Bitterroot Resources Updates the LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Bitterroot Resources Ltd.
- Ticker
- BTT
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Primary commodity
- Nickel
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Gold, Platinum, Palladium
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-15 15:34:06 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bitterroot Resources provided an update on its winter 2022 drilling program at the LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project in Michigan, which included five new holes. The program confirmed the presence of nickel-copper-platinum-palladium mineralization, with a highlight intercept of 3.68% copper over 0.51 metres in hole LM 22-22. While some new intercepts showed moderate to strong grades, several holes returned low-grade mineralization, contributing to the understanding of the conduit-hosted system.
Reasoning: The winter 2022 drilling program confirmed the presence of Ni-Cu-PGM mineralization and extended geological understanding of the conduit, with one exceptional copper intercept and several moderate nickel and copper intercepts, but also included numerous low-grade results.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Step-Out Extension
- Exceptional Copper Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Many Low-Grade Intercepts
Facts used in scoring: 71
Classification and evidence
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Mr. Glenn W. Scott, CPG, is the Qualified Person responsible for the technical content of this disclosure.
Evidence · text
“Mr. Glenn W. Scott, CPG, is the Qualified Person responsible for the technical content of this disclosure.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The release provides downhole intercept lengths but does not state or estimate true widths for any of the reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“Interval (m)”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The release does not disclose specific QA/QC methods such as blanks, standards, duplicates, or laboratory certifications.
Evidence · text
“Mr. Glenn W. Scott, CPG, is the Qualified Person responsible for the technical content of this disclosure.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Hole LM 22-25 intersected the deepest point yet observed on the basal contact of the intrusion, indicating an extension of the known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“Hole LM 22-25 intersected the deepest point yet observed on the basal contact of the intrusion.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The project is described as being explored for mineralization similar to Lundin Mining Corporation's Eagle and Eagle East orebodies, which are located 25 kilometres to the east.
Evidence · text
“The LM Property is being explored for conduit-hosted nickel-copper-platinum-palladium mineralization similar to Lundin Mining Corporation's Eagle and Eagle East orebodies, which are located 25 kilometres to the east.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 71. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (71)
LM 20-01LM · nickelGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 20-01
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 253.8 m
- To
- 259.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-02-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate nickel grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 5.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 20-01LM · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 20-01
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 253.8 m
- To
- 259.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-02-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate copper grade over a good width, supporting the project's polymetallic nature.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 5.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 20-01LM · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 20-01
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 253.8 m
- To
- 259.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-02-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade, but confirms the presence of precious metals in the system.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 5.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-07LM · nickelGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.93 m
- From
- 270.07 m
- To
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:270.07-273
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate nickel grade, contributing to the understanding of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 2.93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-07LM · copperGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.93 m
- From
- 270.07 m
- To
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:270.07-273
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade, supporting the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: 2.93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-07LM · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.93 m
- From
- 270.07 m
- To
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:270.07-273
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade, but confirms the presence of precious metals.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 2.93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-07LM · nickelGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:273-273.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional nickel grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade zones within the system.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-07LM · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:273-273.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, complementing the high nickel grade.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-07LM · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-07
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-07:273-273.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade, but confirms the presence of precious metals.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-10LM · nickelGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate nickel grade, contributing to the understanding of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-10LM · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade, supporting the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-10LM · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade, but confirms the presence of precious metals.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-10LM · nickelGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong nickel grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade zones.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Strong Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“2.74”
Context: 0.19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-10LM · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak copper grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 0.19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-10LM · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-10
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 0.19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-13LM · nickelGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.68 m
- From
- 247.68 m
- To
- 250.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak nickel grade over a moderate width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 2.68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-13LM · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.68 m
- From
- 247.68 m
- To
- 250.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak copper grade over a moderate width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 2.68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-13LM · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.68 m
- From
- 247.68 m
- To
- 250.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 2.68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-13LM · nickelGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong nickel grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade zones.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Strong Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“1.81”
Context: 0.39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-13LM · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 0.39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-13LM · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-13
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 0.39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-14LM · nickelGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.27 m
- From
- 235.79 m
- To
- 236.06 m
- Intercept Depth
- 235.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong nickel grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Strong Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“1.96”
Context: 0.27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-14LM · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.27 m
- From
- 235.79 m
- To
- 236.06 m
- Intercept Depth
- 235.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-14LM · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.27 m
- From
- 235.79 m
- To
- 236.06 m
- Intercept Depth
- 235.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-14LM · nickelGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 235.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional nickel grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade zones.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“4.81”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-14LM · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 235.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 21-14LM · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 21-14
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 235.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LM 22-22LM · nickelGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.59 m
- From
- 256.27 m
- To
- 258.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:256.27-258.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a moderate nickel grade over a moderate width, contributing to the understanding of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 2.59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-22LM · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.59 m
- From
- 256.27 m
- To
- 258.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:256.27-258.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a moderate width, supporting the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 2.59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-22LM · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.59 m
- From
- 256.27 m
- To
- 258.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:256.27-258.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade, but confirms the presence of precious metals.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 2.59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-22LM · nickelGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a moderate nickel grade over a narrow width, indicating localized higher-grade mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Moderate Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: 0.51
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-22LM · copperGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over a narrow width, representing a significant high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“3.68”
Context: 0.51
