# Boron One Holdings Inc. Completes an Environmental Impact Assessment for its Piskanja Boron Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/boron-one-holdings-inc-completes-an-environmental-impact-assessment-for-its-pisk--9646cef4-6451-4c54-8f58-937e11720b3d

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/BONE/news/8945701523454922/boron-one-holdings-inc-completes-an-environmental-impact-assessment-for-its-pisk

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-05-26T12:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Boron One Holdings Inc.

- Ticker: BONE

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Serbia

- Primary commodity: Boron

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Permitting

- Extracted: 2026-09-15 15:20:41 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Boron One Holdings Inc. has completed an independent Environmental Impact Assessment \(EIA\) for its Piskanja Boron Project in Serbia. The EIA is a critical component for the upcoming submission of an exploitation license application. The company also restated its existing mineral resource estimates from its June 2022 Technical Report.

Reasoning: The announcement of a completed EIA is a positive de-risking milestone for the permitting process, though the resource figures provided are historical restatements from a 2022 PEA.

- Positive factor: Completion of EIA is a key regulatory milestone

- Positive factor: Resource details provided for the Piskanja project

- Negative factor: Resource data is a restatement of a 2022 report

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document restates the mineral resource estimates for the Piskanja project.

Evidence · text

> as disclosed in the Company's report titled, "Technical Report and Preliminary Economic Assessment For The Piskanja Borate Project, Serbia, June 24, 2022"

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (3)

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/boron-one-holdings-inc-completes-an-environmental-impact-assessment-for-its-pisk--9646cef4-6451-4c54-8f58-937e11720b3d#fact-resource-facts-0)

Piskanja Boron Project · boron

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Piskanja Boron Project
- Commodity: boron
- Region: serbia
- Reported Region: Serbia
- Ticker: BONE

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: other
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Miodrag Banješević
- Resource group id: resource:9e898efa38475f8a9c03

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 1390000
- Grade: 35.59
- Grade Unit: % B2O3

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2022-06-24

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of measured resource from 2022 report.

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · text

> Measured Mineral Resource of 1.39 million tonnes \(averaging 35.59% B2O3\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/boron-one-holdings-inc-completes-an-environmental-impact-assessment-for-its-pisk--9646cef4-6451-4c54-8f58-937e11720b3d#fact-resource-facts-1)

Piskanja Boron Project · boron

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Piskanja Boron Project
- Commodity: boron
- Region: serbia
- Reported Region: Serbia
- Ticker: BONE

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: other
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Miodrag Banješević
- Resource group id: resource:bbb235a6459b965874c8

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 5480000
- Grade: 34.05
- Grade Unit: % B2O3

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2022-06-24

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of indicated resource from 2022 report.

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · text

> Indicated Mineral Resource of 5.48 million tonnes \(averaging 34.05% B2O3\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/boron-one-holdings-inc-completes-an-environmental-impact-assessment-for-its-pisk--9646cef4-6451-4c54-8f58-937e11720b3d#fact-resource-facts-2)

Piskanja Boron Project · boron

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Piskanja Boron Project
- Commodity: boron
- Region: serbia
- Reported Region: Serbia
- Ticker: BONE

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: other
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Miodrag Banješević
- Resource group id: resource:5321bbfcc59ece3e6e8b

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 284700
- Grade: 39.59
- Grade Unit: % B2O3

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2022-06-24

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of inferred resource from 2022 report.

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · text

> Inferred Mineral Resource of 284.7 thousand tonnes \(averaging 39.59% B2O3\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
