Aztec Drills Oxide Gold & Silver in the Westside Area of the Tombstone Project, Arizona; Intersecting 44.1m of 0.86gpt AuEq (0.22 gpt Au and 44.6 gpt Ag) as Part of a 250m Step Out; And has Joined the Contention and Westside Areas

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Aztec Minerals Corp.
Ticker
AZT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Arizona
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 12:07:51 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Aztec Minerals announced new drill results from its 2025-2026 program at the Tombstone Project in Arizona, highlighting successful step-out drilling that expanded oxide gold and silver mineralization. Key intercepts include 44.1m of 0.86 gpt AuEq in hole TR25-36 and 40.2m of 1.09 gpt AuEq in TR25-34, with several high-grade sub-intervals. The drilling has extended the known mineralization and joined target areas, indicating a larger, shallow, oxide system.

Reasoning: The document reports strong drill results from step-out holes that significantly expand the known gold-silver mineralization at the Tombstone Project. The intercepts include high-grade zones and broad oxide mineralization, indicating potential for a large, shallow, heap-leachable deposit. The program successfully joined previously separate target areas, demonstrating continuity. While true widths are not stated, the overall results are highly positive for the project's scale and potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant step-out drilling successfully extended known mineralization, demonstrating potential for a larger system.
  • High-grade gold and silver intercepts were reported, including bonanza grades in some sub-intervals.
  • Broad zones of shallow, oxide gold-silver mineralization were intersected, which is favorable for open-pit, heap-leachable operations.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off.

Negative factors

  • True widths are not reported, and apparent widths may overstate true thickness.
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are disclosed, but the ratio changed over time, which can complicate comparisons.

Facts used in scoring: 180

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 180. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (180)

TR25-32area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-32
Project
area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
28.9 m
To
47.1 m
Hole Depth
225 m
Intercept Depth
28.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-32:28.9-47.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Easting
588746
Northing
3507408
Azimuth
420 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, contributing to the overall understanding of the Contention system, but the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-32area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · silverGrade: 27.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-32
Project
area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
27.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
28.9 m
To
47.1 m
Hole Depth
225 m
Intercept Depth
28.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-32:28.9-47.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Easting
588746
Northing
3507408
Azimuth
420 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, contributing to the overall understanding of the Contention system, but the silver grade is low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“27.94”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-32area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-32
Project
area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.3 m
From
98.8 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
225 m
Intercept Depth
98.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-32:98.8-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Easting
588746
Northing
3507408
Azimuth
420 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 59.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-32area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · silverGrade: 8.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-32
Project
area to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.3 m
From
98.8 m
To
158.1 m
Hole Depth
225 m
Intercept Depth
98.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-32:98.8-158.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Easting
588746
Northing
3507408
Azimuth
420 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“8.92”

Context: 59.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.091
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
0 m
To
9.1 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:0-9.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.152
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the gold grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.091”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · silverGrade: 4.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
0 m
To
9.1 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:0-9.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.152
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“4.25”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
18.2 m
To
42.5 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
18.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:18.2-42.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.794
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · silverGrade: 38.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
38.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
18.2 m
To
42.5 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
18.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:18.2-42.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.794
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“38.06”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.178Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.178
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
62.3 m
To
83.6 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:62.3-83.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.356
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.178”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · silverGrade: 12.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
62.3 m
To
83.6 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:62.3-83.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.356
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“12.48”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.511Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.511
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
98.8 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
98.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:98.8-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.561
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.511”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · silverGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
98.8 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
98.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:98.8-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.561
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“3.48”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · goldGrade: 0.257Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.257
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
42.6 m
From
109.4 m
To
152 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
109.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:109.4-152
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.452
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.257”

Context: 42.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-33area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-33
Project
area atop the unmined land bridge between the two pits to test the Grand Central portion of the Contention
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
42.6 m
From
109.4 m
To
152 m
Hole Depth
152 m
Intercept Depth
109.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-33:109.4-152
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Pit Land Bridge Test
Easting
588774
Northing
3507462
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.452
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“11.5”

