Capitan Silver Intersects 1,130.1 g/t Silver Equivalent over 1.5 Metres, Within a Wider Zone of 240.5 g/t Silver Equivalent over 25.9 Metres at the Cruz De Plata Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Capitan Silver Corp.
Ticker
CAPT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Durango, Mexico
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-17 15:27:27 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Capitan Silver reported high-grade silver equivalent drill results from its Cruz de Plata project in Mexico, including a bonanza intercept of 1,130.1 g/t AgEq over 1.5 metres within a wider zone of 240.5 g/t AgEq over 25.9 metres. The drilling successfully extended known mineralization down-dip and identified a new silver zone, expanding the project's footprint. The company also disclosed its QA/QC protocols and metal equivalent calculation assumptions.

Reasoning: The drill results demonstrate exceptional high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including a bonanza grade, within significant wider zones. The program successfully extended known mineralization and made a new discovery, substantially increasing the project's potential. Robust QA/QC disclosure and transparent metal equivalent calculations support the reported figures, despite the common limitation of estimated true widths.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including a bonanza grade of 1,130.1 g/t AgEq over 1.5m.
  • Significant wider zones of high-grade mineralization, such as 240.5 g/t AgEq over 25.9m.
  • Successful step-out drilling extending known high-grade mineralization down-dip by 50m to 90m.
  • Discovery of a new silver zone (Encarnación Zone), increasing the property's mineralized footprint.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including standards, blanks, duplicates, and check assays, enhancing data credibility.
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly stated, allowing for transparent evaluation.

Negative factors

  • True widths are estimated for the main trend and unknown for new discoveries, which may overstate actual thickness for some intercepts.
  • Some step-out intercepts, while extending mineralization, show lower grades compared to the historical high-grade results they are extending.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 228

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 228. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (228)

25-ERRC-27Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 30.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-27
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
30.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-27:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate silver intercept, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.

Evidence · table

“30.4”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-27Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.218Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-27
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.218
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-27:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not a primary driver.

Evidence · table

“0.218”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-27Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-27
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-27:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not economically significant on its own.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-27Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-27
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-27:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not economically significant on its own.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 88.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
88.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong silver intercept marking a new discovery, indicating significant exploration potential for the project.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · table

“88.9”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.061
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept within a new discovery zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · table

“0.061”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept within a new discovery zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.075
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept within a new discovery zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · table

“0.075”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 137.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
137.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade silver intercept within a new discovery zone, indicating strong potential.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.
  • High-grade intercept within the new discovery zone.

Evidence · table

“137.2”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept within a new discovery zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept within a new discovery zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-29Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-29
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-29:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept within a new discovery zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Represents a new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-29 intersected a new silver zone, southeast of the Peñoles Fault zone and 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María Silver Trend”
25-ERRC-30Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-30
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
13.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-30:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade silver intercept in a new discovery zone, but the hole's positioning limited its effectiveness.

Positive factors

  • Part of the new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Negative factors

  • The hole appears to have been collared too far north to intersect the main new zone.

Evidence · table

“13.2”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María”
25-ERRC-30Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.234Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-30
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.234
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-30:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept in a new discovery zone, but the hole's positioning limited its effectiveness.

Positive factors

  • Part of the new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Negative factors

  • The hole appears to have been collared too far north to intersect the main new zone.

Evidence · table

“0.234”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María”
25-ERRC-30Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-30
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-30:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept in a new discovery zone, but the hole's positioning limited its effectiveness.

Positive factors

  • Part of the new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Negative factors

  • The hole appears to have been collared too far north to intersect the main new zone.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María”
25-ERRC-30Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-30
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-30:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Encarnación Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept in a new discovery zone, but the hole's positioning limited its effectiveness.

Positive factors

  • Part of the new silver discovery in the Encarnación Zone, expanding the mineralized footprint.

Negative factors

  • The hole appears to have been collared too far north to intersect the main new zone.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

New DiscoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-30 targeted a new silver occurrence that has been traced on surface for over 250m, located approximately 250m to the southeast of the Jesús María”
25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 195.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
195.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong silver intercept, contributing positively to the project's overall grade profile.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept.

