Bonanza Gold Intercept from Phase 2 Drilling at Bousquet
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Bullion Gold Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- BGD
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Quebec, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 14:47:15 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bullion Gold Resources announced bonanza gold assay results from Phase 2 drilling at its Bousquet Gold Project in Quebec, Canada. Hole BO-26-63 returned 7.5m at 41.81 g/t Au from 182m, including higher-grade sub-intervals, marking the best drill intersection for the project to date. Assays for the remainder of this hole and six other holes are still pending.
Reasoning: The announcement reports a bonanza gold intercept of 7.5m at 41.81 g/t Au, including higher-grade sub-intervals, which is the best drill intersection to date for the Bousquet Project. This result is highly material and novel, confirming high-grade potential and validating the structural model, supported by robust QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept significantly exceeds previous best results for the project
- Confirms visible gold observations, adding confidence to the geological model
- Detailed QA/QC procedures and QP sign-off enhance data reliability
- Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly disclosed
Negative factors
- Assays are still pending for the remainder of the hole and other drill holes, creating uncertainty
- Intercepts are reported as downhole widths only, with no true width stated
Facts used in scoring: 69
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes detailed QA/QC disclosure, naming a Competent Person, certified laboratories (AGAT Laboratories and Laboratoire Expert), and specific methods like fire assay, ICP-OES, screen fire assay, gravimetric finish, and downhole surveying.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Mr. Neal Leggo, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a consultant to Olympio Metals Limited. Mr. Leggo has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves". Mr Leggo consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. Diamond core samples (NQ) were collected in timber core trays, sequence checked, metre marked and oriented at the drill site. The drill core was logged at Explo-logik core shack in Val D'Or by Quebec qualified geologists. All drill core is NQ. All downhole surveying is done with an OMNIX42 (every 30m), rig alignment with a TN14 Gyro, diamond core was not orientated for this program. Alternatively, a downhole televiewer survey will be conducted on all holes. Proportion of core recovered for each 3-metre interval of core drilled is recorded in the drill database. All drill core was qualitatively logged by the Explo-logik staff geologist. Logging includes lithology, alteration, mineralisation, veining and photography. The main rock types observed in the logging were greywacke, siltstone and conglomerate. Sample are sent to either AGAT Laboratories in Thunder Bay or Laboratory Expert in Rouyn-Noranda. All samples from 2025 and 2026 drilling were analysed at AGAT Laboratories; However, samples from BO-26-63 drillhole have been analysed at Laboratoire Expert. Samples sent to AGAT were analysed for Au by 50g fire assay fusion (FA) with Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) finish (202-551), and also 34 elements by 4-acid digest with ICP_OES finish (201-070). Samples with observed or suspected coarse gold as logged by the geologist were analysed by screen Fire assay (202-121). From the pulverised sample, a 1kg sub-sample was sieved to 106μm. The +106μm fraction was analysed to extinction by FA/ICP(OES) and the -106μm fraction by FA/ICP(OES). AGAT protocols are considered by the Qualified Person to be consistent, in general, with industry standards. Samples sent to Laboratory Expert were analysed for Au by 30gm lead fire assay (FA) with Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) finish. Samples with values greater than 30g/t or have logged visible gold are re assayed by fire assay with gravimetric finish.”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au for reporting significant intersections.
Evidence · text
“≥ 0.5g/t Au cut-off”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The document states a minimum width of 1m and a maximum internal dilution of 2m for compositing intervals.
