Capitan Silver Intersects 1,833 g/t Silver Equivalent over 1.5 M Within a Broader Zone of 340 g/t Silver Equivalent over 21.3 M at the New High-Grade Silver Zone at Cruz De Plata

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Capitan Silver Corp.
Ticker
CAPT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Durango, Mexico
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-17 15:20:17 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Capitan Silver announced high-grade silver equivalent drill results from its 2025 RC drill program at the Cruz de Plata project in Mexico. Highlights include 1,833.1 g/t AgEq over 1.5m within a broader zone of 340.4 g/t AgEq over 21.3m, and 1,254.8 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, extending mineralization and defining new high-grade zones. The company plans further drilling to test the system at depth.

Reasoning: Capitan Silver reports multiple high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including bonanza grades, which extend and expand known mineralization at the Cruz de Plata project, indicating significant exploration success.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercepts
  • Bonanza grades reported
  • Extension of mineralization
  • New high-grade zone identified
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed
  • Qualified Person sign-off
  • Clear compositing rules stated

Negative factors

  • True widths are estimated or unknown for new targets

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 300

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 300. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (300)

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 153.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
153.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall mineralization at the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade over significant width
  • High silver equivalent grade
  • Confirms continuity of mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“153.4”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.152Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.152
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is present but not a primary driver for this silver-focused intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.152”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.046
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.046”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1308Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1308
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1254.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade silver intercept significantly contributes to the overall high-grade nature of the project and confirms continuity.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • High silver equivalent grade
  • High GT product
  • Confirms continuity of mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“1,308.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.134Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.134
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1254.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is present but not a primary driver for this silver-focused intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.134”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.265Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.265
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1254.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is present but not a primary driver for this silver-focused intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.265”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-32Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.254Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-32
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.254
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-32:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1254.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is present but not a primary driver for this silver-focused intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.254”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 20.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
20.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a silver equivalent grade below the stated cut-off, indicating it's a lower-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the stated cut-off for reporting
  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“20.1”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.174Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.174
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.174”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is very low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 106.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
106.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“106.6”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.161
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.161”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 35.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
35.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“35.1”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.236Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.236
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.236”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-33Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-33
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-33:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
26.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade over significant width

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“26.5”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.190”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is very low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
38.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 93.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
93.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
132.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“93.9”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
132.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is moderate and contributes to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.630”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
132.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
132.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 16.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
16.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a silver equivalent grade below the stated cut-off, indicating it's a lower-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the stated cut-off for reporting
  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“16.7”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.166Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.166
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.166”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is very low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 72.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
72.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating consistent mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade over good width

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“72.4”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.065Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.065
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.065”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.029
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.029”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 114.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
114.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“114.1”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.120”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 195Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
195
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
191.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“195.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
191.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
191.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
191.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.030”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 76.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
76.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
84.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating consistent mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade over good width

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“76.5”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.122Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.122
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
84.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.122”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.053Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.053
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
84.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.053”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.069Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.069
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
84.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.069”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 188.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
188.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
198.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“188.3”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.257Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.257
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
198.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.257”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.077Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.077
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
198.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.077”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
198.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 39.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
39.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“39.9”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-35Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-35
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-35:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 346Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
346
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
340.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept demonstrates significant silver equivalent mineralization, confirming and extending the high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade over significant width
  • High GT product
  • Extends mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“346.0”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.199Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.199
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
340.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is present but not a primary driver for this silver-focused intercept.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.199”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.013
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
340.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.013”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.034
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
340.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.034”

Context: 21.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 787Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
787
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
759
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade silver intercept significantly contributes to the overall high-grade nature of the project and extends mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • High silver equivalent grade
  • High GT product
  • Extends mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“787.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.252Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.252
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
759
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.252”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
759
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
759
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 445Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
445
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
441.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing to the high-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade
  • High GT product
  • Extends mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“445.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.308Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.308
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
441.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.308”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.013
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
441.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.013”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.054
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
441.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.054”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 993.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
993.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
955.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade silver intercept significantly contributes to the overall high-grade nature of the project and extends mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • High silver equivalent grade
  • High GT product
  • Extends mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“993.3”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.298Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.298
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
955.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.298”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.029
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
955.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.029”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.027
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
955.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.027”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1918Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1918
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1833.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept represents an exceptionally high-grade silver equivalent result, significantly contributing to the expansion of the high-grade zone at the Jesus Maria Silver Trend.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Exceptional silver equivalent grade
  • Exceptional GT product
  • Extends mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“1,918.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.409Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.409
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1833.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.409”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1833.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.031
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1833.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.031”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 63.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
63.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a good width, indicating consistent mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade over good width

