Brasnova Energy Materials Inc. Advances Capela Gold Project Through Expanded Sampling and Follow-Up of Additional Prospective Areas
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Brasnova Energy Materials Inc.
- Ticker
- BEM
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Sulfur, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 14:29:12 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Brasnova Energy Materials Inc. provided an update on its ongoing exploration program at the Capela Gold Project in Bahia, Brazil. The program includes detailed geological mapping, rock sampling, and systematic soil sampling to advance geological interpretation and define the extent of gold mineralization. While the release highlights previously reported encouraging rock chip results, new assay results from the expanded sampling are pending.
Reasoning: The company provided an update on its ongoing exploration program at the Capela Gold Project, highlighting previously reported encouraging surface rock chip results and the identification of new prospective areas. However, the assay results for the expanded sampling are pending, and the reported grades are historical surface samples, limiting the immediate novelty and materiality.
Positive factors
- Ongoing exploration program with systematic sampling
- Identification of additional prospective areas
- Previously reported encouraging rock chip results
- QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off
Negative factors
- Reported assay results are historical surface samples, not new drill intercepts
- New assay results from expanded sampling are pending
- Surface samples provide limited information on depth and continuity
Facts used in scoring: 147
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 147. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (147)
BGP-ROCK-002Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 4130Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-002
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4130
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a strong gold grade of 4.13 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- High gold grade for a surface sample (4.13 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“4,130”
Context: BGP-ROCK-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-002Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-002
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.8 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: BGP-ROCK-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-002Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-002
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“7.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-002Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 150.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-002
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 150.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 150.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.015% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“150.5”
Context: BGP-ROCK-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-002Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 188.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-002
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 188.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 188.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.018% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“188.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-002Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-002
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-002Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 51Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-002
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 51.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.005% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“51.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-002
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-003Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 527Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-003
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 527
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.527 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.527 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“527”
Context: BGP-ROCK-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-003Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-003
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.4 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-003Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-003
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-003Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 675.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-003
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 675.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 675.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.067% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“675.5”
Context: BGP-ROCK-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-003Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 336.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-003
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 336.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 336.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.033% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“336.5”
Context: BGP-ROCK-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-003Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-003
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-003Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 1162Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-003
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1162
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1162 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.116% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1,162”
Context: BGP-ROCK-003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-004Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 835Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-004
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 835
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.835 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.835 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“835”
Context: BGP-ROCK-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-004Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-004
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.8 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: BGP-ROCK-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-004Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-004
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-004Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 277.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-004
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 277.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 277.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.027% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“277.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-004Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 239.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-004
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 239.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 239.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.023% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“239.8”
Context: BGP-ROCK-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-004Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-004
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-004Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 1633Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-004
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1633
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1633 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.163% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1,633”
Context: BGP-ROCK-004
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-005Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 441Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-005
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 441
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.441 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.441 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“441”
Context: BGP-ROCK-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-005Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-005
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.7 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-005Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-005
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-005Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 729.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-005
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 729.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 729.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.072% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“729.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-005Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 237.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-005
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 237.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 237.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.023% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“237.8”
Context: BGP-ROCK-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-005Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-005
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-005Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 1921Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-005
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1921
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1921 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.192% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1,921”
Context: BGP-ROCK-005
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-006Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 1734Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-006
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1734
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 1.734 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (1.734 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“1,734”
Context: BGP-ROCK-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-006Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-006
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.7 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-006Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-006
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-006Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 151.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-006
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 151.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 151.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.015% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“151.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-006Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 44.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-006
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 44.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 44.1 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.004% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“44.1”
Context: BGP-ROCK-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-006Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-006
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-006Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 59Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-006
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 59
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 59.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.005% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“59.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-006
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-007Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 412Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-007
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 412
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.412 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.412 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“412”
Context: BGP-ROCK-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-007Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-007
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.3 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-007Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-007
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-007Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 347.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-007
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 347.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 347.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.034% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“347.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-007Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 72.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-007
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 72.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 72.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.007% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“72.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-007Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-007
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: BGP-ROCK-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-007Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 69Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-007
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 69
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 69.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.006% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“69.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-007
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-008Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 737Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-008
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 737
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.737 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.737 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“737”
Context: BGP-ROCK-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-008Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-008
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.5 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: BGP-ROCK-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-008Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-008
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-008Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 187.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-008
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 187.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 187.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.018% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“187.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-008Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 71.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-008