Evidence · text
“1m min. width, 2m max. internal dilution (downhole)”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 69. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (69)
BO-26-63Bousquet · goldGrade: 41.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-26-63
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 182 m
- To
- 189.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 249 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-26-63:182-189.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676560.2
- Northing
- 5343688
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Laboratoire Expert
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept of 7.5m at 41.81 g/t Au is a bonanza grade, significantly exceeding previous results and representing the best intersection to date for the Bousquet Project, indicating strong potential for high-grade mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (41.81 g/t Au) over a significant width (7.5m)
- This is the best drill intersection for the project to date, indicating high-grade potential
- Confirms visible gold observations, adding confidence to the geological model
Negative factors
- Assays are still pending for the remainder of the hole
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“41.81”
Context: 7.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 41.81 g/t Au over 7.5m is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (15 g/t Au for underground mining).
Evidence · table
“41.81”
Context: 7.5
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: 182.0
BO-26-63Bousquet · goldGrade: 60.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-26-63
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 60.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 182 m
- To
- 186.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 249 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-26-63:182-186.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676560.2
- Northing
- 5343688
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Laboratoire Expert
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 4.3m at 60.36 g/t Au is an exceptionally high-grade component of the main intercept, further highlighting the bonanza nature of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- Extremely high gold grade (60.36 g/t Au) over a good width (4.3m)
- This sub-interval contributes significantly to the overall bonanza intercept
Negative factors
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“60.36”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 60.36 g/t Au over 4.3m is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (15 g/t Au for underground mining).
Evidence · table
“60.36”
Context: 4.3
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 182.0
BO-26-63Bousquet · goldGrade: 109.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-26-63
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 109.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 182.7 m
- To
- 184.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 249 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-26-63:182.7-184.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676560.2
- Northing
- 5343688
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Laboratoire Expert
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 2.0m at 109.51 g/t Au is an exceptionally high-grade component, further emphasizing the bonanza nature of the mineralization within BO-26-63.
Positive factors
- Extremely high gold grade (109.51 g/t Au) over a good width (2.0m)
- This sub-interval represents the highest-grade portion of the bonanza intercept
Negative factors
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“109.51”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 109.51 g/t Au over 2.0m is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (15 g/t Au for underground mining).
Evidence · table
“109.51”
Context: 2.0
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 182.7
BO-25-27Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-27
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 35.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 336 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-27:34-35.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676528
- Northing
- 5343882
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 188 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.62 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 34
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-27”
Context: 34
BO-25-27Bousquet · goldGrade: 6.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-27
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 189.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 336 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-27:183-189.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676528
- Northing
- 5343882
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 188 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (6.54 g/t Au) over a good width (6.4m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“6.54”
Context: 6.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“6.4”
Context: 183
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-27”
Context: 183
BO-25-27Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-27
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 199.5 m
- To
- 201 m
- Hole Depth
- 336 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-27:199.5-201
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676528
- Northing
- 5343882
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 188 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.83 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 199.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-27”
Context: 199.5
BO-25-27Bousquet · goldGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.55 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-27
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.55 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 219.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 336 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-27:218-219.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676528
- Northing
- 5343882
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 188 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (2.05 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“2.05”
Context: 1.55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.55”
Context: 218
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-27”
Context: 218
BO-25-28Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-28
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 42 m
- To
- 43 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-28:42-43
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676568
- Northing
- 5343839
- Elevation
- 322 m
- Azimuth
- 205 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.77 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 42
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-28”
Context: 42
BO-25-28Bousquet · goldGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-28
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 138 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-28:138-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676568
- Northing
- 5343839
- Elevation
- 322 m
- Azimuth
- 205 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (6.2 g/t Au) over a good width (7.9m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: 7.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: 138
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-28”
Context: 138
BO-25-28Bousquet · goldGrade: 54.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-28
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 54.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 235.5 m
- To
- 237 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-28:235.5-237
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676568
- Northing
- 5343839
- Elevation
- 322 m
- Azimuth
- 205 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, indicating high-grade potential within the deposit, but its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (54.2 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“54.2”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 54.2 g/t Au over 1.5m is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (15 g/t Au for underground mining).