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“63.4”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.136
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.136”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 38.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
38.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
42.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“38.3”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.075
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
42.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.075”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
42.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
42.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
19.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a silver equivalent grade below the stated cut-off, indicating it's a lower-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the stated cut-off for reporting
  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“19.3”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.063
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.063”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
22.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a silver equivalent grade below the stated cut-off, indicating it's a lower-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the stated cut-off for reporting
  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“22.9”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.058Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.058
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.058”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.068Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.068
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.068”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 21.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
21.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a silver equivalent grade below the stated cut-off, indicating it's a lower-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the stated cut-off for reporting
  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“21.2”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.055
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.055”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.117
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.117”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.290”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a silver equivalent grade below the stated cut-off, indicating it's a lower-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the stated cut-off for reporting
  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“19.4”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.061
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.061”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.110”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.335Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.335
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
36.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.335”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 128.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
128.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
147.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“128.7”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.085Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.085
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
147.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.085”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
147.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.310”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-37Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.349Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-37
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.349
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-37:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
147.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.349”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-49Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-49
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-49:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver equivalent grade over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“33.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-49Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-49
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-49:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-49Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-49
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-49:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead grade is very low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-ERRC-49Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-49
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-49:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low and contributes minimally to the overall value.

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 153.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
153.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 153.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“153.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.152Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.152
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.152 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.152”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.036 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.036 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.046
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
18.29 m
To
35.05 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.29-35.05
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.046 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.046 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.046”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1308Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1308
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1308 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1,308.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.134Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.134
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.134 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.134”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.265Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.265
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.265 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.265 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.265”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.254Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.254
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.34 m
Intercept Depth
19.81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:19.81-21.34
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.254 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.254 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.254”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 20.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
20.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 20.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“20.1”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.174Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.174
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.174 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.174”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
12.19 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:12.19-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 106.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
106.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 106.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“106.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.161
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.161 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.161”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.026 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
57.91 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
57.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:57.91-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.024 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 35.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
35.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“35.1”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.236Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.236
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.236 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.236”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.018 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.97 m
To
126.49 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-126.49
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
26.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 26.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“26.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.19 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.190”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22.9 m
From
22.86 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
22.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.86-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.021 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 93.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
93.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 93.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“93.9”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.63 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.630”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.008 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
33.5 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 16.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
16.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“16.7”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.166Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.166
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.166 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.166”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
53.34 m
To
59.44 m
Intercept Depth
53.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:53.34-59.44
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.023 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 72.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
72.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 72.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“72.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.065Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.065
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.065 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.065”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.011 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.029
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
70.1 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.029 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.029”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 114.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
114.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 114.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“114.1”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.12 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.120”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.022 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
70.1 m
To
71.63 m
Intercept Depth
70.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:70.1-71.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.028 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 195Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
195
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 195 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“195.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.1 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.72 m
To
79.25 m
Intercept Depth
77.72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.72-79.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.030”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 76.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
76.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 76.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“76.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.122Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.122
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.122 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.122”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.053Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.053
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.053 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.053 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.053”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.069Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.069
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
83.82 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
83.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.82-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.069 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.069 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.069”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 188.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
188.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 188.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“188.3”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.257Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.257
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.257 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.257”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.077Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.077
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.077 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.077 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.077”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
88.39 m
To
89.92 m
Intercept Depth
88.39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:88.39-89.92
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.041 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 39.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
39.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 39.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“39.9”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.05 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.008 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
102.11 m
To
103.63 m
Intercept Depth
102.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:102.11-103.63
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 346Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
346
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 346 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“346.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.199Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.199
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.199 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.199”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.013
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.013 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.013”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.034
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.3 m
