# /C O R R E C T I O N -- Kootenay Silver Inc./

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/KTN/news/4654306570261309/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-06-15T18:35:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Kootenay Silver Inc.

- Ticker: KTN

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Chihuahua, Mexico

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Lead, Zinc

- Document categories: Resource update, Economic study, Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 06:41:42 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Kootenay Silver Inc. announced a positive Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for its La Cigarra Silver Project in Chihuahua, Mexico, highlighting a post-tax NPV of US$763 million and an IRR of 41% with a 1.9-year payback period. The PEA outlines a 14-year open-pit operation with average annual payable silver production of 4.55 million ounces. The study is based on an updated Mineral Resource Estimate \(MRE\) effective April 4, 2026, which includes Measured, Indicated, and Inferred resources, with a significant portion of Inferred material. The company plans to advance the project through resource expansion, engineering optimization, and permitting.

Reasoning: Kootenay Silver announced a positive PEA for its La Cigarra Silver Project, demonstrating robust economics with a 41% post-tax IRR and a 1.9-year payback. The study is supported by an updated Mineral Resource Estimate, but its preliminary nature and reliance on Inferred resources, coupled with undisclosed economic conventions and theoretical metallurgical assumptions, introduce some uncertainty.

- Positive factor: Positive PEA results with strong economics \(high IRR, fast payback, significant NPV\)

- Positive factor: Updated Mineral Resource Estimate provides a solid foundation for the project

- Positive factor: Project located in a well-established mining district with existing infrastructure

- Positive factor: Identified upside opportunities for resource expansion and optimization

- Positive factor: QP sign-off for both PEA and MRE

- Negative factor: PEA is preliminary in nature and includes a significant portion of Inferred Mineral Resources

- Negative factor: Several key economic conventions \(IRR basis, payback basis, price deck basis, cost basis\) are undisclosed

- Negative factor: Metallurgical recoveries used in the AgEq calculation are theoretical assumptions, not actual test results, and some are relatively low \(Au, Zn\)

- Negative factor: Project is not yet fully permitted

- Negative factor: Unusual LOM closure and reclamation cost as a credit

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 29

## Classification and evidence

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route \("flotation"\)

**Theoretical Recovery Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only theoretical or liberation-derived recovery reported, with no actual test result.

Why it applies: The disclosure includes a theoretical recovery figure, distinct from actual test results

**Multi-Domain Tested**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Variability across ore domains \(oxide, transition, fresh\) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 3 distinct composites were tested

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 27. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (20)

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-2)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:1f1cd17045660d05d3cb
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 2930000
- Grade: 84
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 7.87
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured Mineral Resource provides a high-confidence estimate for a portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Highest confidence category \(Measured\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 84

Context: 2.93

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-3)

La Cigarra Silver Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:1f1cd17045660d05d3cb
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 2930000
- Grade: 0.06
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 5.6
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured Mineral Resource provides a high-confidence estimate for a portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Highest confidence category \(Measured\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.06

Context: 2.93

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-4)

La Cigarra Silver Project · lead

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: lead
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:1f1cd17045660d05d3cb
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 2930000
- Grade: 0.14
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 9.1
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured Mineral Resource provides a high-confidence estimate for a portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining, but the lead grade is low compared to peers.

- Positive factor: Highest confidence category \(Measured\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Low lead grade \(0.14%\) compared to peer comparison

Evidence · table

> 0.14

Context: 2.93

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-5)

La Cigarra Silver Project · zinc

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:1f1cd17045660d05d3cb
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 2930000
- Grade: 0.19
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 12.4
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured Mineral Resource provides a high-confidence estimate for a portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Highest confidence category \(Measured\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.19

Context: 2.93

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-6)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:1f1cd17045660d05d3cb
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 2930000
- Grade: 96
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 9.01
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 96
- Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured Mineral Resource provides a high-confidence estimate for a portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Highest confidence category \(Measured\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 96

Context: 2.93

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-7)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:7ee419d223923d972c0b
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 20090000
- Grade: 81
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 52.14
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource represents the largest and a high-confidence portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Largest portion of the resource in the Indicated category

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 81

Context: 20.09

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-8)

La Cigarra Silver Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:7ee419d223923d972c0b
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 20090000
- Grade: 0.06
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 39.6
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource represents the largest and a high-confidence portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Largest portion of the resource in the Indicated category

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.06

Context: 20.09

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-9)

La Cigarra Silver Project · lead

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: lead
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:7ee419d223923d972c0b
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 20090000
- Grade: 0.14
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 62.2
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource represents the largest and a high-confidence portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining, but the lead grade is low compared to peers.