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 71.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 71.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.007% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“71.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-008Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-008
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: BGP-ROCK-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-008Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 11Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-008
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 11.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.001% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“11.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-008
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-009Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 592Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-009
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 592
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.592 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.592 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“592”
Context: BGP-ROCK-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-009Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-009
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-009Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-009
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-009Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 341.1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-009
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 341.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 341.1 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.034% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“341.1”
Context: BGP-ROCK-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-009Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 180Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-009
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 180
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 180.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.018% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“180.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-009Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-009
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-009Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 55Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-009
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 55
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 55.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.005% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“55.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-009
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-010Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 582Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-010
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 582
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.582 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.582 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“582”
Context: BGP-ROCK-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-010Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-010
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-010Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-010
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-010Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 354.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-010
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 354.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 354.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.035% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“354.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-010Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 93.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-010
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 93.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 93.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.009% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“93.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-010Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-010
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-010Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 51Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-010
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 51
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 51.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.005% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“51.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-010
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-011Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 241Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-011
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 241
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a weak gold grade of 0.241 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade for a surface sample (0.241 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“241”
Context: BGP-ROCK-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-011Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-011
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.3 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-011Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-011
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-011Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 220.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-011
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 220.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 220.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.022% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“220.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-011Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 51.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-011
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 51.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.005% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“51.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-011Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-011
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-011Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-011
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 13.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.001% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“13.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-011
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-012Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 836Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-012
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 836
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.836 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.836 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“836”
Context: BGP-ROCK-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-012Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-012
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-012Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-012
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-012Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 653.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-012
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 653.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 653.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.065% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“653.5”
Context: BGP-ROCK-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-012Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 73Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-012
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 73
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 73.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.007% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“73.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-012Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-012
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-012Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-012
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 6.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.0006% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-012
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-014Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 1435Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-014
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1435
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 1.435 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (1.435 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“1,435”
Context: BGP-ROCK-014
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-014Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-014
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.7 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-014
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-014Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-014
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-014
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-014Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 72.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-014
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 72.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 72.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.007% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“72.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-014
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-014Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 93.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-014
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 93.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 93.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.009% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“93.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-014
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-014Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-014
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-014
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-014Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-014
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 42.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.004% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“42.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-014
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-015Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 441Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-015
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 441
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.441 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.441 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“441”
Context: BGP-ROCK-015
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-015Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-015
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.7 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-015
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-015Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-015
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-015
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-015Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 707.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-015
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 707.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 707.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.070% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“707.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-015
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-015Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 136.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-015
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 136.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 136.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.013% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“136.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-015
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-015Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-015
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: BGP-ROCK-015
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-015Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 1343Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-015
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1343
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1343 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.134% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1,343”
Context: BGP-ROCK-015
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-016Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 694Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-016
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 694
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.694 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.694 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“694”
Context: BGP-ROCK-016
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-016Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-016
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.9 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-016
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-016Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-016
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-016
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-016Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 345.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-016
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 345.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 345.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.034% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“345.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-016
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-016Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 54.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-016
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 54.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 54.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.005% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“54.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-016
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-016Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-016
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: BGP-ROCK-016
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-016Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-016
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 10.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.001% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“10.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-016
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-017Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 578Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-017