From
36.58 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.034 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.034 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.034”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 787Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
787
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 787 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“787.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.252Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.252
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.252 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.252”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
36.58 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
36.58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:36.58-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.039 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.039 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 445Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
445
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 445 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“445.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.308Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.308
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.308 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.308”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.013
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.013 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.013”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.054
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.62 m
To
41.15 m
Intercept Depth
39.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.62-41.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.054 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.054 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.054”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 993.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
993.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 993.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“993.3”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.298Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.298
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.298 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.298”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.029
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.029 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.029”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.027
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
48.77 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-48.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.027 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.027”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1918Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1918
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1918 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1,918.0”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.409Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.409
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.409 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.409”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.037 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.031
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
44.2 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:44.2-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.031 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.031 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.031”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 63.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
63.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 63.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“63.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.022 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.136
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
64.01 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:64.01-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.136 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.136 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.136”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 38.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
38.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 38.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“38.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.075
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.075 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.075”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.25 m
To
80.77 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-80.77
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.026 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
19.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“19.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.063
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.063 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.063”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.038
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
99.06 m
To
106.68 m
Intercept Depth
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:99.06-106.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.038 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.038 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.038”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
22.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“22.9”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.058Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.058
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.058 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.058”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.022 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.068Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.068
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
111.25 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:111.25-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.068 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.068 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.068”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 21.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
21.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 21.2 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“21.2”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.055
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.055 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.055”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.117
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.117 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.117 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.117”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
124.97 m
To
132.59 m
Intercept Depth
124.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:124.97-132.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.290”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“19.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.061
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.061 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.061”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.110”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.335Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.335
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
137.16 m
To
138.68 m
Intercept Depth
137.16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:137.16-138.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.335 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.335 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.335”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 128.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
128.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 128.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“128.7”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.085Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.085
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.085 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.085”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.31 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.310”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.349Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.349
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
155.45 m
To
156.97 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-156.97
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.349 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.349 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.349”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
33
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“33.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.025 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
67.06 m
To
68.58 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-68.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.022 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 51Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
51
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 51 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“51.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.044 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
76.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:76.2-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 46.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
46.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
96.01 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 46.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“46.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
96.01 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.039 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
96.01 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
96.01 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.022 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 25.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
25.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15.2 m
From
132.59 m
To
147.83 m
Intercept Depth
132.59 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:132.59-147.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“25.7”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15.2 m
From
132.59 m
To
147.83 m
Intercept Depth
132.59 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:132.59-147.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.09 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.090”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15.2 m
From
132.59 m
To
147.83 m
Intercept Depth
132.59 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:132.59-147.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15.2 m
From
132.59 m
To
147.83 m
Intercept Depth
132.59 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:132.59-147.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.025 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.025 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 63.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
63.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
155.45 m
To
163.07 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-163.07
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 63.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“63.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.057
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
155.45 m
To
163.07 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-163.07
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.057 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.057”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
155.45 m
To
163.07 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-163.07
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
155.45 m
To
163.07 m
Intercept Depth
155.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:155.45-163.07
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.023 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 102Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
102
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
156.97 m
To
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:156.97-158.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 102 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“102.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.087Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.087
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
156.97 m
To
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:156.97-158.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.087 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.087”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.014
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
156.97 m
To
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:156.97-158.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.014 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.014”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
156.97 m
To
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
156.97 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:156.97-158.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.024 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 65.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
65.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
193.55 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
193.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.55-196.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 65.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“65.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.138Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.138
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
193.55 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
193.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.55-196.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.138 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.138”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.026
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
193.55 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
193.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.55-196.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.026 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.026”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.046
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
193.55 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
193.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:193.55-196.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.046 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.046 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.046”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 56.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
56.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m
Intercept Depth
73.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 56.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“56.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m
Intercept Depth
73.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.12 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.120”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.7 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m
Intercept Depth
