Bunker Hill Intersects Additional High-Grade Silver in the Cate-8 Vein; Individual Drill Samples to 16.3 oz/ton Silver, 41.1% Lead, 7.41% Zinc; Underground Channel Sampling Returns 46 Feet of 8.19% Lead, 2.49 oz/ton Silver, 1.18% Zinc (4.83 oz/ton AgEq) (14.03M at 166 g/t AgEq)

Original announcement by globenewswire on

Company
Bunker Hill Mining Corp.
Ticker
BNKR
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Idaho
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results, Capital raise
Extracted
2026-09-12 01:29:02 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Bunker Hill Mining Corp. announced additional high-grade silver-polymetallic drill results from its Cate-8 zone at the Bunker Hill Mine in Idaho, with individual samples up to 16.3 oz/ton silver, 41.1% lead, and 7.41% zinc. The ongoing underground exploration program continues to expand the mineralized system, confirming continuity and scale, and is progressing towards an initial resource estimate. The company also reported a 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces for the Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate and drew US$2 million from its standby credit facility to support mine ramp-up.

Reasoning: New high-grade silver-polymetallic drill results from the Cate-8 zone significantly expand the known mineralization and confirm continuity, supporting future resource estimation and mine planning. The updated exploration target shows substantial growth, and a capital drawdown provides operational flexibility, although true widths are not consistently reported and the target is not yet a formal resource.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver-polymetallic intercepts
  • Expansion of mineralized zone along strike and downdip
  • Confirmation of continuity and scale of mineralization
  • Significant growth in exploration target tonnage and contained metal
  • Financial flexibility provided by capital drawdown
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not always stated for drill results
  • Exploration target estimate is not a formal mineral resource estimate
  • Some drill holes reported no significant intercepts or assays pending

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 70

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept in BHP26-21 (226.8-227.4m) returned 602.79 g/t AgEq, which is exceptionally high-grade for silver equivalent.

Evidence · table

“602.79”

Context: 0.18

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept in BHP26-24 (234.2-234.9m) returned 837.74 g/t AgEq, which is exceptionally high-grade for silver equivalent.

Evidence · table

“837.74”

Context: 0.21

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept in BHP26-24 (245.8-246.5m) returned 818.95 g/t AgEq, which is exceptionally high-grade for silver equivalent.

Evidence · table

“818.95”

Context: 0.21

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details rigorous QA/QC protocols including insertion of blanks and standards, and states that samples were prepared and analyzed at SVL Lab, which holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation.

Evidence · text

“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... Samples were prepared and analyzed at SVL Lab located in Smelterville, Idaho, using standard industry grind, split, and pulp preparation, followed by microwave digestion and Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis, with overlimit samples assayed by fire assay with a gravimetric finish for silver. SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: The metal equivalent grade (AgEq) is reported with full disclosure of long-term metal price forecasts and recovery rates used in its calculation.

Evidence · text

“Silver equivalent grade (AgEq) was calculated using long-term metal price forecasts of US$76.36/troy ounce silver, $0.89/lb lead and $1.41/lb zinc, with recovery rates of 91.6% for silver, 88.6% for lead and 86.8% for zinc (from Bunker Hill Mining 2022 PFS ). Using these parameters, the metal equivalent factors are 1% zinc = 12.66 g/t AgEq, and 1% lead = 7.99 g/t AgEq, with total AgEq calculated with the formula: AgEq g/t=Ag g/t + (Zn% * 12.66) + (Pb% * 7.99)”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The release states that intercepts are drilled length and true thickness is unknown, estimated from 3D modeling at 50-95% of drilled length.

Evidence · text

“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”

Resource Updateneutral · Story-specific tag

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document discusses an 'Exploration Target Estimate' for Cate-8, which is an update to a prior calculation, but explicitly states 'no mineral resource estimate exists for the Cate-8 Target'.

Evidence · text

“Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces from the prior calculation ( July 15, 2026, Bunker Hill Mining news release )”

Maiden Resourceneutral · Story-specific tag

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component. No prior estimate exists, so every change band is not applicable.

Why it applies: The company is working towards completing an initial resource estimate for Cate-8 by the end of the year, indicating it would be a maiden resource.

