Cabral Gold Announces Additional Results of Infill Drilling at the MG Gold deposit, Cuiú Cuiú Gold District, Brazil

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Cabral Gold Inc.
Ticker
CBR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Pará, Brazil
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-17 14:58:43 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Cabral Gold announced additional infill drilling results from the MG Gold deposit in Brazil, targeting gold-in-oxide material within the MG starter pit. The program aims to upgrade the current reserve to measured classification, with results confirming the existing geological model and showing initial model reconciliation within 3%. Notable intercepts include 25m at 4.35 g/t gold in RC690 and 36m at 1.07 g/t gold in RC687, with several bonanza-grade sub-intervals. The company plans to commence Phase 1 gold-in-oxide mining in Q4 2026.

Reasoning: The infill drilling program at the MG Gold deposit has returned several high-grade, near-surface gold intercepts, confirming the existing geological model and supporting the upgrade of the current reserve for the Phase 1 gold-in-oxide mining operation. The positive model reconciliation further de-risks the project.

Positive factors

  • Infill drilling confirms continuity and enhances resource model
  • Several high-grade, near-surface gold intercepts reported
  • Aims to upgrade current reserve to measured classification
  • Initial model reconciliation within 3% of existing model
  • Good QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • True width is only estimated, potentially overstating apparent width

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 92

Classification and evidence

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states 'The program of infill drilling is aimed at improving the confidence around the current mine plan at MG and upgrading the current reserve.'

Evidence · text

“The program of infill drilling is aimed at improving the confidence around the current mine plan at MG and upgrading the current reserve.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed 'Quality Assurance / Quality Control' section outlining procedures like verifiable chain of custody, insertion of certified reference materials, blanks, duplicates, and check assays.

Evidence · text

“Cabral maintains a Quality Assurance / Quality Control ("QAQC") program for all its exploration projects using industry best practices. Key elements of the QAQC program include verifiable chain of custody for samples, regular insertion of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, as well as check assays on results.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states that 'True widths may be up to 50% of actual drill intercepts', indicating that reported intercept lengths are apparent widths.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be up to 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Brian Arkell, Cabral Gold's Vice President, Exploration and Technical Services, is named as the Qualified Person who supervised and approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

“Technical information included in this release was supervised and approved by Brian Arkell, B.S. Geology and M.S. Economic Geology, SME (Registered Member), AusIMM (Fellow) and SEG (Fellow), Cabral Gold's Vice President, Exploration and Technical Services, and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 92. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (92)

