# Brasnova Energy Materials Inc. Advances Capela Gold Project Through Expanded Sampling and Follow-Up of Additional Prospective Areas Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/BEM/news/8654627448360393/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-08-13T12:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Brasnova Energy Materials Inc. - Ticker: BEM - Exchange: TSX - Region: Bahia, Brazil - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver, Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Sulfur, Zinc - Document categories: Drill results - Extracted: 2026-09-13 14:29:12 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Brasnova Energy Materials Inc. provided an update on its ongoing exploration program at the Capela Gold Project in Bahia, Brazil. The program includes detailed geological mapping, rock sampling, and systematic soil sampling to advance geological interpretation and define the extent of gold mineralization. While the release highlights previously reported encouraging rock chip results, new assay results from the expanded sampling are pending. Reasoning: The company provided an update on its ongoing exploration program at the Capela Gold Project, highlighting previously reported encouraging surface rock chip results and the identification of new prospective areas. However, the assay results for the expanded sampling are pending, and the reported grades are historical surface samples, limiting the immediate novelty and materiality. - Positive factor: Ongoing exploration program with systematic sampling - Positive factor: Identification of additional prospective areas - Positive factor: Previously reported encouraging rock chip results - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off - Negative factor: Reported assay results are historical surface samples, not new drill intercepts - Negative factor: New assay results from expanded sampling are pending - Negative factor: Surface samples provide limited information on depth and continuity Facts used in scoring: 147 ## Classification and evidence No classification tags are available. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 147. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (147) ### BGP-ROCK-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-0) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-002 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 4130 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a strong gold grade of 4.13 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: High gold grade for a surface sample \(4.13 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 4,130 Context: BGP-ROCK-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-1) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-002 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.8 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.8 Context: BGP-ROCK-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-2) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-002 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 7.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-3) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-002 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 150.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 150.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.015% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 150.5 Context: BGP-ROCK-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-4) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-002 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 188.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 188.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.018% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 188.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-5) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-002 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-6) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-002 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 51 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 51.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.005% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 51.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-002 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-7) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-003 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 527 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.527 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.527 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 527 Context: BGP-ROCK-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-8) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-003 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.4 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-9) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-003 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 3.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-10) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-003 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 675.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 675.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.067% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 675.5 Context: BGP-ROCK-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-11) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-003 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 336.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 336.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.033% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 336.5 Context: BGP-ROCK-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-12) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-003 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-003 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-13) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-003 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1162 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1162 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.116% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1,162 Context: BGP-ROCK-003 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-14) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-004 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 835 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.835 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.835 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 835 Context: BGP-ROCK-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-15) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-004 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.8 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.8 Context: BGP-ROCK-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-16) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-004 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 6.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-17) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-004 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 277.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 277.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.027% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 277.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-18) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-004 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 239.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 239.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.023% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 239.8 Context: BGP-ROCK-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-19) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-004 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-20) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-004 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1633 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1633 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.163% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1,633 Context: BGP-ROCK-004 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-21) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-005 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 441 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.441 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.441 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 441 Context: BGP-ROCK-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-22) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-005 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.7 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-23) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-005 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 3.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-24) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-005 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 729.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 729.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.072% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 729.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-25) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-005 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 237.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 237.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.023% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 237.8 Context: BGP-ROCK-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-26) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-005 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-005 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-27) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-005 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1921 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1921 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.192% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1,921 Context: BGP-ROCK-005 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-28) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-006 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1734 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 1.734 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(1.734 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 1,734 Context: BGP-ROCK-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-29) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-006 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.7 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-30) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-006 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 4.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-31) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-006 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 151.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 151.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.015% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 151.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-32) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-006 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 44.1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 44.1 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.004% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 44.1 Context: BGP-ROCK-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-33) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-006 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-006 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-34) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-006 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 59 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 59.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.005% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 59.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-006 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-35) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-007 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 412 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.412 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.412 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 412 Context: BGP-ROCK-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-36) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-007 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.3 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-37) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-007 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 4.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-38) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-007 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 347.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 347.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.034% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 347.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-39) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-007 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 72.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 72.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.007% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 72.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-40) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-007 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.1 Context: BGP-ROCK-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-007 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-41) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-007 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 69 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 69.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.006% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 69.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-007 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-42) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-008 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 737 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.737 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.737 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 737 Context: BGP-ROCK-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-43) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-008 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.5 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.5 Context: BGP-ROCK-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-44) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-008 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 5.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-45) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-008 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 187.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 187.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.018% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 187.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-46) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-008 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 71.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 71.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.007% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 71.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-47) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-008 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: BGP-ROCK-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-008 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-48) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-008 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 11 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 11.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.001% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 11.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-008 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-49) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-009 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 592 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.592 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.592 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 592 Context: BGP-ROCK-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-50) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-009 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-51) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-009 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 5.