Context: 42.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
0 m
To
7.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:0-7.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.407
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the gold grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · silverGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
0 m
To
7.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:0-7.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.407
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“18.7”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.047Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.047
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
35 m
To
41.1 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:35-41.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.222
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the gold grade is extremely low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.047”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
35 m
To
41.1 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:35-41.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.222
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the silver grade is extremely low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“12.22”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.075
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
123.1 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
123.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:123.1-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.121
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the gold grade is extremely low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.075”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
123.1 m
To
129.2 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
123.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:123.1-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.121
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the silver grade is extremely low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“3.2”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.994Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.994
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.2 m
From
139.8 m
To
190 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
139.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:139.8-190
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.092
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a significant intercept with a good length and moderate gold grade, contributing to the expansion of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.
  • Moderate gold grade for an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.994”

Context: 40.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.2 m
From
139.8 m
To
190 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
139.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:139.8-190
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.092
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a significant intercept with a good length, contributing to the expansion of mineralization, though the silver grade is low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is weak.

Evidence · table

“6.9”

Context: 40.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · goldGrade: 9.569Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.569
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
173.7 m
To
176.3 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:173.7-176.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.861
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade gold intercept, significantly enhancing the overall value of the hole and indicating high-grade zones within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Bonanza gold grade for an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“9.569”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · silverGrade: 20.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
20.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
173.7 m
To
176.3 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:173.7-176.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.861
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong silver intercept, contributing to the high-grade nature of this sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Moderate silver grade for an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“20.43”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.055
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
212.8 m
To
235.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
212.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:212.8-235.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.116
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but extremely low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.055”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-34Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-34
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
212.8 m
To
235.6 m
Hole Depth
243.9 m
Intercept Depth
212.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-34:212.8-235.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline/AZ Queen test
Easting
588698
Northing
3508036
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.116
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing a good length but extremely low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“4.27”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-35Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.156Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-35
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.156
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
0 m
To
13.7 m
Hole Depth
206.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-35:0-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline test
Easting
588616
Northing
3508058
Azimuth
106 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.257
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the gold grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.156”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-35Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-35
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
0 m
To
13.7 m
Hole Depth
206.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-35:0-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline test
Easting
588616
Northing
3508058
Azimuth
106 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.257
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, but the silver grade is very low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“7.13”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-35Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.113Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-35
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.113
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.8 m
From
92.7 m
To
191.5 m
Hole Depth
206.7 m
Intercept Depth
92.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-35:92.7-191.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline test
Easting
588616
Northing
3508058
Azimuth
106 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.232
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing an exceptional length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.113”

Context: 98.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-35Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-35
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.8 m
From
92.7 m
To
191.5 m
Hole Depth
206.7 m
Intercept Depth
92.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-35:92.7-191.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside Anticline test
Easting
588616
Northing
3508058
Azimuth
106 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.232
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is part of the newly reported drill results, showing an exceptional length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“8.32”

Context: 98.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-36Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.221Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-36
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.221
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.1 m
From
56.2 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
146 m
Intercept Depth
56.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-36:56.2-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside, Boss dike test
Easting
588450
Northing
3508122
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.859
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a significant new intercept with exceptional length, contributing to the expansion of mineralization, though the gold grade is low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.221”

Context: 44.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-36Tombstone · silverGrade: 44.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-36
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
44.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.1 m
From
56.2 m
To
100.3 m
Hole Depth
146 m
Intercept Depth
56.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-36:56.2-100.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside, Boss dike test
Easting
588450
Northing
3508122
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.859
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a significant new intercept with exceptional length, contributing to the expansion of mineralization, though the silver grade is low.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“44.64”

Context: 44.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-36Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.905Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-36
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.905
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
65.3 m
To
71.4 m
Hole Depth
146 m
Intercept Depth
65.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-36:65.3-71.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside, Boss dike test
Easting
588450
Northing
3508122
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.724
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong sub-interval with a moderate gold grade, enhancing the overall significance of the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Moderate gold grade for an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“0.905”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-36Tombstone · silverGrade: 197.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-36
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
197.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
65.3 m
To
71.4 m
Hole Depth
146 m
Intercept Depth
65.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-36:65.3-71.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Westside, Boss dike test
Easting
588450
Northing
3508122
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.724
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Au-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong silver intercept, significantly enhancing the overall significance of the broader intercept and indicating high-grade silver zones.

Positive factors

  • New drill results from an exploration program.
  • Strong silver grade for an open pit setting.

