62.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
27.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
27.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“10.4”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
123.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:123.4-158.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.8
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 35.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
123.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:123.4-158.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.8
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 35.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:182.9-192
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.9
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:182.9-192
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.9
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“5.4”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
89.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak gold grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 50.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
89.7
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“53.0”

Context: 50.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
456.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with strong gold grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for an open-pit context.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 253Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
253
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
456.6
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with strong silver grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade for an open-pit context.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“253.0”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
185.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
37.17
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade over a very narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Very narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 27.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
27.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
185.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
37.17
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade over a very narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Very narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“27.05”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
196.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:196.1-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade over a very narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Very narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
196.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:196.1-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.35
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade over a very narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Very narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“6.15”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
3.04 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85.46
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak gold grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 36.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
36.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
3.04 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85.46
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“36.36”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
19.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
590.42
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with strong gold grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for an open-pit context.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“3.91”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 238.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
238.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
19.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
590.42
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with strong silver grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade for an open-pit context.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“238.73”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.13
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“13.95”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:76-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
250.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with strong gold grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for an open-pit context.
  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“1.99”

Context: 28.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 70.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
70.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:76-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
250.22
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“70.83”

Context: 28.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
17.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2149.5
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional gold grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade for an open-pit context.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 556.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
556.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2149.5
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional silver grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade for an open-pit context.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“556.5”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:112.5-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.38
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:112.5-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.38
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“5.06”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
42.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.64
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
42.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.64
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“10.37”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
68.4 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:68.4-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
68.4 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:68.4-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“3.80”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
103.4 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
103.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:103.4-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.31
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
103.4 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
103.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:103.4-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.31
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“2.92”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41 m
From
171.8 m
To
212.8 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:171.8-212.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.89
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 41.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41 m
From
171.8 m
To
212.8 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:171.8-212.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.89
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade over a good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“5.39”

Context: 41.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
48.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
155.78
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with moderate gold grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 94.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
94.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
48.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
155.78
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with moderate silver grade over a narrow width, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“94.47”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74.5 m
From
47.1 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
47.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:47.1-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak gold grade over a very good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Very good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 74.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 19.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74.5 m
From
47.1 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
47.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:47.1-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.45
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with weak silver grade over a very good width, providing context but not new material information.

Positive factors

  • Very good width of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“19.85”

Context: 74.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
156.6 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:156.6-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.72
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak gold grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
156.6 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:156.6-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.72
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very weak silver grade, providing context but not new material information.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open-pit context.
  • Only apparent width reported.
  • Historical data, low novelty.

Evidence · table

“6.04”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.