Evidence · text

“supporting the Company's objective of completing an initial resource estimate for Cate-8 by the end of the year.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 69. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (69)

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 128.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
128.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.81 m
From
317.5 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
317.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:317.5-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.75
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHD26-17 shows a strong silver equivalent grade, contributing to the expansion of the Cate-8 mineralized zone. The QA/QC and AgEq assumptions are transparent, but the lack of true width information is a minor drawback.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“128.65”

Context: 3.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 199.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
199.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.13 m
From
323 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
323 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:323-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.82
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval further enhances the positive results from BHD26-17, demonstrating strong silver equivalent mineralization. The transparency in QA/QC and AgEq calculations is positive, but the absence of true width remains a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval within BHD26-17, indicating strong mineralization
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“199.40”

Context: 2.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 125.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
125.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
203 m
To
208 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:203-208
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.66
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-19 shows a good silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. While the intercept is narrow and true width is not stated, the transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“125.41”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 156.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
156.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.91 m
From
237.5 m
To
240.5 m
Intercept Depth
237.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:237.5-240.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.57
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-19 shows a good silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. While the intercept is narrow and true width is not stated, the transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“156.83”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 108.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
108.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.68 m
From
158.7 m
To
167.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:158.7-167.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.16
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-21 shows a good silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. The transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“108.24”

Context: 2.68

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 50.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
50.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.29 m
From
226.8 m
To
237.6 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-237.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-21 shows a moderate silver equivalent grade. While it contributes to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone, its grade is lower than other reported intercepts. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower silver equivalent grade compared to other intercepts
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“50.99”

Context: 3.29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 602.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
602.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.18 m
From
226.8 m
To
227.4 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-227.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.58
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval from BHP26-21 is a significant positive, demonstrating bonanza-grade mineralization within the Cate-8 zone. While the intercept is very narrow and true width is not stated, the grade is highly material. Transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“602.79”

Context: 0.18

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 124.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
124.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.34 m
From
236.5 m
To
237.6 m
Intercept Depth
236.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:236.5-237.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.64
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-21 shows a good silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. While the intercept is very narrow and true width is not stated, the transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“124.72”

Context: 0.34

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 77.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.89 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
77.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.89 m
From
320.5 m
To
326.7 m
Intercept Depth
320.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:320.5-326.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.27
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-22 shows a moderate silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“77.94”

Context: 1.89

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 71.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.74 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
71.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.74 m
From
337.3 m
To
343 m
Intercept Depth
337.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:337.3-343
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.07
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-22 shows a moderate silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“71.10”

Context: 1.74

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 68.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.84 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
68.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.84 m
From
355.4 m
To
368 m
Intercept Depth
355.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:355.4-368
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.01
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-22 shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a reasonable length, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade over a reasonable length
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“68.88”

Context: 3.84

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 137.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
137.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.91 m
From
362.2 m
To
365.2 m
Intercept Depth
362.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:362.2-365.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.02
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval from BHP26-22 further enhances the positive results, demonstrating strong silver equivalent mineralization. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“137.89”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 111.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
111.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.38 m
From
202 m
To
209.8 m
Intercept Depth
202 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:202-209.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.24
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-24 shows a good silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“111.12”

Context: 2.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 837.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
837.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.21 m
From
234.2 m
To
234.9 m
Intercept Depth
234.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:234.2-234.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
24.43
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade intercept from BHP26-24 is a significant positive, demonstrating bonanza-grade mineralization within the Cate-8 zone. While the intercept is very narrow and true width is not stated, the grade is highly material. Transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver equivalent intercept, one of the highest reported
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“837.74”

Context: 0.21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 96.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
96.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
245.8 m
To
255 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-255
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.81
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from BHP26-24 shows a good silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Cate-8 zone. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“96.21”

Context: 2.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 232.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
232.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.98 m
From
245.8 m
To
249 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-249
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.78
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval from BHP26-24 further enhances the positive results, demonstrating strong silver equivalent mineralization. Transparency in reporting is positive, but the absence of true width is a minor concern.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“232.31”