73.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.7 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m
Intercept Depth
73.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 114.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
114.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
74.68 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
74.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:74.68-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 114.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“114.5”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
74.68 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
74.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:74.68-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.19 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.190”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.014
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
74.68 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
74.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:74.68-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.014 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.014”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
74.68 m
To
77.72 m
Intercept Depth
74.68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:74.68-77.72
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 25.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
25.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.49 m
To
96.01 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.49-96.01
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“25.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.49 m
To
96.01 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.49-96.01
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.041 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.49 m
To
96.01 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.49-96.01
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.49 m
To
96.01 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.49-96.01
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 52Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
52
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
9.14 m
To
12.19 m
Intercept Depth
9.14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:9.14-12.19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 52 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“52.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.065Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.065
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
9.14 m
To
12.19 m
Intercept Depth
9.14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:9.14-12.19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.065 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.065”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
9.14 m
To
12.19 m
Intercept Depth
9.14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:9.14-12.19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.049Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.049
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
9.14 m
To
12.19 m
Intercept Depth
9.14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:9.14-12.19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.049 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.049 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.049”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 54.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
54.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
21.34 m
To
27.43 m
Intercept Depth
21.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:21.34-27.43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 54.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“54.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
21.34 m
To
27.43 m
Intercept Depth
21.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:21.34-27.43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.017 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
21.34 m
To
27.43 m
Intercept Depth
21.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:21.34-27.43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.035
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
21.34 m
To
27.43 m
Intercept Depth
21.34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:21.34-27.43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.035 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.035”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 158.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
158.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
32 m
To
36.58 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-36.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 158.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“158.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
32 m
To
36.58 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-36.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.041 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.014
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
32 m
To
36.58 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-36.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.014 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.014”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
32 m
To
36.58 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-36.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.044 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.044 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 397Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
397
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.53 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.53
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 397 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“397.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.065Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.065
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.53 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.53
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.065 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.065”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.039
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.53 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.53
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.039 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.039 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.039”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.077Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.077
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.53 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.53
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.077 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.077 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.077”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 48Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
48
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
89.92 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
89.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:89.92-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 48 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“48.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.109Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.109
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
89.92 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
89.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:89.92-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.109 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.109”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
89.92 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
89.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:89.92-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
89.92 m
To
100.58 m
Intercept Depth
89.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:89.92-100.58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.036 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.036 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 70.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
70.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
51.82 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
51.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:51.82-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 70.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“70.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.063
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
51.82 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
51.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:51.82-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.063 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.063”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
51.82 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
51.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:51.82-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
51.82 m
To
57.91 m
Intercept Depth
51.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:51.82-57.91
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.023 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 139Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
139
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
54.86 m
To
56.39 m
Intercept Depth
54.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:54.86-56.39
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 139 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“139.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.167Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.167
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
54.86 m
To
56.39 m
Intercept Depth
54.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:54.86-56.39
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.167 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.167”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
54.86 m
To
56.39 m
Intercept Depth
54.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:54.86-56.39
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.029
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
54.86 m
To
56.39 m
Intercept Depth
54.86 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:54.86-56.39
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.029 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.029”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 30.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
30.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
67.06 m
To
74.68 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-74.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 30.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“30.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.111Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.111
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
7.6 m
From
67.06 m
To
74.68 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-74.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.111 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.111”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
67.06 m
To
74.68 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-74.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.014
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
67.06 m
To
74.68 m
Intercept Depth
67.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:67.06-74.68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.014”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 35Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
35
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
79.25 m
To
82.3 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-82.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“35.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.027
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
79.25 m
To
82.3 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-82.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.027 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.027”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
79.25 m
To
82.3 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-82.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
79.25 m
To
82.3 m
Intercept Depth
79.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:79.25-82.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.009 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
18
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
96.01 m
To
97.54 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-97.54
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“18.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.214Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.214
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
96.01 m
To
97.54 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-97.54
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.214 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.214”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
96.01 m
To
97.54 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-97.54
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
96.01 m
To
97.54 m
Intercept Depth
96.01 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:96.01-97.54
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 52.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
52.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
146.3 m
To
164.59 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-164.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 52.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“52.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.063
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
146.3 m
To
164.59 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-164.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.063 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.063”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.3 m
From
146.3 m
To
164.59 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-164.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.3 m
From
146.3 m
To
164.59 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-164.59
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.037 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 143Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
143
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
146.3 m
To
149.83 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-149.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 143 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“143”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.243Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.243
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
146.3 m
To
149.83 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-149.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.243 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.243”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.013
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
146.3 m
To
149.83 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-149.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.013 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.013”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.035
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
146.3 m
To
149.83 m
Intercept Depth
146.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:146.3-149.83
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.035 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.035”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.