Evidence · table

“197.37”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TC25-01PCTombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01PC
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
105.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01PC:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TC25-01PCTombstone · silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TC25-01PC
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
105.1 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
182.9 m
Intercept Depth
105.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TC25-01PC:105.1-128
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588540
Northing
3507254
Azimuth
82 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
39.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“23.0”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02aTombstone · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
73.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
40.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 62.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02aTombstone · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02a
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.5 m
From
73.1 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
73.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02a:73.1-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588721
Northing
3507513
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
40.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“19.4”

Context: 62.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
27.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
68.6 m
To
97.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:68.6-97.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
27.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“10.4”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
123.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:123.4-158.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but extremely low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 35.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.1 m
From
123.4 m
To
158.5 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
123.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:123.4-158.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: 35.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:182.9-192
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-02Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-02
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
182.9 m
To
192 m
Hole Depth
193.6 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-02:182.9-192
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588722
Northing
3507589
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“5.4”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
89.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 50.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.3 m
From
67 m
To
117.3 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:67-117.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
89.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“53.0”

Context: 50.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
456.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade, indicating a high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-03Tombstone · silverGrade: 253Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-03
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
253
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-03:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588721
Northing
3507586
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
456.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong silver grade, indicating a high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“253.0”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
185.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
37.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 27.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
27.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
185.4 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
185.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:185.4-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
37.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“27.05”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
196.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:196.1-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.35
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-04Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-04
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.04 m
From
196.1 m
To
199.1 m
Hole Depth
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
196.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-04:196.1-199.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588524
Northing
3507933
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.35
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“6.15”

Context: 3.04

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
3.04 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length and moderate gold grade, indicating a significant zone of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.
  • Moderate gold grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 36.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
36.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.1 m
From
3.04 m
To
50.2 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
3.04 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:3.04-50.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length and low silver grade, indicating a significant zone of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“36.36”

Context: 47.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · goldGrade: 3.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
19.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
590.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“3.91”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-05Tombstone · silverGrade: 238.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-05
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
238.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
19.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-05:19.8-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588826
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
590.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong silver grade, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“238.73”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
35 m
To
44.1 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:35-44.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“13.95”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:76-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
250.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade and good length, indicating a significant high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for an open pit setting.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“1.99”

Context: 28.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 70.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
70.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.9 m
From
76 m
To
104.9 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
76 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:76-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
250.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong silver grade and good length, indicating a significant high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade for an open pit setting.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“70.83”

Context: 28.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
17.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2149.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a bonanza gold grade, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“17.7”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 556.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
556.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.6 m
To
86.6 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:83.6-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2149.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a bonanza silver grade, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza silver grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“556.5”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:112.5-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.38
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but extremely low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-06Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-06
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
112.5 m
To
135.3 m
Hole Depth
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-06:112.5-135.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588825
Northing
3507637
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.38
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“5.06”

Context: 22.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
42.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.64
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 10.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
42.6 m
To
56.2 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
42.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:42.6-56.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
22.64
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“10.37”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
68.4 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:68.4-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
68.4 m
To
79 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
68.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:68.4-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“3.80”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
103.4 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
103.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:103.4-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.31
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
103.4 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
103.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:103.4-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.31
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“2.92”

Context: 18.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41 m
From
171.8 m
To
212.8 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:171.8-212.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 41.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-07Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-07
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41 m
From
171.8 m
To
212.8 m
Hole Depth
225.6 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-07:171.8-212.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588647
Northing
3507948
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“5.39”

Context: 41.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
48.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
155.78
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 94.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
94.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
48.6 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
48.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:48.6-60.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
155.78
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a moderate silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade for an open pit setting.

Negative factors

  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“94.47”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74.5 m
From
47.1 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
47.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:47.1-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 74.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 19.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74.5 m
From
47.1 m
To
121.6 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
47.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:47.1-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“19.85”

Context: 74.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
156.6 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:156.6-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-08Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-08
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
156.6 m
To
188.5 m
Hole Depth
193.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-08:156.6-188.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588639
Northing
3507848
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“6.04”

Context: 31.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
12.1 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
12.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:12.1-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with extremely low gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is extremely weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
9.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
12.1 m
To
24.3 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
12.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:12.1-24.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with very low silver grade.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“9.49”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.312Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.312
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.4 m
From
51.7 m
To
85.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:51.7-85.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.92
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.312”

Context: 33.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.4 m
From
51.7 m
To
85.1 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:51.7-85.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.92
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“12.1”