Evidence · table
“54.2”
Context: 1.5
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 235.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-28”
Context: 235.5
BO-25-33Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-33
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.55 m
- From
- 49.3 m
- To
- 53.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 102 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-33:49.3-53.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Amadee
- Easting
- 676092
- Northing
- 5343758
- Elevation
- 334 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.71 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.71”
Context: 4.55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“4.55”
Context: 49.3
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-33”
Context: 49.3
BO-25-34Bousquet · goldGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-34
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 31.5 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 102 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-34:31.5-33
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Amadee
- Easting
- 676038
- Northing
- 5343774
- Elevation
- 336 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (4.7 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“4.7”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 31.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-34”
Context: 31.5
BO-25-38Bousquet · goldGrade: 3.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-38
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 5.65 m
- To
- 10.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 102 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-38:5.65-10.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Amadee
- Easting
- 676202
- Northing
- 5343726
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (3.29 g/t Au) over a good width (4.5m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“3.29”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: 5.65
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-38”
Context: 5.65
BO-25-40Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-40
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 355.5 m
- To
- 370 m
- Hole Depth
- 408 m
- Intercept Depth
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-40:355.5-370
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur
- Easting
- 675089
- Northing
- 5343598
- Elevation
- 320 m
- Azimuth
- 220 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a significant width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (1.96 g/t Au) over a significant width (14.5m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.96”
Context: 14.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“14.5”
Context: 355.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-40”
Context: 355.5
BO-25-53Bousquet · goldGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-53
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 218.2 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-53:218.2-219.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677036
- Northing
- 5344273
- Elevation
- 338 m
- Azimuth
- 343 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, which was previously the best result for the project but is now superseded by the new bonanza intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade (12.2 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.3m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“12.2”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 218.2
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-53”
Context: 218.2
BO-25-57Bousquet · goldGrade: 4.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-57
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 92.5 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-57:92.5-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676625
- Northing
- 5343718
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 211 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (4.22 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“4.22”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 92.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-57”
Context: 92.5
BO-25-38Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-38
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 28.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 102 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-38:27.4-28.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Amadee
- Easting
- 676202
- Northing
- 5343726
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.54 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.15m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: 27.4
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-38”
Context: 27.4
BO-25-39Bousquet · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-39
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- From
- 13.25 m
- To
- 17 m
- Hole Depth
- 207 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-39:13.25-17
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur Ext.
- Easting
- 675423
- Northing
- 5343350
- Elevation
- 308 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (2.24 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“2.24”
Context: 3.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“3.75”
Context: 13.25
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-39”
Context: 13.25
BO-25-40Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-40
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.15 m
- From
- 338 m
- To
- 340.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 408 m
- Intercept Depth
- 338 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-40:338-340.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur
- Easting
- 675089
- Northing
- 5343598
- Elevation
- 320 m
- Azimuth
- 220 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.84 g/t Au) over a narrow width (2.15m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: 2.15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“2.15”
Context: 338
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-40”
Context: 338
BO-25-40Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-40
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 373.8 m
- To
- 375.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 408 m
- Intercept Depth
- 338 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-40:373.8-375.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur
- Easting
- 675089
- Northing
- 5343598
- Elevation
- 320 m
- Azimuth
- 220 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.39 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 373.8
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-40”
Context: 373.8
BO-25-41Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-41
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 67 m
- To
- 68.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 225 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-41:67-68.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676496
- Northing
- 5343909
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 187 °
- Dip
- -51 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.58 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.2m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 67
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-41”
Context: 67
BO-25-41Bousquet · goldGrade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-41
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 182.3 m
- To
- 187.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 225 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-41:182.3-187.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676496
- Northing
- 5343909
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 187 °
- Dip
- -51 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (2.16 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“2.16”
Context: 4.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: 182.3
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-41”
Context: 182.3
BO-25-41Bousquet · goldGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-41
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 204 m
- To
- 205.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 225 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-41:204-205.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676496
- Northing
- 5343909
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 187 °
- Dip
- -51 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (2.52 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“2.52”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 204
