# Boots-on-the-Ground Work Program commences at the Jupiter Lithium Project in James Bay, Quebec

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/boots-on-the-ground-work-program-commences-at-the-jupiter-lithium-project-in-jam--ce70c157-f8d8-47bf-a65e-7b87160a78a3

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/GEM/news/6397120925831159/boots-on-the-ground-work-program-commences-at-the-jupiter-lithium-project-in-jam

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2023-09-12T13:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Green Battery Minerals Inc.

- Ticker: GEM

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Quebec

- Primary commodity: Lithium

- Secondary commodities: Graphite, Rare earth elements

- Document categories: Resource update, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-12 07:44:22 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Green Battery Minerals has commenced a 'boots-on-the-ground' exploration program at the Jupiter Lithium Project in James Bay, Quebec. The project is an early-stage lithium and REE opportunity surrounded by significant lithium deposits.

Reasoning: The company is commencing a new exploration program at the Jupiter Lithium project, which is highly prospective due to nearby discoveries, though it is still in the early exploration stage.

- Positive factor: commencement of exploration program

- Positive factor: proximity to major lithium deposits

- Positive factor: documented pegmatite occurrences

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document provides a summary of the current mineral resource at the Berkwood Graphite Project.

Evidence · text

> The current mineral resource at the Berkwood Graphite Project includes

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is described in a NI 43-101 Technical Report.

Evidence · text

> described in the technical report entitled, NI 43-101 Technical Report

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/boots-on-the-ground-work-program-commences-at-the-jupiter-lithium-project-in-jam--ce70c157-f8d8-47bf-a65e-7b87160a78a3#fact-resource-facts-0)

Berkwood Graphite Project · graphite

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Berkwood Graphite Project
- Commodity: graphite
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: Quebec
- Ticker: GEM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Edward Lyons, Florent Baril, Claude Duplessis, Luke van der Meer, Maxime Bouchard
- Resource group id: resource:11efe0956b7fc9947c68
- Deposit or zone: Lac Gueret South Project
- Material type: in-pit
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1760000
- Grade: 17
- Grade Unit: % Cgr
- Cutoff Grade: 6.81
- Cutoff Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2019-06-30

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-06-17T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2023-09-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a 2019 resource estimate for the Berkwood Graphite Project.

- Positive factor: high grade

- Negative factor: historical data

Evidence · table

> 17.0

Context: 1.76

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 4.2 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/boots-on-the-ground-work-program-commences-at-the-jupiter-lithium-project-in-jam--ce70c157-f8d8-47bf-a65e-7b87160a78a3#fact-resource-facts-1)

Berkwood Graphite Project · graphite

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Berkwood Graphite Project
- Commodity: graphite
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: Quebec
- Ticker: GEM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Edward Lyons, Florent Baril, Claude Duplessis, Luke van der Meer, Maxime Bouchard
- Resource group id: resource:8e95e1827d399d230eac
- Deposit or zone: Lac Gueret South Project
- Material type: in-pit
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 1530000
- Grade: 16.4
- Grade Unit: % Cgr
- Cutoff Grade: 6.81
- Cutoff Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2019-06-30

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2019-06-17T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2023-09-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a 2019 resource estimate for the Berkwood Graphite Project.

- Negative factor: historical data

Evidence · table

> 16.4

Context: 1.53

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 4.2 years before this release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
