Blackrock Silver Announces Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for Its Tonopah West Project in Nevada; +10 Year Mine Life Fortified by 90% Increase in Indicated Mineral Resources

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Blackrock Silver Corp.
Ticker
BKRRF
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada, United States
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold
Document categories
Resource update, Production, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-13 14:42:36 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Blackrock Silver has announced an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for its Tonopah West Project in Nevada, highlighting a 90% increase in indicated mineral resources. The PEA outlines robust economics with an after-tax IRR of 28% and a US$437 million NPV over an 11.2-year mine life, based on conservative metal prices. The project also boasts high metallurgical recoveries of 91.6% for silver and 96.3% for gold, with low All-In Sustaining Costs (AISC) of US$17.44 per silver equivalent ounce.

Reasoning: The updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Tonopah West Project demonstrates significantly improved project economics and a substantial increase in higher-confidence indicated mineral resources, which substantially de-risks the project and extends its mine life. High metallurgical recoveries further enhance the project's viability.

Positive factors

  • Significant 90% increase in indicated mineral resources, de-risking the project.
  • Robust project economics with a 28% after-tax IRR and US$437 million NPV at base case prices.
  • Long mine life of 11.2 years.
  • Low All-In Sustaining Costs (AISC) of US$17.44/oz AgEq.
  • High metallurgical recoveries for both silver (91.6%) and gold (96.3%).
  • NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate and PEA.

Negative factors

  • A significant portion of the total resource remains in the inferred category.
  • The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources, which are considered too speculative geologically to be classified as mineral reserves.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 25

Classification and evidence

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The document reports a 90% increase in indicated mineral resources, indicating a significant upgrade in resource confidence.

Evidence · text

“90% Increase in Indicated Mineral Resources”

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: The indicated silver equivalent ounces increased by 90% from the previous MRE, representing a substantial growth in contained metal.

Evidence · text

“40.2 million ounces of AgEq ... - a 90% increase over the previous mineral resource estimate”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PEA and MRE were prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

“in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 ")”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons are named as responsible for the PEA and MRE, and have verified and approved the contents of the news release.

Evidence · text

“The "Qualified Persons" (as defined by NI 43-101) who were responsible for the PEA and MRE and who have verified and approved the contents of this news release are Robert H. Todd, P.E., of Minetech, Jeffery Bickel, C.P.G (AIPG) of RESPEC, Travis Manning, P.E., QP of Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, Thomas H. Bagan, P.E., MBA, SME-RM, an independent consulting mining engineer and Richard DeLong, QP of Westland Engineering and Environmental Inc.”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 140 g/t AgEq is clearly stated for the resource estimate.

Evidence · table

“140”

Context: 2,750

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Average recoveries of 91.6% for silver and 96.3% for gold are high for the stated processing route.

Evidence · text

“Life-of-mine metal recovery averages 91.6% for silver and 96.3% for gold.”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the resource, 5.54 million tonnes grading 466 g/t AgEq for 83 million ounces, is in the inferred category.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 5,538

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The resource estimate was prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment.

Evidence · text

“Blackrock Silver Announces Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for Its Tonopah West Project”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document announces an updated mineral resource estimate for the project.

Evidence · text

“updated mineral resource estimate prepared by RESPEC Company, LLC”

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 25. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (23)

indicatedTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 2750000Grade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 199000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:b671b67ace93da540aab
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2750000
Grade
2.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
199000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
454.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This indicated gold resource contributes to the overall positive resource update, providing higher confidence in the project's gold endowment.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence indicated resource category.
  • Contributes to a significant increase in overall indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“2.25”

Context: 2,750,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 2750000Grade: 216.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 19167000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:b671b67ace93da540aab
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2750000
Grade
216.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
19167000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
454.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This indicated silver resource contributes to the overall positive resource update, providing higher confidence in the project's silver endowment.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence indicated resource category.
  • Contributes to a significant increase in overall indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“216.8”

Context: 2,750,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 2750000Grade: 454.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 40159000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:be15b57aff3b55967438
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2750000
Grade
454.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
40159000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04
Prior Contained Metal
21157895

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
454.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The substantial increase in indicated silver equivalent ounces is a key positive outcome of the updated resource estimate, demonstrating significant project de-risking and growth in higher-confidence resources.

Positive factors

  • Represents a 90% increase in indicated AgEq ounces over the previous MRE, significantly de-risking the project.
  • High-confidence indicated resource category.