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 578
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.578 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.578 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“578”
Context: BGP-ROCK-017
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-017Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-017
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-017
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-017Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-017
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-017
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-017Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 255Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-017
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 255
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 255 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.025% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“255”
Context: BGP-ROCK-017
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-017Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 90.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-017
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 90.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 90.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.009% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“90.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-017
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-017Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-017
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-017
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-017Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 954Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-017
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 954
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 954 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.095% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“954”
Context: BGP-ROCK-017
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-018Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 522Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-018
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 522
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.522 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.522 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“522”
Context: BGP-ROCK-018
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-018Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-018
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-018
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-018Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-018
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-018
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-018Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 322.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-018
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 322.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 322.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.032% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“322.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-018
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-018Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 81.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-018
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 81.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 81.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.008% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“81.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-018
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-018Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-018
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-018
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-018Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 263Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-018
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 263
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 263 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.026% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“263”
Context: BGP-ROCK-018
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-019Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 601Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-019
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 601
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.601 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.601 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“601”
Context: BGP-ROCK-019
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-019Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-019
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-019
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-019Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-019
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-019
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-019Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 378.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-019
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 378.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 378.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.037% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“378.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-019
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-019Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 271.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-019
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 271.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 271.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.027% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“271.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-019
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-019Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-019
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-019
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-019Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 453Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-019
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 453
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 453 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.045% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“453”
Context: BGP-ROCK-019
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-020Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 768Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-020
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 768
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.768 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.768 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“768”
Context: BGP-ROCK-020
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-020Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-020
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-020
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-020Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-020
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“<1”
Context: BGP-ROCK-020
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-020Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 233.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-020
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 233.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 233.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.023% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“233.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-020
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-020Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 206.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-020
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 206.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 206.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.020% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“206.3”
Context: BGP-ROCK-020
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-020Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-020
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-020
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-020Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 742Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-020
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 742
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 742 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.074% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“742”
Context: BGP-ROCK-020
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-021Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 771Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-021
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 771
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.771 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.771 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“771”
Context: BGP-ROCK-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-021Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-021
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.6 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: BGP-ROCK-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-021Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-021
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-021Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 449.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-021
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 449.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 449.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.044% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“449.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-021Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 418.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-021
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 418.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 418.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.041% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“418.7”
Context: BGP-ROCK-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-021Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-021
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: BGP-ROCK-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-021Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 1656Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-021
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1656
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1656 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.165% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1,656”
Context: BGP-ROCK-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-022Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 1170Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-022
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1170
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 1.170 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (1.170 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“1,170”
Context: BGP-ROCK-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-022Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-022
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 1.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (1.0 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-022Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-022
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-022Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 688.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-022
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 688.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 688.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.068% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“688.8”
Context: BGP-ROCK-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-022Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 357.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-022
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 357.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 357.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.035% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“357.5”
Context: BGP-ROCK-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-022Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-022
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-022Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 772Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-022
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 772
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 772 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.077% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“772”
Context: BGP-ROCK-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-023Capela Gold Project · goldGrade: 671Grade Unit: ppbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-023
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 671
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.671 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample (0.671 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept
Evidence · table
“671”
Context: BGP-ROCK-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-023Capela Gold Project · silverGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-023
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade (0.2 ppm)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-023Capela Gold Project · arsenicGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-023
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges.
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“7.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-023Capela Gold Project · copperGrade: 80.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-023
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 80.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 80.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.008% Cu)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“80.2”
Context: BGP-ROCK-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-023Capela Gold Project · leadGrade: 46.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-023
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 46.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.004% Pb)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“46.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-023Capela Gold Project · sulfurGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-023
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration.
Negative factors
- Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: BGP-ROCK-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BGP-ROCK-023Capela Gold Project · zincGrade: 25Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BGP-ROCK-023
- Project
- Capela Gold Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Bahia, Brazil
- Ticker
- BEM
Geometry
- Grade
- 25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 25.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.002% Zn)
- Result is historical and from a surface sample
Evidence · table
“25.0”
Context: BGP-ROCK-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.