RC674MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC674
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19 m
From
0 m
To
19 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC674:0-19
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade and weak grade-thickness product for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC674MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC674
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
10 m
To
11 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
10 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC674:10-11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the overall infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC674MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC674
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
25 m
To
35 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
25 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC674:25-35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade and good width for an infill hole, supporting the resource model for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade over a good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC674MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 6.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC674
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
6.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
27 m
To
28 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC674:27-28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade over a narrow interval, confirming high-grade zones within the deposit and supporting resource confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“6.36”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC674MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC674
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
30 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC674:30-33
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a moderate interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC674MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC674
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
37 m
To
40 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
37 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC674:37-40
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.03”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC674MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC674
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
41 m
To
50 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
41 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC674:41-50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC675MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC675
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27 m
From
0 m
To
27 m
Hole Depth
46 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC675:0-27
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 27.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC675MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC675
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
20 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
46 m
Intercept Depth
20 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC675:20-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.96”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC676MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC676
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
0 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC676:0-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC676MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC676
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
11 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC676:11-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC676MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC676
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
14 m
To
36 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC676:14-36
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC676MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC676
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
14 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC676:14-15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“2.14”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC677MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC677
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
0 m
To
12 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC677:0-12
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC677MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC677
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
34 m
To
35 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC677:34-35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC678MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC678
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
0 m
To
18 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC678:0-18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 18.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC678MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC678
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
3 m
To
5 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC678:3-5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC679MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC679
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
0 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC679:0-29
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC679MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC679
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
11 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC679:11-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC680MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC680
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
0 m
To
35 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC680:0-35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 35.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC680MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC680
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
12 m
To
17 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC680:12-17
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC680MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC680
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
30 m
To
31 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC680:30-31
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC680MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC680
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
33 m
To
34 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC680:33-34
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC681MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC681
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m
From
0 m
To
39 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC681:0-39
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a significant width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 39.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC681MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 4.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC681
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
4.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
0 m
To
1 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC681:0-1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“4.39”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC681MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC681
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
13 m
To
23 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
13 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC681:13-23
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC681MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC681
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
43 m
To
50 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC681:43-50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 7.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC681MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC681
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
43 m
To
46 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC681:43-46
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a moderate interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC682MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC682
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
34 m
From
0 m
To
34 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC682:0-34
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 34.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC683MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC683
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
0 m
To
17 m
Hole Depth
47 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC683:0-17
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 17.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC683MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC683
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
18 m
To
39 m
Hole Depth
47 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC683:18-39
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 21.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC683MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC683
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
21 m
To
22 m
Hole Depth
47 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC683:21-22
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC684MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC684
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
0 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC684:0-15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade, but below typical economic thresholds.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC685MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC685
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
0 m
To
22 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC685:0-22
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC685MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC685
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
14 m
To
19 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC685:14-19
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC686MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC686
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35 m
From
0 m
To
35 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC686:0-35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 35.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC686MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC686
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
14 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC686:14-15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC686MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC686
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
21 m
To
22 m
Hole Depth
35 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC686:21-22
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.03”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC687MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC687
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36 m
From
0 m
To
36 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC687:0-36
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a significant width for an infill hole, contributing strongly to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 36.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC687MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 26.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC687
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
26.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
30 m
To
31 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC687:30-31
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza-grade gold intercept, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program and significantly enhancing resource confidence.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“26.10”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC688MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC688
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
0 m
To
10 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC688:0-10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC688MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC688
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
5 m
To
7 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC688:5-7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC688MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC688
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
17 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC688:17-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC688MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC688
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
18 m
To
22 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC688:18-22
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a moderate interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.98”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC689MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 3.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC689
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
3.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
0 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC689:0-15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a good width for an infill hole, significantly contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.71”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC689MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 9.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC689
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
9.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
5 m
To
9 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC689:5-9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade over a moderate width, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program and significantly enhancing resource confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“9.21”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC690MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 4.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC690
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
4.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25 m
From
0 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC690:0-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a significant width for an infill hole, significantly contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.35”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC690MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 24.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC690
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
24.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
7 m
To
8 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC690:7-8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza-grade gold intercept, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program and significantly enhancing resource confidence.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“24.22”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC690MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 5.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC690
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
5.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
10 m
To
11 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
10 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC690:10-11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“5.09”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC690MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 40.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC690
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
40.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
17 m
To
18 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC690:17-18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza-grade gold intercept, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program and significantly enhancing resource confidence.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“40.30”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC691MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC691
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25 m
From
0 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC691:0-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a significant width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC691MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC691
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
4 m
To
10 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC691:4-10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a good width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.65”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC691MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC691
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
15 m
To
16 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
15 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC691:15-16
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“2.31”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC692MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC692
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25 m
From
0 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC692:0-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a significant width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC692MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC692
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
10 m
To
12 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
10 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC692:10-12
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.70”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC692MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC692
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
19 m
To
20 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
19 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC692:19-20
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC693MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC693
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
0 m
To
11 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC693:0-11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC693MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC693
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
5 m
To
7 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC693:5-7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.08”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC693MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC693
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
13 m
To
23 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
13 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC693:13-23
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC694MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC694
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
0 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC694:0-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC694MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 6.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC694
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
6.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
12 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC694:12-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“6.69”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC694MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC694
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
21 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC694:21-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC695MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC695
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
0 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC695:0-15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC695MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC695
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
18 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC695:18-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 7.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC695MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC695
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
18 m
To
20 m
Hole Depth
50 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC695:18-20
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC696MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC696
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
0 m
To
10 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC696:0-10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC696MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC696
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
14 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC696:14-15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.38”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC696MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC696
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
16 m
To
19 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC696:16-19
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade over a moderate interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.53”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC696MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 6.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC696
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
6.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
17 m
To
18 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC696:17-18
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade over a narrow interval, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“6.43”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC696MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC696
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
21 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC696:21-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC697MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC697
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25 m
From
0 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC697:0-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a significant width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC697MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 3.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC697
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
3.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
5 m
To
7 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC697:5-7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.51”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC698MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC698
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25 m
From
0 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC698:0-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a significant width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC698MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC698
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
6 m
To
7 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
6 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC698:6-7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“2.28”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC699MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC699
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
0 m
To
21 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC699:0-21
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.60”

Context: 21.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC699MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC699
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
3 m
To
5 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC699:3-5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.89”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC699MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 3.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC699
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
3.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
11 m
To
17 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC699:11-17
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a good width, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program and enhancing resource confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.62”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC699MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 11.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC699
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
11.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
14 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC699:14-15
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza-grade gold intercept, confirming high-grade continuity within the infill drilling program and significantly enhancing resource confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“11.97”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC700MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC700
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
0 m
To
17 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC700:0-17
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 17.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC700MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC700
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
7 m
To
8 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC700:7-8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“2.24”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC701MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC701
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
0 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC701:0-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC701MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC701
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
7 m
To
9 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC701:7-9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC702MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC702
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
0 m
To
17 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC702:0-17
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 17.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC702MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC702
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
0 m
To
5 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC702:0-5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate, near-surface interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC702MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC702
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
10 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
10 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC702:10-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC703MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC703
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
0 m
To
11 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC703:0-11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC703MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC703
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
2 m
To
4 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC703:2-4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.74”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC704MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC704
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25 m
From
0 m
To
25 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC704:0-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a significant width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Good width
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC704MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC704
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
0 m
To
1 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC704:0-1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow, near-surface interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC704MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC704
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
15 m
To
16 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
15 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC704:15-16
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a narrow interval, contributing to the infill drilling program for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for open pit
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC705MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC705
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
0 m
To
12 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC705:0-12
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a good width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Near surface intercept
  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

RC705MG Gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC705
Project
MG Gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
17 m
To
24 m
Hole Depth
25 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RC705:17-24
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MG starter pit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width for an infill hole, contributing to the overall resource confidence for reserve upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Infill drilling for reserve upgrade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade for open pit

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 7.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.