Evidence · table

“195.8”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.084Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.084
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.084”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 49.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
49.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate silver intercept, contributing to the overall grade profile.

Evidence · table

“49.8”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.207Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.207
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.207”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-31Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-31
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-31:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
13.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade silver intercept, contributing to the overall grade profile.

Evidence · table

“13.6”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.282Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.282
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.282”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
26.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade silver intercept, contributing to the overall grade profile.

Evidence · table

“26.8”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.292Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.292
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.292”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 241.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
241.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very strong silver intercept over a substantial width, confirming continuity and adding significant value to the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade over a significant width, confirming continuity of high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“241.8”

Context: 25.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.169Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.169
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept within a significant wider zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.169”

Context: 25.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept within a significant wider zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: 25.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.035
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept within a significant wider zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.035”

Context: 25.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1151Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1151
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A bonanza-grade silver intercept, representing a highly significant result that confirms and expands high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade silver intercept, significantly above the project average and peer comparison.
  • Confirms continuity of high-grade mineralization between prior drill holes.

Evidence · table

“1,151.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 1,151.0 ppm Ag over 1.5m is exceptionally high-grade for an epithermal silver deposit.

Evidence · table

“1,151.0”

Context: 1.5

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.647Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.647
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept within a bonanza silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade within a bonanza silver intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.647”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.032
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade lead intercept within a bonanza silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.032”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.081Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.081
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept within a bonanza silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.081”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 497.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
497.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional silver intercept, further enhancing the high-grade nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade over a good width, contributing significantly to the overall resource potential.

Evidence · table

“497.3”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.286Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.286
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept within a significant high-grade silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.286”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade lead intercept within a significant high-grade silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.052Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.052
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept within a significant high-grade silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.052”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 756Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
756
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A bonanza-grade silver intercept, further confirming the presence of very high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade silver intercept, significantly enhancing the high-grade zone.

Evidence · table

“756.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 756.0 ppm Ag over 1.5m is exceptionally high-grade for an epithermal silver deposit.

Evidence · table

“756.0”

Context: 1.5

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.564Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.564
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept within a bonanza silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade within a bonanza silver intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.564”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade lead intercept within a bonanza silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept within a bonanza silver zone, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 41.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
41.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate silver intercept, contributing to the overall grade profile.

Evidence · table

“41.2”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.078Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.078
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.078”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
27.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade silver intercept over a good width, contributing to the overall grade profile.

Evidence · table

“27.7”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.077Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.077
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept over a good width, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.077”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept over a good width, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-34Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-34
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-34:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace zinc intercept over a good width, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 82.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
82.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong silver intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept, extending mineralization down-dip.

Evidence · table

“82.3”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.508Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.508
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade within a step-out intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.508”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade lead intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.040”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 49.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
49.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate silver intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver intercept, extending mineralization down-dip.

Evidence · table

“49.8”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.151Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.151
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.151”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.031
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.031”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 31.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
31.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate silver intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver intercept, extending mineralization down-dip.

Evidence · table

“31.3”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.090”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 69.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
69.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate silver intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver intercept over a good width, extending mineralization down-dip.

Evidence · table

“69.6”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.104Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.104
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.104”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade lead intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.113Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.113
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.113”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 221Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
221
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong silver intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept, extending mineralization down-dip.

Evidence · table

“221”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade lead intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 30.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
30.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate silver intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver intercept, extending mineralization down-dip.

Evidence · table

“30.3”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace gold intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.030”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A trace lead intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.051
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade zinc intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the polymetallic nature.

Evidence · table

“0.051”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-36Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 216.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-36
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
216.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
181.4 m
To
184.4 m
Intercept Depth
181.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-36:181.4-184.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong silver intercept from a step-out hole, contributing to the extension of mineralization, though at a lower grade than the historical high.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept, extending mineralization down-dip.