Evidence · table

“454.3”

Context: 2,750

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 40159000 against 21157895 previously

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 5538000Grade: 2.62Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 467000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:601bec83dc4b307aa569
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5538000
Grade
2.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
467000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
465.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This inferred gold resource contributes to the overall project scale, but its lower confidence category means it is more speculative than indicated resources.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“2.62”

Context: 5,538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 5538000Grade: 188.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 82944000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:601bec83dc4b307aa569
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5538000
Grade
188.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
82944000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
465.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The large inferred silver equivalent resource indicates significant potential for project growth, though its speculative nature requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant inferred resource base provides substantial upside potential for future conversion to higher confidence categories.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence and cannot be used for economic studies alone.

Evidence · table

“188.5”

Context: 5,538,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 882000Grade: 2.65Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 75000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:66e0f09b6fcbe3f61f98
Deposit or zone
Victor
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
882000
Grade
2.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
75000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
525.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold resource in the Victor area adds to the project's higher-confidence resource base, supporting the overall positive update.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence indicated resource in a key area.
  • Contributes to the overall increase in indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“2.65”

Context: 882,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 882000Grade: 255.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 14899000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:66e0f09b6fcbe3f61f98
Deposit or zone
Victor
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
882000
Grade
255.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
14899000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
525.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high-grade indicated silver equivalent resource in the Victor area is a strong positive, enhancing the project's overall confidence and economic potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade indicated silver equivalent resource in a key area.
  • Contributes significantly to the overall increase in indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“255.2”

Context: 882,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 1854000Grade: 2.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 168000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:bad46032ebe214a3cfa3
Deposit or zone
Victor
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1854000
Grade
2.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
168000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
509.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This inferred gold resource in the Victor area contributes to the project's overall scale, but its lower confidence category means it is more speculative.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential in the Victor area.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“2.82”

Context: 1,854,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 1854000Grade: 221.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 30354000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:bad46032ebe214a3cfa3
Deposit or zone
Victor
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1854000
Grade
221.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
30354000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
509.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The large inferred silver equivalent resource in the Victor area indicates significant potential for project growth, though further work is needed to upgrade its confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant inferred silver equivalent resource in the Victor area provides substantial upside potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“221.7”

Context: 1,854,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 263000Grade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 15000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:7ae8dcbfea4785093e21
Deposit or zone
DPB North
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
263000
Grade
1.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
15000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
339.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold resource in the DPB North area adds to the project's higher-confidence resource base, supporting the overall positive update.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence indicated resource in the DPB North area.
  • Contributes to the overall increase in indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“1.79”

Context: 263,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 263000Grade: 146.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2865000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:7ae8dcbfea4785093e21
Deposit or zone
DPB North
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
263000
Grade
146.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2865000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
339.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high-grade indicated silver equivalent resource in the DPB North area is a strong positive, enhancing the project's overall confidence and economic potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade indicated silver equivalent resource in the DPB North area.
  • Contributes significantly to the overall increase in indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“146.1”

Context: 263,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 1686000Grade: 2.68Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 145000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:c43880c894cb880d3f4d
Deposit or zone
DPB North
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1686000
Grade
2.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
145000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
482.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This inferred gold resource in the DPB North area contributes to the project's overall scale, but its lower confidence category means it is more speculative.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential in the DPB North area.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“2.68”

Context: 1,686,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 1686000Grade: 193.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 26180000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:c43880c894cb880d3f4d
Deposit or zone
DPB North
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1686000
Grade
193.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
26180000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
482.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The large inferred silver equivalent resource in the DPB North area indicates significant potential for project growth, though further work is needed to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant inferred silver equivalent resource in the DPB North area provides substantial upside potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“193.9”

Context: 1,686,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 1281000Grade: 2.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 87000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:229729563fa42ffe648c
Deposit or zone
DPB South
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1281000
Grade
2.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
87000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
442
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold resource in the DPB South area adds to the project's higher-confidence resource base, supporting the overall positive update.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence indicated resource in the DPB South area.
  • Contributes to the overall increase in indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“2.12”

Context: 1,281,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 1281000Grade: 213.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 18209000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:229729563fa42ffe648c
Deposit or zone
DPB South
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1281000
Grade
213.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
18209000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
442
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high-grade indicated silver equivalent resource in the DPB South area is a strong positive, enhancing the project's overall confidence and economic potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade indicated silver equivalent resource in the DPB South area.
  • Contributes significantly to the overall increase in indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“213.3”

Context: 1,281,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 485000Grade: 2.02Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 31000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:e6b844dab2ea8be5bd3e
Deposit or zone
DPB South
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
485000
Grade
2.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
31000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
305.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This inferred gold resource in the DPB South area contributes to the project's overall scale, but its lower confidence category means it is more speculative.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential in the DPB South area.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“2.02”

Context: 485,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 485000Grade: 87.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4763000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:e6b844dab2ea8be5bd3e
Deposit or zone
DPB South
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
485000
Grade
87.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4763000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
305.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred silver equivalent resource in the DPB South area indicates potential for project growth, though further work is needed to upgrade its confidence.