Context: 33.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-09Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 164.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.014
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
164.2 m
From
109.4 m
To
273.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
109.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:109.4-273.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but extremely low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is extremely weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.014”

Context: 164.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-09Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 164.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-09
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
164.2 m
From
109.4 m
To
273.6 m
Hole Depth
274.4 m
Intercept Depth
109.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-09:109.4-273.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588636
Northing
3507894
Azimuth
105 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but very low silver grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for silver in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“7.31”

Context: 164.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.192
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
72.9 m
From
0 m
To
72.9 m
Hole Depth
79.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:0-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
588833
Northing
3507673
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with exceptional length but very low gold grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very weak for gold in an open pit setting.
  • Historical data.

Evidence · table

“0.192”

Context: 72.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TR25-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 14.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
14.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
72.9 m
From
0 m
To
72.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:0-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.92 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1087.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.92”

Context: TR25-10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-10Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.485Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.485
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
31.9 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:21.3-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70.65
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.485 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.485”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-10Tombstone · silverGrade: 36.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-10
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
36.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
31.9 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-10:21.3-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70.65
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.71 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 389.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“36.71”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.033
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.2 m
From
0 m
To
88.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:0-88.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.033 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.033 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.033”

Context: TR25-11

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.2 m
From
0 m
To
88.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:0-88.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 987.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.2”

Context: TR25-11

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-11Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.453Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.453
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
107.9 m
To
115.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:107.9-115.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
34.49
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.453 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.453”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-11Tombstone · silverGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-11
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
2.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
107.9 m
To
115.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-11:107.9-115.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
34.49
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.78 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.78”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.041 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: TR25-12

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 15.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 15.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.1”

Context: TR25-12

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:72.9-112.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.87
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:72.9-112.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.87
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.06 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 239.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.06”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-12Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
153.5 m
To
162.6 m
Intercept Depth
153.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:153.5-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.043 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.043 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-12Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-12
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
153.5 m
To
162.6 m
Intercept Depth
153.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-12:153.5-162.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.03 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.03 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.03”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-13Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.045
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
155 m
To
167.2 m
Intercept Depth
155 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-13:155-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.92
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.045 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.045”

Context: TR25-13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-13Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-13
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
155 m
To
167.2 m
Intercept Depth
155 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-13:155-167.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.92
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.78 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 143.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.78”

Context: TR25-13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.214Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.214
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
109.4 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:21.3-109.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.214 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.214”

Context: TR25-14

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 23.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
23.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
109.4 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:21.3-109.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.19 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2008.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.19”

Context: TR25-14

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.811Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.811
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:36.5-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
118.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.811 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.811”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 61.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
61.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:36.5-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
118.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 61.68 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 937.5 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“61.68”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-14Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.032
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
124.6 m
To
133.7 m
Intercept Depth
124.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:124.6-133.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.032 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.032 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.032”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-14Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-14
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
124.6 m
To
133.7 m
Intercept Depth
124.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-14:124.6-133.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 76.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.38”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
0 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:0-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 21.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: TR25-15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
0 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:0-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.37 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 338.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.37”

Context: TR25-15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-15Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.7 m
From
85.1 m
To
104.9 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:85.1-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.041 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-15Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-15
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.7 m
From
85.1 m
To
104.9 m
Intercept Depth
85.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-15:85.1-104.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 139.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.07”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
92.39
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: TR25-16

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 50.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
50.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.2 m
From
16.7 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:16.7-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
92.39
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50.76 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2548.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“50.76”

Context: TR25-16

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-16Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.921Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.921
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.921 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.921”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-16Tombstone · silverGrade: 32.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-16
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
32.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
152 m
To
161.1 m
Intercept Depth
152 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-16:152-161.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.27 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 293.7 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.27”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17ATombstone · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17A
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
22.8 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17A:12.2-22.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
80.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: TR25-17A

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17ATombstone · silverGrade: 10.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17A
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
10.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
22.8 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17A:12.2-22.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
80.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.96 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 199.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.96 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.96”

Context: TR25-17A

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
57.8 m
From
9.1 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
9.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:9.1-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
400.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 298.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.16 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.16”

Context: TR25-17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 39.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
39.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
57.8 m
From
9.1 m
To
66.9 m
Intercept Depth
9.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:9.1-66.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
400.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.12 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2261.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“39.12”

