Bullion Gold Launches Surface Exploration Programs at BODO and Langlade Projects
Original announcement by newsfile on
- Company
- Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp.
- Ticker
- BGD
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Québec
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Silver, Zinc, Cobalt
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 11:23:22 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp. has launched surface exploration programs at its BODO and Langlade projects in Québec. New drill results from Langlade include polymetallic intercepts, with a highlight of 0.8m at 1.15% Cu and 34.4 g/t Ag in hole LAN-26-32. High-grade surface samples from the BODO project returned up to 15.20% Cu, 2.53 g/t Au, and 137.00 g/t Ag.
Reasoning: The document reports new polymetallic drill intercepts from Langlade and high-grade surface samples from BODO, indicating exploration success. While some drill holes were barren, the overall results are positive for early-stage exploration, supported by disclosed QA/QC and QP sign-off. However, the lack of true width for drill intercepts and unadjusted metal equivalents temper the overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified at both projects
- High-grade surface samples from BODO project
- QA/QC procedures disclosed for drill results
- Qualified Person sign-off for technical information
- Metal equivalent assumptions are transparently disclosed
Negative factors
- Several drill holes returned no significant assays
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured per intercept
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
- Surface samples are early-stage exploration results
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 112
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release explicitly mentions the laboratory used (AGAT Laboratories), assay methods (fire assay, four-acid digestion, ICP-OES, ICP-MS), and QA/QC procedures including preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Core samples were split in half, and one half was sent to AGAT Laboratories in Val-d'Or for analysis. Gold was analyzed by fire assay (50 g) with atomic absorption finish, while base metals were analyzed by four-acid digestion with ICP-OES finish. A separate fraction is prepared to independently analyze mineralized intervals with target grades greater than 1.00% Cu-Zn using Na₂O₂ fusion with ICP-OES or ICP-MS finish. Preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks are inserted into the sample stream.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Ms. Suzie Tremblay, a member of the Ordre des géologues du Québec (OGQ No. 10664), is named as the Qualified Person who reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“The scientific and technical information disclosed in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Ms. Suzie Tremblay, a member in good standing of the Ordre des géologues du Québec (OGQ No. 10664), who is a "Qualified Person" within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The reported widths correspond to core lengths, and true thickness is only estimated as a percentage of core length, not precisely stated for each intercept.
Evidence · table
“The reported widths correspond to core lengths. True thickness is estimated at approximately 80-85% of core length, depending on the angles of deviation.”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: The CuEq calculation explicitly states that no adjustments have been made for metal recoveries, which is a critical factor for economic evaluation.
Evidence · table
“CuEq is used to calculate cut-off grades for exploration purposes, and no adjustments have been made for metal recoveries.”
No significant assaysnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: Drill holes LAN-26-34, LAN-26-35, and LAN-26-36 are explicitly reported as having no significant assays.
Evidence · table
“No significant assays”
Context: LAN-26-34
No significant assaysnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: Drill holes LAN-26-34, LAN-26-35, and LAN-26-36 are explicitly reported as having no significant assays.
Evidence · table
“No significant assays”
Context: LAN-26-35
No significant assaysnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: Drill holes LAN-26-34, LAN-26-35, and LAN-26-36 are explicitly reported as having no significant assays.
Evidence · table
“No significant assays”
Context: LAN-26-36
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drilling program at Langlade targeted a prospective area for a potential extension of mineralization.
Evidence · text
“The program targeted a prospective area for a potential extension of mineralization.”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Surface sample F671605 returned 6.85 g/t Au, which is above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for VMS gold.
Evidence · table
“6.85”
Context: F671605
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Surface sample F671605 returned 2.82% Cu, which is above the 2.5% exceptional threshold for VMS copper.
Evidence · table
“2.82”
Context: F671605
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Surface sample F671617 returned 15.20% Cu, which is above the 2.5% exceptional threshold for VMS copper.
Evidence · table
“15.20”
Context: F671617
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Surface sample F671707 returned 3.96% Cu, which is above the 2.5% exceptional threshold for VMS copper.
Evidence · table
“3.96”
Context: F671707
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Surface sample F671713 returned 3.22% Cu, which is above the 2.5% exceptional threshold for VMS copper.
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: F671713
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Surface sample F671714 returned 6.83% Cu, which is above the 2.5% exceptional threshold for VMS copper.