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-52) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-009 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 341.1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 341.1 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.034% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 341.1 Context: BGP-ROCK-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-53) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-009 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 180 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 180.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.018% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 180.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-54) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-009 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-009 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-55) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-009 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 55 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 55.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.005% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 55.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-009 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-56) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-010 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 582 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.582 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.582 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 582 Context: BGP-ROCK-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-57) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-010 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-58) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-010 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 5.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-59) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-010 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 354.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 354.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.035% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 354.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-60) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-010 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 93.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 93.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.009% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 93.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-61) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-010 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.6 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-010 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-62) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-010 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 51 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 51.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.005% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 51.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-010 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-63) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-011 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 241 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a weak gold grade of 0.241 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Weak gold grade for a surface sample \(0.241 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 241 Context: BGP-ROCK-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-64) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-011 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.3 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-65) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-011 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 4.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-66) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-011 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 220.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 220.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.022% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 220.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-67) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-011 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 51.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 51.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.005% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 51.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-68) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-011 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-69) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-011 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 13 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 13.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.001% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 13.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-011 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-70) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-012 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 836 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.836 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.836 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 836 Context: BGP-ROCK-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-71) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-012 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-72) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-012 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 5.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-73) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-012 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 653.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 653.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.065% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 653.5 Context: BGP-ROCK-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-74) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-012 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 73 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 73.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.007% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 73.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-75) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-012 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 3.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-76) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-012 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 6.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.0006% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 6.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-012 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-014 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-77) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-014 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1435 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 1.435 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(1.435 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 1,435 Context: BGP-ROCK-014 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-014 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-78) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-014 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.7 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-014 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-014 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-79) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-014 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 4.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-014 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-014 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-80) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-014 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 72.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 72.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.007% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 72.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-014 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-014 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-81) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-014 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 93.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 93.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.009% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 93.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-014 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-014 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-82) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-014 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-014 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-014 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-83) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-014 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 42.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.004% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 42.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-014 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-015 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-84) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-015 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 441 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.441 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.441 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 441 Context: BGP-ROCK-015 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-015 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-85) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-015 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.7 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-015 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-015 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-86) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-015 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 5.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-015 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-015 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-87) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-015 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 707.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 707.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.070% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 707.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-015 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-015 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-88) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-015 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 136.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 136.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.013% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 136.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-015 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-015 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-89) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-015 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 3.1 Context: BGP-ROCK-015 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-015 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-90) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-015 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1343 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1343 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.134% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1,343 Context: BGP-ROCK-015 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-016 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-91) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-016 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 694 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.694 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.694 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 694 Context: BGP-ROCK-016 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-016 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-92) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-016 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.9 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-016 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-016 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-93) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-016 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 4.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-016 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-016 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-94) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-016 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 345.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 345.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.034% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 345.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-016 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-016 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-95) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-016 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 54.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 54.9 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.005% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 54.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-016 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-016 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-96) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-016 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 2.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 2.1 Context: BGP-ROCK-016 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-016 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-97) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-016 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 10 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 10.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.001% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 10.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-016 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-017 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-98) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-017 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 578 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.578 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.578 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 578 Context: BGP-ROCK-017 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-017 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-99) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-017 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-017 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-017 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-100) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-017 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 4.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-017 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-017 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-101) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-017 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 255 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 255 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.025% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 255 Context: BGP-ROCK-017 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-017 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-102) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-017 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 90.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 90.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.009% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 90.