Context: TR25-17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 58.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
58.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4268.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 269.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 58.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“58.5”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 173.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
173.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:16.7-21.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4268.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173.13 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 796.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“173.13”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.323Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.323
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
174.8 m
To
197.6 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:174.8-197.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
30.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.323 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.323”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-17Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-17
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
174.8 m
To
197.6 m
Intercept Depth
174.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-17:174.8-197.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
30.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 188.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.25”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-18Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.245Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.245
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
22.8 m
To
31.9 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-18:22.8-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
65.81
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.245 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.245 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.245”

Context: TR25-18

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-18Tombstone · silverGrade: 48.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-18
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
48.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
22.8 m
To
31.9 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-18:22.8-31.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
65.81
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 48.67 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 442.9 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“48.67”

Context: TR25-18

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-19Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-19
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-19:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.057 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.057 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: TR25-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-19Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-19
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-19:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.94 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 132.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.94 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.94”

Context: TR25-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-21Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.143Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.143
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
83.6 m
To
91.2 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:83.6-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.21
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.143 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.143 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.143”

Context: TR25-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-21Tombstone · silverGrade: 16.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
16.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
83.6 m
To
91.2 m
Intercept Depth
83.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:83.6-91.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.21
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 123.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.2”

Context: TR25-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-21Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
100.3 m
To
126.1 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:100.3-126.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.112 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.112 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-21Tombstone · silverGrade: 15.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-21
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
100.3 m
To
126.1 m
Intercept Depth
100.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-21:100.3-126.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.73 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 405.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.73”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-22Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.083Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.083
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.3 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:16.7-21.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.083 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.083 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.083”

Context: TR25-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-22Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
16.7 m
To
21.3 m
Intercept Depth
16.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:16.7-21.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.43”

Context: TR25-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-22Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.067Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.067
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
60.8 m
To
69.9 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:60.8-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.067 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.067 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.067”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-22Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-22
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
60.8 m
To
69.9 m
Intercept Depth
60.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-22:60.8-69.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.23 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 56.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.23 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.23”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-23Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.161
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.161 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.161 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.161”

Context: TR25-23

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-23Tombstone · silverGrade: 7.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
0 m
To
16.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:0-16.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 121.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.25”

Context: TR25-23

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-23Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.112
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
22.8 m
To
30.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:22.8-30.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
20.33
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.112 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.112 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.112”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-23Tombstone · silverGrade: 12.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
12.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
22.8 m
To
30.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:22.8-30.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
20.33
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 94.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 12.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.48”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-23Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
118.6 m
To
129.2 m
Intercept Depth
118.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:118.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-23Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-23
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
118.6 m
To
129.2 m
Intercept Depth
118.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-23:118.6-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.07”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-24Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.236Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 152.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.236
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
152.4 m
From
0 m
To
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:0-152.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.236 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 36.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.236”

Context: TR25-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-24Tombstone · silverGrade: 19.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 152.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
19.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
152.4 m
From
0 m
To
152.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:0-152.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.81 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3019.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 19.81 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.81”

Context: TR25-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-24Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.871Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.871
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:3-13.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
212.35
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.871 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.871”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-24Tombstone · silverGrade: 81.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
81.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
3 m
To
13.6 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:3-13.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
212.35
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 81.41 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 862.9 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“81.41”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-24Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.197Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.197
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
50.1 m
To
54.7 m
Intercept Depth
50.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:50.1-54.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.197 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.197”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-24Tombstone · silverGrade: 92.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-24
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
92.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
50.1 m
To
54.7 m
Intercept Depth
50.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-24:50.1-54.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 92.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 426.9 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“92.8”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.186Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.186
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
25.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.186 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.186 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.186”

Context: TR25-25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
25.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 70.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.5”

Context: TR25-25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.042Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.042
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
48.7 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:36.5-48.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.042 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.042 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.042”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
5.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
36.5 m
To
48.7 m
Intercept Depth
36.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:36.5-48.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 65.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.39”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.106Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.106
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
111 m
To
159.6 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:111-159.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.19
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.106 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.106 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.106”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
111 m
To
159.6 m
Intercept Depth
111 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:111-159.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.19
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.79 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 330.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.79”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.139Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.139
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
171.8 m
To
203.7 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:171.8-203.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.36
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.139 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.139 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.139”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 8.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
8.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.9 m
From
171.8 m
To
203.7 m
Intercept Depth
171.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:171.8-203.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18.36
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.65 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 275.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.65”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.192
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
225 m
To
247.8 m
Intercept Depth
225 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:225-247.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.192 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.192 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.192”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-25Tombstone · silverGrade: 15.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-25
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
15.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.8 m
From
225 m
To
247.8 m
Intercept Depth
225 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-25:225-247.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.15 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 345.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.15”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-26Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
0 m
To
48.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:0-48.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
133.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.06 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 51.5 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: TR25-26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-26Tombstone · silverGrade: 58.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
58.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.6 m
From
0 m
To
48.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:0-48.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
133.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.93 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2864.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“58.93”

