Cabral Gold Drills 10.2m @ 8.7 g/t Gold Including 1.3m @ 62.5 g/t Gold at Jerimum Cima Target, Cuiú Cuiú Gold District, Brazil

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Cabral Gold Inc.
Ticker
CBR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Brazil
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-17 15:00:18 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Cabral Gold announced significant drill results from its Cuiú Cuiú Gold District in Brazil, highlighted by a high-grade intercept of 10.2m at 8.7 g/t gold, including 1.3m at 62.5 g/t gold, at the Jerimum Cima target. This extends the known high-grade zone by 455m and remains open. Additionally, infill drilling at the MG gold deposit confirmed mineralization, supporting the existing resource model. The company is conducting ongoing drilling to define initial resources at Jerimum Cima and update the global resource base.

Reasoning: Cabral Gold reported high-grade gold drill results from the Jerimum Cima target, including a bonanza intercept, extending the known mineralization. Infill drilling at the MG deposit confirmed continuity. The company disclosed robust QA/QC procedures, but true widths were not provided for specific intercepts.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept in DDH378 at Jerimum Cima, extending mineralization
  • Confirmation of gold mineralization at MG deposit through infill drilling
  • Comprehensive QA/QC procedures disclosed
  • Potential for new resource definition at Jerimum Cima

Negative factors

  • True width is not explicitly stated for individual intercepts, only a general estimate
  • Some intercepts at MG are lower grade, though they confirm continuity

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 38

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 38. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (38)

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
0 m
To
22 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:0-22
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept from the blanket weathering zone, typical of near-surface material.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
74.5 m
To
75.2 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:74.5-75.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, moderate-grade intercept in saprolite.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
98.9 m
To
99.5 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:98.9-99.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept
  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 8.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
8.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.2 m
From
99.5 m
To
109.7 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
99.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:99.5-109.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional grade gold intercept over a significant width, representing a strong step-out extension of the high-grade zone at Jerimum Cima. The GT product is 88.5 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Strong grade-thickness product
  • Step-out extension of high-grade mineralization

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“8.68”

Context: 10.2

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The hole was designed to test the eastern extension of the high-grade mineralization intersected in previous holes.

Evidence · text

“DDH378 was drilled on section 551266E with an azimuth of 0 degrees and at an angle of 55 degrees within the central eastern part of the Jerimum Cima target and was designed to test the eastern extension of the high-grade mineralization intersected in previous holes.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 15.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
15.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
103.4 m
To
104 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
99.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:103.4-104
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional grade gold intercept, though over a narrow width. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“15.12”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 62.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
62.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
108.4 m
To
109.7 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
99.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:108.4-109.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade gold intercept, contributing significantly to the overall high-grade interval in DDH378. The GT product is 81.3 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade
  • Strong grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“62.53”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Exceptionnally high-grade zone of 62.53 g/t gold over 1.3m, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · table

“62.53”

Context: 1.3

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
120.9 m
To
128.5 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:120.9-128.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH378Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH378
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
From
138 m
To
159.9 m
Hole Depth
263.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH378:138-159.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept over a moderate width.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH379Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH379
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
39.5 m
To
40.5 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH379:39.5-40.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, low-grade intercept in saprolite.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept
  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH379Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH379
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
194 m
To
196 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH379:194-196
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept in intrusive rock.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH379Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH379
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
222.9 m
To
223.7 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH379:222.9-223.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, low-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept
  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH379Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 4.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH379
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
4.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
261.2 m
To
261.9 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
261.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH379:261.2-261.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong grade gold intercept, but over a very narrow width. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.05”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH379Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH379
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
296.2 m
To
296.8 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH379:296.2-296.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, moderate-grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH358MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH358
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
174 m
To
174.6 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH358:174-174.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, moderate-grade intercept in intrusive rock, contributing to infill data.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH358MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH358
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
177 m
To
177.5 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH358:177-177.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, moderate-grade intercept in intrusive rock, contributing to infill data.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH358MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH358
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.2 m
From
270.4 m
To
277.6 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
270.4 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH358:270.4-277.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade intercept over a moderate width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 7.2

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH358MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH358
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.7 m
From
302 m
To
310.7 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
302 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH358:302-310.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade intercept over a moderate width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 8.7

