Bitterroot Resources Updates the LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project in Michigan

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Bitterroot Resources Ltd.
Ticker
BTT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Michigan
Primary commodity
Nickel
Secondary commodities
Copper, Gold, Platinum, Palladium
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-15 15:56:42 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Bitterroot Resources provides an update on its LM Magmatic Nickel-Copper Project in Michigan, reporting on an ongoing drilling program. The release includes a summary of historical drill intercepts from 2020 and 2021, which have been previously disclosed. Four new vertical core holes have been completed since mid-January 2022, with visual mineralization noted in some, but assay results are pending for approximately eight weeks.

Reasoning: The announcement provides an update on an ongoing drilling program, but all presented assay results are historical. While new drilling has visually intersected mineralization, the lack of new assay data and the re-release of old results limit the novelty and immediate positive impact of this update.

Positive factors

  • Active drilling program is underway
  • New holes visually intersected mineralization
  • Qualified Person sign-off for technical content

Negative factors

  • All reported assay results are historical and previously disclosed
  • No new assay results from recent drilling are available
  • Assays for newly drilled holes are pending for approximately eight weeks
  • No true width information provided for intercepts

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 35

Classification and evidence

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The document presents a summary table of drill intercepts from 2020 and 2021, which are historical results and not new assays from the current drilling program.

Evidence · text

“LM Project - Summary of Sulfide-Mineralized Intervals”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release explicitly names Mr. Glenn W. Scott, CPG, as the Qualified Person responsible for the technical content and Mr. Nickolas Dudek, P.Geo, as the Qualified Person for 3D modelling.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Glenn W. Scott, CPG, is the Qualified Person responsible for the technical content of this disclosure. Mr. Nickolas Dudek, P.Geo, of C.J. Greig & Associates Ltd. is the Qualified Person responsible for the 3-dimensional modelling of the drill hole data.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document reports drill intercept lengths as 'Interval (m)' without providing any information on true width or drill orientation relative to mineralization.

Evidence · table

“Interval (m)”

Context: Hole #

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 35. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (35)

LM 20-01LM · nickelGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 20-01
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.3 m
From
253.8 m
To
259.1 m
Intercept Depth
253.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept is below the project's average grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Nickel grade (0.58%) is below the project average (4.041%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 5.30

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 20-01LM · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 20-01
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.3 m
From
253.8 m
To
259.1 m
Intercept Depth
253.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is below the project's average grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.62%) is below the project average (1.377%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 5.30

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 20-01LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 20-01
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
From
253.8 m
To
259.1 m
Intercept Depth
253.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 20-01:253.8-259.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.33 g/tonne) is above the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating potential for PGM credits

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 5.30

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-07LM · nickelGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-07
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.93 m
From
270.07 m
To
273 m
Intercept Depth
270.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-07:270.07-273
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept is below the project's average grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Nickel grade (0.78%) is below the project average (4.041%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 2.93

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-07LM · copperGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-07
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.93 m
From
270.07 m
To
273 m
Intercept Depth
270.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-07:270.07-273
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is below the project's average grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.83%) is below the project average (1.377%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 2.93

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-07LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-07
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.93 m
From
270.07 m
To
273 m
Intercept Depth
270.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-07:270.07-273
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.25 g/tonne) is above the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating potential for PGM credits

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 2.93

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-07LM · nickelGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-07
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
5.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
273 m
To
273.75 m
Intercept Depth
270.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-07:273-273.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept shows a strong grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Nickel grade (5.16%) is above the project average (4.041%) and considered strong for an underground magmatic sulphide deposit

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“5.16”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-07LM · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-07
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
273 m
To
273.75 m
Intercept Depth
270.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-07:273-273.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows a moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade (1.18%) is close to the project average (1.377%) and considered moderate for an underground magmatic sulphide deposit

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-07LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-07
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
273 m
To
273.75 m
Intercept Depth
270.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-07:273-273.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-03-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows a strong grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.82 g/tonne) is significantly above the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating strong potential for PGM credits

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-10LM · nickelGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-10
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.25 m
From
260.5 m
To
262.75 m
Intercept Depth
260.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept is below the project's average grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Nickel grade (0.78%) is below the project average (4.041%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 2.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-10LM · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-10
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.25 m
From
260.5 m
To
262.75 m
Intercept Depth
260.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept is below the project's average grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.80%) is below the project average (1.377%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 2.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-10LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-10
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.25 m
From
260.5 m
To
262.75 m
Intercept Depth
260.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-10:260.5-262.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.40 g/tonne) is above the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating potential for PGM credits

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 2.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-10LM · nickelGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-10
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
2.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m
From
262.75 m
To
262.94 m
Intercept Depth
260.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept shows a moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Nickel grade (2.74%) is considered moderate for an underground magmatic sulphide deposit

Negative factors

  • Nickel grade (2.74%) is below the project average (4.041%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“2.74”

