Capitan Silver Intersects 2,451 g/t Silver Equivalent over 1.5 Metres, within a Wider Zone of 684 g/t Silver Equivalent over 9.1 Metres at the Cruz De Plata Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Capitan Silver Corp.
Ticker
CAPT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Durango, Mexico
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-17 15:57:03 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Capitan Silver announced exceptional drill results from its Cruz de Plata project in Durango, Mexico, including a bonanza intercept of 2,451 g/t silver equivalent over 1.5 metres within a wider zone of 684 g/t silver equivalent over 9.1 metres. These high-grade intercepts, from the 2025 RC drill program, extend mineralization down-dip and along strike, identifying new high-grade silver zones along the Jesus Maria Silver Trend. The company plans to continue drilling with diamond rigs to further test these zones at depth.

Reasoning: The announcement reports bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercepts that are among the best for the company and significantly exceed typical epithermal silver deposit grades. The drilling successfully extended mineralization and identified new high-grade zones, indicating strong exploration success. Robust QA/QC and transparent reporting further bolster confidence in these material results.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including 2,451 g/t AgEq over 1.5m, which is well above peer averages for epithermal silver deposits.
  • Significant step-out extensions of mineralization both down-dip and along strike, identifying new high-grade zones.
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off, enhancing the credibility of the results.
  • Transparent disclosure of metal equivalent assumptions and compositing parameters.

Negative factors

  • True widths are estimated as a range (70-90%) rather than specifically calculated for each intercept, leading to potential overstatement of apparent width.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 296

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 296. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (296)

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 41.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
41.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is below the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“41.8”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.121Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.121
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.121”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 99.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
99.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“99.3”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.040”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 63.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
63.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“63.5”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.064Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.064
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.064”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 43.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
43.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the weak threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“43.7”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 29.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
29.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is just above the weak threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“29.1”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
27.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is just above the weak threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“27.9”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 51.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
51.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“51.3”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.116Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.116
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.116”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-28Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-28
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-28:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 28.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
28.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is just above the weak threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“28.8”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.135Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.135
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.135”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 48.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
48.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“48.7”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.170”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
27.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is just above the weak threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“27.8”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.099Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.099
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.099”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 55.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
55.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“55.8”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 257.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
257.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong silver grade, well above the average for epithermal silver deposits, and contributes significantly to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade, above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“257.4”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.089Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.089
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.089”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.076Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.076
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.076”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 468Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
468
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional silver grade, significantly contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept and highlighting high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade, well above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“468.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.084Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.084
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.084”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.070”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 78.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
78.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“78.4”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
99
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“99.0”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.156Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.156
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.156”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.055
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.055”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 339Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
339
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong silver grade, well above the average for epithermal silver deposits, and contributes significantly to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade, above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“339.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.271Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.271
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.271”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.161
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.161”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.169Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.169
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.169”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 200.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
200.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate silver grade over a strong width, contributing significantly to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept and highlighting high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade over a strong width, above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“200.6”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.034
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.034”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.051
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.051”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.058Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.058
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.058”