Context: 0.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 818.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
818.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.21 m
From
245.8 m
To
246.5 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-246.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.89
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval from BHP26-24 is a significant positive, demonstrating bonanza-grade mineralization within the Cate-8 zone. While the intercept is very narrow and true width is not stated, the grade is highly material. Transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver equivalent sub-interval, one of the highest reported
  • Part of an ongoing exploration program expanding mineralization
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • True width not stated

Evidence · table

“818.95”

Context: 0.21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

Fact 18Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 166Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
166
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.03 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.83
Metal Eq. Unit
oz/ton AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade channel sample confirms continuous silver-polymetallic mineralization over a significant width in the Cate-8 zone, providing strong support for the geological model and future resource estimation. Transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent channel sample over a significant length
  • Confirms continuous mineralization in underground drift
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“14.03M at 166 g/t AgEq”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

Fact 19Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 8.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
8.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.03 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade channel sample confirms continuous lead mineralization over a significant width in the Cate-8 zone, providing strong support for the geological model and future resource estimation. Transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • High-grade lead channel sample over a significant length
  • Confirms continuous mineralization in underground drift
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“8.19% Lead”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

Fact 20Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 14.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
oz/ton
Intercept
14.03 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade channel sample confirms continuous silver mineralization over a significant width in the Cate-8 zone, providing strong support for the geological model and future resource estimation. Transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver channel sample over a significant length
  • Confirms continuous mineralization in underground drift
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“2.49 oz/ton Silver”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

Fact 21Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.03 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This good-grade zinc channel sample confirms continuous mineralization over a significant width in the Cate-8 zone, providing strong support for the geological model and future resource estimation. Transparency in reporting is positive.

Positive factors

  • Good-grade zinc channel sample over a significant length
  • Confirms continuous mineralization in underground drift
  • QA/QC protocols disclosed and QP signed off
  • Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“1.18% Zinc”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.5 m
From
317.5 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
317.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:317.5-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
128.65
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: BHD26-17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 3.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
3.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.5 m
From
317.5 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
317.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:317.5-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
128.65
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.17 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 39.6 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.17”

Context: BHD26-17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 100.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
100.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.5 m
From
317.5 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
317.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:317.5-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
128.65
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 100.77 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1259.6 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“100.77”

Context: BHD26-17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
323 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
323 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:323-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
199.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
4.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
323 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
323 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:323-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
199.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.36 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 30.5 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.36”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 162.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHD26-17
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
162.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
323 m
To
330 m
Intercept Depth
323 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHD26-17:323-330
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
199.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 162.96 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1140.7 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“162.96”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 5.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
5.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
203 m
To
208 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:203-208
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.93 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 29.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.93”

Context: BHP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
203 m
To
208 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:203-208
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.88 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.88”

Context: BHP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 35.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
35.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
203 m
To
208 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:203-208
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35.31 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 176.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“35.31”

Context: BHP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
237.5 m
To
240.5 m
Intercept Depth
237.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:237.5-240.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
156.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: BHP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 5.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
5.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
237.5 m
To
240.5 m
Intercept Depth
237.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:237.5-240.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
156.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.93 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 17.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.93”

Context: BHP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 108.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-19
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
108.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
237.5 m
To
240.5 m
Intercept Depth
237.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-19:237.5-240.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
156.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 108.14 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 324.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“108.14”

Context: BHP26-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
1.69
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.8 m
From
158.7 m
To
167.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:158.7-167.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
108.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.69 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 14.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.69 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.69”

Context: BHP26-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
4.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.8 m
From
158.7 m
To
167.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:158.7-167.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
108.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.08 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 35.9 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.08”

Context: BHP26-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 54.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
54.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.8 m
From
158.7 m
To
167.5 m
Intercept Depth
158.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:158.7-167.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
108.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 54.24 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 477.3 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“54.24”

Context: BHP26-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
226.8 m
To
237.6 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-237.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: BHP26-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
2.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
226.8 m
To
237.6 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-237.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.07 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 22.4 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.07”

Context: BHP26-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 33.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
33.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.8 m
From
226.8 m
To
237.6 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-237.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.46 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 361.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“33.46”

