# Canadian GoldCamps Reports High-Grade Gold and Manganese-Enriched Iron Formation at Mercator

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8

Original source: https://webfiles-primary.thecse.com/news_releases/neutral/2805/c4203ffa-75df-48a9-9590-0ccdece387a8

Publisher: cse

Original announcement: 2026-09-22T15:42:21.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Canadian GoldCamps Corp.

- Ticker: CAMP

- Exchange: CSE

- Region: Québec

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Manganese, Copper, Arsenic

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-22 16:48:31 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Canadian GoldCamps Corp. announced results from a quarter-core re-sampling program at its Mercator Gold Project in Québec, confirming high-grade gold intercepts including 2.05 g/t gold over 8.65 metres in hole MCT-22-08. The program also identified manganese-enriched iron formation \(up to 1.96% Mn\) and elevated copper \(up to 240.5 ppm Cu\) and arsenic, providing new exploration vectors. While the re-sampling generally yielded lower grades than the original 2022 assays, the company filed an independent NI 43-101 Technical Report recommending a C$4.895 million exploration program.

Reasoning: The announcement reports high-grade gold intercepts from a re-sampling program, confirming historical mineralization and providing new multi-element vectors. However, the re-sampling generally returned lower grades than the original, and no new drilling or economic assessment of critical minerals has been completed. The filing of a technical report provides project validation.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercepts confirmed by re-sampling

- Positive factor: Multi-element analysis provides new exploration vectors \(manganese, copper, arsenic\)

- Positive factor: NI 43-101 Technical Report filed, providing project validation and future exploration recommendations

- Positive factor: Detailed QA/QC disclosure and verification of sample chain of custody

- Negative factor: Re-sampling results are generally lower than original 2022 half-core composites, indicating potential nugget effect or sampling bias

- Negative factor: True widths are not known at this stage

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

- Negative factor: Economic significance of manganese or copper not yet assessed

Facts used in scoring: 13

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 13. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (13)

### MCT-22-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-0)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-08
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.05
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 8.65 m
- From: 55.6 m
- To: 64.6 m
- Intercept Depth: 55.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-08:55.6-64.6
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The intercept confirms high-grade gold in a historical hole, providing detailed resolution. However, the grade is lower than the original composite, and true width is unknown, limiting its immediate impact.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept confirmed by re-sampling

- Positive factor: Detailed 25 cm sub-sampling provides better resolution of mineralization

- Positive factor: Part of a data-verification program, increasing confidence in historical data

- Negative factor: Re-sampling result is lower than the original 2022 half-core composite \(2.62 g/t Au over 17.80 m\)

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · text

> The program returned 2.05 g/t gold over 8.65 metres in drill hole MCT-22-08

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-1)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-08
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 15.46
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-08:61.95-62.95
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very high-grade gold intercept, even if narrow, is a strong positive signal for the presence of bonanza zones within the system, confirming the potential for high-grade mineralization.

- Positive factor: Bonanza grade gold intercept confirmed by re-sampling

- Positive factor: Highlights the high-grade nature of the mineralization at a fine scale

- Positive factor: Provides sharper vectors for future drilling

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept length

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · text

> including a peak value of 15.46 g/t gold over 0.20 metre.

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 15.46 g/t gold over 0.20 m is exceptionally high-grade for gold.

Evidence · text

> 15.46 g/t gold over 0.20 metre

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-2)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-08
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.64
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 57.55 m
- To: 58.55 m
- Intercept Depth: 57.55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-08:57.55-58.55
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold intercept within a broader zone, confirming the presence of significant mineralization at a finer scale.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept confirmed by re-sampling

- Positive factor: Provides detailed resolution of mineralization within the composite

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 4.64

Context: 4.64 g/t Au over 1.00 m \(57.55–58.55 m\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-3)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-08
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 8.53
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.25 m
- From: 59.55 m
- To: 59.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 59.55 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-08:59.55-59.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very strong gold intercept, even if narrow, further confirms the high-grade nature of the mineralization at a fine scale.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept confirmed by re-sampling

- Positive factor: Provides detailed resolution of mineralization within the composite

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept length

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 8.53

Context: 8.53 g/t Au over 0.25 m \(59.55–59.80 m\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-4)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-08
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.51
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 61.95 m
- To: 62.95 m
- Intercept Depth: 61.95 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-08:61.95-62.95
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold intercept within a broader zone, confirming the presence of significant mineralization at a finer scale.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept confirmed by re-sampling

- Positive factor: Provides detailed resolution of mineralization within the composite

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 4.51

Context: 4.51 g/t Au over 1.00 m \(61.95–62.95 m\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-5)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-08
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.65
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.35 m
- From: 47.05 m
- To: 51.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 47.05 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-08:47.05-51.4
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade intercept confirming mineralization, but not as significant as other reported results.

- Positive factor: Confirms gold mineralization in the upper part of the hole

- Negative factor: Lower grade compared to other intercepts

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 0.65

Context: 0.65

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-6)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-08
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.58
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 13 m
- From: 47.05 m
- To: 64.6 m
- Intercept Depth: 47.05 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-08:47.05-64.6
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept confirming mineralization, but the grade is lower than the original composite, indicating potential nugget effect or sampling bias.

- Positive factor: Confirms gold mineralization over a significant length in a historical hole

- Positive factor: Provides detailed resolution of mineralization within the composite

- Negative factor: Lower grade compared to the original 2022 half-core composite \(2.62 g/t Au over 17.80 m\)

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 1.58

Context: 1.58

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-11

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-7)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-11
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.35
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.55 m
- From: 103 m
- To: 107.55 m
- Intercept Depth: 103 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-11:103-107.55
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade intercept confirming mineralization, with a high-grade component, but true width is unknown.