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-41”
Context: 204
BO-25-42Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-42
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 87 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 222 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-42:87-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676495
- Northing
- 5343909
- Elevation
- 325 m
- Azimuth
- 150 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.57 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 87
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-42”
Context: 87
BO-25-42Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-42
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 216.5 m
- To
- 218 m
- Hole Depth
- 222 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-42:216.5-218
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676495
- Northing
- 5343909
- Elevation
- 325 m
- Azimuth
- 150 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.68 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 216.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-42”
Context: 216.5
BO-25-43Bousquet · goldGrade: 3.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-43
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 190 m
- To
- 192.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-43:190-192.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676551
- Northing
- 5343907
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (3.13 g/t Au) over a narrow width (2.6m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“3.13”
Context: 2.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 190
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-43”
Context: 190
BO-25-43Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-43
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 195 m
- To
- 196.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-43:195-196.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676551
- Northing
- 5343907
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.6 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 195
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-43”
Context: 195
BO-25-43Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-43
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 207 m
- To
- 208 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-43:207-208
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676551
- Northing
- 5343907
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.65 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 207
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-43”
Context: 207
BO-25-43Bousquet · goldGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-43
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 210 m
- To
- 211 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-43:210-211
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676551
- Northing
- 5343907
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (4.43 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“4.43”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 210
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-43”
Context: 210
BO-25-44Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-44
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 99.6 m
- To
- 101 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 99.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-44:99.6-101
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676796
- Northing
- 5343897
- Elevation
- 323 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.42 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.42”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 99.6
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-44”
Context: 99.6
BO-25-44Bousquet · goldGrade: 6.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-44
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 219 m
- To
- 220 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 99.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-44:219-220
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676796
- Northing
- 5343897
- Elevation
- 323 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (6.33 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“6.33”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 219
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-44”
Context: 219
BO-25-45Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-45
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 21.75 m
- To
- 22.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-45:21.75-22.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- VLF
- Easting
- 676601
- Northing
- 5343677
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.07 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 21.75
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-45”
Context: 21.75
BO-25-45Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-45
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 131 m
- To
- 132 m
- Hole Depth
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-45:131-132
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- VLF
- Easting
- 676601
- Northing
- 5343677
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.7 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 131
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-45”
Context: 131
BO-25-45Bousquet · goldGrade: 3.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-45
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 188.5 m
- To
- 189.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-45:188.5-189.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- VLF
- Easting
- 676601
- Northing
- 5343677
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (3.43 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.1m)
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“3.43”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 188.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-45”
Context: 188.5
BO-25-48Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-48
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 94.2 m
- To
- 95.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-48:94.2-95.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- VLF
- Easting
- 676793
- Northing
- 5343508
- Elevation
- 311 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.4 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 1.05
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: 94.2
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-48”
Context: 94.2
BO-25-48Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-48
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 103.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-48:103.5-105
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- VLF
- Easting
- 676793
- Northing
- 5343508
- Elevation
- 311 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.91 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.91”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 103.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-48”
Context: 103.5
BO-25-48Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-48
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 171.5 m
- To
- 174.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-48:171.5-174.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- VLF
- Easting
- 676793
- Northing
- 5343508
- Elevation
- 311 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.6 g/t Au) over a narrow width (3.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 171.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-48”
Context: 171.5
BO-25-49Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.32 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-49
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.32 m
- From
- 198.8 m
- To
- 200.12 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-49:198.8-200.12
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- VLF
- Easting
- 676843
- Northing
- 5343595
- Elevation
- 311 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.55 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.32m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 1.32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.32”
Context: 198.8
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-49”
Context: 198.8
BO-25-50Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-50
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 37 m
- To
- 39 m
- Hole Depth
- 162 m
- Intercept Depth
- 37 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-50:37-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur Ext.
