Bravo Reports Results of Pre-Feasibility Study for its Luanga Project

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Bravo Mining Corp.
Ticker
BRVO.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Pará State, Brazil
Primary commodity
Palladium
Secondary commodities
Platinum, Rhodium, Gold, Nickel, Sulfur
Document categories
Resource update, Economic study, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-22 10:23:10 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Bravo Mining Corp. announced robust results from a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for its Luanga Project in Brazil, highlighting a Base Case with a US$1.45 billion after-tax NPV and a 35.1% IRR. The study includes a maiden Mineral Reserve of 86.7 Mt grading 2.77 g/t PdEq1 and improved metallurgical recoveries for key metals. The project benefits from vertical integration through a ZPE smelter, offering fiscal advantages, and has achieved a key environmental permitting milestone.

Reasoning: Bravo Mining's PFS for the Luanga Project demonstrates strong economics with a US$1.45 billion after-tax NPV and 35.1% IRR, supported by a maiden Mineral Reserve and improved metallurgical recoveries. The vertical integration strategy within Brazil's ZPE offers significant fiscal advantages. While the inclusion of Inferred resources in the Opportunity Case and the exclusion of copper revenues from the Base Case present minor caveats, the overall study results are highly positive and de-risk the project significantly.

Positive factors

  • Robust economics with high NPV and IRR for the Base Case PFS.
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declared, converting a significant portion of M&I resources.
  • Improved metallurgical recoveries for key metals (Pd, Au, Ni) with Jameson Cell technology.
  • Strategic vertical integration with ZPE smelter providing fiscal benefits.
  • Key environmental permitting milestone achieved (Preliminary Licence granted).

Negative factors

  • Opportunity Case includes Inferred Mineral Resources in the economic analysis, which is speculative.
  • The PFS does not contemplate processing the Oxide component of the MRE, which is stockpiled.
  • Copper revenues are not incorporated into the PFS Base Case economic analysis, representing a potential missed upside.

Facts used in scoring: 35

Classification and evidence

PFS Completepositive

AACE Class 3 study complete.

Why it applies: The document reports the results of an independent Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for the Luanga Project.

Evidence · text

“Bravo Reports Results of Pre-Feasibility Study for its Luanga Project”

High IRRpositive

Post-tax real unlevered IRR in the strong tier or better.

Why it applies: The Base Case After-tax IRR is 35.1%, which is in the exceptional tier (>=25%) for economic studies.

Evidence · table

“35.1 %”

Context: After-tax IRR (%)

Fast Paybackpositive

Payback in the strong tier or better, on the required basis.

Why it applies: The Base Case post-tax payback period is 2.0 years, which is in the exceptional tier (<=2 years).

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: Payback, post-tax (years)*

Bottom Quartile Costpositive

P0-25 of the relevant commodity cost curve.

Why it applies: The LOM C1 Cash Cost of US$478/oz 4E PGM and AISC of US$706/oz 4E PGM are very competitive, indicating a bottom quartile position.

Evidence · text

“Average LOM C1 Cash Cost of US$478/oz 4E PGM and All-in Sustaining Cost ("AISC") of US$706/oz 4E PGM.”

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component. No prior estimate exists, so every change band is not applicable.

Why it applies: The document announces a maiden Mineral Reserve estimate for the project.

Evidence · text

“Maiden Mineral Reserve Declared”

Inferred Heavy Feednegative

Material Inferred share of LOM mill feed, or the share is undisclosed.

Why it applies: The Opportunity Case includes 33.1 million tonnes (27%) of Inferred material in its mine schedule, which is a significant portion.

Evidence · text

“The mine schedule contemplates mineralised material mined of 123.3 million tonnes of which 33.1 million tonnes (27%) were attributable to the Inferred category.”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The PFS assumes improved recoveries of 82% Pd, 80% Pt, 55% Rh, 88% Au and 71% Ni, with Pd and Au recoveries being particularly strong.

Evidence · text

“the PFS assumes recoveries of 82% Pd, 80% Pt, 55% Rh, 88% Au and 70% Ni”

Recovery Improvingpositive

Recovery improved versus a like-for-like prior test program on the same domain and route.

Why it applies: Metallurgical recoveries for Pd, Au, and Ni improved significantly (4.5%, 40.0%, and 20.6% respectively) compared to the 2025 PEA.