Context: 16.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1239Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1239
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional silver grade, significantly contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept and highlighting high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade, well above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1,239.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.120”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.233Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.233
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.233”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.222Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.222
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.222”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 254Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
254
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong silver grade, well above the average for epithermal silver deposits, and contributes significantly to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade, above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“254”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.073Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.073
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.073”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 694.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
694.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional silver grade over a strong width, significantly contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept and highlighting high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade over a strong width, well above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“694.8”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.053Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.053
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.053”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.280”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.557Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.557
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.557”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1332Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1332
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional silver grade over a strong width, significantly contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept and highlighting high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade over a strong width, well above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1,332.0”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.086Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.086
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.086”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.307Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.307
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.307”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.494Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.494
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.494”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1141Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1141
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional silver grade, significantly contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept and highlighting high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade, well above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1,141.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.033
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.033”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.223Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.223
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.223”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.362Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.362
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.362”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 2549Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
2549
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional, bonanza-grade silver intercept, significantly contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept and highlighting high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept: Exceptionally high-grade silver, well above the 75th percentile for epithermal silver deposits and among the best for the company.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2,549.0”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.210”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.492Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.492
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.492”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-38Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.787Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-38
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.787
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-38:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.787”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
9.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is below the weak threshold for epithermal silver.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“9.6”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.267Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.267
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.267”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · silverGrade: 54.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
54.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade is above the moderate threshold for epithermal silver, contributing to the overall polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“54.8”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.088
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade is low and below the weak threshold for gold in an underground setting.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.088”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lead grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25-ERRC-42Cruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-ERRC-42
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.019
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-ERRC-42:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Upper Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
25
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low and does not contribute significantly to the intercept's value.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.019”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 41.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
41.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“41.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.121Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.121
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.121 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.121”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
16.8 m
To
27.4 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-27.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 99.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
99.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 99.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“99.3”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.125 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.011 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
22.9 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:22.9-24.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.040”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 63.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
63.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 63.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“63.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.064Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.064
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.064 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.064”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
33.5 m
To
35.1 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:33.5-35.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 43.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
43.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 43.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“43.7”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.037 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
39.6 m
To
41.1 m
Intercept Depth
39.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:39.6-41.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.010”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 29.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
29.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 29.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“29.1”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.043 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
47.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.017 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
27.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“27.9”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.162 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
61 m
To
62.5 m
Intercept Depth
61 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:61-62.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 51.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
51.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 51.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“51.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.116Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.116
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.116 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.116”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
77.7 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
77.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:77.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.012 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 28.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
28.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 28.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“28.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.135Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.135
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.135 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.135”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
32 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:32-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 48.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
48.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 48.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“48.7”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.17 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.170”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
41.1 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:41.1-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.012 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
27.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“27.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.099Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.099
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.099 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.099”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
56.4 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:56.4-57.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 55.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
55.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 55.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“55.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.125 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
62.5 m
To
65.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:62.5-65.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.021 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 257.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
257.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 257.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“257.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.089Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.089
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.089 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.089”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.037 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.076Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.076
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
83.8 m
To
89.9 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-89.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.076 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.076 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.076”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 468Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
468
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 468 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“468.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.084Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.084
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.084 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.084”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.044 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.044 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
83.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
83.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:83.8-85.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.070”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 78.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
78.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 78.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“78.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.125Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.125
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.125 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.125”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.009
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.009”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
94.5 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:94.5-96
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.041 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
99
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 99 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“99.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.156Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.156
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.156 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.156”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.050”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.055
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
141.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
141.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:141.7-147.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.055 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.055 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.055”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 339Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
339
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 339 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“339.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.271Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.271
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.271 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.271”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.161
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.161 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.161 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.161”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.169Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.169
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
143.3 m
To
144.8 m
Intercept Depth
143.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:143.3-144.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.169 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.169 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.169”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 200.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
200.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 200.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“200.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.034
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.034 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.034”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.051
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.051 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.051 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.051”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.058Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.058
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.8 m
From
157 m
To
173.7 m
Intercept Depth
157 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:157-173.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.058 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.058 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.058”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1239Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1239
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1239 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1,239.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.12 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.120”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.233Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.233