- Easting
- 675641
- Northing
- 5343263
- Elevation
- 316 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.15 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 37
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-50”
Context: 37
BO-25-51Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-51
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.1 m
- From
- 47.1 m
- To
- 54.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 174 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-51:47.1-54.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur Ext.
- Easting
- 675838
- Northing
- 5343286
- Elevation
- 310 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.43 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.43”
Context: 7.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“7.1”
Context: 47.1
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-51”
Context: 47.1
BO-25-51Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-51
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 59.6 m
- To
- 62 m
- Hole Depth
- 174 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-51:59.6-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur Ext.
- Easting
- 675838
- Northing
- 5343286
- Elevation
- 310 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.06 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 59.6
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-51”
Context: 59.6
BO-25-51Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-51
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 69 m
- Hole Depth
- 174 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-51:68-69
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Decoeur Ext.
- Easting
- 675838
- Northing
- 5343286
- Elevation
- 310 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.5 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 68
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-51”
Context: 68
BO-25-53Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-53
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 225 m
- To
- 226.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 252 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-53:225-226.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677036
- Northing
- 5344273
- Elevation
- 338 m
- Azimuth
- 343 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.66 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 225
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-53”
Context: 225
BO-25-54Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-54
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 225.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-54:224-225.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677011
- Northing
- 5344327
- Elevation
- 340 m
- Azimuth
- 155 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.54 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.54”
Context: 1.35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.35”
Context: 224
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-54”
Context: 224
BO-25-54Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-54
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 245.7 m
- To
- 247 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-54:245.7-247
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677011
- Northing
- 5344327
- Elevation
- 340 m
- Azimuth
- 155 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.82 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.3m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 245.7
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-54”
Context: 245.7
BO-25-54Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-54
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 261.8 m
- To
- 263.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-54:261.8-263.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677011
- Northing
- 5344327
- Elevation
- 340 m
- Azimuth
- 155 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.18 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 261.8
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-54”
Context: 261.8
BO-25-54Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-54
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 279.3 m
- To
- 280.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-54:279.3-280.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677011
- Northing
- 5344327
- Elevation
- 340 m
- Azimuth
- 155 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.73 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.73”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 279.3
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-54”
Context: 279.3
BO-25-54Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-54
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 289.5 m
- To
- 292.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-54:289.5-292.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677011
- Northing
- 5344327
- Elevation
- 340 m
- Azimuth
- 155 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.49 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 289.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-54”
Context: 289.5
BO-25-54Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-54
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 334 m
- To
- 335 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-54:334-335
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677011
- Northing
- 5344327
- Elevation
- 340 m
- Azimuth
- 155 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.6 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 334
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-54”
Context: 334
BO-25-54Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-54
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 342.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-54:341-342.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677011
- Northing
- 5344327
- Elevation
- 340 m
- Azimuth
- 155 °
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.61 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 341
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-54”
Context: 341
BO-25-55Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-55
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 156.1 m
- To
- 157.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 330 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-55:156.1-157.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 676898
- Northing
- 5344358
- Elevation
- 339 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.54 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.3m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 156.1
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-55”
Context: 156.1
BO-25-55Bousquet · goldGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-55
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.45 m
- From
- 270.9 m
- To
- 272.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 330 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-55:270.9-272.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 676898
- Northing
- 5344358
- Elevation
- 339 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (2.04 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“2.04”
Context: 1.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.45”
Context: 270.9
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-55”
Context: 270.9
BO-25-56Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-56
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 250.5 m
- To
- 252 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 250.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-56:250.5-252
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- CB-1
- Easting
- 677092
- Northing
- 5344409
- Elevation
- 339 m
- Azimuth
- 156 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.51 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 250.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-56”
Context: 250.5
BO-25-57Bousquet · goldGrade: 2.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-57
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 24.35 m
- To
- 27.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-57:24.35-27.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676625
- Northing
- 5343718
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 211 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (2.21 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“2.21”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 24.35
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-57”
Context: 24.35
BO-25-57Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-57
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 36 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-57:33-36
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676625
- Northing
- 5343718