Positive factors

  • Inferred silver equivalent resource in the DPB South area provides upside potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“87.5”

Context: 485,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 323000Grade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 21000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:bedf06e9f76dbb9c3e70
Deposit or zone
NW Step Out
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
323000
Grade
2.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
21000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
402.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold resource in the new NW Step Out area adds to the project's higher-confidence resource base and demonstrates potential for expansion.

Positive factors

  • High-confidence indicated resource in the NW Step Out area.
  • Represents a new extension of vein zones.

Evidence · table

“2.03”

Context: 323,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 323000Grade: 183.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4186000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:bedf06e9f76dbb9c3e70
Deposit or zone
NW Step Out
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
323000
Grade
183.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4186000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
402.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated silver equivalent resource in the NW Step Out area is a positive for future growth, though its exclusion from the current mine plan limits immediate economic impact.

Positive factors

  • High-grade indicated silver equivalent resource in the new NW Step Out area.
  • Represents a new extension of vein zones, indicating growth potential.

Negative factors

  • Resources from this area are excluded from the current PEA mine plan.

Evidence · table

“183.4”

Context: 323,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 622000Grade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 33000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:ed4c9e75064d9b305712
Deposit or zone
NW Step Out
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
622000
Grade
1.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
33000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
327
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This inferred gold resource in the NW Step Out area contributes to the project's overall scale, but its lower confidence and exclusion from the mine plan limit immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential in the NW Step Out area.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Resources from this area are excluded from the current PEA mine plan.

Evidence · table

“1.67”

Context: 622,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 622000Grade: 146.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6538000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:ed4c9e75064d9b305712
Deposit or zone
NW Step Out
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
622000
Grade
146.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
6538000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
327
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred silver equivalent resource in the NW Step Out area indicates potential for project growth, though its exclusion from the mine plan and lower confidence limit immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Inferred silver equivalent resource in the NW Step Out area provides upside potential for future growth.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Resources from this area are excluded from the current PEA mine plan.

Evidence · table

“146.7”

Context: 622,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · goldTonnes: 891000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 89000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:09f76975e68fbabfe0df
Deposit or zone
East Extension
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
891000
Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
89000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
527.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This inferred gold resource in the East Extension area contributes to the project's overall scale, but its lower confidence category means it is more speculative.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential in the East Extension area.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“3.10”

Context: 891,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredTonopah West Project · silverTonnes: 891000Grade: 193Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 15109000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Jeffrey Bickel
Resource group id
resource:09f76975e68fbabfe0df
Deposit or zone
East Extension
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
891000
Grade
193
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
15109000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
140
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-04

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
527.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The large inferred silver equivalent resource in the East Extension area indicates significant potential for project growth, though further work is needed to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant inferred silver equivalent resource in the East Extension area provides substantial upside potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“193.0”

Context: 891,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Metallurgical Results (2)

agitated cyanide leachingTonopah West Project · goldRecovery: 96.3 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
agitated cyanide leaching
Processing Route
3-stage crushing, milling, agitated cyanide leaching, Merrill-Crowe zinc precipitation, precipitate smelting

Recovery

Recovery
96.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Laboratory
Kappes, Cassiday and Associates
Consultant
Travis Manning

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high gold recovery achieved through a conventional processing route is a strong positive, supporting the project's economic viability.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery (96.3%) indicates efficient processing.
  • Conventional and proven processing route.

Evidence · text

“Life-of-mine metal recovery averages 91.6% for silver and 96.3% for gold.”

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 96.3% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

agitated cyanide leachingTonopah West Project · silverRecovery: 91.6 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tonopah West Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, United States
Ticker
BKRRF

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
agitated cyanide leaching
Processing Route
3-stage crushing, milling, agitated cyanide leaching, Merrill-Crowe zinc precipitation, precipitate smelting

Recovery

Recovery
91.6 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Laboratory
Kappes, Cassiday and Associates
Consultant
Travis Manning

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high silver recovery achieved through a conventional processing route is a strong positive, supporting the project's economic viability.

Positive factors

  • High silver recovery (91.6%) indicates efficient processing.
  • Conventional and proven processing route.

Evidence · text

“Life-of-mine metal recovery averages 91.6% for silver and 96.3% for gold.”

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 91.6% is at or above the exceptional band (90%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.