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.233 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.233 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.233”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.222Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.222
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
161.5 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
161.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:161.5-163.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.222 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.222 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.222”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 254Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
254
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 254 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“254”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.012
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.012 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.012”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.073Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.073
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.073 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.073 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.073”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
169.2 m
To
172.2 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-172.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 694.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
694.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 694.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“694.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.053Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.053
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.053 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.053”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.28 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.280”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.557Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.557
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
187.5 m
To
196.6 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-196.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.557 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.557 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.557”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1332Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1332
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1332 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1,332.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.086Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.086
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.086 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.086”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.307Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.307
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.307 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.307 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.307”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.494Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.494
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
187.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
187.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:187.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.494 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.494 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.494”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1141Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1141
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1141 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1,141.0”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.033
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.033 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.033”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.223Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.223
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.223 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.223 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.223”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.362Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.362
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
189 m
To
190.5 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:189-190.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.362 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.362 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.362”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 2549Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
2549
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2549 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“2,549.0”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.21 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.210”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.492Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.492
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.492 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.492 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.492”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.787Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.787
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
190.5 m
To
192 m
Intercept Depth
190.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:190.5-192
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.787 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.787 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.787”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
9.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.267Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.267
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.267 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.267”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
1.5 m
To
3 m
Intercept Depth
1.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:1.5-3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.021 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 54.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
54.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 54.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“54.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.088
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.088 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.088”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.019
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
7.6 m
To
9.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:7.6-9.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.019 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.019”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 53.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
53.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
82.3 m
To
83.8 m
Intercept Depth
82.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:82.3-83.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 53.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“53.9”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.035
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
82.3 m
To
83.8 m
Intercept Depth
82.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:82.3-83.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.035 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.035”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
82.3 m
To
83.8 m
Intercept Depth
82.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:82.3-83.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
82.3 m
To
83.8 m
Intercept Depth
82.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:82.3-83.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.008 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 158.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
158.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
108.2 m
To
109.7 m
Intercept Depth
108.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:108.2-109.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 158.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“158.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.266Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.266
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
108.2 m
To
109.7 m
Intercept Depth
108.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:108.2-109.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.266 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.266”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
108.2 m
To
109.7 m
Intercept Depth
108.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:108.2-109.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
108.2 m
To
109.7 m
Intercept Depth
108.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:108.2-109.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.017 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 65.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
65.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
135.6 m
To
138.7 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-138.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 65.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“65.7”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.177Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.177
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
135.6 m
To
138.7 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-138.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.177 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.177”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.019
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
135.6 m
To
138.7 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-138.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.019 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.019”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.129Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.129
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
135.6 m
To
138.7 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-138.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.129 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.129 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.129”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 119.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
119.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
135.6 m
To
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-137.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 119.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“119.9”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.133Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.133
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
135.6 m
To
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-137.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.133 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.133”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.034
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
135.6 m
To
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-137.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.034 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.034 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.034”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
135.6 m
To
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
135.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:135.6-137.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 147.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
147.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
163.1 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-175.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 147.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“147.4”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.162
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
163.1 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-175.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.162 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.162”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
163.1 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-175.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.025 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.025 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.048
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
163.1 m
To
175.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:163.1-175.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.048 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.048 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.048”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 493Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
493
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
164.6 m
To
166.1 m
Intercept Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:164.6-166.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 493 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“493.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.121Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.121
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
164.6 m
To
166.1 m
Intercept Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:164.6-166.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.121 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.121”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.093Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.093
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
164.6 m
To
166.1 m
Intercept Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:164.6-166.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.093 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.093 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.093”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
164.6 m
To
166.1 m
Intercept Depth
164.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:164.6-166.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.060”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 415Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
415
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
169.2 m
To
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-170.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 415 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“415.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.365Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.365
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
169.2 m
To
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-170.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.365 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.365”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.041
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
169.2 m
To
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-170.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.041 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.041”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.101Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.101
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
169.2 m
To
170.7 m
Intercept Depth
169.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:169.2-170.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.101 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.101 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.101”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 106.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
106.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
199.6 m
To
213.4 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-213.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 106.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“106.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.067Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.067
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
199.6 m
To
213.4 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-213.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.067 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.067”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.7 m
From
199.6 m
To
213.4 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-213.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.037 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.055
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.7 m
From
199.6 m
To
213.4 m
Intercept Depth
199.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:199.6-213.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.055 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.055 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.055”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 193Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
193
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
202.7 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
202.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:202.7-205.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 193 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“193.0”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
202.7 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
202.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:202.7-205.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.19 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.056Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.056
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
202.7 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
202.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:202.7-205.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.056 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.056 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.056”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.074Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.074