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 211 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.16 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 33
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-57”
Context: 33
BO-25-57Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-57
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 49.3 m
- To
- 50.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-57:49.3-50.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676625
- Northing
- 5343718
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 211 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.78 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.78”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: 49.3
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-57”
Context: 49.3
BO-25-57Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-57
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 59.8 m
- To
- 61 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-57:59.8-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676625
- Northing
- 5343718
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 211 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.5 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.2m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 59.8
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-57”
Context: 59.8
BO-25-57Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-57
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 61.95 m
- To
- 63.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-57:61.95-63.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676625
- Northing
- 5343718
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 211 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.56 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.56”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 61.95
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-57”
Context: 61.95
BO-25-57Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-57
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 184.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-57:183-184.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676625
- Northing
- 5343718
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 211 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.16 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 183
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-57”
Context: 183
BO-25-58Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-58
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 25.1 m
- To
- 26.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 201 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-58:25.1-26.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676674
- Northing
- 5343705
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.58 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.3m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 25.1
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-58”
Context: 25.1
BO-25-58Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-58
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 48.5 m
- To
- 49.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 201 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-58:48.5-49.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676674
- Northing
- 5343705
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.07 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: 48.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-58”
Context: 48.5
BO-25-58Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-58
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- From
- 64.35 m
- To
- 65.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 201 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-58:64.35-65.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676674
- Northing
- 5343705
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.73 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.73”
Context: 1.35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.35”
Context: 64.35
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-58”
Context: 64.35
BO-25-58Bousquet · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-58
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 127 m
- Hole Depth
- 201 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-58:126-127
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676674
- Northing
- 5343705
- Elevation
- 321 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak but economic gold grade over a narrow width, providing some context but lacking novelty.
Positive factors
- Grade (1.13 g/t Au) meets the weak threshold for orogenic gold deposits
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“1.13”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 126
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-58”
Context: 126
BO-25-59Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-59
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.45 m
- From
- 23.75 m
- To
- 25.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-59:23.75-25.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676575
- Northing
- 5343732
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.83 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.45m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: 1.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.45”
Context: 23.75
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-59”
Context: 23.75
BO-25-59Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-59
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 50.5 m
- To
- 51.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-59:50.5-51.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676575
- Northing
- 5343732
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.62 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.1m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 50.5
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-59”
Context: 50.5
BO-25-59Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-59
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- From
- 70.15 m
- To
- 74.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-59:70.15-74.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676575
- Northing
- 5343732
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.98 g/t Au) over a narrow width (4.25m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 4.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“4.25”
Context: 70.15
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-59”
Context: 70.15
BO-25-59Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-59
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 76.7 m
- To
- 78 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-59:76.7-78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676575
- Northing
- 5343732
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.89 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.3m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 76.7
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-59”
Context: 76.7
BO-25-59Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-59
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 108 m
- To
- 109.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-59:108-109.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676575
- Northing
- 5343732
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.57 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.5m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 108
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-59”
Context: 108
BO-25-59Bousquet · goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BO-25-59
- Project
- Bousquet
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 187.7 m
- To
- 188.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BO-25-59:187.7-188.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Paquin
- Easting
- 676575
- Northing
- 5343732
- Elevation
- 324 m
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade intercept that meets the cut-off but is not material, and has low novelty as it was previously reported.
Negative factors
- Low grade (0.98 g/t Au) over a narrow width (1.0m)
- This is a historical result, not new information
- Intercept is reported as downhole width only, with no true width stated
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10471/289509_82e7543384"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document reports 'Width (m)' as downhole length without stating the true width or drill orientation relative to the structure.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 187.7
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from 2025 drilling and is being re-released in this announcement.
Evidence · table
“BO-25-59”
Context: 187.7
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.