Evidence · table

“+4.5 %”

Context: Pd

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: The metallurgical test work program incorporated Glencore Technology's standardized Jameson Cell test protocols and technical review, indicating advanced testing.

Evidence · text

“The program was conducted independently at Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek) and incorporated Glencore Technology's standardized Jameson Cell test protocols, with Glencore Technology also providing technical review, flowsheet design support and independent verification of the metallurgical performance assumptions adopted for the 2026 PFS.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The scientific and technical information has been reviewed and approved by Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez and Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, both independent Qualified Persons.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez, Mining Engineer, BSc (Mine Eng), FAIG, CKO of GE21 Consultoria Mineral Ltda., and Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Geologist, BSc (Geology), FAIG, CEO of GE21 Consultoria Mineral Ltda., lead authors and independent Qualified Persons, as defined under NI 43-101.”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PFS and Mineral Reserve estimate are prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Both Base Case and Alternate Case A were prepared at prefeasibility level (AACE Cass 4*) in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The source explicitly discloses a revised resource estimate

Evidence · text

“updated Mineral Resource”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("concentrator")

POX/BIOX Routeneutral

Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX.

Why it applies: the document describes a pox_biox route ("roasting")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 31. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (27)

probableLuanga Project · palladiumTonnes: 86700000Grade: 2.77Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7731Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c200fc61b531493983b6
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86700000
Grade
2.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
7731
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total Mineral Reserve, combining Proven and Probable categories, represents a substantial and high-confidence resource base for the Luanga Project, underpinning the positive PFS results.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good overall grade for a PGM deposit.
  • Total Reserves provide a solid foundation for the project's economics.

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · platinumTonnes: 86700000Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2603Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c200fc61b531493983b6
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86700000
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2603
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Reserves for platinum contribute to the overall confidence in the project, reflecting a high level of geological and economic certainty for this metal.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · rhodiumTonnes: 86700000Grade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1908Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c200fc61b531493983b6
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86700000
Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1908
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Reserves for rhodium, a high-value PGM, add to the project's overall economic robustness and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · goldTonnes: 86700000Grade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 295Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c200fc61b531493983b6
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86700000
Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
295
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Reserves for gold, while a lower grade, contribute to the overall contained metal and confidence in the project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · nickelTonnes: 86700000Grade: 0.1781Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 154476Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c200fc61b531493983b6
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86700000
Grade
0.1781
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
154476
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Reserves for nickel provide additional value and confidence to the polymetallic project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga Project · palladiumTonnes: 158000000Grade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 10399Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6bbadd32f667916d11af
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
158000000
Grade
2.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
10399
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured + Indicated Resources provide a strong confidence base for the project, contributing positively to the overall resource profile.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated Resources).
  • Good overall grade for palladium.

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga Project · platinumTonnes: 158000000Grade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4998Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6bbadd32f667916d11af
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
158000000
Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4998
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured + Indicated Resources for platinum contribute positively to the overall resource profile.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga Project · rhodiumTonnes: 158000000Grade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3135Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6bbadd32f667916d11af
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
158000000
Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3135
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured + Indicated Resources for rhodium contribute positively to the overall resource profile.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga Project · goldTonnes: 158000000Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 451Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6bbadd32f667916d11af
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
158000000
Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
451
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured + Indicated Resources for gold contribute positively to the overall resource profile.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga Project · nickelTonnes: 158000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 262Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6bbadd32f667916d11af
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
158000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
262
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured + Indicated Resources for nickel contribute positively to the overall resource profile.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga Project · palladiumTonnes: 78000000Grade: 2.01Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5013Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f33f94fe1e7b7dd733d8
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
78000000
Grade
2.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5013
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.01
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred Resources have lower confidence, limiting their immediate economic impact and requiring further drilling for conversion.