Evidence · table
“6.83”
Context: F671714
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 112. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (112)
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 7.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“7.38”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, indicating a higher-grade section, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 14.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“14.35”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“17.60”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 24.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“24.60”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 136 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.96”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 136 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 136 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 14.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 136 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“14.80”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 24.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“24.55”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 13.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“13.16”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 99 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 99 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 99 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 36.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 99 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“36.10”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 19.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“19.90”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“4.68”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“2.35”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“10.70”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows moderate copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 13.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“13.50”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows strong copper grades within a polymetallic zone, but true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows zinc mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 34.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“34.4”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“2.92”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“7.40”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 5.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This broad intercept shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and the true width is an estimate.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“5.05”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the gold grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 11.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the silver grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“11.97”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the copper grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows polymetallic mineralization, but the zinc grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Zinc grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows gold mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows silver mineralization within a polymetallic zone, but the grade is weak for a VMS deposit, and true width is estimated.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely measured
Evidence · table
“6.70”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 77BODO · goldGrade: 6.85Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned an exceptional gold grade, indicating high-grade polymetallic mineralization at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“6.85”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 78BODO · silverGrade: 63Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows significant silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“63.00”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 79BODO · copperGrade: 2.82Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.82
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned an exceptional copper grade, indicating high-grade polymetallic mineralization at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“2.82”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 80BODO · cobaltGrade: 116Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 116
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows significant cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite, indicating potential byproduct credit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Cobalt as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“116”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 81BODO · goldGrade: 4.14Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned a strong gold grade, indicating high-grade potential at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“4.14”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 82BODO · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows trace silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 83BODO · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows trace copper mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 84BODO · cobaltGrade: 28Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows trace cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“28”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 85BODO · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows gold mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 86BODO · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“11.00”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 87BODO · copperGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned a strong copper grade, indicating high-grade potential at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 88BODO · cobaltGrade: 61Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 61
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows significant cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite, indicating potential byproduct credit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Cobalt as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“61”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 89BODO · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows gold mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 90BODO · silverGrade: 16.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“16.10”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 91BODO · copperGrade: 2.21Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned a strong copper grade, indicating high-grade potential at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“2.21”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 92BODO · cobaltGrade: 72Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 72
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows significant cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite, indicating potential byproduct credit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Cobalt as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“72”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 93BODO · goldGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned a strong gold grade, indicating high-grade potential at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 94BODO · silverGrade: 137Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 137
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows moderate silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“137.00”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 95BODO · copperGrade: 15.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned an exceptional copper grade, indicating very high-grade polymetallic mineralization at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“15.20”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 96BODO · cobaltGrade: 577Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 577
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows high cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite, indicating potential byproduct credit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Cobalt as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“577”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 97BODO · goldGrade: 4.17Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned a strong gold grade, indicating high-grade potential at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“4.17”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 98BODO · silverGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows trace silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“5.90”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 99BODO · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows trace copper mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Copper grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 100BODO · cobaltGrade: 52Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 52
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows significant cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite, indicating potential byproduct credit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Cobalt as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“52”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 101BODO · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows gold mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 102BODO · silverGrade: 69.4Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 69.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“69.40”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 103BODO · copperGrade: 3.96Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.96
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned an exceptional copper grade, indicating high-grade polymetallic mineralization at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“3.96”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 104BODO · cobaltGrade: 215Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 215
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows significant cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite, indicating potential byproduct credit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
- Cobalt as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“215”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 105BODO · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows gold mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Gold grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 106BODO · silverGrade: 66Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“66.00”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 107BODO · copperGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.22
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned an exceptional copper grade, indicating high-grade polymetallic mineralization at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 108BODO · cobaltGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows trace cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 109BODO · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned a strong gold grade, indicating high-grade potential at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“2.20”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 110BODO · silverGrade: 62.4Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 62.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows silver mineralization as part of a polymetallic suite, though the grade is weak for a VMS deposit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak for VMS deposit type
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“62.40”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 111BODO · copperGrade: 6.83Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.83
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample returned an exceptional copper grade, indicating very high-grade polymetallic mineralization at the BODO project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for VMS deposit type
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“6.83”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 112BODO · cobaltGrade: 20Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows significant cobalt as part of a polymetallic suite, indicating potential byproduct credit.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Early-stage surface sample, not drill intercept
Evidence · table
“20”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.