Context: BHP26-21

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
226.8 m
To
227.4 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-227.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
602.79
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 27.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
27.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
226.8 m
To
227.4 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-227.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
602.79
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.8 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 16.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 27.8 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.80”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 380.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-21
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
380.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
226.8 m
To
227.4 m
Intercept Depth
226.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-21:226.8-227.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
602.79
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 380.57 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 228.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 380.57 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“380.57”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.2 m
From
320.5 m
To
326.7 m
Intercept Depth
320.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:320.5-326.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
77.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.99 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.99 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 3.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
3.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.2 m
From
320.5 m
To
326.7 m
Intercept Depth
320.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:320.5-326.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
77.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.44 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 21.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.44”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 37.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
37.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
320.5 m
To
326.7 m
Intercept Depth
320.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:320.5-326.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
77.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.94 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 235.2 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.94”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.7 m
From
337.3 m
To
343 m
Intercept Depth
337.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:337.3-343
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
71.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.43 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
3.53
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.7 m
From
337.3 m
To
343 m
Intercept Depth
337.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:337.3-343
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
71.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.53 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 20.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.53”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 37.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
37.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.7 m
From
337.3 m
To
343 m
Intercept Depth
337.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:337.3-343
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
71.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.51 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 213.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.51”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.6 m
From
355.4 m
To
368 m
Intercept Depth
355.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:355.4-368
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
68.88
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.88 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 2.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
2.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.6 m
From
355.4 m
To
368 m
Intercept Depth
355.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:355.4-368
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
68.88
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.85 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 35.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.85”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 34.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
34.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.6 m
From
355.4 m
To
368 m
Intercept Depth
355.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:355.4-368
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
68.88
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.95 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 440.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“34.95”

Context: BHP26-22

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
362.2 m
To
365.2 m
Intercept Depth
362.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:362.2-365.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
137.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.25 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.25 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 6.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
6.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
362.2 m
To
365.2 m
Intercept Depth
362.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:362.2-365.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
137.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.18 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.18 % lead is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.18”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 72.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-22
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
72.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
362.2 m
To
365.2 m
Intercept Depth
362.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-22:362.2-365.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
137.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 72.69 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 218.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“72.69”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.8 m
From
202 m
To
209.8 m
Intercept Depth
202 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:202-209.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
111.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.5 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
4.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.8 m
From
202 m
To
209.8 m
Intercept Depth
202 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:202-209.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
111.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.44 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 34.6 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.44”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 56.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
56.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.8 m
From
202 m
To
209.8 m
Intercept Depth
202 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:202-209.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
111.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.64 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 441.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.64”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
2.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
234.2 m
To
234.9 m
Intercept Depth
234.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:234.2-234.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
837.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.86 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.86”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 41.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
41.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
234.2 m
To
234.9 m
Intercept Depth
234.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:234.2-234.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
837.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 41.1 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 28.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 41.1 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“41.10”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 473.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
473.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
234.2 m
To
234.9 m
Intercept Depth
234.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:234.2-234.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
837.74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 473.14 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 331.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 473.14 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“473.14”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.2 m
From
245.8 m
To
255 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-255
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.21
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.28 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
4.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.2 m
From
245.8 m
To
255 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-255
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.21
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.36 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 40.1 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.36”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 57.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
57.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
245.8 m
To
255 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-255
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
96.21
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 57.92 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 532.9 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“57.92”

Context: BHP26-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.2 m
From
245.8 m
To
249 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-249
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
232.31
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 10.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
10.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.2 m
From
245.8 m
To
249 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-249
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
232.31
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.62 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 34.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.62 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.62”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 143.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BHP26-24
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
143.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.2 m
From
245.8 m
To
249 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BHP26-24:245.8-249
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
232.31
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 143.79 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 460.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“143.79”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

which includesBunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
which includes
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
245.8 m
To
246.5 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
which includes:245.8-246.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
818.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: which includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

which includesBunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 33.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
which includes
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
33.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
245.8 m
To
246.5 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
which includes:245.8-246.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
818.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.4 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 23.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 33.4 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“33.40”

Context: which includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

which includesBunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 538.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
which includes
Project
Bunker Hill Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
BNKR

Geometry

Grade
538.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
245.8 m
To
246.5 m
Intercept Depth
245.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
which includes:245.8-246.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
818.95
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 538.29 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 376.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 538.29 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“538.29”

Context: which includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces "

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.