Canuc Drills 1.0 m of 32.1 g/t Au Within an 11.5 m Interval of 3.18 g/t Au near Surface in Gold Lens 1

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Canuc Resources Corporation
Ticker
CDA
Exchange
TSX
Region
Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 15:03:22 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Canuc Resources Corporation announced high-grade gold drill results from its East Sudbury Project in Ontario, including 1.0 m of 32.1 g/t Au within an 11.5 m interval of 3.18 g/t Au. The drilling confirmed continuity of the near-surface Gold Lens 1 and will be used to refine a block model for potential near-term production. The program also included infill and boundary definition, with results reviewed by a Qualified Person.

Reasoning: The document reports high-grade gold drill results from the East Sudbury Project, confirming continuity of a near-surface gold lens. While some holes were unsuccessful or pending QA/QC, the overall results are positive for the project's development, with QP sign-off providing credibility.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercepts, including 1.0 m of 32.1 g/t Au, demonstrate strong mineralization.
  • Drilling confirms continuity of Gold Lens 1 near surface, which is positive for potential near-term production.
  • The drill program included both infill and boundary definition, contributing to a refined block model.
  • Qualified Person (QP) sign-off and NI 43-101 compliance enhance credibility.

Negative factors

  • Several holes did not intersect mineralization or were lost, indicating geological variability or targeting challenges.
  • One intersection is pending QA/QC, and another failed QA/QC, introducing uncertainty for those results.
  • True width is not disclosed for any of the intercepts, which may overstate actual thickness.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 19

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 19. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (19)

SM-25-123East Sudbury · goldGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-123
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
19.6 m
To
24.6 m
Hole Depth
48 m
Intercept Depth
19.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-123:19.6-24.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529114
Northing
5166697
Elevation
306.5 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a 5-meter width, contributing to the understanding of Gold Lens 1 continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.00”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-123East Sudbury · goldGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-123
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
19.6 m
To
20.6 m
Hole Depth
48 m
Intercept Depth
19.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-123:19.6-20.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529114
Northing
5166697
Elevation
306.5 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept of 12.00 g/t over 1.0 m is significant, though its narrow width limits overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept, indicating a rich zone within the broader interval.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width of the high-grade zone.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“12.00”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-125East Sudbury · goldGrade: 6.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-125
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
6.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
35 m
To
38 m
Hole Depth
101 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-125:35-38
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529284
Northing
5166732
Elevation
313 m
Azimuth
295 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade of 6.89 g/t over 3.0 m, which is a positive result for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a moderate width.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.89”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-129East Sudbury · goldGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-129
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
45 m
To
51 m
Hole Depth
81 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-129:45-51
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529158
Northing
5166634
Elevation
313 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a 6-meter width, contributing to the understanding of Gold Lens 1 continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“2.51”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-129East Sudbury · goldGrade: 6.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-129
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
6.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
50 m
To
51 m
Hole Depth
81 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-129:50-51
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529158
Northing
5166634
Elevation
313 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept of 6.59 g/t over 1.0 m is significant, though its narrow width limits overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept, indicating a rich zone within the broader interval.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width of the high-grade zone.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.59”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-131East Sudbury · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-131
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.6 m
From
8.4 m
To
17 m
Hole Depth
46.3 m
Intercept Depth
8.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-131:8.4-17
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529109
Northing
5166656
Elevation
657 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, which is less material but still contributes to the geological model.

Positive factors

  • Intercept over a reasonable width near surface.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 8.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-131East Sudbury · goldGrade: 4.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-131
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
4.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
15.5 m
To
16 m
Hole Depth
46.3 m
Intercept Depth
8.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-131:15.5-16
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529109
Northing
5166656
Elevation
657 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade of 4.75 g/t over a very narrow 0.5 m interval is noted, but its limited width reduces overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade within a narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width of the high-grade zone.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.75”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-132East Sudbury · goldGrade: 3.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-132
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
3.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.5 m
From
4.9 m
To
16.4 m
Hole Depth
51 m
Intercept Depth
4.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-132:4.9-16.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529110
Northing
5166656
Elevation
309.6 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is a strong result with a good gold grade over a significant width, starting near surface, which is highly material for the project's development.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a significant width near surface, confirming continuity.
  • Intercept starts very close to surface, which is favorable for potential open-pit mining.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“3.18”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-132East Sudbury · goldGrade: 32.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-132
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
32.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
5.8 m
To
6.8 m
Hole Depth
51 m
Intercept Depth
4.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-132:5.8-6.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529110
Northing
5166656
Elevation
309.6 m
Azimuth
330 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade gold intercept of 32.10 g/t over 1.0 m is highly material and a significant positive for the project, despite its narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade gold intercept, indicating very high-grade mineralization.
  • Intercept is very shallow, favorable for potential mining.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width of the bonanza-grade zone.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“32.10”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-133East Sudbury · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-133
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
13 m
To
21 m
Intercept Depth
13 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-133:13-21
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529163
Northing
5166682
Elevation
306.5 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the understanding of Gold Lens 1 continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width near surface.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-133East Sudbury · goldGrade: 9.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-133
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
9.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
13 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
13 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-133:13-14
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529163
Northing
5166682
Elevation
306.5 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept of 9.63 g/t over 1.0 m is significant, though its narrow width limits overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept, indicating a rich zone within the broader interval.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width of the high-grade zone.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“9.63”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-135East Sudbury · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-135
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.6 m
From
43 m
To
54.6 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-135:43-54.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529180
Northing
5166713
Elevation
306.8 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, which is less material but still provides geological information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept over a significant width.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 11.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

SM-25-135East Sudbury · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SM-25-135
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
1.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
49 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SM-25-135:49-50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Easting
529180
Northing
5166713
Elevation
306.8 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade of 1.38 g/t over a narrow 1.0 m interval is noted, but its limited width reduces overall materiality.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade within a narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Narrow width of the moderate-grade zone.
  • True width not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.38”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

(Incl)East Sudbury · goldGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
(Incl)
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
19.6 m
To
20.6 m
Intercept Depth
19.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
(Incl):19.6-20.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.00”

Context: (Incl)

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

(Incl)East Sudbury · goldGrade: 6.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
(Incl)
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
6.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
50 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
(Incl):50-51
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.59 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.59 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.59”

Context: (Incl)

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

(Incl)East Sudbury · goldGrade: 4.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
(Incl)
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
4.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
15.5 m
To
16 m
Intercept Depth
15.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
(Incl):15.5-16
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.75 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.75 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.75”

Context: (Incl)

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

(Incl)East Sudbury · goldGrade: 32.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
(Incl)
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
32.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
5.8 m
To
6.8 m
Intercept Depth
5.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
(Incl):5.8-6.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 32.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 32.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.10”

Context: (Incl)

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

(Incl)East Sudbury · goldGrade: 9.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
(Incl)
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
9.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
13 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
13 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
(Incl):13-14
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.63 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.63 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.63”

Context: (Incl)

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

(Incl)East Sudbury · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
(Incl)
Project
East Sudbury
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
CDA

Geometry

Grade
1.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
49 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
(Incl):49-50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Gold Lens 1
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.38 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.38”

Context: (Incl)

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.