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
202.7 m
To
205.7 m
Intercept Depth
202.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:202.7-205.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.074 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.074 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.074”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 60.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
60.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
16.8 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 60.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“60.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
From
16.8 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.022 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
16.8 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.027
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
16.8 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.027 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.027”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 237Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
237
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
18.3 m
To
19.8 m
Intercept Depth
18.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.3-19.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 237 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“237”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
18.3 m
To
19.8 m
Intercept Depth
18.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.3-19.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.022 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
18.3 m
To
19.8 m
Intercept Depth
18.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.3-19.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.023 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
18.3 m
To
19.8 m
Intercept Depth
18.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:18.3-19.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.001 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 35.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
35.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
27.4 m
From
48.8 m
To
76.2 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-76.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“35.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.175Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.175
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
27.4 m
From
48.8 m
To
76.2 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-76.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.175 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.175”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
27.4 m
From
48.8 m
To
76.2 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-76.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
27.4 m
From
48.8 m
To
76.2 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-76.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.024 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 61Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
61
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 61 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“61.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.169Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.169
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.169 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.169”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.045
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
140.2 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:140.2-141.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.045 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.045”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 477Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
477
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
184.4 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
184.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:184.4-185.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 477 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“477.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.251Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.251
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
184.4 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
184.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:184.4-185.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.251 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.251”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.044
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
184.4 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
184.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:184.4-185.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.044 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.044 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.044”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
184.4 m
To
185.9 m
Intercept Depth
184.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:184.4-185.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.090”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 44.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
44.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
243.8 m
To
254.5 m
Intercept Depth
243.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:243.8-254.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 44.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“44.3”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.022
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10.7 m
From
243.8 m
To
254.5 m
Intercept Depth
243.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:243.8-254.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.022 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.022”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
243.8 m
To
254.5 m
Intercept Depth
243.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:243.8-254.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.060”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.088
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
243.8 m
To
254.5 m
Intercept Depth
243.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:243.8-254.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.088 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.088 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.088”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 67Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
67
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
259.1 m
To
260.6 m
Intercept Depth
259.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:259.1-260.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 67 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“67.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.005
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
259.1 m
To
260.6 m
Intercept Depth
259.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:259.1-260.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.005 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.005”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
259.1 m
To
260.6 m
Intercept Depth
259.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:259.1-260.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.027
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
259.1 m
To
260.6 m
Intercept Depth
259.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:259.1-260.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.027 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.027 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.027”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 38Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
38
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
269.7 m
To
271.3 m
Intercept Depth
269.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:269.7-271.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 38 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“38.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.018
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
269.7 m
To
271.3 m
Intercept Depth
269.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:269.7-271.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.018 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.018”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.068Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.068
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
269.7 m
To
271.3 m
Intercept Depth
269.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:269.7-271.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.068 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.068 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.068”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.675Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.675
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
269.7 m
To
271.3 m
Intercept Depth
269.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:269.7-271.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.675 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.675 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.675”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
3 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:3-6.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.349Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.349
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
3 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:3-6.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.349 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.349”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.047Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.047
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
3 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:3-6.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.047 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.047 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.047”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.062Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.062
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
3 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:3-6.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.062 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.062 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.062”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 33.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
33.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
47.2 m
To
48.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-48.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 33.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“33.8”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.247Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.247
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
47.2 m
To
48.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-48.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.247 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.247”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.581Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.581
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
47.2 m
To
48.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-48.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.581 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.581 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.581”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.763Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.763
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
47.2 m
To
48.8 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-48.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.763 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.763 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.763”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
89
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 89 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“89.0”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.105Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.105
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.105 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.105”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.099Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.099
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.099 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.099 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.099”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.165Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.165
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:97.5-99.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.165 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.165 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.165”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
4.9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16.8 m
To
18.3 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-18.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.9”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.299Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.299
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16.8 m
To
18.3 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-18.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.299 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.299”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.001
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16.8 m
To
18.3 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-18.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.001”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
16.8 m
To
18.3 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:16.8-18.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 35.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
35.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
47.2 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“35.6”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.189Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.189
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
47.2 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.189 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.189”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.311Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.311
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.7 m
From
47.2 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.311 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.311 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.311”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.466Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.466
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.7 m
From
47.2 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:47.2-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.466 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.466 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.466”

Context: Interval

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 75.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
75.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
48.8 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 75.6 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“75.6”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.439Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.439
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
48.8 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.439 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.439”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
48.8 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.38 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
48.8 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:48.8-51.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.48 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
26.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
59.4 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
59.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:59.4-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 26.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“26.7”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.288Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.288
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
59.4 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
59.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:59.4-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.288 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.288”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.846Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
0.846
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
59.4 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
59.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:59.4-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.846 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.846 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.846”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Interval
Project
Cruz de Plata
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
CAPT

Geometry

Grade
1.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
59.4 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
59.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Interval:59.4-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas and SGS labs in Durango
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.54 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.54 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.54”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.