- Positive factor: Largest portion of the resource in the Indicated category

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Low lead grade \(0.14%\) compared to peer comparison

Evidence · table

> 0.14

Context: 20.09

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-10)

La Cigarra Silver Project · zinc

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:7ee419d223923d972c0b
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 20090000
- Grade: 0.19
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 84.6
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource represents the largest and a high-confidence portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Largest portion of the resource in the Indicated category

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.19

Context: 20.09

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-11)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:7ee419d223923d972c0b
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 20090000
- Grade: 93
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 60.01
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 93
- Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource represents the largest and a high-confidence portion of the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Largest portion of the resource in the Indicated category

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 93

Context: 20.09

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-12)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:5318a989fe95c3da5892
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 23020000
- Grade: 81
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 60.02
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource provides a substantial, high-confidence estimate for the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Significant portion of the resource in high-confidence categories \(Measured + Indicated\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 81

Context: 23.02

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-13)

La Cigarra Silver Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:5318a989fe95c3da5892
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 23020000
- Grade: 0.06
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 45.2
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource provides a substantial, high-confidence estimate for the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Significant portion of the resource in high-confidence categories \(Measured + Indicated\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.06

Context: 23.02

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-14)

La Cigarra Silver Project · lead

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: lead
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:5318a989fe95c3da5892
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 23020000
- Grade: 0.14
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 71.3
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource provides a substantial, high-confidence estimate for the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining, but the lead grade is low compared to peers.

- Positive factor: Significant portion of the resource in high-confidence categories \(Measured + Indicated\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Low lead grade \(0.14%\) compared to peer comparison

Evidence · table

> 0.14

Context: 23.02

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-15)

La Cigarra Silver Project · zinc

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:5318a989fe95c3da5892
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 23020000
- Grade: 0.19
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 97
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource provides a substantial, high-confidence estimate for the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Significant portion of the resource in high-confidence categories \(Measured + Indicated\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.19

Context: 23.02

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-16)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:5318a989fe95c3da5892
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 23020000
- Grade: 93
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 69.02
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 93
- Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource provides a substantial, high-confidence estimate for the La Cigarra deposit, compliant with industry standards and supporting open-pit mining.

- Positive factor: Significant portion of the resource in high-confidence categories \(Measured + Indicated\)

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Evidence · table

> 93

Context: 23.02

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-17)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:69eca0a666da70c0f5e2
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6780000
- Grade: 79
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 17.25
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Mineral Resource provides additional tonnage and metal content, offering exploration upside, but carries a lower level of confidence and cannot be directly converted to reserves.

- Positive factor: Provides exploration upside and potential for conversion to higher categories

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence category \(Inferred\)

- Negative factor: Cannot be converted to Mineral Reserves directly

- Negative factor: Considered speculative for economic considerations in PEA

Evidence · table

> 79

Context: 6.78

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-18)

La Cigarra Silver Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:69eca0a666da70c0f5e2
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6780000
- Grade: 0.05
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 11.9
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Mineral Resource provides additional tonnage and metal content, offering exploration upside, but carries a lower level of confidence and cannot be directly converted to reserves.

- Positive factor: Provides exploration upside and potential for conversion to higher categories

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence category \(Inferred\)

- Negative factor: Cannot be converted to Mineral Reserves directly

- Negative factor: Considered speculative for economic considerations in PEA

Evidence · table

> 0.05

Context: 6.78

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-19)

La Cigarra Silver Project · lead

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: lead
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:69eca0a666da70c0f5e2
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6780000
- Grade: 0.15
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 22.7
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Mineral Resource provides additional tonnage and metal content, offering exploration upside, but carries a lower level of confidence and cannot be directly converted to reserves, and the lead grade is low compared to peers.

- Positive factor: Provides exploration upside and potential for conversion to higher categories

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence category \(Inferred\)

- Negative factor: Cannot be converted to Mineral Reserves directly

- Negative factor: Considered speculative for economic considerations in PEA

- Negative factor: Low lead grade \(0.15%\) compared to peer comparison

Evidence · table

> 0.15

Context: 6.78

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-20)

La Cigarra Silver Project · zinc

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:69eca0a666da70c0f5e2
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6780000
- Grade: 0.17
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 25.5
- Contained Unit: mlb
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Mineral Resource provides additional tonnage and metal content, offering exploration upside, but carries a lower level of confidence and cannot be directly converted to reserves.

- Positive factor: Provides exploration upside and potential for conversion to higher categories

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence category \(Inferred\)

- Negative factor: Cannot be converted to Mineral Reserves directly

- Negative factor: Considered speculative for economic considerations in PEA

Evidence · table

> 0.17

Context: 6.78

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-resource-facts-21)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:69eca0a666da70c0f5e2
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6780000
- Grade: 90
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 19.72
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 90
- Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Mineral Resource provides additional tonnage and metal content, offering exploration upside, but carries a lower level of confidence and cannot be directly converted to reserves.

- Positive factor: Provides exploration upside and potential for conversion to higher categories

- Positive factor: Compliant with NI 43-101 and CIM standards

- Positive factor: QP signed off

- Positive factor: Open-pit mining method envisioned

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade and metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence category \(Inferred\)

- Negative factor: Cannot be converted to Mineral Reserves directly

- Negative factor: Considered speculative for economic considerations in PEA

Evidence · table

> 90

Context: 6.78

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## Metallurgical Results (7)

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-metallurgical-facts-22)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Test Work

- Program Status: scoping
- Test Type: unspecified
- Processing Route: leaching \(oxide\)
- Sample: oxide mineralization

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 88.3 %
- Recovery Basis: theoretical

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 88.3% silver recovery for oxide mineralization is a theoretical assumption used for the AgEq calculation in the resource estimate, not an actual metallurgical test result.