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH358MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 3.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH358
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
3.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
308.7 m
To
310.7 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
302 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH358:308.7-310.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong grade gold intercept over a narrow width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.28”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH361MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH361
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
53.7 m
To
54.9 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH361:53.7-54.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow, moderate-grade intercept in blanket material, contributing to infill data.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH361MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH361
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.3 m
From
152.2 m
To
162.5 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
152.2 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH361:152.2-162.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade intercept over a moderate width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.45”

Context: 10.3

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH361MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH361
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
7.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
152.2 m
To
153.2 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
152.2 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH361:152.2-153.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional grade gold intercept over a narrow width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.20”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH361MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH361
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
8.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
157 m
To
157.7 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
152.2 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH361:157-157.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional grade gold intercept over a very narrow width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“8.20”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH364MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH364
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30 m
From
0 m
To
30 m
Hole Depth
159.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH364:0-30
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept over a significant width in blanket material, contributing to infill data.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 30.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH364MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH364
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
75 m
To
77.7 m
Hole Depth
159.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH364:75-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept in intrusive rock, contributing to infill data.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH380MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH380
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
10 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH380:10-15
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept in saprolite, contributing to infill data.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH380MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH380
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
233.7 m
To
252 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
233.7 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH380:233.7-252
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept over a moderate width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width intercept

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 18.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH380MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH380
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
249.1 m
To
250.7 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
233.7 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH380:249.1-250.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade intercept over a narrow width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 1.6

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH380MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH380
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.3 m
From
256.6 m
To
265.9 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH380:256.6-265.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept over a moderate width, contributing to infill data.

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 9.30

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH380MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH380
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.8 m
From
276.2 m
To
292 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
276.2 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH380:276.2-292
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept over a moderate width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width intercept

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 15.8

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH380MG gold deposit · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH380
Project
MG gold deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
284.6 m
To
285.6 m
Hole Depth
308 m
Intercept Depth
276.2 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH380:284.6-285.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
MG gold deposit
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong grade gold intercept over a narrow width, confirming mineralization for resource modeling. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.30”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling at the MG gold deposit was completed in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.

Evidence · text

“Four additional diamond drill holes (DDH358, DDH361, DDH364 and DDH380) were completed at MG in order to address gaps in the 2022 resource model.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH372Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 87.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH372
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
87.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.5 m
From
173.8 m
To
183.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH372:173.8-183.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade historical intercept over a significant width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 830.3 g/t*m, which is exceptional. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade
  • Strong grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“9.5m @ 87.4 g/t gold from 173.8m depth”

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Exceptionnally high-grade zone of 87.4 g/t gold over 9.5m, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“9.5m @ 87.4 g/t gold”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

DDH372Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 285.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH372
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
285.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
173.8 m
To
176.7 m
Intercept Depth
173.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH372:173.8-176.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade historical intercept over a narrow width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 827.95 g/t*m, which is exceptional. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade
  • Exceptional grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“2.9m @ 285.5 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Exceptionnally high-grade zone of 285.5 g/t gold over 2.9m, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“2.9m @ 285.5 g/t gold”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

CC26Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CC26
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
45.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional grade historical intercept over a continuous width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 205.2 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Strong grade-thickness product
  • Continuous width intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“45.6m @ 4.5 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

CC26Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 117.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CC26
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
117.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade historical intercept over a narrow width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 175.89 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade
  • Exceptional grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“1.5m @ 117.26 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Exceptionnally high-grade zone of 117.26 g/t gold over 1.5m, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“1.5m @ 117.26 g/t gold”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

DDH359Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 82.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH359
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
82.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade historical intercept over a continuous width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 80.9 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Continuous width intercept

Negative factors

  • Low grade intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“82.6m @ 0.98 g/t”

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

DDH359Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 5.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH359
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
5.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional grade historical intercept over a significant width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 54.53 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Strong grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“9.5m @ 5.74 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

RC561Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC561
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong grade historical intercept over a continuous width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 98 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade
  • Strong grade-thickness product
  • Continuous width intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“49m @ 2.0 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

RC561Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RC561
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade historical intercept over a narrow width, used for comparison to the new results. The GT product is 57 g/t*m, which is strong. True width is not stated.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade
  • Exceptional grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“1m @ 57.0 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Exceptionnally high-grade zone of 57.0 g/t gold over 1.0m, well above the deposit-type norm.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 57.0 g/t gold”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.