Negative factors

  • Grade is lower than the historical 25-ERRC-26 intercept it extends.

Evidence · table

“216.8”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 was designed as an on-section step out to test the continuity of high-grade mineralization below drill hole 25-ERRC-26, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip.

Evidence · text

“Drill hole 25-ERRC-36 , a down-dip, step-out hole from previously announced drill hole 25-ERRC-26, intersected multiple intervals including 306.6 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, and 223.6 g/t AgEq over 3.0m, extending mineralization from 60 to 90m down-dip”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 30.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
30.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 30.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“30.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.218Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.218
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.218 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.218”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
7.6 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.025 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.025 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 88.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
88.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 88.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“88.9”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.061
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.061 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.061”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.075
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.075 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.075 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.075”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 137.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
137.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 137.2 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“137.2”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.04 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
15.2 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:13.7-15.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
13.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 13.2 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“13.2”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.234Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.234
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.234 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.234”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
50.3 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:50.3-51.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 195.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
195.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 195.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“195.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.084Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.084
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.084 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.084”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.038 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.038 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 49.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
49.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 49.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“49.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.207Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.207
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.207 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.207”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
173.7 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
173.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:173.7-175.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
13.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 13.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“13.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.282Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.282
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.282 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.282”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
35.1 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
35.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:35.1-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
26.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 26.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“26.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.292Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.292
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.292 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.292”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.1-68.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 241.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
241.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 241.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“241.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.169Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.169
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.169 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.169”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.035
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.035 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.035”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1151Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1151
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1151 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1,151.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.647Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.647
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.647 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.647”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.032
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.032 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.032 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.032”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.081Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.081
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.081 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.081 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.081”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 497.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
497.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 497.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“497.3”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.286Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.286
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.286 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.286”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.036 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.036 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.052Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.052
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
88.4 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.052 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.052 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.052”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 756Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
756
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 756 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“756.0”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.564Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.564
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.564 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.564”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.039 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.039 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.4 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.4-89.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.038 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.038 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 41.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
41.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41.2 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“41.2”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.078Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.078
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.078 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.078”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.008 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
103.6 m
To
105.2 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:103.6-105.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.036 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.036 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
27.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“27.7”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.077Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.077
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.077 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.077”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.011 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
115.8 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:115.8-132.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.026 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 82.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
82.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 82.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“82.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.508Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.508
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.508 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.508”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.040”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 49.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
49.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 49.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“49.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.151Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.151
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.151 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.151”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.031
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
68.6 m
To
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:68.6-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.031 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.031 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.031”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 31.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
31.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“31.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.09 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.090”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
105.2 m
To
111.3 m
Intercept Depth
105.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:105.2-111.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.044 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.044 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 69.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
69.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 69.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“69.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.104Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.104
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.104 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.104”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.043 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.043 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.113Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.113
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
138.7 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:138.7-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.113 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.113 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.113”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 221Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
221
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 221 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“221”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.24 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.028 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 30.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
30.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 30.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“30.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.03 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.030”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.012 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.051
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
163.1 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-164.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.051 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.051 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.051”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 216.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
216.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
181.4 m
To
184.4 m
Intercept Depth
181.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:181.4-184.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 216.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“216.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.175Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.175
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
181.4 m
To
184.4 m
Intercept Depth
181.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:181.4-184.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.175 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.175”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.087Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.087
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
181.4 m
To
184.4 m
Intercept Depth
181.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:181.4-184.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.087 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.087 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.087”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.158Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.158
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
181.4 m
To
184.4 m
Intercept Depth
181.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:181.4-184.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.158 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.158 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.158”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 131.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
131.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
193.5 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
193.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.5-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 131.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“131.9”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
193.5 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
193.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.5-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.01 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.031
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
193.5 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
193.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.5-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.031 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.031 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.031”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
