Cabral Gold Drills 107.6m @ 2.5 g/t Gold Including 17.8m @ 13.0 g/t Gold at Jerimum Cima Target, Cuiú Cuiú Gold District, Brazil

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Cabral Gold Inc.
Ticker
CBR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Brazil
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-17 15:52:40 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Cabral Gold has reported high-grade gold drill results from the Jerimum Cima target in Brazil, highlighted by an intercept of 107.6m @ 2.5 g/t Au in hole DDH384. The results include a bonanza-grade interval of 3.8m @ 59.9 g/t Au and demonstrate significant strike and depth extension of the mineralized zone.

Reasoning: The release reports significant high-grade gold intercepts at the Jerimum Cima target, demonstrating both strike continuity and depth extension, which are key exploration milestones for this discovery.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept in DDH384 (13.0 g/t Au)
  • Bonanza grade component (59.9 g/t Au)
  • Demonstrated along-strike continuity of high-grade zone
  • Extension of mineralization to greater depth
  • QA/QC protocols and lab accreditation disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width not explicitly stated (noted as potentially 50% of apparent width)

Facts used in scoring: 12

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 3.8m @ 59.9 g/t gold is exceptionally high grade for an orogenic gold system.

Evidence · text

“3.8 meter zone of nearly 60 grams per tonne”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling extends the high-grade zone 60m further down dip than previously known.

Evidence · text

“extends at least 60m further down dip than previously thought”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release mentions certified reference materials, blanks, duplicates, and an ISO 17025 accredited lab.

Evidence · text

“regular insertion of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states true widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts without providing specific true widths for the new holes.

Evidence · text

“True widths may be 50% of actual drill intercepts”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 12. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (12)

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 107.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
107.6 m
From
162.7 m
To
270.3 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
162.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH384:162.7-270.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant intercept demonstrating continuity and grade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width (2.5 g/t over 107.6m)

Evidence · text

“returned 107.6m @ 2.5 g/t gold from 162.7m depth”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 13.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
13.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.8 m
From
232.9 m
To
250.7 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
162.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH384:232.9-250.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong high-grade component of the main intercept.

Positive factors

  • High grade interval

Evidence · text

“including 17.8m @ 13.0 g/t gold from 232.9m depth”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 59.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
59.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
232.8 m
To
236.6 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m
Intercept Depth
162.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH384:232.8-236.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade interval.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade

Evidence · text

“3.8m @ 59.9 g/t gold from 232.9m depth”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH375Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH375
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37.4 m
From
133.3 m
To
170.7 m
Hole Depth
211.4 m
Intercept Depth
133.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH375:133.3-170.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade intercept.

Negative factors

  • Low grade

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 37.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH375Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH375
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
150 m
To
151.4 m
Hole Depth
211.4 m
Intercept Depth
133.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH375:150-151.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Small high-grade interval within a low-grade hole.

Evidence · table

“3.70”

Context: 1.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH375Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH375
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.8 m
From
181.2 m
To
202 m
Hole Depth
211.4 m
Intercept Depth
133.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH375:181.2-202
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 20.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH382Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH382
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
170 m
To
172.4 m
Hole Depth
250 m
Intercept Depth
145.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH382:170-172.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Jerimum Cima
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.70”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.8 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill

Location

Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant intercept demonstrating continuity and grade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width (2.5 g/t over 107.6m)

Evidence · text

“including 17.8m @ 13.0 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 285.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
285.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill

Location

Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant intercept demonstrating continuity and grade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width (2.5 g/t over 107.6m)

Evidence · text

“including 2.9m @ 285.5 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 62.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
62.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill

Location

Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant intercept demonstrating continuity and grade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width (2.5 g/t over 107.6m)

Evidence · text

“including 1.3m @ 62.5 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 117.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
117.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill

Location

Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant intercept demonstrating continuity and grade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width (2.5 g/t over 107.6m)

Evidence · text

“including 1.5m @ 117.26 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH384Jerimum Cima · goldGrade: 5.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH384
Project
Jerimum Cima
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
CBR

Geometry

Grade
5.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.5 m
Hole Depth
371.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill

Location

Azimuth
180 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS GEOSOL Laboratorios
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant intercept demonstrating continuity and grade.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width (2.5 g/t over 107.6m)

Evidence · text

“including 9.5m @ 5.74 g/t gold”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.