Canasil Announces Start of Drill Program to Test Initial Silver-Gold Vein Target at the Nora Project in Durango State, Mexico
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Canasil Resources Inc.
- Ticker
- CLZ
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Durango State, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Copper, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 17:21:54 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Canasil Resources has commenced a drill program at its Nora Project in Durango State, Mexico, targeting the Candy silver-gold epithermal vein. The program will consist of six holes to test the vein below high-grade surface samples. Historical surface samples from the Candy vein, previously reported in 2019, show high-grade silver and gold, along with significant copper, lead, and zinc values.
Reasoning: The announcement of a new drill program on a promising silver-gold target is positive for exploration, supported by high-grade historical surface samples. However, the lack of new drill results limits the immediate impact, and the absence of true width for historical samples introduces some uncertainty.
Positive factors
- Drill program initiated on a high-grade silver-gold epithermal vein target, indicating active exploration.
- Historical surface samples show high grades for silver and gold, along with significant base metals, suggesting potential for economic mineralization.
- QA/QC disclosure with a Qualified Person review enhances credibility.
Negative factors
- The document announces the start of drilling, but no new drill results are presented, only historical surface samples.
- True width is not disclosed for the historical surface samples, which are described as 'width metres' for vein samples.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 30
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The technical information has been reviewed and approved by a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.
Evidence · text
“The technical information herein has been reviewed and approved by J. Blackwell (P. Geo.), a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The table reports 'Width Metres' for vein samples without specifying true width.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 14278
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The reported grades are from surface samples collected in August 2019 and previously reported in September 2019.
Evidence · text
“Surface samples collected in August 2019 and reported in News Release dated September 26, 2019”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 30. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (30)
Fact 1Nora · goldGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451609
- Northing
- 2822331
- Elevation
- 2017.12 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a strong gold grade, indicating potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- High gold grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“3.72”
Context: 14278
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 2Nora · silverGrade: 605Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 605
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451609
- Northing
- 2822331
- Elevation
- 2017.12 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows an exceptional silver grade, which is a strong indicator of high-grade potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade for a surface sample, indicating high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“605”
Context: 14278
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 3Nora · copperGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451609
- Northing
- 2822331
- Elevation
- 2017.12 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate copper grade, adding to the polymetallic potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: 14278
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 4Nora · leadGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451609
- Northing
- 2822331
- Elevation
- 2017.12 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak lead grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: 14278
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 5Nora · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451609
- Northing
- 2822331
- Elevation
- 2017.12 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak zinc grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 14278
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 6Nora · goldGrade: 2.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451614
- Northing
- 2822339
- Elevation
- 2018.7 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate gold grade, indicating potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.98”
Context: 14281
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 7Nora · silverGrade: 540Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 540
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451614
- Northing
- 2822339
- Elevation
- 2018.7 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows an exceptional silver grade, which is a strong indicator of high-grade potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade for a surface sample, indicating high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“540”
Context: 14281
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 8Nora · copperGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451614
- Northing
- 2822339
- Elevation
- 2018.7 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate copper grade, adding to the polymetallic potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 14281
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 9Nora · leadGrade: 4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451614
- Northing
- 2822339
- Elevation
- 2018.7 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate lead grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: 14281
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 10Nora · zincGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451614
- Northing
- 2822339
- Elevation
- 2018.7 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate zinc grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“3.55”
Context: 14281
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 11Nora · goldGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451623
- Northing
- 2822395
- Elevation
- 1972.83 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate gold grade, indicating potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.18”
Context: 14287
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 12Nora · silverGrade: 316Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 316
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451623
- Northing
- 2822395
- Elevation
- 1972.83 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a strong silver grade, indicating potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“316”
Context: 14287
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 13Nora · copperGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451623
- Northing
- 2822395
- Elevation
- 1972.83 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate copper grade, adding to the polymetallic potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 14287
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 14Nora · leadGrade: 2.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451623
- Northing
- 2822395
- Elevation
- 1972.83 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate lead grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.44”
Context: 14287
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 15Nora · zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451623
- Northing
- 2822395
- Elevation
- 1972.83 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak zinc grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 14287
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 16Nora · goldGrade: 3.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451629
- Northing
- 2822403
- Elevation
- 1984.14 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate gold grade, indicating potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“3.03”
Context: 14288
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 17Nora · silverGrade: 585Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 585
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451629
- Northing
- 2822403
- Elevation
- 1984.14 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows an exceptional silver grade, which is a strong indicator of high-grade potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade for a surface sample, indicating high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“585”
Context: 14288
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 18Nora · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451629
- Northing
- 2822403
- Elevation
- 1984.14 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows an exceptional copper grade, adding to the polymetallic potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.80”
Context: 14288
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 19Nora · leadGrade: 5.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451629
- Northing
- 2822403
- Elevation
- 1984.14 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate lead grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“5.24”
Context: 14288
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 20Nora · zincGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451629
- Northing
- 2822403
- Elevation
- 1984.14 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak zinc grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: 14288
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 21Nora · goldGrade: 6.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451626
- Northing
- 2822578
- Elevation
- 2006.46 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows an exceptional gold grade, indicating high-grade potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“6.55”
Context: 14299
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 22Nora · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451626
- Northing
- 2822578
- Elevation
- 2006.46 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak silver grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“10.4”
Context: 14299
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 23Nora · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451626
- Northing
- 2822578
- Elevation
- 2006.46 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak copper grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 14299
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 24Nora · leadGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451626
- Northing
- 2822578
- Elevation
- 2006.46 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak lead grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 14299
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 25Nora · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451626
- Northing
- 2822578
- Elevation
- 2006.46 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak zinc grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 14299
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 26Nora · goldGrade: 12.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451608
- Northing
- 2822812
- Elevation
- 2009.71 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows an exceptional gold grade, indicating high-grade potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“12.55”
Context: 14311
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 27Nora · silverGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451608
- Northing
- 2822812
- Elevation
- 2009.71 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak silver grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“12.2”
Context: 14311
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 28Nora · copperGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451608
- Northing
- 2822812
- Elevation
- 2009.71 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate copper grade, adding to the polymetallic potential, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 14311
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 29Nora · leadGrade: 2.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451608
- Northing
- 2822812
- Elevation
- 2009.71 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a moderate lead grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade for a surface sample.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“2.67”
Context: 14311
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 30Nora · zincGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Nora
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CLZ
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Vein
- Easting
- 451608
- Northing
- 2822812
- Elevation
- 2009.71 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-09-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak zinc grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature, but it is not new information and lacks true width disclosure.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: 14311
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.