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-017 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-017 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-103) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-017 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-017 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-017 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-104) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-017 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 954 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 954 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.095% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 954 Context: BGP-ROCK-017 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-018 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-105) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-018 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 522 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.522 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.522 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 522 Context: BGP-ROCK-018 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-018 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-106) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-018 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-018 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-018 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-107) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-018 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 5.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-018 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-018 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-108) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-018 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 322.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 322.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.032% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 322.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-018 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-018 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-109) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-018 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 81.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 81.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.008% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 81.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-018 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-018 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-110) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-018 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-018 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-018 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-111) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-018 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 263 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 263 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.026% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 263 Context: BGP-ROCK-018 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-019 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-112) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-019 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 601 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.601 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.601 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 601 Context: BGP-ROCK-019 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-019 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-113) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-019 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-019 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-019 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-114) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-019 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 3.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-019 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-019 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-115) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-019 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 378.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 378.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.037% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 378.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-019 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-019 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-116) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-019 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 271.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 271.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.027% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 271.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-019 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-019 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-117) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-019 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-019 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-019 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-118) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-019 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 453 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 453 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.045% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 453 Context: BGP-ROCK-019 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-020 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-119) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-020 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 768 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.768 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.768 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 768 Context: BGP-ROCK-020 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-020 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-120) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-020 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-020 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-020 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-121) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-020 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > <1 Context: BGP-ROCK-020 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-020 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-122) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-020 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 233.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 233.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.023% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 233.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-020 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-020 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-123) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-020 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 206.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 206.3 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.020% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 206.3 Context: BGP-ROCK-020 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-020 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-124) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-020 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-020 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-020 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-125) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-020 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 742 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 742 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.074% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 742 Context: BGP-ROCK-020 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-021 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-126) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-021 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 771 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.771 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.771 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 771 Context: BGP-ROCK-021 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-021 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-127) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-021 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.6 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.6 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: BGP-ROCK-021 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-021 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-128) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-021 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 5.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-021 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-021 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-129) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-021 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 449.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 449.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.044% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 449.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-021 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-021 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-130) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-021 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 418.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 418.7 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.041% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 418.7 Context: BGP-ROCK-021 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-021 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-131) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-021 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: BGP-ROCK-021 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-021 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-132) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-021 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1656 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 1656 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.165% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1,656 Context: BGP-ROCK-021 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-022 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-133) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-022 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1170 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 1.170 g/t, indicating significant surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(1.170 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 1,170 Context: BGP-ROCK-022 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-022 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-134) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-022 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 1.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(1.0 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-022 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-022 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-135) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-022 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 6.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-022 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-022 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-136) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-022 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 688.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 688.8 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.068% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 688.8 Context: BGP-ROCK-022 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-022 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-137) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-022 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 357.5 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 357.5 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.035% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 357.5 Context: BGP-ROCK-022 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-022 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-138) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-022 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-022 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-022 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-139) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-022 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 772 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 772 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.077% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 772 Context: BGP-ROCK-022 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-023 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-140) Capela Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-023 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 671 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a moderate gold grade of 0.671 g/t, indicating surface mineralization, though its novelty is low as it was previously reported. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade for a surface sample \(0.671 g/t Au\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample, not a drill intercept Evidence · table > 671 Context: BGP-ROCK-023 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-023 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-141) Capela Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-023 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low silver grade of 0.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low silver grade \(0.2 ppm\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-023 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-023 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-142) Capela Gold Project · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-023 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: arsenic - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of arsenic, a deleterious element, which could indicate potential processing challenges. - Negative factor: Presence of arsenic, a deleterious element - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 7.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-023 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-023 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-143) Capela Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-023 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 80.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low copper grade of 80.2 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low copper grade \(0.008% Cu\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 80.2 Context: BGP-ROCK-023 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-023 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-144) Capela Gold Project · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-023 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: lead - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 46.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low lead grade of 46.4 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low lead grade \(0.004% Pb\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 46.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-023 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-023 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-145) Capela Gold Project · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-023 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: sulfur - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample shows the presence of sulfur, indicating sulphide mineralization which could be a processing consideration. - Negative factor: Presence of sulfur, which can indicate sulphide mineralization and potential processing challenges - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: BGP-ROCK-023 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### BGP-ROCK-023 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/brasnova-energy-materials-inc-advances-capela-gold-project-through-expanded-samp--9e874834-d71d-4f49-be7a-f92d091fbe89#fact-drill-facts-146) Capela Gold Project · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: BGP-ROCK-023 - Project: Capela Gold Project - Commodity: zinc - Region: brazil - Reported Region: Bahia, Brazil - Ticker: BEM #### Geometry - Grade: 25 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS Geosol - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, sulfur #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This historical rock chip sample returned a very low zinc grade of 25.0 ppm, which is not material for a gold project. - Negative factor: Very low zinc grade \(0.002% Zn\) - Negative factor: Result is historical and from a surface sample Evidence · table > 25.0 Context: BGP-ROCK-023 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.