- Negative factor: Theoretical recovery only, not actual test results

- Negative factor: Unspecified test type and program status

Evidence · text

> for oxide mineralization—88.3% for Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**Theoretical Recovery Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only theoretical or liberation-derived recovery reported, with no actual test result.

Why it applies: recovery\_basis is theoretical

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-metallurgical-facts-23)

La Cigarra Silver Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Test Work

- Program Status: scoping
- Test Type: unspecified
- Processing Route: leaching \(oxide\)
- Sample: oxide mineralization

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 37.5 %
- Recovery Basis: theoretical

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 37.5% gold recovery for oxide mineralization is a theoretical assumption for AgEq calculation and is relatively low, with no actual test results provided.

- Negative factor: Theoretical recovery only, not actual test results

- Negative factor: Unspecified test type and program status

- Negative factor: Low gold recovery \(37.5%\) for oxide mineralization

Evidence · text

> 37.5% for Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**Theoretical Recovery Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only theoretical or liberation-derived recovery reported, with no actual test result.

Why it applies: recovery\_basis is theoretical

**Low Recovery**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 37.5% is below the weak band \(80%\)

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-metallurgical-facts-24)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Test Work

- Program Status: scoping
- Test Type: unspecified
- Processing Route: flotation \(sulphide\)
- Sample: sulphide mineralization

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 89.3 %
- Recovery Basis: theoretical

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 89.3% silver recovery for sulphide mineralization is a theoretical assumption used for the AgEq calculation in the resource estimate, not an actual metallurgical test result.

- Negative factor: Theoretical recovery only, not actual test results

- Negative factor: Unspecified test type and program status

Evidence · text

> for sulphide mineralization—89.3% for Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

**Theoretical Recovery Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only theoretical or liberation-derived recovery reported, with no actual test result.

Why it applies: recovery\_basis is theoretical

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-metallurgical-facts-25)

La Cigarra Silver Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Test Work

- Program Status: scoping
- Test Type: unspecified
- Processing Route: flotation \(sulphide\)
- Sample: sulphide mineralization

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 61.8 %
- Recovery Basis: theoretical

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 61.8% gold recovery for sulphide mineralization is a theoretical assumption for AgEq calculation, with no actual test results provided.

- Negative factor: Theoretical recovery only, not actual test results

- Negative factor: Unspecified test type and program status

Evidence · text

> 61.8% for Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

**Theoretical Recovery Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only theoretical or liberation-derived recovery reported, with no actual test result.

Why it applies: recovery\_basis is theoretical

**Low Recovery**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 61.8% is below the weak band \(80%\)

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-metallurgical-facts-26)

La Cigarra Silver Project · lead

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: lead
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Test Work

- Program Status: scoping
- Test Type: unspecified
- Processing Route: flotation \(sulphide\)
- Sample: sulphide mineralization

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 70 %
- Recovery Basis: theoretical

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 70.0% lead recovery for sulphide mineralization is a theoretical assumption used for the AgEq calculation in the resource estimate, not an actual metallurgical test result.

- Negative factor: Theoretical recovery only, not actual test results

- Negative factor: Unspecified test type and program status

Evidence · text

> 70.0% for Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

**Theoretical Recovery Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only theoretical or liberation-derived recovery reported, with no actual test result.

Why it applies: recovery\_basis is theoretical

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-metallurgical-facts-27)

La Cigarra Silver Project · zinc

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Test Work

- Program Status: scoping
- Test Type: unspecified
- Processing Route: flotation \(sulphide\)
- Sample: sulphide mineralization

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 59.1 %
- Recovery Basis: theoretical

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 59.1% zinc recovery for sulphide mineralization is a theoretical assumption for AgEq calculation and is relatively low, with no actual test results provided.

- Negative factor: Theoretical recovery only, not actual test results

- Negative factor: Unspecified test type and program status

- Negative factor: Low zinc recovery \(59.1%\) for sulphide mineralization

Evidence · text

> 59.1% for Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

**Theoretical Recovery Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only theoretical or liberation-derived recovery reported, with no actual test result.

Why it applies: recovery\_basis is theoretical

### unspecified

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/c-o-r-r-e-c-t-i-o-n-kootenay-silver-inc--5215f17d-329c-47fb-a2bd-c974e2343ddc#fact-metallurgical-facts-28)

La Cigarra Silver Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra Silver Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Test Work

- Program Status: detailed
- Test Type: unspecified
- Processing Route: flotation and leaching process plant
- Sample: LOM average

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 89.3 %
- Recovery Basis: unspecified

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The PEA reports an average silver recovery of 89.3% over the life of mine, which is a strong figure, but the specific basis and test type for this average are not detailed.

- Positive factor: High average silver recovery for the project

- Negative factor: Recovery basis unspecified \(average, not specific test\)

- Negative factor: Test type unspecified

Evidence · text

> Average silver recovery: 89.3%

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