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-22LM · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-22
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256.27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-22:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a low Au+PGM grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 0.51
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-23LM · nickelGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-23
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.04 m
- From
- 258.32 m
- To
- 260.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-23:258.32-260.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low nickel grade over a moderate width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 2.04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-23LM · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-23
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.04 m
- From
- 258.32 m
- To
- 260.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-23:258.32-260.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low copper grade over a moderate width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 2.04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-23LM · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-23
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.04 m
- From
- 258.32 m
- To
- 260.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-23:258.32-260.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a moderate width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 2.04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-24LM · nickelGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-24
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.38 m
- From
- 240.4 m
- To
- 245.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 240.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-24:240.4-245.78
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a weak nickel grade over a good width, confirming mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 5.38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-24LM · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-24
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.38 m
- From
- 240.4 m
- To
- 245.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 240.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-24:240.4-245.78
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a weak copper grade over a good width, confirming mineralization.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 5.38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-24LM · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-24
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.38 m
- From
- 240.4 m
- To
- 245.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 240.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-24:240.4-245.78
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a good width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 5.38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · nickelGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 163.2 m
- To
- 165.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:163.2-165.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low nickel grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 1.95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 163.2 m
- To
- 165.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:163.2-165.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low copper grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 1.95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 163.2 m
- To
- 165.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:163.2-165.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · nickelGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 190.8 m
- To
- 192.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:190.8-192.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low nickel grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 1.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 190.8 m
- To
- 192.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:190.8-192.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 1.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 190.8 m
- To
- 192.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:190.8-192.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 1.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · nickelGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 318.09 m
- To
- 323.09 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:318.09-323.09
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low nickel grade over a good width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 5.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 318.09 m
- To
- 323.09 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:318.09-323.09
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 5.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-25LM · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-25
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 318.09 m
- To
- 323.09 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-25:318.09-323.09
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a good width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 5.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · nickelGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.97 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.97 m
- From
- 232.19 m
- To
- 234.16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:232.19-234.16
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low nickel grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 1.97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.97 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.97 m
- From
- 232.19 m
- To
- 234.16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:232.19-234.16
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low copper grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 1.97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.97 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.97 m
- From
- 232.19 m
- To
- 234.16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:232.19-234.16
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · nickelGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 234.16 m
- To
- 235.16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:234.16-235.16
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a weak nickel grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 234.16 m
- To
- 235.16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:234.16-235.16
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 234.16 m
- To
- 235.16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:234.16-235.16
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · nickelGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 235.16 m
- To
- 235.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:235.16-235.52
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a moderate nickel grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
- Moderate Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“1.23”
Context: 0.36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 235.16 m
- To
- 235.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:235.16-235.52
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 0.36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LM 22-26LM · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM 22-26
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 235.16 m
- To
- 235.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 232.19 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM 22-26:235.16-235.52
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low Au+PGM grade over a very narrow width.
Positive factors
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- No QA/QC Disclosure
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 0.36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · nickelGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273-273.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 % nickel is exceptional against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 5.16 % nickel is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 273.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273-273.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.18 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.18 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · nickelGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 262.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.74 % nickel is strong against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 2.74 % nickel is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.74”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.19 m
- From
- 262.75 m
- To
- 262.94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 262.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:262.75-262.94
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · nickelGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 250.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.81 % nickel is strong against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 1.81 % nickel is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.81”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.39 m
- From
- 250.36 m
- To
- 250.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 250.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:250.36-250.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · nickelGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 236.06 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.81 % nickel is exceptional against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Positive factors
- 4.81 % nickel is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.81”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 236.06 m
- To
- 236.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 236.06 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:236.06-236.86
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · nickelGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 % nickel is moderate against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · copperGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
- From
- 258.86 m
- To
- 259.37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:258.86-259.37
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.68 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.68 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.68”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · nickelGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 190.8 m
- To
- 192.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:190.8-192.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- 0.13 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 190.8 m
- To
- 192.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:190.8-192.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · nickelGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 318.09 m
- To
- 323.09 m
- Intercept Depth
- 318.09 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:318.09-323.09
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andLM · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- LM
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Reported Region
- upper peninsula of michigan
- Ticker
- BTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 318.09 m
- To
- 323.09 m
- Intercept Depth
- 318.09 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:318.09-323.09
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.