Context: 0.19

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-10LM · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-10
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m
From
262.75 m
To
262.94 m
Intercept Depth
260.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows a weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.43%) is significantly below the project average (1.377%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 0.19

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-10LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-10
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.19 m
From
262.75 m
To
262.94 m
Intercept Depth
260.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-10:262.75-262.94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-04-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.37 g/tonne) is above the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating potential for PGM credits

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 0.19

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-13LM · nickelGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-13
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.68 m
From
247.68 m
To
250.36 m
Intercept Depth
247.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept shows a weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Nickel grade (0.33%) is significantly below the project average (4.041%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 2.68

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-13LM · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-13
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.68 m
From
247.68 m
To
250.36 m
Intercept Depth
247.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows a weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.38%) is significantly below the project average (1.377%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 2.68

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-13LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-13
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.68 m
From
247.68 m
To
250.36 m
Intercept Depth
247.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-13:247.68-250.36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows a weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.10 g/tonne) is below the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 2.68

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-13LM · nickelGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-13
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
1.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m
From
250.36 m
To
250.75 m
Intercept Depth
247.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept shows a moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Nickel grade (1.81%) is considered moderate for an underground magmatic sulphide deposit

Negative factors

  • Nickel grade (1.81%) is below the project average (4.041%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“1.81”

Context: 0.39

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-13LM · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-13
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m
From
250.36 m
To
250.75 m
Intercept Depth
247.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows a weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.51%) is significantly below the project average (1.377%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 0.39

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-13LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-13
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.39 m
From
250.36 m
To
250.75 m
Intercept Depth
247.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-13:250.36-250.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows a strong grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.52 g/tonne) is significantly above the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating strong potential for PGM credits

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 0.39

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-14LM · nickelGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-14
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
1.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m
From
235.79 m
To
236.06 m
Intercept Depth
235.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept shows a moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Nickel grade (1.96%) is considered moderate for an underground magmatic sulphide deposit

Negative factors

  • Nickel grade (1.96%) is below the project average (4.041%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“1.96”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-14LM · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-14
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m
From
235.79 m
To
236.06 m
Intercept Depth
235.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows a very weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.01%) is significantly below the project average (1.377%) and considered very weak
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-14LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-14
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.27 m
From
235.79 m
To
236.06 m
Intercept Depth
235.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-14:235.79-236.06
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows a very weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.01 g/tonne) is significantly below the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating very weak potential for PGM credits
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-14LM · nickelGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-14
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
4.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
236.06 m
To
236.86 m
Intercept Depth
235.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical nickel intercept shows a strong grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Nickel grade (4.81%) is above the project average (4.041%) and considered strong for an underground magmatic sulphide deposit

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“4.81”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-14LM · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-14
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
236.06 m
To
236.86 m
Intercept Depth
235.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows a weak grade, and its re-reporting offers no new information.

Negative factors

  • Copper grade (0.78%) is below the project average (1.377%)
  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

LM 21-14LM · au+pgmGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM 21-14
Project
LM
Commodity
au+pgm
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
236.06 m
To
236.86 m
Intercept Depth
235.79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM 21-14:236.06-236.86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Au+PGM intercept shows moderate grade, but its re-reporting offers no new information.

Positive factors

  • Au+PGM grade (0.25 g/tonne) is above the project's average gold (0.122 g/t), palladium (0.121 g/t), and platinum (0.185 g/t) grades, indicating potential for PGM credits

Negative factors

  • This is a re-reported historical result with no new information

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

andLM · nickelGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
5.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
273 m
To
273.75 m
Intercept Depth
273 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:273-273.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.16 % nickel is exceptional against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Positive factors

  • 5.16 % nickel is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.16”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andLM · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
273 m
To
273.75 m
Intercept Depth
273 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:273-273.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.18 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.18 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andLM · nickelGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
2.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m
From
262.75 m
To
262.94 m
Intercept Depth
262.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:262.75-262.94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.74 % nickel is strong against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Positive factors

  • 2.74 % nickel is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.74”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andLM · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m
From
262.75 m
To
262.94 m
Intercept Depth
262.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:262.75-262.94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andLM · nickelGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
1.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m
From
250.36 m
To
250.75 m
Intercept Depth
250.36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:250.36-250.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.81 % nickel is strong against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Positive factors

  • 1.81 % nickel is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.81”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andLM · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m
From
250.36 m
To
250.75 m
Intercept Depth
250.36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:250.36-250.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andLM · nickelGrade: 4.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
nickel
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
4.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
236.06 m
To
236.86 m
Intercept Depth
236.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:236.06-236.86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.81 % nickel is exceptional against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Positive factors

  • 4.81 % nickel is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.81”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andLM · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
LM
Commodity
copper
Region
michigan
Reported Region
michigan
Ticker
BTT

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
236.06 m
To
236.86 m
Intercept Depth
236.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:236.06-236.86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.