193.5 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
193.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.5-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.026 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 321Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
321
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
196.6 m
To
198.1 m
Intercept Depth
196.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:196.6-198.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 321 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“321.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.014
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
196.6 m
To
198.1 m
Intercept Depth
196.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:196.6-198.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.014 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.014”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.081Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.081
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
196.6 m
To
198.1 m
Intercept Depth
196.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:196.6-198.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.081 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.081 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.081”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.048
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
196.6 m
To
198.1 m
Intercept Depth
196.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:196.6-198.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.048 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.048 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.048”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
24
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.7 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 24 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“24.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.137Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.137
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.7 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.137 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.137”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.7 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.7 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.008 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
89
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
73.2 m
To
74.7 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-74.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 89 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“89.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.198Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.198
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
73.2 m
To
74.7 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-74.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.198 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.198”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
73.2 m
To
74.7 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-74.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
73.2 m
To
74.7 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.2-74.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 31Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
31
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
112.8 m
To
114.3 m
Intercept Depth
112.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:112.8-114.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“31.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.214Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.214
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
112.8 m
To
114.3 m
Intercept Depth
112.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:112.8-114.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.214 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.214”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
112.8 m
To
114.3 m
Intercept Depth
112.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:112.8-114.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.045
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
112.8 m
To
114.3 m
Intercept Depth
112.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:112.8-114.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.045 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.045”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 30Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
30
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
128 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:128-129.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 30 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“30.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
128 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:128-129.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.039 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
128 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:128-129.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
128 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:128-129.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.028 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 61.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
61.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
155.4 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.4-173.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 61.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“61.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
155.4 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.4-173.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.125 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.191Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.191
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.3 m
From
155.4 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.4-173.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.191 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.191 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.191”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.478Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.478
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.3 m
From
155.4 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.4-173.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.478 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.478 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.478”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 173Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
173
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 173 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“173”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.16 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 119Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
119
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
170.7 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:170.7-172.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 119 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“119”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
170.7 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:170.7-172.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.1 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
170.7 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:170.7-172.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.61 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
170.7 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
170.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:170.7-172.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 89.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
89.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
182.9 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:182.9-185.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 89.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“89.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
182.9 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:182.9-185.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.044 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
182.9 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:182.9-185.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.043 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.043 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.086Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.086
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
182.9 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
182.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:182.9-185.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.086 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.086 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.086”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
237.7 m
To
240.8 m
Intercept Depth
237.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:237.7-240.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.806Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.806
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
237.7 m
To
240.8 m
Intercept Depth
237.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:237.7-240.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.806 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.806”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
237.7 m
To
240.8 m
Intercept Depth
237.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:237.7-240.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.011 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
27
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
120.4 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
120.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:120.4-121.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“27.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
120.4 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
120.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:120.4-121.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.28 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.280”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
120.4 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
120.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:120.4-121.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.064Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.064
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
120.4 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
120.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:120.4-121.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.064 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.064 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.064”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 117.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
117.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
187.5 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-205.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 117.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“117.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.029
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
187.5 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-205.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.029 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.029”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.119Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.119
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.3 m
From
187.5 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-205.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.119 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.119 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.119”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.3 m
From
187.5 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-205.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.190”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 409Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
409
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
187.5 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-189
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 409 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“409.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.115Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.115
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
187.5 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-189
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.115 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.115”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.193Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.193
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
187.5 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-189
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.193 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.193 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.193”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.199Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.199
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
187.5 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-189
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.199 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.199 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.199”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 715Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
715
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
199.6 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 715 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“715.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.054
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
199.6 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.054 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.054”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.334Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.334
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
199.6 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.334 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.334 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.334”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.212Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.212
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
199.6 m
To
201.2 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-201.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.212 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.212 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.212”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
219.5 m
To
221 m
Intercept Depth
219.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:219.5-221
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 14 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“14.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
219.5 m
To
221 m
Intercept Depth
219.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:219.5-221
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.021 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.052Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.052
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
219.5 m
To
221 m
Intercept Depth
219.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:219.5-221
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.052 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.052 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.052”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.353Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.353
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
219.5 m
To
221 m
Intercept Depth
219.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:219.5-221
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.353 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.353 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.353”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.