Positive factors

  • Good overall grade for palladium.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence category (Inferred Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga Project · platinumTonnes: 78000000Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2421Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f33f94fe1e7b7dd733d8
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
78000000
Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2421
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred Resources for platinum have lower confidence, limiting their immediate economic impact and requiring further drilling for conversion.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence category (Inferred Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga Project · rhodiumTonnes: 78000000Grade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1476Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f33f94fe1e7b7dd733d8
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
78000000
Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1476
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred Resources for rhodium have lower confidence, limiting their immediate economic impact and requiring further drilling for conversion.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence category (Inferred Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga Project · goldTonnes: 78000000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 202Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f33f94fe1e7b7dd733d8
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
78000000
Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
202
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred Resources for gold have lower confidence, limiting their immediate economic impact and requiring further drilling for conversion.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence category (Inferred Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga Project · nickelTonnes: 78000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 128Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f33f94fe1e7b7dd733d8
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
78000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
128
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred Resources for nickel have lower confidence, limiting their immediate economic impact and requiring further drilling for conversion.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence category (Inferred Resources).

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga Project · palladiumTonnes: 17.7Grade: 1703Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c4b20a038643028f95e0
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
1703
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Proven Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Proven Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“1,703”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga Project · platinumTonnes: 17.7Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c4b20a038643028f95e0
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Proven Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Proven Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga Project · goldTonnes: 17.7Grade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c4b20a038643028f95e0
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Proven Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Proven Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga Project · nickelTonnes: 17.7Grade: 466Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c4b20a038643028f95e0
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
466
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Proven Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Proven Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“466”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · palladiumTonnes: 69Grade: 6028Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:fce4e5180991afafb611
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
6028
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“6,028”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · platinumTonnes: 69Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:fce4e5180991afafb611
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · goldTonnes: 69Grade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:fce4e5180991afafb611
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · nickelTonnes: 69Grade: 1442Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:fce4e5180991afafb611
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
1442
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“1,442”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · palladiumTonnes: 86.7Grade: 7731Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:b1ab8baa83ed8358fe1d
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
7731
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“7,731”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · platinumTonnes: 86.7Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:b1ab8baa83ed8358fe1d
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · goldTonnes: 86.7Grade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:b1ab8baa83ed8358fe1d
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga Project · nickelTonnes: 86.7Grade: 1908Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:b1ab8baa83ed8358fe1d
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
1908
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The declaration of Probable Reserves is a strong positive, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the deposit. The grade is good, and it's a maiden reserve, adding significant novelty. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category (Probable Reserves).
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declaration is a significant de-risking milestone.
  • Good grade for a PGM deposit.

Evidence · table

“1,908”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Metallurgical Results (4)

flotationLuanga Project · palladiumRecovery: 81.5 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
Jameson Cell flotation
Sample
representative Luanga sulphide material

Recovery

Recovery
81.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Palladium recovery is strong and shows significant improvement over previous test work, indicating a robust processing solution for this key commodity.

Positive factors

  • High recovery for palladium (81.5%).
  • Recovery improved significantly (+4.5%) compared to prior PEA.
  • Use of Jameson Cell technology and independent laboratory/consultant adds credibility.
  • Achieved higher concentrate grade (100 g/t PGM+Au).

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga Project · platinumRecovery: 80 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
Jameson Cell flotation
Sample
representative Luanga sulphide material

Recovery

Recovery
80 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Platinum recovery is good, although it saw a slight decrease compared to the previous PEA. The overall processing strategy appears robust for this metal.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for platinum (80%).
  • Use of Jameson Cell technology and independent laboratory/consultant adds credibility.
  • Achieved higher concentrate grade (100 g/t PGM+Au).

Negative factors

  • Slight decrease in recovery (-1.0%) compared to prior PEA.

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga Project · rhodiumRecovery: 55 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
Jameson Cell flotation
Sample
representative Luanga sulphide material

Recovery

Recovery
55 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Rhodium recovery shows improvement over previous test work, contributing positively to the overall PGM recovery profile.

Positive factors

  • Recovery improved (+4.0%) compared to prior PEA.
  • Use of Jameson Cell technology and independent laboratory/consultant adds credibility.
  • Achieved higher concentrate grade (100 g/t PGM+Au).

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga Project · goldRecovery: 88 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga Project
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
Jameson Cell flotation
Sample
representative Luanga sulphide material

Recovery

Recovery
88 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold recovery is exceptionally high and shows a very significant improvement, indicating a highly effective processing solution for gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional recovery for gold (88%).
  • Recovery improved dramatically (+40.0%) compared to prior PEA.
  • Use of Jameson Cell technology and independent laboratory/consultant adds credibility.
  • Achieved higher concentrate grade (100 g/t PGM+Au).

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.