- Positive factor: Confirms gold mineralization in a historical hole

- Positive factor: Includes a high-grade sub-interval \(6.77 g/t Au over 0.25 m\)

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 1.35

Context: 1.35

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-11

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-8)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-11
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.95
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.3 m
- From: 188.5 m
- To: 192.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 188.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-11:188.5-192.8
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade intercept confirming mineralization, with a high-grade component, but true width is unknown.

- Positive factor: Confirms gold mineralization in a historical hole

- Positive factor: Includes a high-grade sub-interval \(6.30 g/t Au over 0.25 m\)

- Negative factor: Lower grade compared to other intercepts

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 0.95

Context: 0.95

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### MCT-22-03

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-9)

Mercator · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: MCT-22-03
- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.62
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 33.3 m
- To: 37.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 33.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: orogenic
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: MCT-22-03:33.3-37.9
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept confirming mineralization, but not particularly significant on its own.

- Positive factor: Confirms gold mineralization in a historical hole

- Negative factor: Lower grade compared to other intercepts

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: No new drilling, only re-sampling of historical core

Evidence · table

> 0.62

Context: 0.62

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that 'true widths are not known at this stage'.

Evidence · text

> Intervals are core lengths; true widths are not known at this stage.

### Fact 11

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-10)

Mercator · manganese

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: manganese
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.96
- Grade Unit: %

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The identification of significant manganese values adds a critical mineral component to the project and provides new exploration vectors, although its economic significance is yet to be determined.

- Positive factor: Identifies a critical mineral component \(manganese\) in the project

- Positive factor: Provides additional geological vectors for future exploration

- Positive factor: Manganese is recognized as a critical mineral by the Government of Canada

- Negative factor: Economic significance of manganese not yet assessed

- Negative factor: Not tied to specific drill intervals, but a general finding from multi-element analysis

Evidence · text

> Multi-element analysis of the same samples also identified manganese-enriched banded iron formation, with values of up to 19,644 ppm manganese \(1.96% Mn\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

### Fact 12

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-11)

Mercator · copper

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 240.5
- Grade Unit: ppm

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The identification of copper as an associated metal provides additional geological information and potential for critical minerals, though its economic significance is not yet clear.

- Positive factor: Identifies copper as an associated metal, providing additional geological vectors

- Positive factor: Copper is recognized as a critical mineral by the Government of Canada

- Negative factor: Economic significance of copper not yet assessed

- Negative factor: Not tied to specific drill intervals, but a general finding from multi-element analysis

Evidence · text

> The multi-element program on the same 111 sub-samples returned copper up to 240.5 ppm

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

### Fact 13

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/canadian-goldcamps-reports-high-grade-gold-and-manganese-enriched-iron-formation--56358515-93fc-4267-91c3-18fe80c087b8#fact-drill-facts-12)

Mercator · arsenic

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Mercator
- Commodity: arsenic
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: canada\_qc
- Ticker: CAMP

#### Geometry

- Grade: 534
- Grade Unit: ppm

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill

#### Location

- Location: Meridian Zone
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No
- Deleterious Elements: arsenic

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The confirmation of arsenic as a pathfinder element is positive for exploration targeting, but its presence also introduces a potential processing consideration.

- Positive factor: Arsenic confirmed as a reliable pathfinder element for gold targeting

- Positive factor: Strengthens geological interpretation and improves exploration targeting

- Negative factor: Arsenic can be a deleterious element in processing, though not explicitly flagged as a penalty here

Evidence · text

> The multi-element program on the same 111 sub-samples returned... arsenic up to 534 ppm

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

#### Rejected tags

**QA/QC Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Reason: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified lab, QP sign-off, standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> The 111 sub-samples were collected on April 28, 2026 from holes MCT-22-08 \(55 samples, of which 30 were submitted under interim bag numbers and subsequently repositioned at 55.60–62.95 m from their 2022 sample tags\), MCT-22-11 \(35 samples\) and MCT-22-03 \(19 samples\), plus two small samples of cutting rejects that carry no position and are excluded from all composites. Samples were submitted to IGS Impact Global Solutions Inc. \(“IGS”\), an independent commercial laboratory in Delson, Québec operating an ISO-grade quality-management system. Gold was determined by lead-collection fire assay on a 40 g charge with an ICP-OES finish under IGS procedure FC-MP-SAA/ICP, with gravimetric finish \(FA-GRAV-Au\) available for high-grade samples and a reported detection limit of 0.006 ppm Au \(certificate CA-CAMP-LA-2026-01, May 22, 2026\). The laboratory inserted one certified reference material \(Oreas 236, certified value 1.85 ppm Au\), one preparation blank and one replicate per fire-assay batch, for six of each across the run. All six CRMs returned recoveries between 97.1% and 105.4% of the certified value \(mean 101.5%\), within 2σ of the certificate. All six blanks returned gold below the reportable detection limit \(<0.006 ppm Au\). Replicate analyses, including the 6.77 g/t Au sample 22-011-14 \(replicate 6.99 g/t Au, RPD 3%\), showed the reproducibility expected of a system known to host centimetre-scale high-grade bands and visible gold; relative differences of 28–40% on three lower-grade pairs are consistent with that nugget effect. The Company has verified the sample chain of custody and the analytical certificate, and the results are summarized in Section 12 and Appendix III of the Technical Report.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.