Context: TR25-26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-26Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.061
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
130.7 m
To
141.3 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:130.7-141.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.34
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.061 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.061 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.061”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-26Tombstone · silverGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-26
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
4.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
130.7 m
To
141.3 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-26:130.7-141.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.34
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.06”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-27Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.427Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-27
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.427
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.7 m
From
0 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-27:0-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
72.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.427 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 22.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.427”

Context: TR25-27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-27Tombstone · silverGrade: 42.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-27
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
42.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.7 m
From
0 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-27:0-51.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
72.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42.87 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2216.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“42.87”

Context: TR25-27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-27Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.332Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-27
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.332
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
62.3 m
To
86.6 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-27:62.3-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
109.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.332 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.332”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-27Tombstone · silverGrade: 85.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-27
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
85.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
62.3 m
To
86.6 m
Intercept Depth
62.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-27:62.3-86.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
109.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 85.94 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2088.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“85.94”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-28Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-28
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.3 m
From
0 m
To
62.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-28:0-62.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.26
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: TR25-28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-28Tombstone · silverGrade: 28.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-28
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
28.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.3 m
From
0 m
To
62.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-28:0-62.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.26
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.69 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1787.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.69”

Context: TR25-28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-28Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-28
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
97.3 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
97.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-28:97.3-112.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.037 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-28Tombstone · silverGrade: 11.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-28
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
11.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
97.3 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
97.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-28:97.3-112.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 169.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.15”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-29Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.059Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-29
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.059
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
0 m
To
13.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-29:0-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.36
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.059 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.059 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.059”

Context: TR25-29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-29Tombstone · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-29
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
6.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
0 m
To
13.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-29:0-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.36
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 84.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.2”

Context: TR25-29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-29Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.616Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-29
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.616
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
115.5 m
To
141.3 m
Intercept Depth
115.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-29:115.5-141.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
111.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.616 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 15.9 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.616”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-29Tombstone · silverGrade: 68.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-29
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
68.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
115.5 m
To
141.3 m
Intercept Depth
115.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-29:115.5-141.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
111.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 68.07 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1756.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“68.07”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-30Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-30
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.027
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
121.6 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-30:112.5-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.027 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.027”

Context: TR25-30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-30Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-30
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
112.5 m
To
121.6 m
Intercept Depth
112.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-30:112.5-121.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
15.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 124.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.65”

Context: TR25-30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-31Tombstone · goldGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-31
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
0.051
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
0 m
To
25.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-31:0-25.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.051 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.051 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.051”

Context: TR25-31

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-31Tombstone · silverGrade: 13.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-31
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
13.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.8 m
From
0 m
To
25.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-31:0-25.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.48 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 347.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.48”

Context: TR25-31

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-31Tombstone · goldGrade: 1.161Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-31
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
1.161
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.1 m
From
94.2 m
To
138.3 m
Intercept Depth
94.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-31:94.2-138.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
158.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.161 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 51.2 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.161”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-31Tombstone · silverGrade: 77.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-31
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
77.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.1 m
From
94.2 m
To
138.3 m
Intercept Depth
94.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-31:94.2-138.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
158.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 77.7 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3426.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 77.7 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“77.7”

Context: Table 1B: Tombstone 2025 Previously Repo

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-31Tombstone · goldGrade: 7.504Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-31
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
7.504
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
126.2 m
To
129.2 m
Intercept Depth
126.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-31:126.2-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
990.78
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.504 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 22.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.504 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.504”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TR25-31Tombstone · silverGrade: 465.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TR25-31
Project
Tombstone
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
usa_az
Ticker
AZT

Geometry

Grade
465.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
126.2 m
To
129.2 m
Intercept Depth
126.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TR25-31:126.2-129.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
North Grand Central Pit Test
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
990.78
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 465.5 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1396.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 465.5 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“465.5”

Context: Including:

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.